¿Tener una primogénita reduce la violencia masculina contra las madres en Perú?
No. 98 (2024-10-31)Autor/a(es/as)
-
Carlos Salas PeñaUniversidad Continental, PerúIdentificador ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1342-0691
Resumen
La violencia de pareja íntima es un problema latente a nivel mundial y se presenta con mayor fuerza en países de ingresos medios y bajos, este fenómeno implica costos enormes para la sociedad, sin embargo este fenómeno aún no se comprende completamente. En ese marco, este artículo tiene como objetivo estudiar el impacto de tener una niña primogénita en la violencia masculina contra la mujer en Perú. Para ello, se utilizó una muestra de alrededor de 150.000 parejas, se encontró que las mujeres que tuvieron una primogénita respecto a aquellas que tuvieron un niño, tienen un 6.35% menos de probabilidades de sufrir algún tipo de violencia severa por parte de su pareja cada año. Las probabilidades de sufrir violencia emocional y violencia sexual se reducen en un 2.18% y 6.92%, respectivamente. Se puede inferir cómo los niños influyen en el comportamiento de sus padres. Estos hallazgos se pueden interpretar como efectos causales bajo el supuesto de que el sexo del primogénito es exógeno, tal como sugiere la literatura.
Referencias
1. Aizer, A. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. The American Economic Review, 100(4), 1847-1859.
2. Alesina, A., Brioschi, B., & La Ferrana, E. (2016). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1847-59.
3. Ananat, E., & Michaels, G. (2008). The effect of marital breakup on the income distribution of women with children. Journal of Human Resources, 43(3), 611-629.
4. Banerjee , A., La Ferrara, E., & Orozco, V. (2019). Entertainment, education, and attitudes toward domestic violence. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109, 133-137.
5. Baniel, A., Cowlishaw , G., & Huchard, E. (2017). Male violence and sexual intimidation in a wild primate society. Current Biology, 2163-2168.e3.
6. Barcellos, S., Carvalho, L., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2014). Child gender and parental investments in india. Are boys and girls treated differently? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 157-89.
7. Bedard, K., & Deschenes, O. (2005). Sex preferences, marital dissolution, and the economic. Journal of Human Resources, 40(2).
8. Bott, S., Guedes, A., Goodwin, M., & Mendoza, J. (2012). Violence against women in Latin America and the Caribbean. A comparative analysis of population-based data from 12 countries. Pan American Health Organization.
9. Card, D., & B. Dahl, G. (2011). Family violence and football. The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 103-143.
10. Choi, E. J., & Hwang, J. (2015). hild gender and parental inputs. No more son preference in Korea? American Economic Review, 105(5), 63843.
11. Dahl, G., & Moretti, E. (2008). The demand for sons. Evidence from divorce, fertility and shotgun marriage. NBER Working Papers 10281, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
12. Erten, B., & Keskin, P. (2018). Or better or for worse?: education and the prevalence of domestic violence in Turkey. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(1), 64-105.
13. Heath, R. (2014). Women’s access to labor market opportunities, control of household resources, and domestic violence. Evidence from Bangladesh. World Development 57(C), 32-46.
14. Heise, L., & Kotsadam, A. (2015). Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence. An analysis of data from population-based surveys. The Lancet Global Health, 3(6), e332-e340.
15. Ichino, A., Lindström, E., & Viviano, E. (2011). Hidden consequences of a first-born boy for mothers. Economics Letters, Elsevier, 123(3), 274-278.
16. Jayachandran, S., & Kuziemko, I. (2011). Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1485-1538.
17. Jensen, R., & Oster, E. (2009). The power of TV: cable television and women’s status in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1057-1094.
18. Lundberg , S., & Rose, E. (2002). The Effects of Sons and Daughters on Men’s Labor Supply and Wages. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 251-268.
19. Lundberg, S. (2005). Sons, daughters, and parental behaviour. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21, 340-356.
20. Miller, A., & Segal, C. (2019). Do female officers improve law enforcement quality? Effects on crime reporting and domestic violence. The Review of Economic Studies, 86, 220-2247.
21. Rainer, H., yerberg, D., Wadsworth, J., & Wilson, T. (2013). Unemployment and domestic violence: theory and evidence. Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, 126(597), 1947-1979.
22. Somville, V. (2019). Having a daughter reduces male violence against a partner. Discussion Paper Series in Economics, 24/2019.
23. Stöckl, H., Devries, K., Rotstein, A., Abrahams, N., Campbell, J., Watts, C., & Moreno, C. G. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review. Lancet, 382(9895), 859-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61030-2
24. Tur-Prats, A. (2019). Family types and intimate partner violence. A historical perspective. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(5), 878-891.
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.