The Anthropocene Put to the Test in the Field: Climate Change and the Crisis of Reciprocal Relations between the Q’ero of the Peruvian Andes
No. 38 (2020-01-01)Author(s)
-
Geremia ComettiUniversité de Strasbourg, Francia
Abstract
Objective/context: The neologism Anthropocene is one of the most discussed concepts in the scientific community today. The debates surrounding the new concept go above and beyond classical disciplinary boundaries, in particular the boundaries between natural and social sciences. The purpose of this article is to show that anthropology can also play an important role in this debate. Methodology: Through a fieldwork study conducted from 2011 to 2017 among the Q’ero of the Peruvian Andes (Cuzco region), this article discusses the neologism’s relevance in non-western societies. Conclusions: The article reveals that when confronted with non-Western societies, the concept of Anthropocene can make sense only if it is analyzed from non-naturalist points of view. Therefore, the concept and its possible reformulation open very stimulating reflections -even for naturalist ontologies- that can lead to a rethinking of other forms of life in common with non-human entities. Originality: The article shows that most of the Q’ero explain the climatic and atmospheric changes through the gradual abandonment of a number of rituals. It is precisely in these anthropic responsibilities that the discussion of the neologism in a non-modern society -such as the Q’ero of the Peruvian Andes- can stimulate debate regarding its relevance.
References
Alberti, Giorgio y EnriqueMayer, eds. 1974. Reciprocidad e intercambio en los Andes peruanos. Lima: IEP Ediciones.
Allen, Catherine. 2008. La coca sabe. Coca e identidad cultural en una comunidad andina.Cusco: Centro Bartolomé de las Casas.
Blaser, Mario. 2013. “Ontological Conflicts and the Stories of Peoples in Spite of Europe: Toward a Conversation on Political Ontology”. Current Anthropology 54 (5): 547-568.
Bonneuil, Christophe. 2017. “Capitalocène. Réflexions sur l’échange écologique inégal et le crime climatique à l’âge de l’Anthropocène”. EcoRev’ Revue Critique de l’Ecologie Politique 1 (44): 52-60.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cometti, Geremia. 2015. Lorsque le brouillard a cessé de nous écouter. Changement climatique et migrations chez les Q’eros des Andes péruviennes. Berna: Peter Lang.
Crutzen, Paul. 2002. “Geology of Mankind: The Anthropocene”. Nature. International Journal of Science 415: 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a
Crutzen, Paul y EugeneStoermer. 2000. “The Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter IGBP 41: 17-18.
De la Cadena, Marisol. 2015. Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
Descola, Philippe. 2012. Más allá de naturaleza y cultura. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Descola, Philippe. 2015. “Humain, Trop Humain”. Esprit 12: 8-22. https://esprit.presse.fr/article/philippe-descola/philippe-descola-humain-trop-humain-38537
Ellis, Erle. 2011. “The Planet of no Return: Human Resilience on an Artificial Earth”. Breakthrough Journal 2: 37-44. https://thebreakthrough.org/journal/issue-2/the-planet-of-no-return
Flores Ochoa, Jorge. 2006. “La cultura quechua”. El Antoniano 109: 6-12.
Gow, David. 1976. The Gods and Social Change in the High Andes. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Grinevald, Jacques. 2007. La Biosphère de l’Anthropocène: climat et pétrole, la double menace: repères transdisciplinaires (1824-2007). Chêne-Bourg: Georg.
Haraway, Donna, Ishikawa Noboru, Gilbert Scott F., Olwig Kenneth, Tsing Anna L. y NilsBubandt. 2016. “Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene”. Ethnos 81 (33): 535-564.
Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. Essays in Livehood, Dwelling and Skill. Londres: Routledge.
Latour, Bruno. 2015. Face à Gaïa. Huit conférences sur le nouveau régime climatique. París: La Découverte.
Le Borgne, Yann. 2003. “Evolution de l’indigénisme dans la société péruvienne. Le traitement du groupe ethnique q’ero”. Ateliers 25: 141-159.
Lewis, Simon y MarkMaslin. 2015. “Defining the Anthropocene”. Nature. International Journal of Science 519: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258
Molinié Fioravanti, Antoinette. 1985. “Tiempo del espacio y espacio del tiempo en los Andes”. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 71: 97-114.
Moore, Jason W., ed. 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
Moreno, Luis y DanieleConversi. 2017. “Antropoceno, cambio climático y modelo social”. Documentación Social 183: 13-30.
Moreno, Luis y DanieleConversi. 2018. “Cambio climático y modelo de bienestar en la era del Antropoceno”. En Bienestar social y políticas públicas. Retos para pactar el futuro, editado por Germán JaraízArroyo, 74-90. Madrid: Catarata.
Morrison, Kathleen D.2015. “Provincializing the Anthropocene”. Seminar 673: 75-80.
Orlove, Benjamin, ChiangJohn y MarkCane. 2000. “Forecasting Andean Rainfall and Crop Yield from the Influence of El Niño on Pleiades Visibility”. Nature. International Journal of Science 403: 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1038/47456
Orlove, Benjamin, ChiangJohn y MarkCane. 2002. “Ethnoclimatology in the Andes: A Cross-disciplinary Study Uncovers a Scientific Basis for the Scheme Andean Potato Farmers Traditionally Use to Predict the Coming Rains”. American Scientist 90 (5): 428-435.
Ricard Lanata, Xavier. 2007. Ladrones de sombra: el universo religioso de los pastores del Ausangate. Cusco: Centro Bartolomé de Las Casas.
Ruddiman, William F.2003. “The Anthropogenic Greenhouse Era Began Thousands of Years Ago”. Climatic Change 61: 261-293.
Salas Carreño, Guillermo. 2012. “Entre les mineurs, les grands propriétaires terriens et l’État: les allégeances des montagnes dans le sud des Andes péruviennes (1930-2012)”. Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec 42 (2-3): 25-37. https://doi.org/10.7202/1024100ar
Steffen, Will, PaulCrutzen y JohnMcNeill. 2007. “The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?”. Ambio 36 (8): 614-621.
Steffen, Will, WendyBroadgate, LisaDeutsch, OwenGaffney y CorneliaLudwig. 2015. “The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration”. The Anthropocene Review 2 (1): 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785
Stoppani, Antonio. 1873. Corso di Geologia. Vol. 2. Milán: G. Bernardoni y G. Brigola Editori.
Strauss, Sarah y BenjaminOrlove. 2003. “Up in the Air: The Anthropology of Weather and Climate”. En Weather, Climate, Culture, editado por SarahStrauss y BenjaminOrlove, 3-14. Oxford: Berg.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. “Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation”. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 2 (1): 3-22.
Wachtel, Nathan. 1990. Le retour des ancêtres: Les Indiens Urus de Bolivie, XXe-XVIe siècle, Essai d’histoire régressive. París: Gallimard.
White, LynnJr.1967. “The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis”. Science 155 (3767): 1203-1207. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203
Zalasiewicz, Jan, JanZalasiewicz, Colin N.Waters, MarkWilliams, Anthony D.Barnosky, AlejandroCearreta, PaulCrutzene, ErleEllis, Michael A.Ellis, Ian J.Fairchild, JacquesGrinevald, Peter K.Haff, IrkaHajdas, ReinholdLeinfelder, JohnMcNeill, Eric O.Odadam, ClémentPoiriern, DanielRichter, WillSteffen, ColinSummerhayes, James P. M.Syvitskir, DavorVidas, MichaelWagreich, Scott L.Wing, Alexander P.Wolfe, ZhishengAn y NaomiOreskes. 2015. “When did the Anthropocene Begin? A Mid-Twentieth Century Boundary Level is Stratigraphically Optimal”. Quaternary International 383: 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.045