Historia Crítica

Hist. Crit. | eISSN 1900-6152 | ISSN 0121-1617

¿De quién son los objetos? ¿De quién son las historias? La historia pública y la representación de la mujer en el Museo de Ciencia y Tecnología de Canadá

No. 68 (2018-04-01)
  • Anna Adamek
    Canada Science and Technology Museums Corporation
  • Emily Gann
    Canada Science and Technology Museums Corporation
https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit68.2018.03

Resumen

De quién son los objetos? ¿De quién son las historias? explora el uso de la historia pública para narrar historias de la relación de la mujer con la ciencia y la tecnología en uno de los museos nacionales de Canadá. Este artículo analiza cómo las historias de las mujeres fueron ignoradas por los curadores de museos, quienes en el pasado categorizaron dispositivos tecnológicos con criterios como tipo de colección, historia de la ciencia y metodologías de la tecnología. El artículo se centra en cómo ahora estos mismos objetos se enmarcan en el contexto de la historia pública y por lo tanto se ubican a la vanguardia de la colección e interpretación en museos.

Palabras clave: Palabras clave autor: colecciones de museo, género y museos, mujer y tecnología, exposición de museo, historia pública

Referencias

Primary Sources

Printed Primary Documentation

Museums Act, Statutes of Canada (1990, c.3 13-14) (Canada: Minister of Justice, 2014). Available from Canada. Department of Justice Law <http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/M-13.4/>.

Trépanier, Gabrielle. “CSTM Visitors 2007-09. Profiles from the CSTMC Summer Surveys.” Report, 2010, <https://documents.techno-science.ca/documents/CSTMCVisitors2007to2009.pdf>.

Canada Science and Technology Museum Corporation. “Collection Development Strategy, Approved by CSTMC Management Comm.: 2006/01/24.” <http://collect-connect.cstmcweb.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/collection_development_strategy_2006.pdf>.

Adamek, Anna. “KE Emu Collection Management System Analysis, 2014, 2017,” Canada Science and Technology Museum.

Exhibitions

Autopsy of a Murder. Travelling Exhibition, Montreal Science Centre, Montreal, Canada, 2008.

From Earth to Us. Women who Mine, Rock! Permanent exhibition, Canada Science and Technology Museum, Ottawa, Canada, 2017.

Love, Leisure and Laundry. Exhibition Fond, 1996, Library and Archives, Canada Science and Technology Museum, Ottawa, Canada.

Technology in Our Lives. Permanent Exhibition, Canada Science and Technology Museum, Ottawa, Canada, 2017.

Interviews

Doe, Jane. In discussion with the author, October 30, 2012.

Kalin, Margaret. In discussion with the author, January 28, 2012.

Figures

Figure 1. Anna Adamek, photography Connexions (1995), Connextions Exhibition Fond, Library and Archives, Canada Science and Technology Museum, Ottawa, Canada

Figures 2 & 3. Anna Adamek, photography Examples of Technologies Donated by Men and Women, (2018), National Collection, Canada Science and Technology Museum, Ottawa, Canada.

Figure 4. The Hydro Lamp, 3, n ° 4 (February 1925). Front Cover, LLL Fond, Library and Archives, Canada Science and Technology Museum, Ottawa, Canada..

Figure 5. Pierre Martin, photography Toy Shop, Technology in Our Lives (2018), at Canada Science and Technology Museum, Ottawa, Canada.

Figure 6. Pierre Martin, photography Whose Dream Kitchen? Technology in Our Lives (2018) at Canada Science and Technology Museum, Ottawa, Canada.

Secondary Sources

Baldwin, John H. and Anne W. Ackerson, Women in the Museum: Lessons from the Workplace. New York: Routledge, 2017.

Bicknell, Sandra, “Engendering Equality: A Look at the Influence of Gender on Attitudes to Science and Technology.” In Here and Now: Contemporary Science and Technology in Museums and Science Centres. London: Science Museum, 1997, 205-213.

Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes, Trevor Pinch, editors. The Social Constructions of Technological Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987.

Blud, Linda M. “Social Interaction and Learning among Family Groups Visiting a Museum.” Museum Management and Curatorship 9, n ° 1 (1990): 43-51.

Edwards, Elise Coralie “The Future of Curators.” Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 18, S1 (2007): 98-114.

Ewin, Timothy A.M. and Joanne V. Ewin, “In Defence of the Curator: Maximising Museum Impact.” Museum Management and Curatorship 31, n. ° 4 (2016): 322-330, https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2015.1060865

Glassie, Henry. Material Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.

Hoare, Natasha, Coline Milliard, Rafal Niemojewski, Ben Borthwick and Jonathan Watkins. The New Curator. London: Laurence King Publishing Ltd., 2016.

Kelle, Robert. “Public History: Its Origins, Nature, and Prospects.” The Public Historian 1, n. ° 1 (1978): 16-28, https://doi.org/10.2307/3377666

Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Material Culture Review. Ottawa: National Museum of Science and Technology, 1991-2005.

Parr, Joy. “What Makes Washday Less Blue? Gender, Nation, and Technology Choice in Postwar Canada.” Technology and Culture 38, n. ° 1 (1997): 153-186.

Schwartz Cowan, Ruth, “The Consumption Junction: A Proposal for Research Strategies in the Sociology of Technology.” In The Social Constructions of Technological Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993, 253-272.

Schwartz Cowan, Ruth. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Heart to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books, 1983.

Southcott, Chris, editor, “Resources and Sustainable Development in the Arctic.” [Special Issue], The Northern Review, n. ° 41 (2015).

Sweet, Elizabeth Valerie. Boy Builders and Pink Princesses: Gender, Toys, and Inequality over the Twentieth Century. PhD diss., University of California, Davis, 2006.