Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología

Antipod. Rev. Antropol. Arqueol | eISSN 2011-4273 | ISSN 1900-5407

Políticas da evidência: entre pós-verdade, objetividade e etnografia

No. 41 (2020-10-01)
  • Marina Weinberg
    Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile / Universiteit van Amsterdam, Holanda
  • Marcelo González Gálvez
    Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Cristóbal Bonelli
    Universiteit van Amsterdam, Holanda
https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda41.2020.01

Resumo

Ao longo das últimas décadas, diversas sensibilidades analíticas das ciências sociais e, em particular, da antropologia, vêm tentando descolonizar a alteridade com a criação de espaços conceituais e empíricos que respeitem a coexistência sociomaterial de mundos variados e deem lugar a ela. Abraçando esse projeto intelectual e cosmopolítico, este artigo explora conceitual e etnograficamente que tipo de evidências surge em diferentes modos de fazer mundo, a partir do princípio de que não sabemos o que é a evidência até não conhecermos quais são suas capacidades. Com base em uma análise crítica de duas perspectivas que possibilitam um perigoso encerramento ante outros possíveis horizontes, a saber, a pós-verdade e a ciência objetivadora, neste texto, consideramos a etnografia como uma aliada fundamental na tentativa coletiva de criar espaço para outros mundos. Assim, interessa-nos multiplicar a noção de evidência para mais além de sua compreensão como artefato moderno. Para isso, sugerimos a ideia de evidência para fazer pensar como heurística que demonstra a hiperreflexividade relacional necessária na hora de questionar a ausência do pensar próprio da pós-verdade e da univocidade da evidência moderna. Após a discussão, são apresentados os artigos que fazem parte deste número e a maneira na qual acreditamos que promovem essa evidência respeitosa de todos os mundos possíveis.

Palavras-chave: colaboração, democracia, etnografia, evidência, multiplicidade, mundo unívoco

Referências

Arendt, Hanna. 1999. Eichmann en Jerusalén: un estudio acerca de la banalidad del mal. Barcelona: Lumen.

Armenta Iruretagoyena, Ferdinando A. 2020. “El habla de las sombras: domesticación de la diferencia entre jóvenes guaraní-mbya del sur de Brasil”. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 41: 151-169. https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda41.2020.07

Blaser, Mario. 2016. “Is Another Cosmopolitics Possible?”. Cultural Anthropology 31 (4): 545-570. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.05

Bloch, Maurice. 2008. “Truth and Sight: Generalizing without Universalizing”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14: S22-S32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00490.x

Boasso, Florencia. 2004. “Del ingenio al cruce. Relocalización y resistencia de una comunidad indígena”. En La cuenca del río Bermejo: una formación social de fronteras, compilado por ElenaBelli, RicardoSlavutsky y HugoTrinchero, 89-103. Tilcara: Reunir.

Bonelli, Cristóbal. 2019. “Spectral Forces, Time and Excess in Southern Chile”. En The World Multiple Everyday Politics of Knowing and Generating Entangled Worlds, editado por KeiichiOmura, Grant JunOtsuki, ShihoSatsuka y AtsuroMorita, 123-139. Nueva York: Routledge.

Bonelli, Cristóbal y LuisPoirot. 2020. “Secretos de luz: apuntes para una antropología expuesta”. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 41: 173-198. https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda41.2020.08

Briggs, Charles. 2016. “Ecologies of Evidence in a Mysterious Epidemic”. Medicine Anthropology Theory 3 (2): 149-162. https://doi.org/10.17157/mat.3.2.430

Carrithers, Michael. 1990. “Is Anthropology Art or Science?”. Current Anthropology 31: 261-82. https://doi.org/10.1086/203840

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Chandler, James, ArnoldDavidson y HarryHarootunian, eds. 1994. Questions of Evidence: Proof Practice and Persuasion across Disciplines. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Clifford, James. 1986. “Introduction: Partial Truths”. En Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, editado por JamesClifford y GeorgeMarcus, 1-26. Berkeley: University of California Press.

de la Cadena, Marisol. 2015. Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.

de la Cadena, Marisol. 2010. “Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections Beyond ‘Politics’”. Cultural Anthropology 25 (2): 334-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01061.x

de la Cadena, Marisol y MarioBlaser, eds. 2018. A World of many Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.

Deleuze, Gilles y FélixGuattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis; Londres: University of Minnesota Press.

Despret, Vinciane. 2004. “The Body We Care for: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis”. Body & Society 10 (2-3): 111-34. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1357034X04042938

Di Giminiani, Piergiorgio y Marcelo GonzálezGálvez. 2018. “Who Owns the Water? The Relation as Unfinished Objectivation in the Mapuche Lived World”. Anthropological Forum 28 (3): 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2018.1495060

Dorador, Cristina, DanielaMeneses, VivianaUrtuvia, CeciliaDemergasso, IrmaVila, Karl-PaulWitzel y JohannesImhoff. 2009. “Diversity of Bacteroidetes in High‐Altitude Saline Evaporitic Basins in Northern Chile”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 114 (G00D05): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000837

Engelke, Matthew. 2008. “The Objects of Evidence”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14: S1-S21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00489.x

Espírito Santo, Diana y AlejandraVergara. 2020. “The Possible and the Impossible: Reflections on Evidence in Chilean Ufology”. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 41: 125-146. https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda41.2020.06

Geertz, Clifford. 1974. “From the Native’s Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding”. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28 (1): 26-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3822971

Ghosh, Amitav. 2016. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gordillo, Gastón. 2010. Lugares de diablos: tensiones del espacio y la memoria. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros.

Gudynas, Eduardo. 2013. Extracciones, extractivismos y extrehecciones: un marco conceptual sobre la apropiación de recursos naturales. Montevideo: Centro Latino Americano de Ecología Social.

Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham;Londres: Duke University Press.

Haraway, Donna. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest Witness@Second Millennium FemaleMan Meets OncoMouseTM: Feminism and Technoscience. Nueva York: Routledge.

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575-599.

Hartouni, Valerie. 2012. Visualizing Atrocity: Arendt, Evil, and the Optics of Thoughtlessness. Nueva York: NYU Press.

Hastrup, Kirsten. 2004. “Getting It Right: Knowledge and Evidence in Anthropology”. Anthropological Theory 4 (4): 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499604047921

Helmreich, Stefan. 2011. “Nature/Culture/Seawater”. American Anthropologist 113: 132-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01311.x

Henrique, Fernanda Borges. 2020. “As múltiplas agências dos encantados: esboço de uma teoria política kiriri”. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 41: 57-77. https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda41.2020.03

Isla, Alejandro. 2000. “Canibalismo y sacrificio en las dulces tierras del azúcar”. Estudios Atacameños 19: 135-155. https://doi.org/10.22199/S07181043.2000.0019.00008

Jensen, Casper Brunn, 2012. “Anthropology as a Following Science Humanity and Sociality in Continuous Variation”. NatureCulture 1 (1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.18910/75506

Lambert, Helen. 2009. “Evidentiary Truths? The Evidence of Anthropology Through the Anthropology of Medical Evidence”. Anthropology Today 25 (1): 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2009.00642.x

Latour, Bruno. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity.

Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature: How To Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Law, John. 2015. “What’s Wrong with a One-World World?”. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 126-139.

Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1922) 1986. Los argonautas del Pacífico occidental. Barcelona: Planeta-Agostini.

Martínez Medina, Santiago. 2020. “Lo que pliega la colecta: conocimientos, científicos y especímenes para otras ciencias posibles”. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 41: 31-56. https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda41.2020.02

Maturana, Humberto. 1992. La objetividad: un argumento para obligar. Santiago de Chile: Dolmen Ensayo.

Moore, Jason. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. Londres;Nueva York: Verso.

Moore, Jason, ed. 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: PM Press.

Morita, Atsuro y WakanaSusuki. 2019. “Being Affected by Sinking Deltas Changing Landscapes, Resilience, and Complex Adaptive Systems in the Scientific Story of the Anthropocene”. Current Anthropology 60 (20): S286-S295. https://doi.org/10.1086/702735

Omura, Keiichi, Grant JunOtsuki, ShihoSatsuka y AtsuroMorita. 2019. The World Multiple Everyday Politics of Knowing and Generating Entangled Worlds. Nueva York: Routledge Advances in Sociology.

Pignarre, Philippe e IsabelleStengers. 2005. La sorcellerie capitaliste: pratiques de desenvoutement. Paris: Decouver.

Ramos, Ana. 2011. “Perspectivas antropológicas sobre la memoria en contextos de diversidad y desigualdad”. Alteridades 21 (42): 131-148.

Ricoeur, Paul. 2013. La memoria, la historia, el olvido. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Rivera Cusicanqui, Silvia. 2015. Sociología de la imagen: miradas ch’ixi desde la historia andina. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.

Ruiz Romero, Gabriel, PedroJurado Castaño y DanielCastaño Zapata. 2020. “Distancia representacional entre la narración experta y los relatos locales: una reflexión sobre las políticas de la evidencia en el campo de la memoria en Colombia”. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 41: 103-124. https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda41.2020.05

Sahlins, Marshall. 2013. What Kinship Is—and Is Not. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Sarlo, Beatriz. 2012. Tiempo pasado: cultura de la memoria y giro subjetivo. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

Sarra, Sonia Elizabeth. 2020. “De la predación del diablo al fin de esta humanidad: cosmopolítica en la zafra del Noroeste Argentino”. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 41: 79-101. https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda41.2020.04

Sismondo, Sergio. 2017. “Post-Truth?”. Social Studies of Science 47 (1): 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0306312717692076

Sontag, Susan. 2006. Sobre la fotografía. Buenos Aires: Alfaguara.

Stengers, Isabelle. 2005. “The Cosmopolitical Proposal”. En Making Things Public, editado por BrunoLatour y PeterWeibel, 994-1003. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

Strathern, Marilyn. 2004. Partial Connections. Nueva York: Altamira.

Strathern, Marilyn. 1995. The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale. Cambridge: Prickly Pear Press.

Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Teruel, Ana, MarceloLagos y LeonorPeirotti. 2010. “Los valles orientales subtropicales: frontera, modernización azucarera y crisis”. En Jujuy en la historia: de la colonia al siglo XX, editado por AnaTeruel y MarceloLagos, 435-464. Jujuy: Editorial de la UNJu.

Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 1995. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon Press.

Tsing, Anna, HeatherSwanson, ElaineGan y NilsBubandt, eds. 2017. Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.

Venkatesan, Soumhya, MateiCandea, CasperBrunn Jensen, MortenAxel Pedersen, JamesLeach y GillianEvans. 2012. “The Task of Anthropology Is to Invent Relations: 2010 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory”. Critique of Anthropology 32 (1): 43-86 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0308275X11430873

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2020. “Eduardo Viveiros de Castro: ‘El gobierno de Bolsonaro le declaró la guerra a los pueblos indígenas’”. Oplas (Observatorio Plurinacional de Aguas). https://oplas.org/sitio/2020/02/18/eduardo-viveiros-de-castro-el-gobierno-debolsonaro-le-declaro-la-guerra-a-los-indios/

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. “Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation”. Tipití 2 (1): 1-20.

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2002. “O nativo relativo”. Mana 8 (1): 113-148.

Wagner, Roy. 2017. A invenção da cultura. São Paulo: Ubu Editora.

Weinberg, Marina. 2019. “Especies compañeras después de la vida: pensando relaciones humano-perro desde la región surandina”. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 36: 139-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.7440/antipoda36.2019.07

Weinberg, Marina y PabloMercolli. 2017. “Sweet Death: Indigenous Labour Exploitation in the San Martín del Tabacal Sugar Mill, Salta, Argentina”. Cultural Studies 31 (1): 70-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2016.1167929

WHO (World Health Organization). 2020. Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19). Situation Report-198 (Data as received by WHO from national authorities by 10:00 CEST, 5 August 2020). https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200805-covid-19-sitrep-198.pdf?sfvrsn=f99d1754_2