Based within Conflict: Epistemology and Politics in Feminist Ethnography
No. 35 (2019-04-01)Author(s)
-
Andrea García González
Abstract
Objective/Context: Drawing on ethnographic research on the socio-political process in the Basque Country following ETA’s cessation of violence, in this article, I first explore the importance of ethnography as a form of political practice embedded in encounters, conversations, and relationships. Secondly, I address the multiple conflicts that are inherent to ethnographic practice and how their recognition is inextricably linked to a reflexive generation of knowledge. From this foundational base, this article moves on to explore the vulnerability inherent to ethnographic practices, from fieldwork to the writing process. Methodology: My research is based on ethnographic methodology. This article explores the importance, in this methodology, of opening conflicts and awareness of vulnerability as transformative, and part of feminist politics being carried out in different areas of our lives, including the academic framework –which must be reviewed and questioned. Conclusions: In the act of ‘doing’ ethnography, we always practice politics. Politics that are feminist politics are based on doubts and contradictions, as they allow us to err and sway. Politics that seek pleasures. Politics that reflect on our incorporated privileges. Politics that promote debate. Feminist ethnographies exist precisely because they can be questioned. Feminist ethnographies open up conflicts from which knowledge circulates and expands, in connection with our bodies and emotions. Originality: This article aims to spark thoughts and questions for an ethnographic practice full of challenges. Drawing on experiential reflections, this writing entails a provocation in order to open conversations on epistemology, methodology, and politics.
References
Abu‐Lughod, Lila. 1990. “Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography?”. Women & Performance: A journal of Feminist Theory 5: 7-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07407709008571138
Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
Alison, Miranda. 2009. Women and Political Violence: Female Combatants in Ethno-National Conflict. Londres: Routledge.
Aretxaga, Begona. 1988. “The Death of Yoyes: Cultural Discourses of Gender and Politics in the Basque Country”. Critical Matrix 4 (1): 82.
Bell, Christine y CatherineO’Rourke. 2007. “Does Feminism Need a Theory of Transitional Justice? An Introductory Essay”. International Journal of Transitional Justice 1 (1): 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijm002
Behar, Ruth. 1996. The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that Breaks your Heart. Boston: Beacon Press.
Behar, Ruth y GordonDeborah, eds. 1995. Women Writing Culture. California: University of California Press.
Berry, Maya, Claudia ChávezArgüelles, ShanyaCordis, SarahIhmoud, y Elizabeth VelásquezEstrada. 2017. “Toward a Fugitive Anthropology: Gender, Race, and Violence in the Field”. Cultural Anthropology 32 (4): 537-565.
Castillejo, Alejandro. 2000. Poética de lo otro. Antropología de la guerra, la soledad y el exilio interno en Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia (Icanh) e Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (Colciencias).
Cavarero, Adriana. 2014. Relating Narratives: Storytelling and Selfhood. Londres: Routledge.
Cheldelin, Sandra y ManeshkaEliatamby, eds. 2011. Women Waging War and Peace: International Perspectives of Women’s Roles in Conflict and Post-Conflict Reconstruction. Nueva York: Continuum.
Cohn, Carol, MiriamCooke y AngelaWoollacott. 1993. Gendering War Talk. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Crang, Mike y IanCook. 1995. Doing Ethnographies. Norwich: Geobooks.
De la Rey, Cheryl y SusanMcKay. 2006. “Peacebuilding as a Gendered Process”. Journal of Social Issues 62 (1): 141-153.
Enloe, Cynthia H. 2016. “Afterword: Being Reflexively Feminist Shouldn’t Be Easy”. En Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics, editado por AnnickWibben, 258-259. Londres: Routledge.
EnloeCynthia H. 2004. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Eriksson Baaz, Maria y MariaStern. 2016. “A Methodology of Unease”. En Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics, editado por AnnickWibben, 117-140. Londres: Routledge.
Esteban, Mari Luz. 2016. “La reformulación de la política, el activismo y la etnografía. Esbozo de una antropología somática y vulnerable”. Ankulegi. Revista de Antropología Social (19): 75-93.
Federici, Silvia. 2004. Caliban and the Witch. Nueva York: Autonomedia.
Fonow, Mary Margaret y Judith A.Cook. 2005. “Feminist Methodology: New Applications in the Academy and Public Policy”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30: 2211-2236.
Fonow, Mary Margaret y Judith A.Cook, eds. 1991. Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Gaard, Greta. 2011. “Ecofeminism Revisited: Rejecting Essentialism and Re-Placing Species in a Material Feminist Environmentalism”. Feminist Formations 23: 26-53.
Garmendia Lasa, Elixabete, Gloria GonzalezKatarain, Ana GonzalezKatarain, Juli GarmendiaLasa y JuanjoDorronsoro. 2009. Yoyes, desde su ventana. Irún: Alberdania.
Giles, Wenona, Malathide Alwis, EdithKlein y NelukaSilva, eds. 2003. Feminists under Fire: Exchanges across War Zones. Toronto: Between the Lines.
Gubrium, Aline y HarperKrista. 2013. Participatory Visual and Digital Methods. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Gunaratnam, Yasmin y CarrieHamilton. 2016. “Introduction: The Wherewithal of Feminist Methods”. Feminist Review 115 (1): 1-12.
Hamilton, Carrie. 2008. “On Being a ‘Good’ Interviewer: Empathy, Ethics and the Politics of Oral History”. Oral History 1: 35-43.
Haraway, Donna. 1995. Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: la reinvención de la naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra.
Harding, Sandra G. 1987. Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues: Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hinton, Rachael, MichelleKopi, AngelaApa, AgnesSil, MaryKini, JerryKai, YannyGuman, y DaniellCowley. 2008. “The Kup Women for Peace Approach to Peacebuilding: Taking the Lead in the Papua New Guinea National Elections” Gender & Development 16 (3): 523-533.
hooks, bell. 2000. All about Love. Nueva York: Harper.
Icaza, Rosalba. 2017. “Decolonial Feminism and Global Politics: Border Thinking and Vulnerability as a Knowing otherwise”. En Developing a Critical Epistemology of Global Politics, editado por MarcWoons y SebastianWeier, 26-45. Bristol: E‐International Relations.
Icaza, Rosalba y RolandoVázquez. 2016. “The Coloniality of Gender as a Radical Critique of Developmentalism”. En The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development: Critical Engagements in Feminist Theory and Practice, editado por WendyHarcourt, 62-73. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kondo, Dorinne. 1990. Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lugones, María. 2003. Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing Coalition against Multiple Oppressions. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Little, Adrian. 2012. “Rhetorics of Reconciliation: Shifting Conflict Paradigms in Northern Ireland”. En Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution & Repair, editado por Alexander KellerHirsch, 81-94. Nueva York: Routledge.
Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister Outsider. Nueva York: Crossing Press Berkeley.
Lorentzen, Louis Ann y JenniferTurpin, eds. 1998. The Women and War Reader. Nueva York: New York University Press.
Melandri, Manuela. 2009. “Gender and Reconciliation in Post-Conflict Societies: The Dilemmas of Responding to Large-Scale Sexual Violence”. International Public Policy Review 5 (1): 4-27.
Mendia Azkue, Irantzu. 2012. Justicia transicional: dilemas y crítica feminista. Bilbao: Hegoa.
Mendia Azkue, Irantzu, Gloria GuzmánOrellana e Iker ZirionLandaluze. 2012. Género y Justicia Transicional: movimientos de mujeres contra la impunidad. Bilbao: Hegoa.
Milán, Librería de Mujeres de. 1996. “El final del patriarcado (ha ocurrido y no por casualidad)”. El Viejo Topo. 96: 46-59.
Moosa, Zohra, MaryamRahmani y LeeWebster. 2013. “From the Private to the Public Sphere: New Research on Women’s Participation in Peace-Building”. Gender & Development 21 (3): 453-472.
Moser, Caroline O. N. y Fiona C.Clark, eds. 2001. Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict, and Political Violence. Londres: Zed Books.
Naples, Nancy A. 2003. Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist Research. Nueva York: Routledge.
Narayan, Kirin. 1993. “How Native is a “Native” Anthropologist?” American Anthropologist 95: 671-686.
Nkuuhe, Jessica B. 2013. “Women Armed Conflict and Peacebuilding in Uganda”. Women’s World 37: 33-39.
Page, Tiffany. 2017. “Vulnerable Writing as a Feminist Methodological Practice”. Feminist Review 115 (1): 13-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0028-0
Pérez-Bustos, Tania. 2017. “‘No es sólo una cuestión de lenguaje’: lo inaudible de los estudios feministas latino-americanos en el mundo académico anglosajón”. Scientiae Studia 15 (1): 59-72.
Pérez Orozco, Amaia. 2014. Subversión feminista de la economía. Aportes para un debate sobre el conflicto capital-vida. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
Porter, Elisabeth. 2007. Peacebuilding: Women in International Perspective. Londres: Routledge.
Segato, Rita Laura. 2016. La guerra contra las mujeres. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
Sørensen, Birgitte. 1998. Women and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Issues and Sources. Ginebra: Diane Publishing.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” En Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, editador por CaryNelson y LawrenceGrossberg, 271–313. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
Stacey, Judith. 1991. “Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography?” En Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History, editado por Sherna BergerGluck y Daphne, 111-119. Nueva York: Routledge.
Strickland, Richard y NataDuvvury. 2003. Gender Equity and Peacebuilding. From Rhetoric to Reality: Finding the Way. Washington, D. C.: International Centre for Research on Women (ICRW).
Tedlock, Barbara. 1995. “Works and Wives: On the Sexual Division of Textual Labor”. Women Writing Culture, editado por RuthBehar y Deborah A.Gordon, 267-286. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Tickner, J. Ann. 2005. “What is your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions”. International Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 1-21.
Wibben, Annick T. R., ed. 2016. Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics. Londres: Routledge.