Sobre las políticas conductuales de desarrollo humano: de qué manera contribuye la política pública conductual al desarrollo humano
No. 91 (2022-06-01)Autor/a(es/as)
-
Pablo Garcés-Velástegui
Resumen
El influyente enfoque de capacidad, base del paradigma del desarrollo humano, se enfoca en las personas y en su calidad de vida, como método para evaluar el desarrollo. Para ello, proporciona una elaborada descripción de los seres humanos y de su capacidad de agencia. Este proyecto también ha abordado la temática de la racionalidad, aunque sin ofrecer una explicación para la toma de decisiones inferiores y el comportamiento no reflexivo. Aunque la literatura ha propuesto la economía del comportamiento para complementar el enfoque capacitario en el nivel abstracto, hacen falta detalles sobre las implicaciones políticas de esta combinación. Este artículo llena ese vacío, al pasar de la teoría a la práctica. Las implicaciones relevantes para las políticas se extraen en términos de mandatos, empujones (nudges) y estímulos (boosts). Si bien todos pueden contribuir al desarrollo humano, de formas diversas y en diferentes grados, los estímulos resuenan más con el enfoque de capacidad.
Referencias
Alkire, S. (2009). Concepts and Measures of Agency. In K.Basu & R.Kanbur (Eds.), Arguments for a Better World, Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen (pp. 455-474). New York: Oxford University Press
Alkire, S. (2010). Human Development: Definitions, Critiques and Related Concepts. Human Development Research Paper 2010/01
Alkire, S. & Deneulin, S. (2010). The Human Development and Capability Approach. In S.Deneulin & L.Shahani (Eds.), An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach (pp. 22-48). New York: Earthscan
Alpizar, F.,Carlsson, F., Lazna, G., Carney, B., Daniels, R., Jaime, M., Ho, T., Nie, Z., Salazar, C., Tibesigwa, B. & Wahdera, S. (2020). A framework for selecting and designing policies to reduce marine plastic pollution in developing countries. Environmental Science & Policy 109, 25-35
Bhargava, S. & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy: beyond nudging. American Economic Review 105, 396–401.
Beckenbach, F. & Kahlenborn, W. (2014). New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioral Economics. London: Springer
Becker, G. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’donoghue, T. & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the case for Asymmetric Paternalism. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 1211-1254.
Carlsson, F., Gravert, C., Johansson-Stenman, O. & Kurz, V. (2019). Nudging as an Environmental Policy Instrument. Working Paper in Economics No. 756. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg
Chambers, R. (2004). Ideas for Development. IDS Working Paper 238. Sussex: IDS
Chetty, R. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy: a pragmatic perspective. American Economic Review 105, 1–33.
Corr, P. & Plagnol, A. (2019). Behavioral Economics: The Basics. London: Routledge
Crocker, D. & Robeyns, I. (2010). Capability and agency. In C.Morris (Ed.), Amartya Sen (pp. 60-90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dallacker, M., R.Hertwig and J.Mata (2019), Quality matters: A meta-analysis on components of healthy family meals. Health Psychology 38(12): 1137–1149
Dawnay, E. & Shah, H. (2005). Behavioural Economics: Seven Principles for Policy-makers. London: New Economics Foundation.
Drexler, A., Fischer, G. & Schoar, A. (2014). Keeping it simple: Financial literacy and rules of thumb. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6, 1–31
Garcés, P. (2020a). Using the Capability Approach and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis in development policy evaluation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2019.1699277
Garcés, P. (2020b). The reasoning agent: agency in the capability approach and some implications for development research and practice. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 9(2), 268-292. DOI: 10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.491.
Garcés-Velástegui, P. (forthcoming). Towards a Behavioral Capability Approach: the contribution of behavioral economics to Amartya Sen’s framework
Garcés-Velástegui, P. (2022a). Modelling Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: an interdisciplinary and contemporary account. Philosophical Readings, 14(2)
Garcés-Velástegui, P. (2022b). Pragmatic Behaviour: pragmatism as a philosophy for behavioural economics. Journal of Philosophical Economics, XV(1), 1-34 https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.8741
Garcés-Velástegui, P. (2020). Humanizing development: taking stock of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach. Problemas del Desarrollo, 51(203), 191-212
Gigerenzer, G., P.Todd & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grüne-Yanoff, T. & Hertwig, R. (2016). Nudge versus Boost: how coherent are policy and theory. Minds and Machines, 26, 149-183
Grüne-Yanoff, T., Marchionni, C., & Feufel, M. (2018). Toward a Framework for Selecting Behavioural Policies: how To Choose Between Boosts and Nudges. Economics and Philosophy, 34(2), 243-266. Doi:10.1017/S0266267118000032
Haq, M. (1995). The human development paradigm. In M.Haq (Ed.), Reflections on Human Development (pp. 13-23). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hertwig, R. & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017). Nudging and boosting: steering or empowering good decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 973-986
Hvinden, B. & Halvorsen, R. (2017). Mediating Agency and Structure in Sociology: What Role for Conversion Factors?: Critical Sociology, 1-17
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions: a reply to Gigerenzer’s critique. Psychological Review 103, 582–591.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, Values and Frames. American Psychologist, 34(4), 341-350
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232
Le Grand, J. (2003). Motivation, agency and public policy: of knights and knaves, pawns and queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Le Grand, J. (2008). The giants of excess: a challenge to the nation’s health. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 171, 843-856.
Le Grand, J. & New, B. (2015). Government Paternalism: Nany State or Helpful Friend? Princeton: Princeton University Press
Nelson, K., Partelow, S. & Schlüter, A. (2019). Nudging tourists to donate for conservation: Experimental evidence on soliciting voluntary contributions for coastal management. Journal of Environmental Management 237, 30-43
Oliver, A. (2013). Behavioural Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rabin, M. (1997). Psychology and Economics. Working Papers No. 97-251. Berkeley: University of California
Ratcliff, P. (2001). ‘Race’, ethnicity and housing decision: rational choice theory and the choice-constraints debate. In M.Archer & S.Tritter (Eds.), Rational Choice Theory: resisting colonization (pp. 200-216). London: Routledge
Sen, A. (2004). Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation. Feminist Economics, 10(3), 77-80
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and Well-being. In M.Nussbaum & A.Sen (Eds.), The Quality of Life (pp. 30-53). Oxford: Clarendon Press
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Sen, A. (1990). Development as Capability Expansion. In K.Griffin & J.Knight (Eds.), Human Development and the International Development Strategy for the 1990 (pp. 41-58). London: Macmillan
Sen, A. (1988). The concept of Development. In H.Chenery & T.Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics (pp. 10-25). London: Elsevier Science Publishers
Sen, A. (1985). Well-Being, agency and freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221
Sen, A. (1977). Rational Fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(4): 317-344
Shafir, E. (2013). The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Simon, H. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118
Sudarshan, A. (2017). Nudges in the marketplace: The response of household electricity consumption to information and monetary incentives. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 134, 320-335
Sunstein, C. (2017). Human Agency and Behavioral Economics: nudging fast and slow. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sunstein, C. (2020). Behavioral Science and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sunstein, C. & Reisch, L. (2014). Automatically Green: Behavioral Economics and Environmental Protection. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 38, 127-158
Sunstein, C. & Thaler, R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism is not an Oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70(4), 1159-1202.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59, S251–S278.
Thaler, R. (2015). Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company
Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2009). Nudge. New York: Pearson
Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism. The American Economic Review 93(2), 175-179
Vlaev, I. & Dolan, P. (2009). From changing cognitions to changing the context: a dual-route model of behavior change. Discussion Paper 2009/04. London: Imperial College London.
Wittek, R., Snijders, T. & Nee, V. (2013). Introduction: Rational Choice Social Research. In R.Wittek, T.Snijders, & V.Nee, (Eds.) The Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research (pp. 1-32). Stanford: Stanford University Press
Wolff, J. & De-Shalit, A. (2013). Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.