Palabras clave
centralidad
grado
éxito legislativo
copatrocinio
Categorías
Cómo citar
Resumen
Objetivo: este estudio examina la influencia de las medidas de centralidad de los diputados en la probabilidad de éxito de las iniciativas de ley en la LXIII Legislatura de la Cámara de Diputados en México (2015-2018). Metodología: al analizar los copatrocinios y suscripciones de las iniciativas legislativas, construimos una red y estimamos diferentes medidas de centralidad. Posteriormente, utilizamos modelos de regresión logística para evaluar el efecto de estas variables sobre la probabilidad de aprobación de la iniciativa. Conclusiones: nuestros hallazgos sugieren que los legisladores con un alto número de conexiones, medido por grado-salidas, son más propensos a ver aprobadas sus iniciativas. Esto se debe a las relaciones recíprocas que surgen de apoyar los proyectos de otros legisladores. Originalidad: nuestros resultados, obtenidos a partir de 5.275 observaciones, ofrecen nuevas perspectivas sobre la influencia de las conexiones del legislador y el éxito de sus iniciativas, y añaden a la comprensión existente del Poder Legislativo mexicano.
Citas
Alemán, Eduardo y Ernesto Calvo. 2008. “Analyzing Legislative Success in Latin America: The Case of Democratic Argentina”. En New Voices in the Study of Democracy in Latin America, editado por Guillermo O’Donnell, Joseph Tulchin y Augusto Varas, 7-37. Washington, D. C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Alemán, Eduardo y Ernesto Calvo. 2013. “Explaining Policy Ties in Presidential Congresses: A Network Analysis of Bill Initiation Data”. Political Studies 61 (2): 356-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00964.x
Alemán, Eduardo y Paula Clerici. 2022. “Centralidad y productividad legislativa en la Cámara de Diputados argentina, 1983-2019”. Revista de Ciencia Política 42 (1): 31-53. http://ojs.uc.cl/index.php/rcp/article/view/50387
Anderson, William, Janet Box-Steffensmeier y Valeria Sinclair-Chapman. 2003. “The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives”. Legislative Studies Quarterly 38 (3): 357-386. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298003X200926
Arnold, Laura W., Rebecca E. Deen y Samuel C. Patterson. 2000. “Friendship and Votes: The Impact of Interpersonal Ties on Legislative Decision Making”. State and Local Government Review 32 (2): 142-147. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4355260
Austen-Smith, David. 1993. “Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes”. American Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 799-833. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111575
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Nueva York, NY: Basic Books.
Bárcena, Sergio. 2017. “Involucramiento legislativo sin reelección: la productividad de los diputados federales en México 1985-2015”. Política y Gobierno 24 (1): 45-79. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=60349190003
Béjar, Luisa. 2012. “¿Quién legisla en México? Descentralización y proceso legislativo”. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 74 (4): 619-667. http://revistamexicanadesociologia.unam.mx/index.php/rms/article/view/34446
Bonacich, Phillip. 1972. “Factoring and Weighting Approaches to Status Scores and Clique Identification”. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2 (1): 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
Borgatti, Stephen P., Martin G. Everett y Jeffrey Johnson. 2018. Analyzing Social Networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bratton, Kathleen A. y Kerry L. Haynie. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race”. Journal of Politics 61: 658-679. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647822
Bratton, Kathleen y Stella Rouse. 2011. “Networks in the Legislative Arena: How Group Dynamics Affect Cosponsorship”. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (3): 423-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00021.x
Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Caldeira, Gregory A. y Samuel C. Patterson. 1987. “Political Friendship and the Legislative”. The Journal of Politics 49 (2): 953-975. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130779
Caldeira, Gregory A. y Samuel C. Patterson. 1988. “Contours of Friendship and Respect in the Legislature”. American Politics Quarterly 16 (84): 466-485. https://doi.org/10.1177/004478088016004004
Calvo, Ernesto. 2014. Legislator Success in Fragmented Congresses in Argentina. Plurality Cartels, Minority Presidents, and Lawmaking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Cho, Tam Wendy K. y James H. Fowler. 2010. “Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation”. The Journal of Politics 72 (1):124-135. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002238160999051x
Clauset, Aaron, M. E. J. Newman y Cristopher Moore. 2004. “Finding Community Structure in Very Large Networks”. Physical Review E 70 (5): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
Cohen, Lauren y Christopher J. Malloy. 2014. “Friends in High Places”. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6 (3): 63-91. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43189392
Cox Gary y Mathew McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.
Cox Gary y William C. Terry. 2008. “Legislative Productivity in the 93d–105th Congresses”. Legislative Studies Quarterly 33 (4): 603-618. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298008786403123
Craig, A. W. 2017. “Policy Collaboration in the United States Congress”. Tesis de doctorado, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Csardi, Gabor y Tamas Nepusz. 2006. “The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research”. InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695. https://igraph.org
Desmarais, Bruce A., Vincent G. Moscardelli, Brian F. Schaffner y Michael S. Kowal. 2015. “Measuring Legislative Collaboration: The Senate Press Events Network”. Social Networks 40: 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.07.006
Dockendorff, Andrés. 2020. “Why Are Some Parliamentarians’ Bills More Likely to Progress? Sponsorship as a Signal”. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 23 (1): 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/136914812094978
Fiellin, Alan. 1962. “The Functions of Informal Groups in Legislative Institutions”. Journal of Politics 24 (1): 72-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2126738
Fischer, Manuel, Frédéric Varone, Roy Gava y Pascal Sciarini. 2019. “How MPs Ties to Interest Groups Matter for Legislative Co-sponsorship”. Social Networks 57: 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.12.001
Fowler, James H. 2006a. “Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks”. Political Analysis 14 (4): 456-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl002
Fowler, James H. 2006b. “Legislative Cosponsorship Networks in the US House and Senate”. Social Networks 28 (4): 454-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.003
Frantzich, Stephen. 1979. “Who Makes Our Laws? The Legislative Effectiveness of Members of the U. S.”. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4 (3): 409-428. https://www.jstor.org/stable/439582
Freeman, Linton C. 1977. “A Set of Measures of Centrality Bases on Betweenness”. Sociometry 40 (1): 35-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
Freeman, Linton C. 1979. “Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification”. Social Networks 1 (3): 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
Grossman, Gene M. y Elhanan Helpman. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grossman, Matthew y Kurt Pyle. 2013. “Lobbying and Congressional Bill Advancement”. Interest Groups & Advocacy 2 (1): 91-111. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/iga.2012.18
Jeydel, Alana y Andrew J. Taylor. 2003. “Are Women Legislators Less Effective? Evidence from the U. S. House in the 103rd-105th Congress”. Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 19-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219880
Kadushin, Charles. 2012. Understanding Social Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kerevel, Yann P. y Sergio Bárcena. 2017. “Democratización y representación legislativa en México”. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 26 (1): 59-83. http://rucp.cienciassociales.edu.uy/index.php/rucp/article/view/41
Kirkland, Justin H. 2011. “The Relational Determinants of Legislative Outcomes: Strong and Weak Ties between Legislators”. The Journal of Politics 73 (3): 887-898. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000533
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Lüdecke Daniel. 2018. “ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models”. Journal of Open Source Software 3 (26): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00772
Masket, Seth E. 2008. “Where You Sit Is Where You Stand: The Impact of Seating Proximity on Legislative Cue-Taking”. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3: 301-311. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1503596
Matthews, Donald R. y James A. Stimson. 1975. Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. Nueva York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
Menczer, Filippo, Santo Fortunato y Clayton A. Davis. 2020. A First Course in Network Science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, Michael K. y Sue Thomas. 1991. “Explaining Legislative Success in the U. S. Senate; The Role of Majority and Minority Parties”. The Western Political Quarterly 44 (2): 959-970. https://doi.org/10.2307/448802
Padró I Miquel, Gerard y James Snyder. 2006. “Legislative Effectiveness and Legislative Careers”. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (3): 347-381. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40263391
Peoples, Clayton D. 2008. “Interlegislator Relations and Policy Making: A Sociological Study of Roll-Call Voting in a State Legislature”. Sociological Forum 23 (39): 455-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00086.x
Peoples, Clayton D. 2010. “Contributor Influence in Congress: Social Ties and PAC Effects on U. S. House Policymaking”. The Sociological Quarterly 51 (4): 649-677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01187.x
Porter, Mason A., Peter J. Mucha, M. E. J. Newman y A. J. Friend. 2007. “Community Structure in the United States House of Representatives”. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 386 (1): 414-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.07.039
Senk, Kaitlin. 2020. “Are Women Less Effective at Passing Bills? Explaining the Direct and Indirect Effects of Gender”. Legislative Studies Quarterly 46 (3): 791-816. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12303
Skigin, Natan. 2019. “Spreading Influence through Weak Ties: Cosponsorship, Legislative Networks, and Bill Success in Fragmented Congresses”. Legislative Studies Quarterly 44 (2): 239-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12224
Solís, Diego y Josafat Cortez. 2019. “¿Qué intereses se representan en el Congreso? Legisladores mexicanos con antecedentes en grupos de interés 2006-2015”. Perfiles Latinoamericanos 53: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2753-013-2019
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023 Diego Solís Delgadillo, Josafat Cortez Salinas