Las limitaciones paradigmáticas del concepto de hegemonía: China y el sur global
PDF
HTML

Palabras clave

posestructuralismo
hegemonía
China
sur global
la Nueva Ruta de la Seda

Categorías

Cómo citar

Lemus Delgado, Daniel Ricardo. 2023. «Las Limitaciones paradigmáticas Del Concepto De hegemonía: China Y El Sur Global». Colombia Internacional, n.º 113 (enero):85-111. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint113.2023.04.

Resumen

Objetivo/contexto: el ascenso de China ha generado un profundo debate sobre el impacto que genera en el escenario internacional su creciente presencia. Existe una amplia discusión en torno a si China se transformará en un nuevo hegemon o si establecerá un escenario poshegemónico. Sin embargo, estas aproximaciones asumen que la hegemonía es un concepto objetivo y universal. Este artículo presenta una crítica al concepto de hegemonía que ha pretendido explicar el ascenso de China. Considera las limitaciones paradigmáticas de este concepto y destaca la importancia de abandonar nuestros modelos mentales para buscar nuevas formas de conceptualizar el cambiante papel de China en el sur global. Basado en un enfoque teórico posestructuralista, el artículo analiza las serias limitaciones conceptuales para comprender el ascenso de China debido a que los conceptos dominantes para entender este proceso se encuentran en una visión eurocéntrica de la disciplina de las relaciones internacionales. Metodología: se contrastan distintas aproximaciones al concepto de hegemonía desde una perspectiva crítica. Conclusiones: se enfatiza cómo la experiencia histórica de Occidente ha moldeado modelos mentales claves de la disciplina, como sucede con la manera como tradicionalmente se entiende el concepto de hegemonía. Originalidad: este artículo contribuye a la comprensión del ascenso de China al ampliar el abanico paradigmático desde el cual este fenómeno puede ser entendido.

https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint113.2023.04
PDF
HTML

Citas

Adler, Emanuel. 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics”. European Journal of International Relations 3: 319-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003003003

Agger, Ben. 1991. “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance”. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 105-131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.000541

Antwi-Boateng, Osman. 2017. “New World Order Neo-colonialism: A Contextual Comparison of Contemporary China and European Colonization in Africa”. The Journal of Pan African Studies 10: 177-195.

Arase, David. 2016. “The Question of Regional Order in East Asia”. En China’s Rise and Changing Order in East Asia, editado por DavidArase, 3-34. Nueva York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.

Ashley, Richard. 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism”. International Organization 38: 225-286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026709

Bhattacharya, Abanti. 2016. “Conceptualizing the Silk Road Initiative in China’s Periphery Policy”. East Asia 33: 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-016-9263-9

Bieler, Andras y AdamMorton. 2004. “A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations”. Capital & Class 28: 85-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680408200106

Breslin, Shaun. 2010. “China’s Emerging Global Role: Dissatisfied Responsible Great Power”. Politics 30: 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01385.x

Byun, See-Won. 2016. “China’s Major-powers Discourse in the Xi Jinping Era: Tragedy of Great Power Politics Revisited?”. Asian Perspective 40: 493-522. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44074793

Callahan, William. 2008. “Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony?”. International Studies Review 10: 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00830.x

Campbell, David. 2010. “Postestructularism”. En International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, editado por TimDunne, MiljaKurki y SteveSmith, 223-246. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chung, Jae. 2010. “Decoding the Evolutionary Path of Chinese Foreign Policy, 1949-2009: Assessments and Inferences”. East Asia 28: 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-010-9132-x

Clark, Ian. 2011. Hegemony in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Clemens, Jonathan. 2017. A History of the Silk Road. Londres: Haus Publishing.

Cox, Robert. 1981. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”. Millenium: Journal of International Studies 10: 126-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501

Cox, Robert. 1983. “Gramsci, Hegemony, and International Relations: An Essay in Method”. Millenium: Journal of International Studies 12: 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701

Cox, Robert. 1992. “Multilateralism and World Order”. Review of International Studies 18: 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118832

Dados, Nour y RaewynConnell. 2012. “The Global South”. Context 11: 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212436479

De Beulea, Filip, Philippe deLombaerde y HaiyanZhange. 2022. “The Chinese Belt and Road Initiative: Strategic Responses of Governments and Multinational Companies”. Asia Pacific Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2022.2093529

Deng, Yong. 2021. “How China Builds the Credibility of the Belt and Road Initiative”. Journal of Contemporary China 30 (131): 734-750, https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2021.1884958

Devetak, Richard. 2005. “Posmodernism”. En Theories of International Relations, editado por ScottBurchill, AndrewLinklater, RichardDevetak, JackDonnelly, MatthewPaterson y ChristianReus-Smit, 161-187. Nueva York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.

Dillet, Benoit. 2017. “What Is Poststructuralism?”. Political Studies Review 15: 516-527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929917712931

Edkins, Jenny. 2007. “Poststructuralism”. En International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction, editado por MartinGriffiths, 75-98. Abingdon: Routledge.

Feng, Huiyun y KaiHe. 2017. “China’s Institutional Challenges to the International Order”. Strategic Studies Quarterly 11 (4): 23-49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26271633

Ferdinand, Peter. 2016. “Westward Ho—the China Dream and ‘One Belt, One Road’: Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping”. International Affairs 92: 941-957. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12660

Flat, Rowan. 2018. “Where Did the Silk Road Come From?”. En The China Questions: Critical Insights into a Rising Power, editado por JenniferRudolph y MichaelSzonyi, 237-243. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Friedberg, Aaron. 2011. “Hegemony with Chinese Characteristics”. The National Interest 114: 18-27.

Galser, Charles. 2012. “Will China’s Rise Lead to War? Why Realism Does Not Mean Pessimism”. Foreign Affairs 90: 80-91.

Gan, Junxian y YanMao. 2016. “China’s New Silk Road: Where Does It Lead?”. Asian Perspective 40: 105-130.

García Agustín, Oscar. 2016. “Venezuela and China: Independency and Dependency in the Context of Interdependent Hegemony”. Journal of China and International Relations 4: 104-127. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jcir.v4i2.1591

Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Gilpin, Robert. 1988. “The Theory of Hegemonic War”. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18: 591-613. https://doi.org/10.2307/204816

Griffiths, Martin, TerryO’Callaghan y Steven C.Roach. 2002. International Relations: The Key Concepts. Londres: Routledge.

Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2006. “La descolonización de la economía política y los estudios postcoloniales: transmodernidad, pensamiento fronterizo y colonialidad global”. Tabula Rasa 4: 17-48.

He, Baogang. 2019. “The Domestic Politics of the Belt and Road Initiative and Its Implications”. Journal of Contemporary China 28 (116): 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1511391

Heilmann, Sebastian y DirkSchmidt. 2014. China’s Foreign Political and Economic Relations: An Unconventional Global Power. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Heinemeyer, Martin. 2011. “Where Is China Heading? An Analysis of China’s Foreign Policy and How It Affects the Western World”. European View 10: 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-011-0151-9

Herschinger, Eva. 2012. “Hell Is the Other’: Conceptualizing Hegemony and Identity through Discourse Theory”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41: 6-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812449501

Howarth, David. 2013. Poststructuralism and After Structure, Subjectivity and Power. Londres: Palgrave McMillan.

Hu, Richard. 2017. “China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ Strategy: Opportunity or Challenge for India?”. China Report 53: 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009445517696619

Hung, Ho-fung. 2009. “Introduction: The Three Transformations of Global Capitalism”. En China and the Transformation of Global Capitalism, editado por Ho-fungHung, 1-20. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ikenberry, John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Johnson, Christopher. 2016. President Xi Jinping’s “Belt and Road” Initiative. A Practical Assessment of the Chinese Communist Party’s Roadmap for China’s Global Resurgence. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.

Jones, Branwen. 2006. Decolonizing International Relations. Londres: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Keahone, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Keucheyan, Razmig. 2014. The Left Hemisphere: Mapping Critical Theory Today. Londres: Verso.

Kohli, Homi. 2018. “Looking at China’s Belt and Road Initiative from the Central Asian Perspective”. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies 9: 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974910117747760

Lee, Paul. 2016. “The Rise of China and Its Contest for Discursive Power”. Global Media and China 1: 102-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416650549

Lemus-Delgado, Daniel y FranciscoValderrey. 2017. “La Nueva Ruta de la Seda y la diplomacia internacional de negocios”. Comillas Journal of International Relations 10: 47-64. https://doi.org/10.14422/cir.i10.y2017.004

Lentner, Howard. 2005. “Hegemony and Autonomy”. Political Studies 53: 735-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00554.x

Li, Yuan. 2017. “Belt and Road: A Logic behind the Myth”. En China’s Belt and Road: A Game Changer?, editado por AlessiaAmighin, 13-33. Milán: Edizioni Epoké.

Liao, Chang. 2018. “Winds of Change: Assessing China’s Assertive Turn in Foreign Policy”. Journal of Asian and African Studies 53: 880-895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909618762477

Lo, Chi. 2015. “China’s Silk Road Strategy: The Opportunities and Pitfalls of ‘Killing Three Birds with One Stone’”. The International Economy 29: 54-71.

Long, Guoqiang. 2015. “One Belt, One Road”: A New Vision for Open, Inclusive Regional Cooperation. Ciudad de México: UNAM.

Luft, Gal. 2016. “China’s Infrastructure Play: Why Washington Should Accept the New Silk Road”. Foreign Affairs 95: 68-75.

Luft, Gal. 2017. Silk Road 2.0: US Strategy toward China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council.

Marinetto, Michael. 2007. Social Theory: The State and Modern Society. Maidenhead Berkshire: Open University Press.

Mastanduno, Michael. 2002. “Incomplete Hegemony and Security Order in the Asia Pacific”. En America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power, editado por JohnIkenberry, 181-210. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Mearsheimer, John. 2006. “China’s Unpeaceful Rise”. Current History 105: 160-162. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2006.105.690.160

Men, Honghua y SteveTsang. 2016. “Genesis of a Pivotal Decade”. En China in the Xi Jinping Era, editado por HonghuaMen y SteveTsang, 1-16. Nueva York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.

Menegazzi, Silvia. 2017. “China’s Foreign Policy and Ideational Narratives: Key Trends and Major Challenges”. En Understanding China Today. An Exploration of Politics, Economics, Society, and International Relations, editado por SilvioBeretta, AxelBerkofsky y LihongZhang, 175-185. Cham: Springer.

Mignolo, Walter D.2000. Local Histories/Global Designs: Essays on the Coloniality of Power, Subaltern Knowledges and Border Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Mignolo, Walter D. 2005. La idea de América Latina. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Miller, Tom. 2017. China’s Asian Dream: Empire Building along the New Silk Road. Londres: Zed Books.

Mohan, Giles y MayTan-Mullins. 2018. “The Geopolitics of South-South Infrastructure Development: Chinese-financed Energy Projects in the Global South”. Urban Studies 56: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018794351

National Development and Reform Commission. 2015. “Action Plan on the China-proposed Belt and Road Initiative”. URL: http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/publications/2015/03/30/content_281475080249035.htm

Nedopil, Christoph. 2022. “Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative”. Shanghai, Green Finance & Development Center, FISF Fudan University. URL: http://www.greenfdc.org

Peters, Michael. 2001. Poststructuralism, Marxism, and Neoliberalism: Between Theory and Politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Quijano, Aníbal. 1992. “Colonialidad y modernidad/racionalidad”. Perú Indígena 13 (29): 11-20.

Schrift, Alan. 2005. “Structuralism and Poststructuralism”. En Encyclopedia of Philosophy, editado por DonaldBorchert, 273-279. Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference.

Shapiro, Michael. 1985. “Metaphor in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences”. Cultural Critique 2: 191-214.

Slater, David. 2008. “Re-pensando la geopolítica del conocimiento: reto a las violaciones imperiales”. Tabula Rasa 8: 335-358. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.334

Wang, Yuan. 2010. “China’s Response to the Unipolar World: The Strategic Logic of Peaceful Development”. Journal of Asian and African Studies 45: 554-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909610373898

Williams, James. 2013. Understanding Poststructuralism. Stocksfield: Acumen Publishing.

Williams, Kristen, StevenLobell Steven y NealJesse. 2012. Beyond Great Powers and Hegemons: Why Secondary States Support, Follow, or Challenge. Stanford, CA: Stanford Security Studies.

Xiao, Ren. 2011. “Positioning Norm, Principle and Interest in Chinese Foreign Policy: The Case of the Myanmar Issue”. East Asia 28: 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-011-9139-y

Yang, Shih-yueh. 2013. “Power Transition, Balance of Power, and the Rise of China: A Theoretical Reflection about Rising Great Powers”. China Review 13: 35-66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23611064

Yu, Hong. 2017. “Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiatives and Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank”. Journal of Contemporary China 26: 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2016.1245894

Yue, Ricky. 2015. “Beyond Dependency: The Promise of Confucianism in Post-Westphalia International Relations”. Bandung: Journal of the Global South 2: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40728-014-0010-6

Zhang, Feng. 2015. Chinese Hegemony: Grand Strategy and Institutions in East Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Zhang, Qingmin. 2011. La diplomacia de China. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.

Zhang, Yongjin. 2016. “Introduction: Dynamism and Contention: Understanding Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping”. International Affairs 92: 769-772. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12661

Zhao, Keyin. 2015. “The Motivation behind China’s Public Diplomacy”. Chinese Journal of International Politics 8: 167-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pov005

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.