Colombia Internacional

Colomb. int. | eISSN 1900-6004 | ISSN 0121-5612

Brazil’s Lost Pathway to Regional Hegemony: Structural Changes in the South American Regional System (1810-2010s)

No. 111 (2022-07-01)
  • Ana Luiza Vedovato
    Universidade Federal de Santa María (Brazil)
  • Igor Castellano da Silva
    Universidade Federal de Santa María (Brazil)

Abstract

Objective/Context: This article addresses the systemic and macro-historical meaning of the position of Brazil in South America. We argue that the Brazilian predominance was an outcome of structural changes in the regional system. Methodology: We trace the process of formation of the South American regional system in the post-independence period, identifying four intervals of regional structural transformation: 1) anarchical system formation (1810-1870s); 2) anarchical stability (1880-1930s); 3) hegemonic transition (1940-2000s); and 4) hegemonic stabilization (2000-2010s). Process tracing and historical-comparative methods help to organize the corresponding causal chains. Conclusions: Our findings show that Brazil’s role in the region is the result of an ongoing process of regional hegemonic stabilization, characterized by (i) a unipolar distribution of power, (ii) a regional governance order, and (iii) a hegemonic ordering principle. Despite the existence of structural conditions for the configuration of a hegemonic structure, the country did not embrace its position as a regional hegemon. Originality: While the literature on the topic mainly focuses on foreign policy and interactional dynamics, this study proposes an explanation focused on regional structural changes, presenting: (i) a theory of systemic complexity and macro-historical changes, and (ii) a theory of systemic structure types, addressing relations between distinct structural elements at the regional level of analysis.

Keywords: Brazil, hegemony, regional order, regional systems, South America, regionalism, theory

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2007. “The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics.” World Politics 59 (04): 629–52. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2008.0000

Acharya, Amitav. 2011. “Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (1): 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00637.x

Ayoob, Mohammed. 1999. “From Regional System to Regional Society: Exploring Key Variables in the Construction of Regional Order.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 53 (3): 247–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049919993845.

Battaglino, Jorge Mario. 2012. “The Coexistence of Peace and Conflict in South America: Toward a New Conceptualization of Types of Peace.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 55 (2): 131–51. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292012000200008.

Briceño-Ruiz, José, and AndreaRibeiro Hoffmann. 2015. “Post-Hegemonic Regionalism, UNASUR, and the Reconfiguration of Regional Cooperation in South America.” Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 40 (1): 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2015.1031475.

Burges, Sean W. 2008. “Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War.” International Relations 22 (1): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117807087243

Burges, Sean W. 2015. “Revisiting Consensual Hegemony: Brazilian Regional Leadership in Question.” International Politics 52 (2): 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.43

Buzan, Barry. 1998. “Conclusions: System versus Units in Theorizing about the Third World.” In International Relations Theory and the Third World, edited by Stephanie G.Neuman, 213–34. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Buzan, Barry, Charles A.Jones, and RichardLittle. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Buzan, Barry, and RichardLittle. 2000. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Buzan, Barry, and OleWæver. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Capra, Fritjof. 2002. The Hidden Connections: Integrating The Biological Cognitive And Social Dimensions Of Life Into A Science Of Sustainability. New York: Doubleday.

Capra, Fritjof, and PierLuigi Luisi. 2014. The System View of Life: A Unifying Vision. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Castellano, Igor. 2017. Política Externa Da África Austral: Guerra, Construção Do Estado, e Ordem Regional (África Do Sul, Angola, Moçambique, Zimbábue e Namíbia). Porto Alegre: CEBRÁFRICA-UFRGS.

Centeno, Miguel A. 2002. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation-State in Latin America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Cervo, Amado Luiz. 2008. Inserção Internacional: Formação Dos Conceitos Brasileiros. São Paulo: Saraiva.

Clark, Ian. 2011. Hegemony in International Society Abstract and Keywords. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (04): 823–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429

Correlates of War (COW) Project. 2017. “National Material Capabilities (v5.0).” https://correlatesofwar.org/data-sets/national-material-capabilities/nmc-v5-1.

Couto, Leandro Freitas. 2007. “O Horizonte Regional Do Brasil e a Construção Da América Do Sul.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 50 (1): 159–76. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292007000100009

Cui, Shoujun, and ManuelPérez García. 2016. China and Latin America in Transition: Policy Dinamics, Economic Commitments and Social Impacts. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dall’Agnol, Augusto César, and ArthurCoelho DornellesJr.2018. “Classificação de Guerras: A Problemática Das (in)Definições.” Revista Brasileira de Estudos de Defesa 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v4n1.2017.65352

Destradi, Sandra. 2010. “Empire, Hegemony, and Leadership: Developing a Research Framework for the Study of Regional Powers.” Review of International Studies, Cambridge 36 (4): 903–30. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1143902

Ellis, R. Evan. 2014. China on the Ground in Latin America: Challenges for the Chinese and Impacts on the Region. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fawcett, Louise. 2004. “Exploring Regional Domains: A Comparative History of Regionalism.” International Affairs 80 (3): 429–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00391.x.

Fawn, Rick. 2009. “‘Regions’ and Their Study: Wherefrom, What for and Whereto?” Review of International Studies 35 (S1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008419.

Flemes, Daniel, and LeslieWehner. 2015. “Drivers of Strategic Contestation: The Case of South America.” International Politics 52 (2): 163–77. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.45

Fuccille, Alexandre, MarceloPassini Mariano, HaroldoRamanzini Júnior, and Rafael AugustoRibeiro de Almeida. 2017. “O Governo Dilma Rousseff e a América Do Sul: A Atuação Brasileira Na UNASUL (2011-2014).” Colombia Internacional 92 (October): 43–72. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint92.2017.02.

Gallagher, Kevin P. 2016. The China Triangle: Latin America’s China Boom and the Fate of the Washington Consensus. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Galvão, Thiago Gehre. 2009. “América Do Sul: Construção Pela Reinvenção (2000-2008).” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 52 (2): 63–80.

Gardini, Gian Luca. 2010. The Origins of Mercosur: Democracy and Regionalization in South America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

Gardini, Gian Luca. 2015. “Towards Modular Regionalism: The Proliferation of Latin American Cooperation.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 58 (1): 210–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201500111

Garzón Pereira, Jorge F. 2014. “Hierarchical Regional Orders: An Analytical Framework.” Journal of Policy Modeling 36S (S1): S26–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.007.

Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goh, Evelyn. 2008. “Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies.” International Security 32 (3): 113–57. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.113

Harrison, Neil E. 2006. Complexity in World Politics: Concepts and Methods of a New Paradigm. New York: State University of New York Press.

Hettne, Björn, AndrásInotai, and OsvaldoSunkel. 2000. National Perspectives on the New Regionalism in the South. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Holsti, Kalevi J. 1996a. “Analyzing an Anomaly: War, Peace and the State in South America.” In The State, the War and the State of War, 150–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Holsti, Kalevi J. 1996b. The State, the War and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huntington, Samuel P. 2006. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Hurrell, Andrew. 1995. “Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective.” In Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order, edited by LouiseFawcett and AndrewHurrell, 37–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ikenberry, John G. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jervis, Robert. 1998. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kacowicz, Arie M. 1998. “The South Ameican Zone of Peace, 1883-1996.” In Zones Of Peace In The Third World, 67–124. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Katzenstein, Peter J. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Kelly, Robert E. 2007. “Security Theory in the ‘New Regionalism.’” International Studies Review 9 (2): 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2007.00671.x

Lake, David A. 2009. “Regional Hierarchy: Authority and Local International Order.” Review of International Studies 35 (S1): 35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008420

Lake, David A., and PatrickMorgan. 1997. Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Lapp, Nancy D. 2012. “Resistance Is Útil (Useful): Responses to Brazilian Hegemony.” In Beyond Great Powers and Hegemons: Why Secondary States Support, Follow or Challenge, edited by Kristen P.Williams, Steven E.Lobell, and Neal G.Jesse, 145–60. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Lima, Maria Regina Soares de. 2013. “Relações Interamericanas: A Nova Agenda Sul-Americana e o Brasil.” Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política 90: 167–201.

Lima, Maria Regina Soares de, and MonicaHirst. 2006. “Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities.” International Affairs 82 (1): 21–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3569128

Mace, Gordon, Andrew F.Cooper, and Timothy M.Shaw. 2010. Inter-American Cooperation at a Crossroads. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879.

Mahoney, James. 2006. “On the Second Wave of Historical Sociology, 1970s– Present.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 47 (5): 371–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715206068619

Mahoney, James. 2015. “Process Tracing and Historical Explanation.” Security Studies 24 (2): 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1036610

Mahoney, James, and RachelSweet Vanderpoel. 2015. “Set Diagrams and Qualitative Research.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (1): 65–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013519410

Malamud, Andrés. 2011. “A Leader without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy.” Latin American Politics & Society 53 (3): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00123.x

Malamud, Andrés, and IsabellaAlcañiz. 2017. “Managing Security in a Zone of Peace: Brazil´s Soft Approach to Regional Governance.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 60 (1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201700102

Malamud, Andrés, and Júlio C.Rodriguez. 2013. “Com Um Pé Na Região e Outro No Mundo: O Dualismo Crescente Da Política Externa Brasileira.” Estudos Internacionais 1 (2): 167–83.

Mares, David R. 2001. Violent Peace: Militarized Interstate Bargaining in Latin America. New York: Columbia University Press.

Martín, Félix E. 2006. Militarist Peace in South America: Conditions for War and Peace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: WW Norton & Company.

Merke, Federico. 2015. “Neither Balance nor Bandwagon: South American International Society Meets Brazil’s Rising Power.” International Politics 52 (2): 178–92. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.49

Mesquita, Rafael. 2016. “The Hegemonic Hermano : South American Collective Identity and Brazilian Regional Strategy.” Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue Canadienne Des Études Latino-Américaines et Caraïbes 41 (2): 215–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2016.1182691

Mijares, Víctor M. 2020. “Filling the Structural Gap: Geopolitical Links Explaining the South American Defense Council.” Colombia Internacional 101: 3–28. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint101.2020.01

Morin, Edgar. 1990. Introduction à La Pensée Complexe. Paris: ESF.

Nabers, Dirk. 2010. “Power, Leadership and Hegemony in International Politics.” In Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, edited by DanielFlemes, 51-69. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

Nolte, Detlef. 2010. “How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics.” Review of International Studies 36 (4): 881–801. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051000135X

Nolte, Detlef. 2011. “Regional Powers and Regional Governance.” In Regional Powers and Regional Orders, edited by NadineGodehardt and DirkNabers, 49–67. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815984

Oelsner, Andrea. 2005. International Relations in Latin America: Peace and Security in the Southern Cone. New York: Routledge.

Poggio Teixeira, Gustavo. 2014. Brazil, the United States, and the South American Subsystem: Regional Politics and the Absent Empire. New York: Lexington Books.

Prys, Miriam. 2010. “Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood.” International Studies Review 12 (4): 479–504.

Quiliconi, Cintia, and RaúlSalgado Espinoza. 2017. “Latin American Integration: Regionalism à La Carte in a Multipolar World?” Colombia Internacional 92 (October): 15–41. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint92.2017.01.

Rezende, Lucas Pereira. 2016. “Brasil: Ator Unipolar Na América Do Sul?” Carta Internacional 11 (1): 274. https://doi.org/10.21530/ci.v11n1.2016.355

Riggirozzi, Pía, and JeanGrugel. 2015. “Regional Governance and Legitimacy in South America: The Meaning of UNASUR.” International Affairs 91 (4): 781–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12340

Riggirozzi, Pía, and DianaTussie. 2012. The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2694-9.

Rivarola Puntigliano, Andres, and JoséBriceño-Ruiz. 2013. Resilience of Regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean: Development and Autonomy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rodriguez, Júlio César Cossio. 2012. “Chacal Ou Cordeiro? O Brasil Frente Aos Desafios e Oportunidades Do Sistema Internacional.” Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional 55 (2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292012000200005.

Rosenau, James N., and Ernst-OttoCzempiel. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ruggie, John G. 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis.” World Politics 35 (2): 261–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010273

Ruggie, John G. 1989. “International Structure and International Transformation: Space, Time and Method.” In Global Changes and Theoretical Challanges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s, edited by James N.Rosenau and Ernst-OttoCzempiel, 21–36. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. London: Macmillan.

Schenoni, Luis L. 2012. “As Possíveis Causas Domésticas Da Liderança Brasileira Na América Do Sul.” Contexto Internacional 34 (2): 659–91.

Schenoni, Luis. 2018. “The Argentina-Brazil Regional Power Transition.” Foreign Policy Analysis 14 (4): 469–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orx008.

Schweller, Randall L. 2006. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Simpson, Gerry. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Skocpol, Theda. 1984. Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Edited by ThedaSkocpol. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621567

Souza, Nilson Araújo de. 2012. “América Latina: As Ondas Da Integração.” OIKOS 11 (1): 87–126.

Spektor, Matias. 2010. “Ideias de Ativismo Regional: A Transformação Das Leituras Brasileiras Da Região.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 53 (1): 25–44.

Stewart-Ingersoll, Robert, and DerrickFrazier. 2012. Regional Powers and Security Orders: A Theoretical Framework. New York: Routledge.

Teixeira, Carlos Gustavo Poggio. 2011. “Brazil and the Institutionalization of South America: From Hemispheric Estrangement to Cooperative Hegemony.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 54 (2): 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292011000200010

Tilly, Charles. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.

Tilly, Charles. 2001. “Mechanisms in Political Processes.” Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.21.

Vadell, Javier A. 2019. “China in Latin America: South-South Cooperation with Chinese Characteristics.” Latin American Perspectives 46 (2): 107–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X18815511.

Varas, Augusto. 2008. “Brazil in South America: From Indifference to Hegemony.” FRIDE Working Papers. http://fride.org/publication/415/brazil-in-south-america:-from-indifference-to-hegemony.

Vedovato, Ana Luiza, and IgorCastellano. 2019. “O Estado Como Unidade de Análise Dos Sistemas Regionais: Impactos Na Estrutura Sistêmica Da América Do Sul.” Revista Debates 13 (2): 195–222. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.88730

Vitelli, Marina. 2015. “La Identidad Estratégica de Brasil: Política de Defensa Para Un Jugador Global.” Colombia Internacional, no. 85: 141–69. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint85.2015.05.

Waltz, Kenneth W. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Watson, Adam. 1992. The Evolution of International Society. London: Routledge.

Watson, Adam. 2006. Hegemony and History. London: Routledge.

Wehner, Leslie E. 2015. “Role Expectations As Foreign Policy: South American Secondary Powers’ Expectations of Brazil As A Regional Power.” Foreign Policy Analysis 11 (4): 435–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12048

Wendt, Alexander E. 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41 (3): 335. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X

License