Una aproximación constructivista a la guerra estadounidense en contra de las drogas
No. 54 (2002-01-01)Author(s)
-
Sandra Borda Guzmán2M.A. International Relations, University of Chicago; Especialista en Negociación y Relaciones Internacionales y Politóloga de la Universidad de los Andes. Profesora e Investigadora de las facultades de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales de la Universidad del Rosario. Actualmente cursa estudios de doctorado en Ciencia Política en la Universidad de Wisconsin.
Abstract
Notwithstanding the faüures of United States counternarcotics policy, this article explains the reasons why different administrations continué to insist upon its preservation, making use of a legitimating discourse. According the author, the analysis of anti-drug policy requires a historical approach to the causal and constitutive elements ofthe campaign against illegal substances, and an overview of the ways in which this problem has been defined in public discourse. If policy is based upon a prohibitionist strategy or ifdrugs are identified as a security problem, a logic of appropriation prevails. On the other hand, ifpolicies are based upon instrumental strategies, a logic of expected consequences becomes operational. The article defines these two logics and evaluates themfrom the Nixon to Clinton administrations.
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.