Ontologies Wrapped. Concepts and Practices Concerning Textile Bundles among the Maya
No. 37 (2019-10-01)Author(s)
-
Daniel Grecco PachecoEscuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia (ENAH), México
Abstract
Objective/context: In this article I propose to analyze the sacred wrappings and the concept of wrapping among the Maya, based on the use of the ontological theoretical framework present in anthropology and archaeology. Two examples of a possibility of such an approach are presented for the study of the textile wrappings present in the Mayan and Mesoamerican territories, from the concept of relational ontologies and by means of native conceptions and theories. With this, we seek to conceptually define the ceremonial bundles based on notions of Mayan thought itself. Methodology: Based on an analysis of ethnographic data, I reflect on the notions of pixan (souls) and pix (wrapping something) in order to approach the concept of wrapping that defines ceremonial bundles. Thus, the two cases that exemplify such reflections are the Martín Bundle, patron and protector of a Tz’utujil community of Lake Santiago Atitlán in Guatemala, and the image of a ceremonial bundle in a scene of enthronement in the Tablero del Palacio de Palenque in Chiapas, Mexico. Conclusions: With the examples presented, I propose to think of the bundles as elements that protect and give a materiality to the pixanes of the other world when they are present in the ordinary world. As such, the wrapping would function as a body for another form of existence in the first example, and as an element of protection for powerful objects, which ends up breeding a relational field between such artifacts as a whole, as presented in the second case. Originality: I hope with this initial reflection to contribute to a discussion about the use of the ontological theoretical framework in the study of archaeological and ethnographic materials in the Mayan area, based on reflections on concepts proper to these peoples.
References
Alberti, Benjamin. 2016. “Archaeologies of Ontology”. The Annual Review of Anthropology 45: 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095858
Alberti, Benjamin e YvonneMarshall. 2009. “Animating Archaeology: Local Theories and Conceptually Open-Ended Methodologies”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19 (3): 344-356. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000535
Aristóteles. 2011. Metafísica. Ciudad de México: Editorial Porrúa.
Arnold, Denise. 2007. Hilos sueltos: los Andes desde el textil. La Paz: Plural Editores.
Astor Aguilera, Miguel Angel. 2010. The Maya World of Communicating Objects. Quadripartite Crosses, Trees, and Stones. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Ayala Falcón, Maricela. 2002. El bulto ritual de mundo perdido, Tikal. Ciudad de México: Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, UNAM.
Barrera Vásquez, Alfredo, dir. 1980. Diccionario maya Cordemex maya-español; español-maya. Mérida: Ediciones Cordemex.
Bassett, Molly. 2015. The Fate of Earthly Things. Aztec Gods and God-Bodies. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Brown Vega, Margaret. 2015. “Ritual Practices and Wrapped Objects: Unpacking Prehispanic Andean Sacred Bundles”. Journal of Material Culture 21 (2): 223-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183515610135
Bubba, Cristina. 1997. “Los rituales a los vestidos de María Titiqhawa, Juana Palla y otros fundadores del ayllu de Coroma”. En Saberes y memorias en los Andes, editado por Therese BouysseCassagne, 377-400. Lima: Credal-IFEA.
Carmack, Robert. 1981. The Quiché Maya of Utatlán. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Carrithers, Michael, MateiCandea, KarenSykes, MartinHolbraad y SoumhyaVenkatesan. 2010. “Ontology is just another Word for Culture: Motion Tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester”. Critique of Anthropology 30 (2): 152-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X09364070
Chauí, Marilena. 2003. Convite à filosofia. São Paulo: Ática.
Christenson, Allen. 2006. “Sacred Bundle Cults in Highland Guatemala”. En Sacred Bundles. Ritual Acts of Wrapping and Binding in Mesoamerica, editado por JuliaGuernsey y Kent F.Reilly, 226-246. Barnardsville: Boundary End Archaeology Research Center.
Coe, William. 1965. “Tikal, Guatemala, and Emergent Maya Civilization”. Science 147: 1401-1419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.147.3664.1401
De la Garza, Mercedes, Guillermo BernalRomero y Martha CuevasGarcía. 2016. Palenque-Lakamha’: una presencia inmortal del pasado indígena. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
De Munter, Koen. 2016. “Ontología relacional y cosmopraxis, desde los Andes. Visitar y conmemorar entre familias aymara”. Chungara. Revista de Antropología Chilena 48 (4): 629-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-73562016005000030
Descola, Philippe. 2005. Más allá de naturaleza y cultura. Buenos Aires y Madrid: Amorrortu Editores.
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.
González-Abrisketa, Olatz y SuzanaCarro-Ripalda. 2016. “La apertura ontológica de la antropología contemporánea”. Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares 71 (1): 101-128. https://doi.org/10.3989/rdtp.2016.01.003
GuernseyJulia y Kent F.Reilly. 2006. Sacred Bundles. Ritual Acts of Wrapping and Binding in Mesoamerica. Barnardsville: Boundary end Archaeology Research Center.
Hermann Lejarazu, Manuel. 2008. “Religiosidad y bultos sagrados en la Mixteca prehispánica”. Desacatos 27: 75-94.
Herva, Vesa-Pekka. 2009. “Living (with) Things: Relational Ontology and Material Culture in Early Modern Nothern Finland”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19 (3): 388-397. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000572
Holbraad, Martin y Morten AxelPedersen. 2017. The Ontological Turn. An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingold, Tim. 2017. Estar vivo. Ensaios sobre movimento, conhecimento e descrição. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.
Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. An Anthropology of the Moderns, traducido por CatherinePorter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2009. Jamais fomos modernos, traducido por Carlos Irineu daCosta. São Paulo: Editora34.
López Austin, Alfredo. 1973. Hombre-dios: religión y política en el mundo náhuatl. Ciudad de México: Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, UNAM.
López Campeny, Sara Maria Luisa. 2014. “The Agency of Textile Technology in some Archaeological Ritual Contexts of Northwest Argentina”. Journal of Anthropology and Archaeology 2 (2): 39-75. https://doi.org/10.15640/jaa.v2n2a3
McAnany, Patricia. 1995. Living with the Ancestors. Kinship and Kingship in Ancient Maya Society. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Mendelson, E. Michael. 1958. “170. A Guatemalan Sacred Bundle”. Man 58: 121-126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2796271
Olivier, Guilhem. 2007. “Sacred Bundles, Arrows, and New Fire. Foundation and Power in the Mapa de Cuauhtinchan”. En Cave, City, and Eagle’s Nest: An Interpretive Journey through the Mapa de Cuauhtinchan, editado por DavidCarrasco y ScottSessions, 281-313. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
O’Neil, Megan. 2012. Engaging Ancient Maya Sculpture at Piedras Negras, Guatemala. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Pellini, José Roberto. 2018. Senses, Affects and Archaeology: Changing the Heart, the Mind, and the Pants. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Pitarch, Pedro. 2018. “A linha da dobra. Ensaio de cosmologia mesoamericana”. Mana 24 (1): 131-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-49442018v24n1p131
Pitarch, Pedro. 2013. La cara oculta del pliegue. Ensayos de antropología indígena. Ciudad de México: Artes de México.
Reents-Budet, Dorie. 2006. “Power Material in Ancient Mesoamerica: The Roles of Cloth among the Classic Maya”. En Sacred Bundles. Ritual Acts of Wrapping and Binding in Mesoamerica, editado por JuliaGuernsey y Kent F.Reilly, 105-126. Barnardsville: Boundary end Archaeology Research Center.
Schele, Linda y JeffreyMiller. 1983. The Mirror, the Rabbit, and the Bundle: Accession Expressions from the Classic Maya Inscriptions. Washington D. C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
Souriau, Étienne. 2009. Les différents modes d’existence. París: Presses universitaires de France.
Strathern, Marilyn. 2014. O efeito etnográfico. São Paulo: Cosac Naify.
Uexkull, Jakob von. (1934) 1992. “A Stroll through the Worlds of Animals and Men: A Picture Book of Invisible Worlds”. Semiotica 89 (4): 319-391. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1992.89.4.319
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2015. Metafísicas Canibais: elementos para uma antropologia pós-estrutural. São Paulo: Cosac Naify.
Zedeño, Maria Nieves. 2013. “Methodological and Analytical Challenges in Relational Archaeologies: A View from the Hunting Ground”. En Relational Archaeologies, editado por ChristopherWatts, 117-134. Londres: Routledge.
Zedeño, Maria Nieves. 2009. “Animating by Association: Index Object and Relational Taxonomies”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9 (3): 407-417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000596
Zedeño, Maria Nieves. 2008. “Bundled Worlds: The Roles an Interactions of Complex Objects from the North American Plains”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15: 362-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-008-9058-4
Zorn, Elayne. 1984. “Textiles in Herders’ Ritual Bundles of Macusani, Peru”. En The Junius B. Bird Conference, on Andean Textiles, April 7th and 8th, 1984, editado por WilliamConklin, 289-307. Dumbarton Oaks y Washington D. C.: Textile Museum y Trustees for Harvard University.