El aprendizaje entre pares y sus efectos en el desempeño de los estudiantes
PDF
HTML

Palabras clave

tutoría
educación
econometría
Uruguay

Categorías

Cómo citar

Machado, M. (2022). El aprendizaje entre pares y sus efectos en el desempeño de los estudiantes. Revista Desarrollo Y Sociedad, 1(92), 11–43. https://doi.org/10.13043/DYS.92.1

Resumen

Tutorías Entre Pares es un programa desarrollado para mejorar la inserción de las generaciones de ingreso a la educación universitaria. Controlando por características demográficas, académicas y de personalidad, a través de métodos de emparejamiento se busca identificar si el programa tiene efecto sobre distintas dimensiones de los estudiantes. Los resultados muestran que el programa reduce la probabilidad de deserción, siendo una dimensión sobre la cual es esperado que actúe. Por otro lado, se observan resultados positivos sobre dimensiones académicas, de forma que los que participan aprueban más cursos y con mejores calificaciones que estudiantes similares que no participaron. Según estos hallazgos, este programa, destinado a trabajar directamente sobre dimensiones sociales, genera efectos sobre la esfera académica de los participantes. Estos hallazgos podrían representar un punto de partida para la formulación de políticas educativas con objetivos de mejorar las trayectorias en la educación universitaria.

https://doi.org/10.13043/DYS.92.1
PDF
HTML

Citas

Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267.

Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2008). On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica, 76(6), 1537-1557.

Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton University Press.

Barro, P., Lezcano, M., Machado, M., Sena, E., StrehlM., & Torres, J. (2018). Abandono en la Licenciatura en Economía en la UDELAR: caracterización y actividades de los estudiantes. Serie Documentos de Investigación Estudiantil, DIE 07/2018.

Blackwell, J. E. (1989). Mentoring: an action strategy for increasing minority faculty. Academe, 75(5), 8-14.

Bowman, R. L., Bowman, V. E., & DeLucia, J. L. (1990). Mentoring in a graduate counseling program: Students helping students. Counselor Education and Supervision, 30(1), 58-65.

Brown II, M. C., Davis, G. L., & McClendon, S. A. (1999). Mentoring graduate students of color: Myths, models, and modes. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 105-118.

Burone, S., & Lado, M. A. (2016). Efectos del centro educativo secundario en las trayectorias estudiantiles de FCEA. Una aplicación del análisis de supervivencia (No. 16-03).Instituto de Economía-IECON.

Campbell, T. A., & Campbell, D. E. (1997). Faculty/student mentor program: Effects on academic performance and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38(6), 727-742.

Chao, G. T., Walz, P., & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 619-636.

Crisp, G. (2010). The impact of mentoring on the success of community college students. The Review of Higher Education, 34(1), 39-60.

Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525-545.

Cullen, D. L., & Luna, G. (1993). Women mentoring in academe: Addressing the gender gap in higher education. Gender and Education, 5(2), 125-137.

Ehrich, L. C., Hansford, B., & Tennent, L. (2004). Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 518-540.

Freeman, K. (1999). No services needed?: The case for mentoring high-achieving African American students. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 15-26.

Garrido, M. M., Kelley, A. S., Paris, J., Roza, K., Meier, D. E., Morrison, R. S., & Aldridge, M. D. (2014). Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Services Research, 49(5), 1701-1720.

Haring, M. J. (1999). The case for a conceptual base for minority mentoring programs. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 5-14.

Healy, C. C., & Welchert, A. J. (1990). Mentoring relations: A definition to advance research and practice. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 17-21.

Hu, S., & Ma, Y. (2010). Mentoring and student persistence in college: A study of the Washington State Achievers Program. Innovative Higher Education, 35(5), 329-341.

Hunt, D. M., & Michael, C. (1983). Mentorship: A career training and development tool. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 475-485.

Imbens, G. W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 4-29.

Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505-532.

Johnson, I. H. (1996). Access and retention: Support programs for graduate and professional students. New Directions for Student Services, 1996(74), 53-67.

Johnson, W. B., & Nelson, N. (1999). Mentor-protégé relationships in graduate training: Some ethical concerns. Ethics & Behavior, 9(3), 189-210.

Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110-132.

Lester, V., & Johnson, C. (1981). The learning dialogue: Mentoring. New Directions for Student Services, 1981(15), 49-56.

Mangold, W. D., Bean, L. G., Adams, D. J., Schwab, W. A., & Lynch, S. M. (2002). Who goes who stays: An assessment of the effect of a freshman mentoring and unit registration program on college persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 4(2), 95-122.

Moore, K. M., & Amey, M. J. (1988). Some faculty leaders are born women. New Directions for Student Services, 44, 39-50.

Moses, Y. T. (1989). Black Women in Academe. Issues and Strategies.

Nora, A., & Crisp, G. (2007). Mentoring students: Conceptualizing and validating the multi-dimensions of a support system. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(3), 337-356.

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1983). Predicting voluntary freshman year persistence/withdrawal behavior in a residential university: A path analytic validation of Tinto’s model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 215-226.

Rodger, S., & Tremblay, P. F. (2003). The effects of a peer mentoring program on academic success among first year university students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 33(3), 1-17.

Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.

Salinitri, G. (2005). The effects of formal mentoring on the retention rates for first-year, low achieving students. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(4), 853-873.

Santivago, C., Bouzó, A., Álvarez de León, A., Bello, G., Cabrera, L., Couchet, M., De León, F., Lujambio, V., Ramos, S., Rubio, V., Ezcurra, A., Álvarez, P. & Fernández, A. (2018). Las tutorías entre pares como estrategia de apoyo y herramienta de transformación de la educación superior: la experiencia del programa de respaldo al aprendizaje. Comisión Sectorial de Enseñanza.

Schmidt, J. A., & Wolfe, J. S. (1980). The mentor partnership: Discovery of professionalism. NASPA Journal, 17(3), 45-51.

Shandley, T. C. (1989). The use of mentors for leadership development. NASPA Journal, 27(1), 59-66.

Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: exploring the educational character of student persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599-623.

Watson, N. A. (1999). Mentoring today—the students’ views. An investigative case study of pre‐registration nursing students’ experiences and perceptions of mentoring in one theory/practice module of the Common Foundation Programme on a Project 2000 course. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(1), 254-262.

Zimmerman, B. B., & Paul, D. (2007). Technical communication teachers as mentors in the classroom: Extending an invitation to students. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 175-200.

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.