Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología

Antipod. Rev. Antropol. Arqueol | eISSN 2011-4273 | ISSN 1900-5407

Development and the Temporality of Its Exchange. How an Eastern Yucatec Village Made Cash Transfer Promises Accountable

No. 26 (2016-09-01)
  • Andrés Dapuez

Abstract

This paper explores how three temporalities of exchange amend the reception of cash transfers for development in a village in Eastern Yucatan, Mexico. Based on participant observation and in-depth interviews of recipients of cash transfers from Procampo and Oportunidades, this study reveals that ritual promising functions as a means of temporal regulation in most transactions of this sort, and that the recipients hold their government accountable for promises and commitments regarding cash transfers. In assessing the temporal ranges and effectiveness of these transfers by alluding to previous stipulations that sustain the exchange and make it understandable and bearable as a promise, the people in this village consider the objectives of the Procampo and Oportunidades programs to be implausible. Accountability with respect to the long-term effects of these transfers is not, however, based only on local impressions of a state that procrastinates in its “engagement” with peasants. As the timetable established for the accumulation of human capital also exceeds the time limits of responsible promising, these cash transfer programs cannot be evaluated in terms of their fulfilled or unfulfilled promises.

Keywords: exchange, development, ritual, cash transfer, promise

References

Agudo Sanchíz, Alejandro. 2010. “Opportunities for the Poor, Co-responsibilities for Women: Female Capabilities and Vulnerability in Human Development Policy and Practice.”Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development11 (4): 533-554.

Alcocer, Elías M., Grace LloydBascopé and Nidelvia VelaCano. 2010. “El turismo en una comunidad Maya yucateca: Pasado, presente y un probable futuro.”Teoría y Praxis8: 95-112.

Bricker, Victoria Reifler. 1981. The Indian Christ, The Indian King. The Historical Substrate of Maya Myth and Ritual. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bloch, Maurice and JonathanParry. 1989“Introduction. Money and the morality of exchange.” In Money and the Morality of Exchange, 1-32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cannell, Fenella. 2005. “The Christianity of Anthropology.”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute11: 335-356.

Cannell, Fenella. 2006. The Anthropology of Christianity.Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Castellanos, Bianet. 2010. A Return to Servitude. Maya Migration and the Tourist Trade in Cancún.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Cheal, David J. 1988. The Gift Economy.London: Routledge.

Dapuez, Andrés. (Forthcoming). “Supporting a Counterfactual Futurity: Cash Transfers and the Interface between Multilateral Banks, the Mexican State and its People.”Journal of Latin-American and Caribbean Anthropology.

Dapuez, Andrés. 2011. “Promesas rituales y compromisos de libre mercado. Regímenes de futuro en un pueblo de Yucatán.”Cuicuilco. Revista de la Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia51: 79 – 100.

Dapuez, Andrés. 2013. “Promissory Prestations. A Yucatec Village between Ritual Exchange and Development Cash Transfers”. Doctoral dissertation. Johns Hopkins University. United States.

Dapuez, Andrés, AndrésDzib May and SabrinaGavigan. 2011. “Promising and Engaging the Future through Ritual Sponsorship in Eastern Yucatan, Mexico.” In Research in Economic Anthropology, edited by LionelObadia and Donald C.Wood. Vol 31 of The Economics of Religion: Anthropological Approaches, 157-186. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

Deeming, Christopher. 2013. “Trials and Tribulations: The ’Use’ (and ’Misuse’) of Evidence in Public Policy’.”Social Policy & Administration47: 359-381.

Evans-Pritchard, Edward Evan. 1939. “Nuer Time-Reckoning.”Africa: Journal of the International Institute2: 189-216.

Franzoni, Juliana Martínez and KoenVoorend. 2012. “Blacks, Whites, or Grays? Conditional Transfers and Gender Equality in Latin America.”Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society19(3): 383-407.

Gabriel, Marianne. 2004. “El uso ritual de alcohol, cacao, tabaco e incienso en las ceremonias agrarias de los Mayas yucatecos contemporáneos.”Estudios de Cultura MayaXXIX: 155-184.

Gregory, Chris A. 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press.

Guyer, Jane I. 2012. “Obligation, Binding, Debt and Responsibility: Provocations About Temporality from Two New Sources.”Social Anthropology20(4): 491-501.

Hanks, William. 2010. Converting Words: Maya in the Age of the Cross. Berkley: University of California Press.

Hanks, William. 2014. “Space of Translation.”Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory4 (2): 17–39.

Hyland, Richard. 2009. Gifts. A Study in Comparative Law. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mauss, Marcel. 1925. “Essai sur le don.”L’Année SociologiqueI (1923-1924): 30-186.

Molyneux, Maxine. 2006. “Mothers at the Service of the New Poverty Agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s Conditional Transfer Programme.”Social Policy & Administration40(4): 425-449.

Oportunidades. 2011. “Reglas de Operación.” Accessed on January 15, 2013. www.oportunidades.gob.mx/Portal/wb/Web/reglas_de_operacion_2011

Oportunidades. 2012. “Reglas de Operación del Programa de Desarrollo Humano Oportunidades para el ejercicio fiscal 2012.”Diario Oficial (Tercera Sección). Viernes 30 de diciembre de 2011. Mexico: Diario Oficial de la Unión.

Parry, Jonathan P. 1986. “The Gift, the Indian Gift and the “Indian” Gift.”Man, New Series21: 453-473.

Parry, Jonathan P. 1994. Death in Banaras.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Procampo. 2008a. “Apoyos y Servicios a la Comercialización Agropecuaria (ASERCA). Evaluación de Consistencia y Resultados del Programa de Apoyos Directos al Campo (PROCAMPO) para el Ejercicio Fiscal 2007”. México: Servicios Profesionales para el Desarrollo Económico, S.C. (SERpro, S.C.).

Procampo. 2008b. “Programa de Apoyo al Ingreso Agropecuario PROCAMPO. Componente PROCAMPO para Vivir Mejor. Resultados Principales al Tercer Trimestre. Informe enero-septiembre 2012. Año Fiscal 2012”. México: Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentación.

Saucedo Delgado, Odra Angélica. 2013. “The Gendered Reading of Conditionality in Antipoverty Programmes: Unintended Effects on Mexican Rural Households’ Interactions with Public Health Institutions”. Bulletin of Latin American Research32(1): 61-77.

Strathern, Marilyn. 1997. “Partners and Consumers: Making Relations Visible.” In The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity, edited by Alan D.Schrift, 292-311. New York and London: Routledge.

Terán Contreras, Silvia and Christian H.Rasmussen. 2004. El Diario del Comisario Gaspar Canul Nahuat. Mérida: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán.

Vapnarsky, Valentina. 2013. “Mandatos y solicitudes: el arte cotidiano del pedir en el maya yucateco.” In Maya Daily Lives, edited by AndrèBreton and PierreNondédéo, 169-183. Markt Schwaben: Verlag Anton Saurwein.

Vapnarsky, Valentina and Olivier LeGuen. 2011. “The Guardians of Space and History: Understanding Ecological and Historical Relations of the Contemporary Yucatec Maya to their Landscape.”Acta Mesoamericana (Ecology, Power, and Religion in Maya Landscapes)23: 191-206.

Worthman, Carol M. 2011. “Inside-Out and Outside-In? Global Development Theory, Policy, and Youth.”Ethos39: 432-451.