Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología

Antipod. Rev. Antropol. Arqueol | eISSN 2011-4273 | ISSN 1900-5407

Paper Numbers: The Colombian Government´s Accountability to Justice as a Way of Complying Incompliantly

No. 42 (2021-01-01)
  • Valentina Pellegrino
    Laboratory for Anthropology of the State in Colombia (LASC), Colombia - Estados Unidos - Reino Unido
https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda42.2021.01

Abstract

In 2009, the Colombian Constitutional Court issued ruling Auto 004, declaring 34 indigenous groups as being at risk of extermination due to the internal armed conflict and ordered the Colombian government, led by the Interior Ministry, to protect them. Since then, although the critical situation persists, the government has proven its compliance with the Court´s order through a documentation process. The purpose of this article is to examine the role of documentation in mediating legal protection in a violent context. Based on yearlong participant observation at the Colombian Interior Ministry, the study approaches the production of the government´s documentary response as an artifact. It addresses its formulation and context within the institutional setting, the discussions regarding what to include and what to exclude, and the decisions that shape its content. It highlights how the assembled document enchants, by skillfully combining the aesthetics and technical aspects. It illustrates how numbers that portray compliance are constructed and displayed in the document, while concealing the failure to make the changes that were ordered: a phenomenon termed here as complying incompliantly. The paper´s originality lies in deconstructing the powerful governmental sophism of money invested as compliance with an obligation, through ethnographic attention to the document. Likewise, the analysis is part of the challenge dealt with by studies of the gap between law and reality, by suggesting that the problem lies not in a gap between well-intended law and the violent reality that overflows it but rather in the way this “gap” is filled by complex documenting processes. As such, the paper contributes to the anthropological studies on law, documentation and accountability.

Keywords: Accountability, bureaucracy, compliance, documents, indigenous peoples, quantification

References

Alviar, Helena e IsabelJaramillo. 2012. Feminismo y crítica jurídica: el análisis distributivo como alternativa al legalismo liberal. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores / Ediciones Uniandes.

Bacigalupo, Ana Mariella. 2016. Thunder. Making History with Mapuche Spirits in Chile and Patagonia. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bacigalupo, Ana Mariella. 2014. “The Potency of Indigenous Bibles and Biography: Mapuche Shamanic Literacy and Historical Consciousness”. American Ethnologist 41 (4): 648-663.

Ballestero, Andrea. 2012. “Transparency in Triads”. PoLAR 35 (2): 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1555-2934.2012.01196.x

Barrera, Leticia. 2013. “Performing the Court: Public Hearings and the Politics of Judicial Transparency in Argentina”. PoLAR 36 (2): 326-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12032

Buchely, Lina Fernanda. 2015. Activismo burocrático. La construcción cotidiana del principio de legalidad. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.

Buchely, Lina Fernanda e IsabelCristina Jaramillo. 2019. “La etnografía como herramienta crítica en el derecho administrativo”. En Etnografías burocráticas: una nueva mirada a la construcción del Estado en Colombia, compilado por IsabelCristina Jaramillo y Lina FernandaBuchely, 9-36. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.

Burnyeat, Gwen. 2020. “The Face of Peace. Pedagogy and Politics among Government Officials in the Colombian Peace Process with the FARC-EP”. Tesis doctoral, Departamento de Antropología, University College London, Londres.

Cepeda, Manuel José. 2005. “The Judicialization of Politics in Colombia: The Old and the New”. En The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, editado por RachelSieder, LineSchjolden y AlanAngell, 67-104. Nueva York: Palgrave.

Chaves, Margarita. 2011. “Presentación”. En La multiculturalidad estatalizada: indígenas, afrodescendientes y configuraciones de Estado, editado por MargaritaChaves, 9-24. Bogotá: Icanh.

Comaroff, Jean y JohnComaroff. 2009. Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Comaroff, Jean y JohnComaroff. 2006. Introducción a Law and Disorder in the Postcolony, editado por JeanComaroff y JohnComaroff, 1-56. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Comisión de Estudios sobre la Violencia. 1987. Colombia: Violencia y Democracia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia y Colciencias.

Coronil, Fernando. 1997. The Magical State: Nature, Money, and Modernity in Venezuela. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Das, Veena y DeborahPoole. 2004. Anthropology in the Margins of the State. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

DNP (Departamento Nacional de Planeación). 2011. Plan Nacional de Desarrollo: prosperidad para todos. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional.

Espeland, Wendy Nelson y Mitchell L.Stevens. 2008. “A Sociology of Quantification”. European Journal of Sociology 49 (3): 401-436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609000150

Everett, Caleb. 2017. Numbers and the Making of Us. Counting and the Course of Human Cultures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2006. Seguridad, territorio, población. Buenos Aires: FCE.

French, Jan Hoffman. 2009. Legalizing Identities: Becoming Black or Indian Brazil’s Northeast. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

García Villegas, Mauricio, dir. 2009. Normas de papel: la cultura del incumplimiento de reglas. Bogotá: DeJusticia y Siglo del Hombre.

García Villegas, Mauricio. 1993. La eficacia simbólica del derecho: examen de situaciones colombianas. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.

Gell, Alfred. 1992. “The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology”.En Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics, editado por JeremyCoote y AnthonyShelton, 40-63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

GMH (Grupo de Memoria Histórica). 2013. ¡Basta ya! Colombia: Memorias de guerra y dignidad. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional.

Gow, Peter. 1996. “¿Podía leer Sangama?: sistemas gráficos, lenguaje y shamanismo entre los piro (Perú oriental)”. En Globalización y cambio en la amazonía indígena. Volumen I, compilado por FernandoSantos Granero, 261-288. Quito: Abya-Yala.

Gupta, Ahkil. 2012. Red Tape. Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India. Durham: Duke University Press.

Gupta, Akhil y AradhanaSharma. 2006. The Anthropology of the State: A Reader. Malden: Blackwell.

Hart, Keith. 2007. “Money is Always Personal and Impersonal”. Anthropology Today 23 (5): 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2007.00536.x

Herzfeld, Michael. 1992. The Social Production of Indifference. Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Hetherington, Kregg. 2008. “Populist Transparency: The Documentation of Reality in Rural Paraguay”. Journal of Legal Anthropology 1 (1): 45-69. https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2008.010103

Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2012. “The Domestic Mechanisms of Compliance with International Human Rights Law: Case Studies from the Inter-American Human Rights System”. Human Rights Quarterly 34 (4): 959-985. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/489370

Hugh-Jones, Stephen. 2010. “Entre l’image et l’ecrit. La politique tukano de patrimonialisation en Amazonie”. Cahiers des Amériques Latines 63-64: 195-227. https://doi.org/10.4000/cal.895

Hull, Mathew. 2012a. “Documents and Bureaucracy”. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104953

Hull, Mathew. 2012b. Government of Paper. The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Jaramillo, Isabel Cristina. 2013. Derecho y familia en Colombia. Historias de raza, género y propiedad 1540-1980. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.

Jaramillo, Pablo. 2014. Etnicidad y victimización. Genealogías de la violencia y la indigenidad en el norte de Colombia. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.

Kafka, Ben. 2012. The Demon of Writing: Powers and Failures of Paperwork. Nueva York: Zone Books.

Kaplan, Martha. 2003. “The Magical Power of the (Printed) Word”. En Magic and Modernity: Interfaces of Revelation and Concealment, editado por BirgitMeyer y PeterPels, 183-199. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Lemaitre Ripoll, Julieta. 2009. El derecho como conjuro: fetichismo legal, violencia y movimientos sociales. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes y Siglo del Hombre Editores.

Lemaitre Ripoll, Julieta y EstebanRestrepo Saldarriaga. 2019. “Law and Violence in the Colombian Post-Conflict: State-Making in the Wake of the Peace Agreement”. Revista de Estudios Sociales 67: 2-16. https://doi.org/10.7440/res67.2019.01

Lozano Mancera, Natalia. 2012. “Homicidios de indígenas, 2003-2012: instrumento de apropiación violenta de la tierra”. En Forensis Datos para la Vida. 109-119. Bogotá: Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses. https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/documents/20143/49514/Homicidio.pdf

March, James G. y Herbert A.Simon. 1958. Organizations. Nueva York: Wiley.

Maurer, Bill. 2006. “The Anthropology of Money”. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123127

Merry, Sally Engle. 2016. The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Muñoz, Juan Pablo. 2016. La brecha de implementación: derechos territoriales de los pueblos indígenas en Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad del Rosario.

Nader, Laura. 1972. “Up the Anthropologist - Perspectives Gained from Studying Up”. En Reinventing Anthropology, editado por Dell H.Hymes, 284-311. Nueva York: Pantheon Books.

Navaro-Yashin, Yael. 2007. “Make-Believe Papers, Legal Forms and the Counterfeit: Affective Interactions between Documents and People in Britain and Cyprus”. Anthropological Theory 7 (1): 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499607074294

Neiburg, Federico. 2016. “A True Coin of their Dreams. Imaginary Monies in Haiti. The 2010 Sidney Mintz Lecture”. HAU Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6 (1): 75-93. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.005

ONU (Organización de las Naciones Unidas). 2006. Los derechos humanos y las cuestiones indígenas Informe del Relator Especial sobre la situación de los derechos humanos y las libertades fundamentales de los indígenas, Sr. Rodolfo Stavenhagen. E/CN.4/2006/78 16 de febrero de 2006. https://undocs.org/es/E/CN.4/2006/78

Orjuela, Luis Javier, comp. 2010. El Estado en Colombia. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.

Palacios, Marco. 2003. Entre la legitimidad y la violencia: Colombia 1875-1994. Bogotá: Editorial Norma.

Pécaut, Daniel. 1987. Orden y violencia: Colombia 1930-1954. Bogotá: Siglo XXI Editores.

Pellegrino, Valentina. 2017. “Incumplir cumpliendo: una etnografía al papeleo del Auto 004”. Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá.

Pels, Peter. 2003. Introducción a Magic and Modernity: Interfaces of Revelation and Concealment, editado por BirgitMeyer y PeterPels, 1-38. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Poovey, Mary.1998. A History of the Modern Fact. Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Porter, Theodor. 1995. Trust in Numbers. The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rappaport, Joanne y TomCummins. 2012. Beyond the Lettered City: Indigenous Literacies in the Andes. Durham: Duke University Press.

Riles, Annelise. 2006. Introducción a Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, editado por AnneliseRiles, 1-40. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Riles, Annelise. 2000. The Network inside Out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Rodríguez, César y DianaRodríguez. 2010. Cortes y cambio social. Cómo la Corte Constitucional transformó el desplazamiento forzado en Colombia. Bogotá: DeJusticia.

Rojas, Cristina. 2001. Civilization and Violence. Regimes of Representation in Nineteenth-Century Colombia. Minneapolis: University of Minessota Press.

Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing the Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Santamaría, Ángela. 2010. “Redes de defensa de los derechos humanos de los pueblos indígenas: experiencias cruzadas de incidencia en política nacional e internacional”. En Conflictos y judicialización de la política en la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, editado por AlexandraMora, EdgarNaranjo, GloriaAmparo Rodríguez y ÁngelaSantamaría, 3-80. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad del Rosario.

Señal Institucional. 2013. Sesión técnica e informativa sobre protección de pueblos y comunidades indígenas. Colombia: Videoteca de la Rama Judicial. https://videoteca.ramajudicial.gov.co/Fuente/Detalle/2163

Scott, James. 1998. Seeing Like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Sieder, Rachel, LineSchjolden y AlanAngell, eds. 2005. The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. Nueva York: Palgrave.

Strathern, Marilyn. 2000. Introducción a Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, editado por MarylinStrathern, 1-18. Londres: Routledge.

Taussig, Michael. 1997. The Magic of the State. New York: Routledge.

Taussig, Michael. 1995. “Maleficium: el fetichismo de Estado”. En Un gigante en convulsiones: el mundo humano como sistema nervioso en emergencia permanente, publicado por MichaelTaussig, 148-180. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Trouillot, Ralph. 2011. “Antropología del Estado en la época de la globalización: encuentros cercanos del tipo engañoso”. En Transformaciones globales: la antropología y el mundo moderno, publicado por RalphTrouillot, 149-174. Popayán: Universidad del Cauca y Universidad de los Andes.

Unidad de Víctimas. 2020. “Reporte general”. https://cifras.unidadvictimas.gov.co/Home/General

Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2000. The Friendly Liquidation of the Past: The Politics of Diversity in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

Wills, María Emma. 1998. “En contra de la marea o sobre cómo las violencias, a veces, producen democracia”. Revista de Estudios Sociales 1: 16-21. https://doi.org/10.7440/res1.1998.02