Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad logo

Desarro. soc. | eISSN 1900-7760 | ISSN 0120-3584

Estudio comparado de las matrices tecnoeconómicas de Argentina y Canadá: un acercamiento desde el análisis insumo-producto

No. 94 | 2023-07-19
  • Martin Gentili
    CEUR-CONICET

Resumen

Este artículo realiza un estudio comparativo del sistema de relaciones tecnoeconómicas –es decir, de flujos de Investigación y Desarrollo (I+D) incorporado– que estructura el proceso innovador de Argentina y Canadá. Para ello,
se analizaron tanto los flujos domésticos como los de origen importado. La
construcción de indicadores tecnoeconómicos se complementó con un Análisis de Redes. Entre los principales resultados se destaca la mayor articulación
del sistema tecnoeconómico canadiense frente al argentino. Se estableció que
existe una relación entre la articulación y la mayor absorción de I+D del sistema productivo de Canadá vis a vis una participación del componente importado menos relevante. A su vez, dichas diferencias estructurales encuentran
correspondencia con el diferente perfil sectorial de sus respectivas estructuras
tecno-económicas. Entre las principales conclusiones se sugiere que la presencia de un sector dinámico basado en ciencia no compensa la ausencia doméstica de proveedores especializados como núcleos difusores del progreso técnico.

Palabras clave: Cambio tecnológico, Estructura Económica, Desarrollo Endógeno, Investigación y Desarrollo, País en Desarrollo, Argentina

Referencias

Alto, B. P. de. (2013). Autonomía tecnológica: la audacia de la división electrónica de FATE. Ediciones CICCUS.

Amar, A., & García, F. (2018). Integración productiva entre la Argentina y el Brasil. Un análisis basado en metodologías de insumo-producto interpaís. Cepal. http://hdl.handle.net/11362/43623

Andersen, E. S. (1992). Approaching national systems of innovation from the production and linkage structure. En B. Å. Lundvall (Ed.), National systems of innovation. towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 71-96). Anthem Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843318903.005

Andreoni, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Why and how does manufacturing still matter: old rationales, new realities. Revue d’économie Industrielle, (144), 21-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.5668

Antonelli, C., Geuna, A., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2000). Information and communication technologies and the production, distribution and use of knowledge. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(1-2), 72-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2000.002853

Arza, V., & Carattoli, M. (2017). Personal ties in university-industry linkages. A case-study from Argentina. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 814-840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9544-x

Azpiazu, D., Manzanelli, P., & Schorr, M. (2011). Concentración y extranjerización: la Argentina en la posconvertibilidad. Capital Intelectual Buenos Aires.

Azpiazu, D., & Schorr, M. (2010). La industria argentina en la posconvertibilidad: reactivación y legados del neoliberalismo. Problemas del Desarrollo, 41(161), 111-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2010.161.18498

Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1992). Accumulating technological capability in developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 6(suppl. 1), 257-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/6.suppl_1.257

Bisang, R. (1995). Libremercado, intervenciones estatales e instituciones de ciencia y técnica en la Argentina: apuntes para una discusión. Redes, 2(3), 13-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48160/18517072re3.658

Buch, A. (2006). Forma y función de un sujeto moderno: Bernardo Houssay y la fisiología (1900-1943). Editorial UNQ.

Chang, P. L., & Shih, H. Y. (2005). Comparing patterns of intersectoral innovation diffusion in Taiwan and China. A network analysis. Technovation, 25(2), 155-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00077-4

Chudnovsky, D., Niosi, J., & Bercovich, N. (2000). Sistemas nacionales de innovación, procesos de aprendizaje y política tecnológica: una comparación de Canadá y la Argentina. Desarrollo Económico, 40(158), 213-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3456046

Codner, D., Baudry, G., & Becerra, P. (2013). Las oficinas de transferencia de conocimiento como instrumento de las universidades para su interacción con el entorno. Universidades, (58), 24-32.

Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2003). Business services in Germany: Bridges for innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 23(2), 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060412331300862

De Angelis, I. (2016). El posicionamiento argentino frente a los paradigmas tecnoeconómicos globales. Estudios Económicos, 33(67), 3-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2016.715

DeBresson, C. (1996). Long-term innovative clusters in a small, open, industrialized economy: Canada (1945-79). En Economic interdependence and innovative activity: an input-output analysis (pp. 205-215). Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035334957.00024

DeBresson, C., Sirilli, G., Hu, X., & Luk, F. K. (1994). Structure and location of innovative activity in the Italian economy, 1981-1985. Economic Systems Research, 6(2), 135-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319400000013

DeBresson, C., & Townsend, J. (1978). Notes on the inter-industrial flow of technology in post-war Britain. Research Policy, 7(1), 49-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(78)90028-8

DePaolis, F., Murphy, P., & De Paolis, M. (2022). Identifying key sectors in the regional economy: a network analysis approach using input–output data. Applied Network Science, 7(1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00519-2

Díaz-Alejandro, C. F. (1970). Essays on the economic history of the Argentine Republic. Yale University Press.

Diéguez, H. L. (1981). Argentina y Canadá: un comentario. Desarrollo Económico, 21(82), 271-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3466544

Dietzenbacher, E., & Los, B. (2002). Externalities of R&D expenditures. Economic Systems Research, 14(4), 407-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531022000024860

Dutrénit, G., & Arza, V. (2010). Channels and benefits of interactions between public research organisations and industry: Comparing four Latin American countries. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 541-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X512043

Ferrón, L., & Katzer, L. (2021). Los Servicios Tecnológicos de Alto Nivel (STAN) como recursos de vinculación del Conicet. Alcances y limitaciones. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad-CTS, 16(48), 229-247.

Gonçalves, E., & Neto, A. B. F. (2016). Intersectoral flows of technological knowledge in emerging countries: an input-output analysis. Cepal Review, 118, 139-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/db371779-en

González, G. H., & Viego, V. N. (2011). The “Argentine failure” from a comparative perspective: the role of total factor productivity. Revista de Historia Economica, 29(3), 301-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0212610911000176

Goto, A., & Suzuki, K. (1989). R & D capital, rate of return on R & D investment and spillover of R & D in Japanese manufacturing industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics 71(4), 555-564. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1928096

Guan, J., & Chen, Z. (2009). The technological system of Chinese manufacturing industry: A sectorial approach. China Economic Review, 20(4), 767-776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2009.05.001

Gutman, G., Lavarello, P., & Robert, V. (2004). Libéralisation et stratégies des entreprises multinationales: le cas des systèmes agroalimentaires en Argentine. Simposio; Libéralisation et stratégies des entreprises multinationales. Le cas des systèmes agroalimentaires en Argentine.

Hauknes, J., & Knell, M. (2009). Embodied knowledge and sectoral linkages. An input-output approach to the interaction of high-and low-tech industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 459-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.012

Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press.

Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R & D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 984-1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w1815

Katz, J. (2001). Structural reforms and technological behaviour. The sources and nature of technological change in Latin America in the 1990s. Research Policy, 30(1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00099-2

Katz, J., & Bercovich, N. (1993). National systems of innovation supporting technical advance in industry: The case of Argentina. En R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 451-475). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195076165.003.0014

Lange, G.-M., Wodon, Q., & Carey, K. (2018). The changing wealth of nations 2018: Building a sustainable future. World Bank Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1046-6

León, C., & Losada, F. (2002). Ciencia y tecnología agropecuarias antes de la creación del Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios Agrarios, (16), 35-90.

Leoncini, R., Maggioni, M. A., & Montresor, S. (1996a). Intersectoral innovation flows and national technological systems: network analysis for comparing Italy and Germany. Research Policy, 25(3), 415-430.

Leoncini, R., Maggioni, M. A., & Montresor, S. (1996b). Intersectoral innovation flows and national technological systems: network analysis for comparing Italy and Germany. Research Policy, 25(3), 415-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00843-8

Leoncini, R., & Montresor, S. (2000). Network analysis of eight technological systems. International Review of Applied Economics, 14(2), 213-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170050024750

Leontief, W. W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. The Review of Economic Statistics, 18(3), 105-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1927837

Los, B., & Verspagen, B. (2000). R & D spillovers and productivity: Evidence from US manufacturing microdata. Empirical Economics, 25(1), 127-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810050007

Lundvall, B.-A. (1985). Product innovation and user-producer interaction. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, (19), 19-60.

Lundvall, B. Å. (1992). User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalization. En National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 47–63). Pinter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843318903.004

Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1

Mansfield, E. (1971). Technological change. An introduction to a vital area of modern economics. Norton & Company, Inc.

Marengo, L., & Sterlacchini, A. (1990). Intersectoral technology flows. Methodological aspects and empirical applications. Metroeconomica, 41(1), 19-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.1990.tb00455.x

Mas-Verdú, F., Wensley, A., Alba, M., & Álvarez, J. M. G. (2011). How much does KIBS contribute to the generation and diffusion of innovation? Service Business, 5(3), 195-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0110-1

McFetridge, D. G. (1993). The Canadian system of industrial innovation. En R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 299-323). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195076165.003.0009

Montresor, S., & Marzetti, G. V. (2008). Innovation clusters in technological systems. A network analysis of 15 OECD countries for the mid‐1990s. Industry and Innovation, 15(3), 321-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710802041679

Montresor, S., & Marzetti, G. V. (2009). Applying social network analysis to input–output based innovation matrices: An illustrative application to six OECD technological systems for the middle 1990s. Economic Systems Research, 21(2), 129-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310902940228

Mundlak, Y., Cavallo, D., & Domenech, R. (1989). Agriculture and economic growth in Argentina, 1913-1984 (Research Report, vol. 76). International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

Niosi, J. (2014). The construction of national systems of innovation: a comparative analysis of Argentina and Canada. En G. Dutrénit & J. (Eds.), National Innovation Systems, Social Inclusion and Development (pp. 349-379). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548683.00017

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development –OECD. (2021). OECD Inter-Country Input-Output Database. https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/inter-country-input-output-tables.htm

Papaconstantinou, G., Sakurai, N., & Wyckoff, A. (1998). Domestic and international product-embodied R&D diffusion. Research Policy, 27(3), 301-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00044-4

Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). The continuing, widespread (and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies. Research Policy, 23(5), 533-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01004-8

Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0

Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la Notion de Pôle de Croissance. Economie Appliquée, 307-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoap.1955.2522

Platt, D. C., & di Tella, G. (Eds.). (1985). Argentina, Australia, and Canada. Studies in comparative development 1870-1965. Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17765-3

Putnam, J., & Evenson, R. E. (1994). Inter-sectoral technology flows. Estimates from a patent concordance with an application to Italy. Yale University.

Robert, V., Obaya, M., & Cassini, L. (2018). Tecnología, estructura productiva y desarrollo. Desarrollo Económico, 58(225), 213-246.

Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561313

Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611940

Sanz-Villarroya, I. (2005). The convergence process of Argentina with Australia and Canada: 1875-2000. Explorations in Economic History, 42(3), 439-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2004.10.003

Scherer, F. M. (1982). Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. Research Policy, 11(4), 227-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90011-7

Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674432833

Schorr, M. (2012). Argentina: ¿ nuevo modelo o “viento de cola”? Una caracterización en clave comparativa. Nueva Sociedad, (237), 114-127.

Schteingart, D., & Tavosnanska, A. (2022). El retorno de la desindustrialización. H-Industria. Revista de Historia de la Industria y el Desarrollo en América Latina, (30), 101-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56503/H-Industria/n.30(16)pp.101-133

Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles. A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw hill.

Schwab, K. (2018). The global competitiveness report 2018 (Insight Report). World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2018/05FullReport/The-GlobalCompetitivenessReport2018.pdf

Shi, X., & Wu, Y. (2019). Evolution of Product-embodied R & D in China. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, (49), 324-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.11.011

Stanford, J. (2008). Staples, deindustrialization, and foreign investment. Canada’s economic journey back to the future. Studies in Political Economy, 82(1), 7-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2008.11675062

Timmer, M. P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & de Vries, G. J. (2015). An illustrated user guide to the world input-output database. The case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics, 23(3), 575-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/ROIE.12178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12178

Vitelli, G. (1999). Los dos siglos de la Argentina: historia económica comparada. Prendergast Editores.

Wainer, A., & Schorr, M. (2014). Concentración y extranjerización del capital en la Argentina reciente: ¿Mayor autonomía nacional o incremento de la dependencia? Latin American Research Review, 49(3), 103-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2014.0044