Colombia Internacional

Colomb. int. | eISSN 1900-6004 | ISSN 0121-5612

The Contemporary World Order, BRICS and the R2P+ Principle: the Cases of Brazil and China (2005/2017)

No. 105 (2021-01-01)
  • Augusto Leal Rinaldi
    Centro Universitário Belas Artes / Universidade de Sao Paulo (Brasil)
  • Cristina Soreanu Pecequilo
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo / Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Brasil)
https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint105.2021.01

Abstract

Objective/Context: One major pillar of the world orders’ legitimacy is the existence and recognition of international norms and institutions. In the literature on International Relations, many studies call attention to the importance of these features in approaching such topics as (inter)national sovereignty, humanitarian crises, and military interventions. Since the dynamic of contemporary global power is changing due to the rise of new centres of power such as the BRICS countries, it is worth evaluating whether, and to what extent, these new actors will follow the same established norms or challenge them. In this article, we analyse the BRICS’s adherence or failure to adhere to the norms encompassed by the concept of “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P). Methodology: It is a comparative investigation, based on official documents and a qualitative analysis, and focuses on the period of 2005-2017. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that even though the BRICS group do not present a united front in this field, they have highlighted the divisions in the international approach to R2P as seen in two major initiatives, led by Brazil and China. Originality: We argue that Brazil´s “Responsibility while Protecting” (RwP) and China´s “Responsible Protection” (RP) mean that those countries can be classified as “active critics of the norms” of R2P, while the other members are either “active critics” or “active critics and implementers”.

Keywords: BRICS, R2P, world order, rising powers, norms

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2017. “After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order.” Ethics & International Affairs 31 (3): 271–285.

Allison, Graham T. 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Allison, Graham T. 2018. “The Myth of the Liberal Order: From Historical Accident to Conventional Wisdom.” Foreign Affairs 97 (July/August): 124–133.

Averre, Derek, and LanceDavies. 2015. “Russia, Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: the case of Syria.” International Affairs 91 (4): 813–34.

Beeson, Mark, and JinghanZeng. 2018. “The BRICS and Global Governance: China’s Contradictory Role.” Third World Quarterly 39 (10): 1962–1978.

Bellamy, Alex J. 2015. “The three pillars of the responsibility to protect.” Pensamento Propio 41: 35–67.

Bennet, Andrew and ColinElman. 2007. “Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield.” Comparative Political Studies 40(2): 170–95.

Bremmer, Ian. 2020. “Nova fase da rivalidade entre EUA e China tem potencial de deslanchar uma nova guerra fria.” Folha de S. Paulo. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/colunas/ian-bremmer/2020/05/nova-fase-da-rivalidade-entre-eua-e-china-tem-potencial-de-deslanchar-uma-nova-guerra-fria.shtml (May 7, 2020).

Bull, Hedley. 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics.3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Cater, Charles and David MMalone. 2016. “The Origins and Evolution of Responsibility to Protect at the UN.” International Relations 30 (3): 278–297.

Cooper, Andrew F. 2016. The BRICS: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Deitelhoff, Nicole and LisbethZimmermann. 2013. Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of International Norms. Frankfurt am Main: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt.

Ebert, Hannes and DanielFlemes. 2018. “Regional Leadership and Contestation: Strategic Reactions to the Rise of the BRICS.” In Regional Powers and Contested Leadership, orgs. HannesEbert e DanielFlemes. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 1–59. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-73691-4_1 (22 de dezembro de 2018).

Ercan, Pınar G. 2016. Debating the Future of the “Responsibility to Protect”. The Evolution of a Moral Norm. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Esteves, Paulo, Jumbert, Maria Gabrielsen, and Benjaminde Carvalho (eds). 2020. Status and the Rise of Brazil- Global Ambitions, Humanitarian Engagement and International Challenges. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.

Finnemore, Martha and KathrynSikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International organization 52 (4): 887–917.

Fiott, Daniel and JoachimKoops. 2014. The Responsibility to Protect and the Third Pillar: Legitimacy and Operationalization. Springer.

Fung, Courteney J. 2016. “China and the Responsibility to Protect: from opposition to advocacy.” USIP Peace Briefs Issue 205, June: 1–5.

Ganguly, Sumit. 2016. “India and the Responsibility to Protect.” International Relations 30 (3): 362–374.

Garwood-Gowers, Andrew. 2013. “The BRICS and the Responsibility to Protect: Lessons from the Libyan and Syrian Crises.” In Responsibility to Protect in Theory and Practice, 291-315. Ljubljana: GV Zalozba.

Garwood-Gowers, Andrew. 2015. R2P “Ten Years After the World Summit: Explaining Ongoing Contestation over Pillar III”. Global Responsibility to Protect, 7 (3-4): 300-324.

Garwood-Gowers, Andrew. 2016. China’s “Responsible Protection” Concept: Reinterpreting the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and military intervention for humanitarian purposes.” Asian Journal of International Law, 6 (1): 89-118.

Ghisleni, Alexandre P. 2011. Direitos humanos e segurança internacional: o tratamento dos temas de direitos humanos no Conselho de Segurança das Nações Unidas. Brasília, DF: FUNAG.

Griffith-Jones, Stephany. 2014. A BRICS Development Bank: A Dream Coming True?Geneve: UNCTAD. Discussion Paper. https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/osgdp20141_en.pdf (24 de agosto de 2017).

Hamman, Eduarda P and Maria G.Jumbert. 2020. “Brazil´s Evolving 'Balancing Act' on the Use of Force in Multilateral Operations: From Robust Peacekeeping to “Responsibility While Protecting.” In: Esteves, Paulo, Jumbert, Maria Gabrielsen, Carvalho, Benjamin de (eds). Status and the rise of Brazil- global ambitions, humanitarian engagement and international challenges. 153-174 Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.

Hehir, Aidan. 2019. Hollow Norms and Responsibility to Protect. London. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hehir, Aidan, and RobertMurray. 2013. Libya, the Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. London. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hurrell, Andrew. 2018. “Beyond the BRICS: Power, Pluralism, and the Future of Global Order.” Ethics & International Affairs 32 (1): 89–101.

ICISS, International Comission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. 2001. The Responsibility to Protect. Otawa: International Development Research Centre.

Ikenberry, Gilford J. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ikenberry, Gilford J. 2018. “The End of Liberal International Order?” International Affairs 94 (1): 7–23.

Jacques, Martin. 2009. When China Rules the World. The Rise of the Middle Kingdom and the End of the Western World. London: Penguin.

Kassim, Yang R. 2014. The Geopolitics of Intervention in Asia and the Responsibility to Protect. London: Springer.

Kenkel, Kai M, and Marcelle TMartins. 2016. “Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: Moral Duty or Shifting Goalpost?” Brazilian Political Science Review 10 (1): 1–27.

Kenkel, Kai M, Danilo Marcondesde Souza Neto, Mikelli MarzinniLucas Alves Ribeiro. 2020. “Peace operations, intervention, and Brazilian foreign polícy: key issues and debates.” In: Esteves, Paulo, Jumbert, Maria Gabrielsen, Benjamin deCarvalho (eds). Status and the rise of Brazil- global ambitions, humanitarian engagement and international challenges, 133-151. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.

Kiely, Ray. 2015. The BRICs, US ‘Decline’ and Global Transformations. Springer.

Kotyashko, Anna, Laura CristinaFerreira-Pereira and Alena VysotskayaGuedes Vieira. 2018. “Normative Resistance to Responsibility to Protect in Times of Emerging Multipolarity: the Cases of Brazil and Russia.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 61 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201800101

Kozyrev, Vitaly. 2016. “Harmonizing ‘Responsibility to Protect’: China’s Vision of a Post-Sovereign World.” International Relations 30 (3): 328–45.

Lopes, Dawisson B, GuilhermeCasaraões and CarlosFrederico Gama2020. “A Tragedy of Middle Power Politics: Traps in Brazil’s Quest for Institutional Revisionism.” In: Esteves, Paulo, Jumbert, Maria Gabrielsen, Benjamin deCarvalho (eds). Status and the rise of Brazil- global ambitions, humanitarian engagement and international challenges, . 51-71. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.

Mahbubani, Kishore. 2019. Has the West Lost It? A Provocation. London: Penguin Random House.

McCormack, Daniel. 2019. Great Power and International Hierarchy. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mearsheimer, John J. 2014. “Can China Rise Peacefully?” The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/commentary/can-china-rise-peacefully-10204 (22 de dezembro de 2018).

Mearsheimer, John. 2019. “Bound to Fail. The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order.” International Security 43 (4): 7–50.

Murray, Robert W. 2013. “Humanitarianism, Responsibility or Rationality? Evaluating Intervention as State Strategy.” In Libya, the Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention, 15–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Newman, Edward, and BenjaminZala. 2018. “Rising Powers and Order Contestation: Disaggregating the Normative from the Representational.” Third World Quarterly 39 (5): 871–888.

Nexon, Daniel H., MeghamMcConaughey and PaulMusgrave. 2018. “Beyond Anarchy: Logics of Political Organization, Hierarchy, and International Structure.” International Theory 10 (2): 181–218.

Noesselt, Nele. 2016. “Contested Global Order(s): Rising Powers and the Re-Legitimation of Global Constitutionalization.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 14 (3): 639–656.

Pu, Xiaoyu. 2012. “Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (31): 341-367.

Renshon, Jonathan. 2017. Fighting for Status: Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics. Princeton University Press.

Rinaldi, Augusto L. 2017. “The New Development Bank: Challenges and Interests.. Revista de Estudos Internacionais 9 (1): 100–122.

Roberts, Cynthia, Leslie E.Armijo and Saori NKatada. 2018. The BRICS and Collective Financial Statecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smith, Karen. 2016. “South Africa and the Responsibility to Protect: from Champion to Sceptic.” International Relations 30 (3): 391–405.

Stefan, Cristina G. 2017. “On non-Western Norm Shapers: Brazil and the Responsibility while Protecting.” European Journal of International Security 2 (1): 88–110.

Stuenkel, Oliver. 2014. “The BRICS and the Future of R2P: Was Syria or Libya the exception?” Global Responsibility to Protect 6 (1): 3–28.

Stuenkel, Olivier. 2016a. “Brazil and R2P: A Case of Agency and Norm Entrepreneurship in he Global South.” International Relations 30 (3): 375–90.

Stuenkel, Olivier. 2016b. Post-Western World: How Emerging Powers Are Remaking Global Order. Polity Press.

Stuenker, Olivier. 2017. BRICS e o futuro da ordem global. Editora Paz e Terra.

Tooze, Adam. 2020. “Whose Century?” LRB (42) 15: 1–9.

Tourinho, Marcos, OliverStuenkel and SarahBrockmeier. 2016. “‘Responsibility while protecting’: Reforming R2P Implementation.” Global Society 30 (1): 134–150.

UNGA, United Nations General Assembly. 2005. 2005 World Summit Outcome. United Nations. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/world%20summit%20outcome%20doc%202005(1).pdf (30 de julho de 2019).

UNGA. 2009. United Nations General Assembly Report on Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. United Nations. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/SG_reportA_63_677_en.pdf (17 de setembro de 2019).

UNGA. 2011. “United Nations General Assembly Letter dated 9 November 2011 from the Permanent Representative of Brazil to the United Nations Addressed to the Secretary-General”. http://www.globalr2p.org/media/files/concept-paper-_rwp.pdf (17 de setembro de 2019).

UNSC, United Nations Security Council. 2011. “United Nations Security Council Resolution S/RES/1973/2011”. https://www.undocs.org/S/RES/1973%20(2011) (27 de agosto de 2011).

Weiss, Thomas G. 2013. Global Governance: Why? What? Whither? Cambridge. Malden: Polity.

Welsh, Jennifer (2013). “Norms Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect.” GlobalResponsibility to Protect 5: 365-396.

Wiener, Antje. 2007. “Contested Meanings of Norms: A Research Framework.” Comparative European Politics 5 (1): 1–17.

Wolff, Jonas, and LisbethZimmermann. 2016. “Between Banyans and Battle Scenes: Liberal Norms, Contestation, and the Limits of Critique.” Review of International Studies 42 (3): 513–34.

Zakaria, Fareed. 2008. The Post-American World. 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton.

Ziegler, Charles E. 2016a. “Critical Perspectives on the Responsibility to Protect: BRICS and Beyond.” International Relations 30 (3): 262–277.

Ziegler, Charles E. 2016b. “Russia on the Rebound: Using and Misusing the Responsibility to Protect.” International Relations 30 (3): 346–361.

Zongze, Ruan. 2012. “Responsible Protection: Building a Safer World.” China International Studies 34. http://www.ciis.org.cn/english/2012-06/15/content_5090912.htm.

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.