Revista de Ingeniería

revinge | eISSN 2011-0049 | ISSN 0121-4993

CARTAMA, EL MÉTODO AL SERVICIO DE LA CALIDAD

No. 47 (2018-07-01)
  • Camilo Gómez
    1. Profesor asistente. Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial. Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de los Andes. Contacto: gomez.ch@uniandes.edu.co
  • David Álvarez
    2. Profesor asistente. Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial. Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de los Andes. Contacto: d.alvarezm@uniandes.edu.co
  • Susan Saavedra
    3. Analista de operaciones. Grupo Cartama. Contacto: ssaavedra@cartama.com.co
  • Ricardo Uribe
    4. Gerente General. Grupo Cartama. Contacto: ricardouribe@cartama.com.co
https://doi.org/10.16924/revinge.47.4

Resumen

Colombia cuenta con una vocación agrícola que le ofrece grandes posibilidades de desarrollo en el contexto de finalización del conflicto armado. Sin embargo, dado que la agroindustria actual es un sector intensivo en conocimiento y tecnología, se precisan esfuerzos para que la ingeniería y la ciencia del país puedan contribuir a la competitividad global del agro colombiano. En este artículo revisamos el caso de éxito de Cartama, una productora y comercializadora internacional de aguacate Hass basados en una visita a sus instalaciones. A partir de dicha experiencia, identificamos oportunidades y retos en la intersección de la ingeniería y los negocios agroindustriales.

Palabras clave: Agricultura, aguacate, aguacate Hass, agro colombiano, agroindustria

Referencias

Nikolidakis, S., Kandris, D., Vergados, D., & Douligeris, C. (2015). Energy efficient automated control of irrigation in agriculture by using wireless sensor networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 113, 154-163.

Bac, C., Henten, E., Hemming, J., & Edan, Y. (2014). Harvesting robots for high-value crops: State-of-the-art review and challenges ahead. Journal of Field Robotics, 31(6), 888-911.

Auat Cheein, F., Torres-Torriti, M., Hopfenblatt, N., Prado, A., & Calabi, D. (2017). Agricultural service unit motion planning under harvesting scheduling and terrain constraints. Journal of Field Robotics, 34(8), 1531-1542.

Pham, X., & Stack, M. (2018). How data analytics is transforming agriculture. Business Horizons, 61(1), 125-133.

Street, D. (1990). Fisher’s Contributions to Agricultural Statistics. Biometrics, 46(4), 937-945.

Navarro-Hellín, H., Martínez-del-Rincon, J., Domingo-Miguel, R., Soto-Valles, F., & Torres-Sánchez, R. (2016). A decision support system for managing irrigation in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 124, 121-131.

Liakos, K., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors (basel, Switzerland), 18(8).

Pantazi, X., Moshou, D., Alexandridis, T., Whetton, R., & Mouazen, A. (2016). Wheat yield prediction using machine learning and advanced sensing techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 121, 57-65.

Shafaei, S., Nourmohamadi-Moghadami, A., & Kamgar, S. (2016). Development of artificial intelligence based systems for prediction of hydration characteristics of wheat. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 128, 34-45.

Behmann, J., Mahlein, A., Rumpf, T., Römer, C., & Plümer, L. (2015). A review of advanced machine learning methods for the detection of biotic stress in precision crop protection. Precision Agriculture: An International Journal on Advances in Precision Agriculture, 16(3), 239-260.

Murase, H. (2000). Artificial intelligence in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 29(1), 1-2.

Patrício, D., & Rieder, R. (2018). Computer vision and artificial intelligence in precision agriculture for grain crops: A systematic review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 153, 69-81.

Lin, Y., Petway, J., & Settele, J. (2017). Train artificial intelligence to be fair to farming. Nature, 552(7685), 334-334.

Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. (2018). Deep learning in agriculture: A survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 147, 70-90.

Zhu, N., Liu, X., Liu, Z., Hu, K., Wang, Y., Tan, J., Guo, Y. (2018). Deep learning for smart agriculture: Concepts, tools, applications, and opportunities. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 11(4), 21-28.

Moskvin, G. (1998). Artificial intelligence measuring, automatic control and expert systems in agriculture. Ifac Proceedings Volumes, 31(5), 163-167.

Grinblat, G., Uzal, L., Larese, M., & Granitto, P. (2016). Deep learning for plant identification using vein morphological patterns. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 127, 418-424.

Mitton, N., & Simplot-Ryl, D. (2011). From the internet of things to the internet of the physical world. Comptes Rendus -Physique, 12(7), 669-674.

Verdouw, C., Beulens, A., & Vorst, V. (2013). Virtualisation of floricultural supply chains: A review from an internet of things perspective. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 99(1), 160-175.

Serpanos, D. (2018). The cyber-physical systems revolution. Computer, 51(3).

Yao, J. (2017). Optimisation of one-stop delivery scheduling in online shopping based on the physical internet. International Journal of Production Research, 55(2), 358-376.

Sallez, Y., Pan, S., Montreuil, B., Berger, T., & Ballot, E. (2016). On the activeness of intelligent physical internet containers. Computers in Industry, 81, 96-104.

Donella H.Meadows [and others]. (1972). The Limits to growth; a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.

Johnson, N. F. (2009). Simply complexity: A clear guide to complexity theory. Oxford: Oneworld.

H.G.J.van Mil, E.A.Foegeding, E.J.Windhab, N.Perrot, E.van der Linden, A complex system approach to address world challenges in food and agriculture, Trends in Food Science & Technology, Volume 40, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 20-32, ISSN 0924-2244.

Casado-Vara, R., Prieto, J., La Prieta, F., & Corchado, J. (2018). How blockchain improves the supply chain: Case study alimentary supply chain. Procedia Computer Science, 134, 393-398.

Manski, S., & Manski, B. (2018). No gods, no masters, no coders? The future of sovereignty in a blockchain world. Law and Critique, 29(2), 151-162.