Sensorially Different Realities: Methodological and Ethical Reflections on Fieldwork in a Deaf Community
No. 47 (2022-04-01)Author(s)
-
Ana Carolina Palma-GarcíaInvestigadora independiente, Colombia
Abstract
Supported by an ethnography conducted between 2018 and 2019 with people —mainly from the Deaf Association of Cali— participating in a deaf community and culture in Cali, this article discusses the relevance of adapting the recording and investigative writing methods to the populations with whom we work. On the one hand, it explores ethnographic methodologies situated within broader discussions related to the anthropology of the senses, sensory ethnography, the problem of representation, the politics of transcription and the use of drawings as a methodological tool. On the other hand, this article gathers ethical reflections on consent, approach, sensitivity to the context, and the positioning assumed in the field, by choosing to position myself not only as an anthropologist or sociologist, but also as a hard of hearing woman. Thus, it is argued that a correct prior reading of the context of the population to be studied enables the construction of methodological and ethical designs that not only actively avoid reproducing denounced historical violence —such as epistemic violence—, but also provide entry points, readings, and analyses that prioritize local and personal experiences of existence, emerging categories, and the body as potential data to understand them. The article presents the ethical and methodological decisions involved in a study conducted from the perspective of an insider ethnographer, focusing on the social, political, and cultural aspects of Deafhood. It is precisely in the exploration of new intersectional and sensorially diverse perspectives that challenge the traditional ableist readings that this text intends to spark the debate on these collective identities that negotiate their existence within the framework of multiculturalism as a stage for the consolidation of enforceable rights.
References
Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2008. “Writing against Culture”. En The Cultural Geography Reader, editado por TimothyOakes y Patricia L.Price, 50-59. Londres: Routledge.
Almeida, María Eugenia, AlfonsinaAngelino, MariaEugenia Fernández, EstebanKipen, AarónLipschitz, AgustinaSpadillero e IndianaVallejos. 2011. “La construcción del discapacitado como otro, entre la diferencia de lo que falta y la diversidad de lo que abunda”, (en línea): 1-11. Argentina: Facultad de Trabajo Social. https://docplayer.es/13555901-La-construccion-del-discapacitado-como-otro-entre-la-diferencia-de-loque-falta-y-la-diversidad-de-lo-que-abunda.html
Álvarez, Arturo. 1994. “La invención del método etnográfico: reflexiones sobre el trabajo de campo de Malinowski en Melanesia”. Antropología: Revista de Pensamiento Antropológico y Estudios Etnográficos 7 (en línea). https://www.ugr.es/~aalvarez/observadorcultural/Documentos/Alvarez_1995_esp.pdf
Berbrier, Mitch. 2002. “Making Minorities: Cultural Space, Stigma Transformation Frames, and the Categorical Status Claims of Deaf, Gay, and White Supremacist Activists in Late Twentieth Century America”. Sociological Forum 17 (4): 553-591. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021025307028
Bucholtz, Mary. 2000. “The Politics of Transcription”. Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1439-1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00094-6
Burgos Romero, Carol y Carlos IvánMaldonado Gómez. s. f. “Sordo marica ¿y qué? Un análisis a prácticas performativas en cuerpos no hegemónicos”. Buenos Aires: Escuela Interdisciplinaria de Altos Estudios Sociales (Idaes). http://www.idaes.edu.ar/pdf_papeles/8-15%20sordo%20marica%20y%20que.pdf
Cavalcante Carvalho, Alana Micaelle. 2018. “Discriminación interseccional: concepto y consecuencias en la incidencia de violencia sexual contra mujeres con discapacidad”. Journal of Feminist, Gender and Women Studies 7: 15-25. https://doi.org/10.15366/jfgws2018.7.002
Classen, Constance. 2010. “Foundations for an Anthropology of the Senses”. International Social Science Journal 49 (153): 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.1997.tb00032.x
Colic-Peisker, Val. 2004. “Doing Ethnography in ‘One’s Own Ethnic Community’”. En Anthropologists in the Field: Cases in Participant Observation, editado por LynneHume y JaneMulcock, 82-94. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 2002. “Documento para o encontro de especialistas em aspectos da discriminação racial relativos ao gênero”. Revista de Estudos Feministas 10 (1): 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2002000100011
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Legal Forum.
Cuevas, Hernán. 2013. “El gobierno de los sordos: el dispositivo educacional”. Revista de Ciencia Política 33 (3): 693-713. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2013000300006
Davis, Lennard J.1997. “Constructing Normalcy: The Bell Curve, the Novel, and the Invention of the Disabled Body in the Nineteenth Century”. En The Disabilities Studies Reader, editado por Lennard J.Davis, 3-16. Nueva York: Routledge.
Friedner, Michele y KarenWeingarten. 2016. “Disability as Diversity: A New Biopolitics”. Somatosphere. Science, Medicine and Anthropology (en línea). https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1149&context=qc_pubs
García, Carlos. 2017. “La percepción participante como una herramienta metodológica feminista: Una aplicación a los estudios de género”. Revista de Antropología Iberoameriana 12 (2): 125-146. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/623/62352859003.pdf
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. Nueva York: Basic Books.
Ginsburg, Faye y RaynaRapp. 2013. “Disability Worlds”. Annual Review of Anthropology 42: 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155502
Gómez Bernal, Vanessa. 2014. “Análisis de la discapacidad desde una mirada crítica: las aportaciones de las teorías feministas”. Estudios Pedagógicos 40 (2): 391-407. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052014000300023
Guber, Rosana. 2011. La etnografía: método, campo y reflexividad. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI Editores.
Hoffmann-Dilloway, Erika. 2010. “Many Names for Mother: The Ethno-Linguistic Politics of Deafness in Nepal”. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 33 (3): 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2010.520652
Hyde, Merv y DesPower. 2006. “Some Ethical Dimensions of Cochlear Implantation for Deaf Children and Their Families”. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11 (1): 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enj009
Kumari Campbell, Fiona. 2009. Contours of Ableism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230245181
Kumari Campbell, Fiona. 2008. “Exploring Internalized Ableism Using Critical Race Theory”. Disability & Society 23 (2): 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701841190
La Barbera, MariaCaterina.2016. “Interseccionalidad, un ‘concepto viajero’: orígenes, desarrollo e implementación en la Unión Europea”. Interdisciplina 4 (8): 105-122. http://computo.ceiich.unam.mx/webceiich/docs/revis/interV4-N08.pdf
Ladd, Paddy. 2011. Comprendiendo la cultura Sorda: en busca de la Sordedad. Concepción: Consejo Nacional de la Cultura y las Artes; Fondo Nacional de Fomento del Libro y la Lectura.
López, Luz Mary y LauraTabares. 2018. “Aspectos éticos a tener en cuenta al investigar la comunidad Sorda”. En 3er Foro de filosofía. Perspectivas Éticas Actuales, 61-65. Pereira: Instituto Comfamiliar Risaralda. https://www.comfamiliar.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/RevistaFORO-compressed.pdf
Makkonen, LL. M. Timo.2002. Multiple, Compound and Intersectional Discrimination: Bringing the Experiences of the Most Marginalized to the Fore. Finlandia: Institute for Human Rights; Abo Akademi University. https://www.tandis.odihr.pl/bitstream/20.500.12389/20334/1/05091.pdf
Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1922) 1986. Los argonautas del Pacífico Occidental. Barcelona: Península.
Mauldin, Laura. 2014. “Precarious Plasticity: Neuropolitics, Cochlear Implants, and the Redefinition of Deafness”. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39 (1): 130-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913512538
Morales, Gina Viviana.2015. “Diversidad auditiva: imaginarios sociales e inclusión laboral: una aproximación intercultural”. Psicogente 18 (34): 357-64. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0124-01372015000200010
Oviedo, Alejandro. 2006. “El 2do. Congreso Internacional de Maestros de Sordomudos, celebrado en Milán, Italia, del 6 al 11 de Septiembre de 1880”. Cultura Sorda. https://cultura-sorda.org/el-2do-congreso-internacional-de-maestros-de-sordomudosmilan-1880/
Palma-García, Ana Carolina. 2019. “La reivindicación del silencio: una etnografía sobre experiencias y políticas de la Sordedad en Cali”. Tesis de pregrado en Antropología, Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Icesi, Cali. http://repository.icesi.edu.co/biblioteca_digital/handle/10906/86866
Palma-García, Ana Carolina y VanesaEscobar-Ospina. 2016. “Pensar la inclusión: resignificando a las personas sordas”. Trans-pasando Fronteras 10: 77-95. https://doi.org/10.18046/retf.i10.2384
Pink, Sarah. 2009. About Doing Sensory Ethnography. Londres; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Sierralta Aracena, Vianney. 2013. “Violencia de género desde una perspectiva sorda”. Cultura Sorda (en línea). https://cultura-sorda.org/violencia-de-genero-desde-unaperspectiva-sorda/
Skliar, Carlos. 1998. “Bilingüismo y biculturalismo: un análisis sobre las narrativas tradicionales en la educación de los sordos”. Revista Brasileira de Educação (8): 44-57. https://www.academia.edu/31454250/BILING%C3%9CISMO_Y_BICULTURALISMO_UN_AN%C3%81LISIS_SOBRE_LAS_NARRATIVAS_TRADICIONALES_EN_LA_EDUCACI%C3%93N_DE_LOS_SORDOS
Skliar, Carlos. 1997. Una mirada sobre los nuevos movimientos pedagógicos en la educación de los sordos. Porto Alegre: Editora Mediaçáo.
Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?”. En Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, editado por CariNelson y LawrenceGrossberg, 271-313. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.