Colombia Internacional

Colomb. int. | eISSN 1900-6004 | ISSN 0121-5612

The Controversy of Lateralisms: A Comparison between FTAs of China and the United States

No. 107 (2021-07-01)
  • Ana Luiza Beck
    University of Glasgow (United Kingdom)
  • Mayara T. Muller
    Federal University of Santa Catarina (Brazil)
  • Fernando Seabra
    Federal University of Santa Catarina (Brazil)
https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint107.2021.02

Abstract

Objective/Context: In this study, we aim to evaluate the expansion of bilateralism. Indeed, the multilateralism-regionalism dichotomy fails to accurately account for the scopes of trade integration occurring in the past two decades. Methodology: In order to assess the rise of bilateralism, we methodologically choose to examine the protagonist role played by China and the US in the international integration scenario. Conclusions: Empirically, our results show that China and the US hold roughly the same number of FTAs in effect. Our results unveil three major discrepancies that stand out as distinguishing national strategies towards trade agreements. First, concerning profile policy – we show, confirming previous theoretical studies, that the US follows a standard trade strategy while China favors an idiosyncratic posture in the scope of its trade deals. Second, we find out that China shows a clear preference for making trade deals with neighboring countries, which ratifies China´s strategy to consolidate its regional hegemony in Asia. Third, our hypothesis of political proximity proves to be more influential to Chinese trade authorities’ initiatives. Originality: Our main contribution lies in comparing bilateral and regional/multilateral trade agreements regarding the scope of goods and services, the geopolitical context, and the degree of policy flexibility. Theoretically, we show that regionalism and bilateralism benefit its parties by negotiating profits and losses in trade deals; the latter allows for an even more tailored agreement via discretionary measures pertinent to the countries’ needs.

Keywords: Bilateralism, Free Trade Agreements, China, USA

References

Allee, Todd, and ClintPeinhardt. 2014. “Evaluating Three Explanations for the Design of Bilateral Investment Treaties.” World Politics 66 (1): 47–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887113000324

Ba, Alice D. 2003. “China and Asean: Renavigating Relations for a 21st-Century Asia.” Asian Survey 43 (4): 622–47. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2003.43.4.622

Baldwin, Richard. 1993. “A Domino Theory of Regionalism.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series (Cambridge) 4465 (4465): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4465

Baldwin, Richard. 2006. “Multilateralizing Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade.” The World Economy 29: 1451–1518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00852.x

Bhagwati, Jagdish, and ArvindPanagariya. 1996. “Preferential Trading Areas and Multilateralism: Strangers, Friends or Foes?” Discussion Paper Series 9596–04 (9596): 1–66.

Carranza, Mario Esteban. 2017. South American Free Trade Area or Free Trade Area of the Americas?: Open Regionalism and the Future of Regional Economic Integration in South America. Routledge.

Crivelli, Pramila. 2016. “Regionalism and Falling External Protection in High and Low Tariff Members.” Journal of International Economics 102: 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.06.001

Crowley, Meredith A. 2003. “An Introduction to the WTO and GATT.” Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives 27 (4): 42–57.

Dreher, Axel, PeterNunnenkamp, and RainerThiele. 2008. “Does US Aid Buy UN General Assembly Votes? A Disaggregated Analysis.” Public Choice 136 (1/2): 139–64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27698295

Ethier, Wilfred J. 1998. “The New Regionalism.” Economic Journal 108 (449): 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00335

Gabuev, Alexander. 2016. “One Belt One Road Initiative: A Revolution on Regional and Global Development” 12 (2) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2016.11869097.

García-Durán, Patricia, BenjaminKienzle, and MontserratMillet. 2014. “Revisiting European Influence: The Case of Agricultural Trade Negotiations.” Journal of World Trade 48 (5): 1057–1076.

Hoadley, Stephen, and JianYang. 2007. “China’s Cross-Regional FTA Initiatives: Towards Comprehensive National Power.” Pacific Affairs 80 (2): 327–348. https://doi.org/10.5509/2007802327

Hummer, Waldemar, and MichaelSchweitzer. 1994. “Chapter VIII regional arrangements.” in B.Simma (ed) The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary. Oxford. OUP:

Irwin, Douglas A. 1998. “The Smoot-Hawley Tariff: A Quantitative Assessment.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (2): 326–34. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557410

Li, Chunding, JingWang, and JohnWhalley. 2014. “China’s Regional and Bilateral Trade Agreements” National Bureau of Economic Research 19853: 1–26. https://www.nber.org/papers/w19853.pdf

Liu, Xuepeng, and EmanuelOrnelas. 2014. “Free Trade Agreements and the Consolidation of Democracy.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 6 (2): 29–70. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.6.2.29

Mansfield, Edward D. 1998. “The Proliferation of Preferential Trade Agreements.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (5): 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042005001

MOFCOM. China FTA Network.http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/english/index.shtml.

Perrotti, Daniel E. 2015. “The People’s Republic of China and Latin America: the impact of Chinese economic growth on Latin American exports.” CEPAL Review.

Renard, Thomas. 2016. “Partnerships for Effective Multilateralism? Assessing the Compatibility between EU Bilateralism, (Inter-)Regionalism and Multilateralism.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (1): 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2015.1060691

Ruggie, John Gerard. 1992. “Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution.” International Organization: 561-598. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706989

Saggi, Kamal. 2002. “Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and International Technology Transfer.” The World Bank Development Research Group 17 (2): 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/17.2.191

Saggi, Kamal, and HalisMurat. 2010. “Bilateralism, Multilateralism, and the Quest for Global Free Trade.” Journal of International Economics 81 (1): 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.01.004

Schiff, Maurice, and L. AlanWinters. 2002. “Regional Integration and Development.” World Bank and Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2872

Salidjanova, Nargiza. 2015. “China’s Trade Ambitions: Strategy and Objectives behind China’s Pursuit of Free Trade Agreements.” U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Staff Research Report.

Schwab, Susan. 2011. “After Doha: Why the Negotiations Are Doomed and What We Should Do About It.” Foreign Affairs 90: 104-117. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23039412

Teló, Mario. 2007. “Introduction: Globalization, New Regionalism and the Role of the EU.” European Union and New Regionalism: Regional Actors and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era, 406. http://books.google.com/books/about/European_Union_and_New_Regionalism.html?id=ZpxQRKn0ARUC&pgis=1

USTR. 2020. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. Free Trade Agreements.https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements

WTO. 2018. “Regional Trade Agreements and Preferential Trade Arrangements.” 2018. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/rta_pta_e.htm

Wunderlich, Jens-Uwe. 2016. Regionalism, Globalization and International Order: Europe and Southeast Asia. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

Ye, Min. 2015.“China and Competing Cooperation in Asia-Pacific: TPP, RCEP, and the New Silk Road.” Asian Security 11 no. 3: 206-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2015.1109509

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.