Partidismo gubernamental en los sistemas presidenciales. Una estrategia de análisis
No. 120 (2024-10-09)Autor/a(es/as)
-
Marcelo CamerloInstituto de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Lisboa (Portugal)
-
Luis Bernardo Mejía GuinandUniversidad de los Andes (Colombia)
Resumen
Objetivo/contexto: a partir de una definición consistente con el modelo de gobierno de partido, este artículo presenta una tipología flexible para categorizar y clasificar variantes de partidismo en los presidencialismos de coalición latinoamericanos. Metodología: se propone una estrategia de medición que, a partir de los supuestos del partidismo gubernamental, permite representar el vínculo individual-organizacional de un ministro en términos de: comprometido, eventualmente consolidado y jerárquico. Mediante la tipología se puede medir el concepto de partidismo gubernamental de manera nominal, ordinal y dicotómica. Conclusiones: la estrategia de medición hace posible observar un rango de variación de partidismo importante en los presidencialismos de coalición latinoamericanos. De forma adicional, ofrece luces en la comprensión de cómo los presidentes deciden sobre la composición de su gabinete. Originalidad: se sugiere un enfoque innovador para categorizar y clasificar variantes de partidismo en el Gobierno.
Referencias
Alexiadou, Despina. 2015. “Ideologues, Partisans and Loyalists: Cabinet Ministers and Social Welfare Reform in Parliamentary Democracies”. Comparative Political Studies 48 (8): 1051-1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015574880
Amorim Neto, Octavio y Kaare Strøm. 2006. “Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Non-partisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies”. British Journal of Political Science 36 (4): 619-643. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123406000330
Andeweg, Rudolf Bastiaan. 2000. “Political Recruitment and Party Government”. En The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective, editado por Jean Blondel y Maurizio Cotta, 119-140. Londres: St. Martin’s Press. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/27467
Blondel Jean. 1985. Government Ministers in the Contemporary World. Londres: Sage. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/27454
Camerlo, Marcelo y Antonino Castaldo. 2024. “Government Partisans: A Practical Typology”. Party Politics 30 (3): 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231159862
Camerlo, Marcelo y María Eugenia Coutinho. 2019. “Ministros y afiliación partidaria: propuesta metodológica aplicada al caso argentino”. América Latina Hoy 81: 99-118. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh20198199118
Camerlo, Marcelo y Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo. 2018. “Government Formation and Minister Turnover”. En Presidential Cabinets. Comparative Analysis in the Americas, editado por Marcelo Camerlo y Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo, 1-20. Londres; Nueva York: Routledge. http://hdl.handle.net/10451/31851
Camerlo, Marcelo y Aníbal Pérez-Liñán. 2015. “The Politics of Minister Retention in Presidential Systems”. Comparative Politics 47 (3): 315-333. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041515814709310
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1971. “The Cabinet and the Tecnico in Mexico and the United States”. Administration and Society 3 (2): 188-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977100300203
Carreras, Miguel. 2012. “The Rise of Outsiders in Latin America, 1980-2010: An Institutionalist Perspective”. Comparative Political Studies 45 (12): 1451-1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012445753
Castaldo, Antonino y Luca Verzichelli. 2023. “Behind the Technocratic Challenge: Old and New Alternatives to Party Government in Italy”. International Political Science Review 0 (0). https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121231216438
Cotta, Maurizio. 1991. Conclusión de The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe, editado por Jean Blondel y Jean Louis Thiébault, 174-198. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/27503
Cotta, Maurizio. 2000. “Defining Party and Government”. En The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective, editado por Jean Blondel y Maurizio Cotta, 56-95. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977330_4
De Winter, Lieven. 1991. “Parliamentary and Party Pathways to the Cabinet”. En The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe, editado por Jean Blondel y Jean Louis Thiébault, 44-69. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/27503
Domínguez, Jorge I., ed. 1997. Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X98285026
Dowding, Keith y Patrick Dumont. 2009. The Selection of Ministers in Europe. Londres; Nueva York: Routledge.
Dowding, Keith y Patrick Dumont. 2015. The Selection of Ministers around the World. Londres; Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757865
Fearon John. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance”. En Democracy, Accountability and Representation, editado por Adam Przeworski, Susan Stokes y Bernard Manin, 55-97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175104
Gallagher, Michael, Michael Laver y Peter Mair. 2011. Representative Government in Modern Europe. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill Education. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/16654
Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Katz, Richard. 1986. “Party Government: A Rationalistic Conception”. En Visions and Realities of Party Government, editado por Francis G. Castles y Rudolf Wildenmann, 31-71. Berlín: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110904000
Katz Richard. 1987. “Party Government and Its Alternatives”. En Party Governments: European and American Experiences, editado por Richard Katz, 1-26. Berlín; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110900255
Katz, Richard y Peter Mair. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party”. Party Politics 1 (1): 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001
Lijphart, Arend. 2013. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven; Londres: Yale University Press.
Lindberg, Staffan I., Nils Düpont, Masaaki Higashijima et al. 2022. “Codebook Varieties of Party Identity and Organization (V-Party) V2”. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vpartydsv2
Linz, Juan. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism”. Journal of Democracy 1 (1): 51-69. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/225694
Mair, Peter. 2008. “The Challenge to Party Government”. West European Politics 31 (1-2): 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701835033
Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia y Petra Schleiter. 2014. “Choosing Whom to Trust: Agency Risks and Cabinet Partisanship in Presidential Democracies”. Comparative Political Studies 48 (2): 231-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014544361
McDonnell, Duncan y Marco Valbruzzi. 2014. “Defining and Classifying Technocrat-Led and Technocratic Governments”. European Journal of Political Research 53 (4): 654-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12054
Real-Dato, José y Juan Rodríguez-Teruel. 2016. “Politicians, Experts or Both? Democratic Delegation and Junior Ministers in Spain”. Acta Politica 51 (4): 492-516. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2016.6
Rose, Richard. 1974. The Problem of Party Government. Londres: Macmillan.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Londres: Macmillan.
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Marcelo Camerlo, Luis Bernardo Mejía Guinand

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.