Brazil’s Lost Pathway to Regional Hegemony: Structural Changes in the South American Regional System (1810-2010s)
No. 111 (2022-07-01)Author(s)
-
Ana Luiza VedovatoUniversidade Federal de Santa María (Brazil)
-
Igor Castellano da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Santa María (Brazil)
Abstract
Objective/Context: This article addresses the systemic and macro-historical meaning of the position of Brazil in South America. We argue that the Brazilian predominance was an outcome of structural changes in the regional system. Methodology: We trace the process of formation of the South American regional system in the post-independence period, identifying four intervals of regional structural transformation: 1) anarchical system formation (1810-1870s); 2) anarchical stability (1880-1930s); 3) hegemonic transition (1940-2000s); and 4) hegemonic stabilization (2000-2010s). Process tracing and historical-comparative methods help to organize the corresponding causal chains. Conclusions: Our findings show that Brazil’s role in the region is the result of an ongoing process of regional hegemonic stabilization, characterized by (i) a unipolar distribution of power, (ii) a regional governance order, and (iii) a hegemonic ordering principle. Despite the existence of structural conditions for the configuration of a hegemonic structure, the country did not embrace its position as a regional hegemon. Originality: While the literature on the topic mainly focuses on foreign policy and interactional dynamics, this study proposes an explanation focused on regional structural changes, presenting: (i) a theory of systemic complexity and macro-historical changes, and (ii) a theory of systemic structure types, addressing relations between distinct structural elements at the regional level of analysis.
References
Acharya, Amitav. 2007. “The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics.” World Politics 59 (04): 629–52. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2008.0000
Acharya, Amitav. 2011. “Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (1): 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00637.x
Ayoob, Mohammed. 1999. “From Regional System to Regional Society: Exploring Key Variables in the Construction of Regional Order.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 53 (3): 247–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049919993845.
Battaglino, Jorge Mario. 2012. “The Coexistence of Peace and Conflict in South America: Toward a New Conceptualization of Types of Peace.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 55 (2): 131–51. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292012000200008.
Briceño-Ruiz, José, and AndreaRibeiro Hoffmann. 2015. “Post-Hegemonic Regionalism, UNASUR, and the Reconfiguration of Regional Cooperation in South America.” Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 40 (1): 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2015.1031475.
Burges, Sean W. 2008. “Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War.” International Relations 22 (1): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117807087243
Burges, Sean W. 2015. “Revisiting Consensual Hegemony: Brazilian Regional Leadership in Question.” International Politics 52 (2): 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.43
Buzan, Barry. 1998. “Conclusions: System versus Units in Theorizing about the Third World.” In International Relations Theory and the Third World, edited by Stephanie G.Neuman, 213–34. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Buzan, Barry, Charles A.Jones, and RichardLittle. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Buzan, Barry, and RichardLittle. 2000. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buzan, Barry, and OleWæver. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Capra, Fritjof. 2002. The Hidden Connections: Integrating The Biological Cognitive And Social Dimensions Of Life Into A Science Of Sustainability. New York: Doubleday.
Capra, Fritjof, and PierLuigi Luisi. 2014. The System View of Life: A Unifying Vision. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Castellano, Igor. 2017. Política Externa Da África Austral: Guerra, Construção Do Estado, e Ordem Regional (África Do Sul, Angola, Moçambique, Zimbábue e Namíbia). Porto Alegre: CEBRÁFRICA-UFRGS.
Centeno, Miguel A. 2002. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation-State in Latin America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Cervo, Amado Luiz. 2008. Inserção Internacional: Formação Dos Conceitos Brasileiros. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Clark, Ian. 2011. Hegemony in International Society Abstract and Keywords. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (04): 823–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429
Correlates of War (COW) Project. 2017. “National Material Capabilities (v5.0).” https://correlatesofwar.org/data-sets/national-material-capabilities/nmc-v5-1.
Couto, Leandro Freitas. 2007. “O Horizonte Regional Do Brasil e a Construção Da América Do Sul.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 50 (1): 159–76. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292007000100009
Cui, Shoujun, and ManuelPérez García. 2016. China and Latin America in Transition: Policy Dinamics, Economic Commitments and Social Impacts. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dall’Agnol, Augusto César, and ArthurCoelho DornellesJr.2018. “Classificação de Guerras: A Problemática Das (in)Definições.” Revista Brasileira de Estudos de Defesa 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v4n1.2017.65352
Destradi, Sandra. 2010. “Empire, Hegemony, and Leadership: Developing a Research Framework for the Study of Regional Powers.” Review of International Studies, Cambridge 36 (4): 903–30. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1143902
Ellis, R. Evan. 2014. China on the Ground in Latin America: Challenges for the Chinese and Impacts on the Region. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fawcett, Louise. 2004. “Exploring Regional Domains: A Comparative History of Regionalism.” International Affairs 80 (3): 429–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00391.x.
Fawn, Rick. 2009. “‘Regions’ and Their Study: Wherefrom, What for and Whereto?” Review of International Studies 35 (S1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008419.
Flemes, Daniel, and LeslieWehner. 2015. “Drivers of Strategic Contestation: The Case of South America.” International Politics 52 (2): 163–77. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.45
Fuccille, Alexandre, MarceloPassini Mariano, HaroldoRamanzini Júnior, and Rafael AugustoRibeiro de Almeida. 2017. “O Governo Dilma Rousseff e a América Do Sul: A Atuação Brasileira Na UNASUL (2011-2014).” Colombia Internacional 92 (October): 43–72. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint92.2017.02.
Gallagher, Kevin P. 2016. The China Triangle: Latin America’s China Boom and the Fate of the Washington Consensus. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Galvão, Thiago Gehre. 2009. “América Do Sul: Construção Pela Reinvenção (2000-2008).” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 52 (2): 63–80.
Gardini, Gian Luca. 2010. The Origins of Mercosur: Democracy and Regionalization in South America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Gardini, Gian Luca. 2015. “Towards Modular Regionalism: The Proliferation of Latin American Cooperation.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 58 (1): 210–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201500111
Garzón Pereira, Jorge F. 2014. “Hierarchical Regional Orders: An Analytical Framework.” Journal of Policy Modeling 36S (S1): S26–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.007.
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goh, Evelyn. 2008. “Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies.” International Security 32 (3): 113–57. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.113
Harrison, Neil E. 2006. Complexity in World Politics: Concepts and Methods of a New Paradigm. New York: State University of New York Press.
Hettne, Björn, AndrásInotai, and OsvaldoSunkel. 2000. National Perspectives on the New Regionalism in the South. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1996a. “Analyzing an Anomaly: War, Peace and the State in South America.” In The State, the War and the State of War, 150–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1996b. The State, the War and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. 2006. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Hurrell, Andrew. 1995. “Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective.” In Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order, edited by LouiseFawcett and AndrewHurrell, 37–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ikenberry, John G. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jervis, Robert. 1998. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kacowicz, Arie M. 1998. “The South Ameican Zone of Peace, 1883-1996.” In Zones Of Peace In The Third World, 67–124. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Katzenstein, Peter J. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kelly, Robert E. 2007. “Security Theory in the ‘New Regionalism.’” International Studies Review 9 (2): 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2007.00671.x
Lake, David A. 2009. “Regional Hierarchy: Authority and Local International Order.” Review of International Studies 35 (S1): 35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008420
Lake, David A., and PatrickMorgan. 1997. Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Lapp, Nancy D. 2012. “Resistance Is Útil (Useful): Responses to Brazilian Hegemony.” In Beyond Great Powers and Hegemons: Why Secondary States Support, Follow or Challenge, edited by Kristen P.Williams, Steven E.Lobell, and Neal G.Jesse, 145–60. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lima, Maria Regina Soares de. 2013. “Relações Interamericanas: A Nova Agenda Sul-Americana e o Brasil.” Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política 90: 167–201.
Lima, Maria Regina Soares de, and MonicaHirst. 2006. “Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities.” International Affairs 82 (1): 21–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3569128
Mace, Gordon, Andrew F.Cooper, and Timothy M.Shaw. 2010. Inter-American Cooperation at a Crossroads. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879.
Mahoney, James. 2006. “On the Second Wave of Historical Sociology, 1970s– Present.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 47 (5): 371–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715206068619
Mahoney, James. 2015. “Process Tracing and Historical Explanation.” Security Studies 24 (2): 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1036610
Mahoney, James, and RachelSweet Vanderpoel. 2015. “Set Diagrams and Qualitative Research.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (1): 65–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013519410
Malamud, Andrés. 2011. “A Leader without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy.” Latin American Politics & Society 53 (3): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00123.x
Malamud, Andrés, and IsabellaAlcañiz. 2017. “Managing Security in a Zone of Peace: Brazil´s Soft Approach to Regional Governance.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 60 (1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201700102
Malamud, Andrés, and Júlio C.Rodriguez. 2013. “Com Um Pé Na Região e Outro No Mundo: O Dualismo Crescente Da Política Externa Brasileira.” Estudos Internacionais 1 (2): 167–83.
Mares, David R. 2001. Violent Peace: Militarized Interstate Bargaining in Latin America. New York: Columbia University Press.
Martín, Félix E. 2006. Militarist Peace in South America: Conditions for War and Peace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Merke, Federico. 2015. “Neither Balance nor Bandwagon: South American International Society Meets Brazil’s Rising Power.” International Politics 52 (2): 178–92. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.49
Mesquita, Rafael. 2016. “The Hegemonic Hermano : South American Collective Identity and Brazilian Regional Strategy.” Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue Canadienne Des Études Latino-Américaines et Caraïbes 41 (2): 215–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2016.1182691
Mijares, Víctor M. 2020. “Filling the Structural Gap: Geopolitical Links Explaining the South American Defense Council.” Colombia Internacional 101: 3–28. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint101.2020.01
Morin, Edgar. 1990. Introduction à La Pensée Complexe. Paris: ESF.
Nabers, Dirk. 2010. “Power, Leadership and Hegemony in International Politics.” In Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, edited by DanielFlemes, 51-69. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Nolte, Detlef. 2010. “How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics.” Review of International Studies 36 (4): 881–801. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051000135X
Nolte, Detlef. 2011. “Regional Powers and Regional Governance.” In Regional Powers and Regional Orders, edited by NadineGodehardt and DirkNabers, 49–67. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815984
Oelsner, Andrea. 2005. International Relations in Latin America: Peace and Security in the Southern Cone. New York: Routledge.
Poggio Teixeira, Gustavo. 2014. Brazil, the United States, and the South American Subsystem: Regional Politics and the Absent Empire. New York: Lexington Books.
Prys, Miriam. 2010. “Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood.” International Studies Review 12 (4): 479–504.
Quiliconi, Cintia, and RaúlSalgado Espinoza. 2017. “Latin American Integration: Regionalism à La Carte in a Multipolar World?” Colombia Internacional 92 (October): 15–41. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint92.2017.01.
Rezende, Lucas Pereira. 2016. “Brasil: Ator Unipolar Na América Do Sul?” Carta Internacional 11 (1): 274. https://doi.org/10.21530/ci.v11n1.2016.355
Riggirozzi, Pía, and JeanGrugel. 2015. “Regional Governance and Legitimacy in South America: The Meaning of UNASUR.” International Affairs 91 (4): 781–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12340
Riggirozzi, Pía, and DianaTussie. 2012. The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2694-9.
Rivarola Puntigliano, Andres, and JoséBriceño-Ruiz. 2013. Resilience of Regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean: Development and Autonomy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rodriguez, Júlio César Cossio. 2012. “Chacal Ou Cordeiro? O Brasil Frente Aos Desafios e Oportunidades Do Sistema Internacional.” Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional 55 (2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292012000200005.
Rosenau, James N., and Ernst-OttoCzempiel. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruggie, John G. 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis.” World Politics 35 (2): 261–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010273
Ruggie, John G. 1989. “International Structure and International Transformation: Space, Time and Method.” In Global Changes and Theoretical Challanges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s, edited by James N.Rosenau and Ernst-OttoCzempiel, 21–36. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. London: Macmillan.
Schenoni, Luis L. 2012. “As Possíveis Causas Domésticas Da Liderança Brasileira Na América Do Sul.” Contexto Internacional 34 (2): 659–91.
Schenoni, Luis. 2018. “The Argentina-Brazil Regional Power Transition.” Foreign Policy Analysis 14 (4): 469–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orx008.
Schweller, Randall L. 2006. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Simpson, Gerry. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 1984. Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Edited by ThedaSkocpol. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621567
Souza, Nilson Araújo de. 2012. “América Latina: As Ondas Da Integração.” OIKOS 11 (1): 87–126.
Spektor, Matias. 2010. “Ideias de Ativismo Regional: A Transformação Das Leituras Brasileiras Da Região.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 53 (1): 25–44.
Stewart-Ingersoll, Robert, and DerrickFrazier. 2012. Regional Powers and Security Orders: A Theoretical Framework. New York: Routledge.
Teixeira, Carlos Gustavo Poggio. 2011. “Brazil and the Institutionalization of South America: From Hemispheric Estrangement to Cooperative Hegemony.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 54 (2): 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292011000200010
Tilly, Charles. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tilly, Charles. 2001. “Mechanisms in Political Processes.” Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.21.
Vadell, Javier A. 2019. “China in Latin America: South-South Cooperation with Chinese Characteristics.” Latin American Perspectives 46 (2): 107–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X18815511.
Varas, Augusto. 2008. “Brazil in South America: From Indifference to Hegemony.” FRIDE Working Papers. http://fride.org/publication/415/brazil-in-south-america:-from-indifference-to-hegemony.
Vedovato, Ana Luiza, and IgorCastellano. 2019. “O Estado Como Unidade de Análise Dos Sistemas Regionais: Impactos Na Estrutura Sistêmica Da América Do Sul.” Revista Debates 13 (2): 195–222. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.88730
Vitelli, Marina. 2015. “La Identidad Estratégica de Brasil: Política de Defensa Para Un Jugador Global.” Colombia Internacional, no. 85: 141–69. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint85.2015.05.
Waltz, Kenneth W. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Watson, Adam. 1992. The Evolution of International Society. London: Routledge.
Watson, Adam. 2006. Hegemony and History. London: Routledge.
Wehner, Leslie E. 2015. “Role Expectations As Foreign Policy: South American Secondary Powers’ Expectations of Brazil As A Regional Power.” Foreign Policy Analysis 11 (4): 435–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12048
Wendt, Alexander E. 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41 (3): 335. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.