Colombia Internacional

Colomb. int. | eISSN 1900-6004 | ISSN 0121-5612

Partidismo gubernamental en los sistemas presidenciales. Una estrategia de análisis

No. 120 (2024-10-09)
  • Marcelo Camerlo
    Instituto de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Lisboa (Portugal)
  • Luis Bernardo Mejía Guinand
    Universidad de los Andes (Colombia)

Resumen

Objetivo/contexto: a partir de una definición consistente con el modelo de gobierno de partido, este artículo presenta una tipología flexible para categorizar y clasificar variantes de partidismo en los presidencialismos de coalición latinoamericanos. Metodología: se propone una estrategia de medición que, a partir de los supuestos del partidismo gubernamental, permite representar el vínculo individual-organizacional de un ministro en términos de: comprometido, eventualmente consolidado y jerárquico. Mediante la tipología se puede medir el concepto de partidismo gubernamental de manera nominal, ordinal y dicotómica. Conclusiones: la estrategia de medición hace posible observar un rango de variación de partidismo importante en los presidencialismos de coalición latinoamericanos. De forma adicional, ofrece luces en la comprensión de cómo los presidentes deciden sobre la composición de su gabinete. Originalidad: se sugiere un enfoque innovador para categorizar y clasificar variantes de partidismo en el Gobierno.

Palabras clave: modelo de gobierno partido, variantes de partidismo, estrategia de medición, presidencialismo

Referencias

Alexiadou, Despina. 2015. “Ideologues, Partisans and Loyalists: Cabinet Ministers and Social Welfare Reform in Parliamentary Democracies”. Comparative Political Studies 48 (8): 1051-1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015574880

Amorim Neto, Octavio y Kaare Strøm. 2006. “Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Non-partisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies”. British Journal of Political Science 36 (4): 619-643. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123406000330

Andeweg, Rudolf Bastiaan. 2000. “Political Recruitment and Party Government”. En The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective, editado por Jean Blondel y Maurizio Cotta, 119-140. Londres: St. Martin’s Press. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/27467

Blondel Jean. 1985. Government Ministers in the Contemporary World. Londres: Sage. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/27454

Camerlo, Marcelo y Antonino Castaldo. 2024. “Government Partisans: A Practical Typology”. Party Politics 30 (3): 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231159862

Camerlo, Marcelo y María Eugenia Coutinho. 2019. “Ministros y afiliación partidaria: propuesta metodológica aplicada al caso argentino”. América Latina Hoy 81: 99-118. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh20198199118

Camerlo, Marcelo y Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo. 2018. “Government Formation and Minister Turnover”. En Presidential Cabinets. Comparative Analysis in the Americas, editado por Marcelo Camerlo y Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo, 1-20. Londres; Nueva York: Routledge. http://hdl.handle.net/10451/31851

Camerlo, Marcelo y Aníbal Pérez-Liñán. 2015. “The Politics of Minister Retention in Presidential Systems”. Comparative Politics 47 (3): 315-333. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041515814709310

Camp, Roderic Ai. 1971. “The Cabinet and the Tecnico in Mexico and the United States”. Administration and Society 3 (2): 188-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977100300203

Carreras, Miguel. 2012. “The Rise of Outsiders in Latin America, 1980-2010: An Institutionalist Perspective”. Comparative Political Studies 45 (12): 1451-1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012445753

Castaldo, Antonino y Luca Verzichelli. 2023. “Behind the Technocratic Challenge: Old and New Alternatives to Party Government in Italy”. International Political Science Review 0 (0). https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121231216438

Cotta, Maurizio. 1991. Conclusión de The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe, editado por Jean Blondel y Jean Louis Thiébault, 174-198. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/27503

Cotta, Maurizio. 2000. “Defining Party and Government”. En The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective, editado por Jean Blondel y Maurizio Cotta, 56-95. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977330_4

De Winter, Lieven. 1991. “Parliamentary and Party Pathways to the Cabinet”. En The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe, editado por Jean Blondel y Jean Louis Thiébault, 44-69. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/27503

Domínguez, Jorge I., ed. 1997. Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X98285026

Dowding, Keith y Patrick Dumont. 2009. The Selection of Ministers in Europe. Londres; Nueva York: Routledge.

Dowding, Keith y Patrick Dumont. 2015. The Selection of Ministers around the World. Londres; Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757865

Fearon John. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance”. En Democracy, Accountability and Representation, editado por Adam Przeworski, Susan Stokes y Bernard Manin, 55-97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175104

Gallagher, Michael, Michael Laver y Peter Mair. 2011. Representative Government in Modern Europe. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill Education. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/16654

Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Katz, Richard. 1986. “Party Government: A Rationalistic Conception”. En Visions and Realities of Party Government, editado por Francis G. Castles y Rudolf Wildenmann, 31-71. Berlín: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110904000

Katz Richard. 1987. “Party Government and Its Alternatives”. En Party Governments: European and American Experiences, editado por Richard Katz, 1-26. Berlín; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110900255

Katz, Richard y Peter Mair. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party”. Party Politics 1 (1): 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001

Lijphart, Arend. 2013. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven; Londres: Yale University Press.

Lindberg, Staffan I., Nils Düpont, Masaaki Higashijima et al. 2022. “Codebook Varieties of Party Identity and Organization (V-Party) V2”. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vpartydsv2

Linz, Juan. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism”. Journal of Democracy 1 (1): 51-69. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/225694

Mair, Peter. 2008. “The Challenge to Party Government”. West European Politics 31 (1-2): 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701835033

Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia y Petra Schleiter. 2014. “Choosing Whom to Trust: Agency Risks and Cabinet Partisanship in Presidential Democracies”. Comparative Political Studies 48 (2): 231-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014544361

McDonnell, Duncan y Marco Valbruzzi. 2014. “Defining and Classifying Technocrat-Led and Technocratic Governments”. European Journal of Political Research 53 (4): 654-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12054

Real-Dato, José y Juan Rodríguez-Teruel. 2016. “Politicians, Experts or Both? Democratic Delegation and Junior Ministers in Spain”. Acta Politica 51 (4): 492-516. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2016.6

Rose, Richard. 1974. The Problem of Party Government. Londres: Macmillan.

Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Londres: Macmillan.

Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2024 Marcelo Camerlo, Luis Bernardo Mejía Guinand

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.