Colombia Internacional

Colomb. int. | eISSN 1900-6004 | ISSN 0121-5612

Simultaneous and Open Primaries in Latin America. A Preliminary Proposal for a Comparative Study

No. 118 (2024-04-11)
  • Daniel Buquet
    Universidad de la República (Uruguay)
  • Ariadna Gallo
    Conicet/Iealc (Argentina)
    ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0605-2202
https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint118.2024.01

Abstract

Objective/context: This article presents a comparative analysis of the system of simultaneous and open presidential primaries (PAS, for its acronym in Spanish) in Latin American countries that have adopted legislation on the subject. In what appears to be a growing trend, nine countries—with differences among them—have established a PAS regime regulated by the electoral body and with public financing. Methodology: First, a description is presented to characterize and classify different PAS systems, considering their main normative differences. Then, hypotheses about their possible effects are proposed based on the literature on presidential primaries and electoral systems. Finally, taking into account the results of the primaries carried out and the subsequent presidential elections, an attempt is made to show to what extent the PAS system encourages citizen participation and competition for nomination, whether it favors or harms the parties that carry them out, and its capacity to stabilize the party system. Conclusions: Factors that stimulate participation, such as compulsory voting and simultaneity with other elections, and encourage competition, such as open presidential ticket, are identified. No institutional factors are found to directly benefit or harm the groups that decide the candidacy in a primary, although conflicting primaries seem to affect them. The ability of the PAS system to stabilize party systems seems to depend on its interaction with other institutional and political factors. Originality: This is the first work that ventures into a comparative analysis of the PAS system with regional coverage.

Keywords: Latin America, political parties, presidential candidates, presidential primaries, primary elections, simultaneous open primaries

References

Adams, James y Samuel Merrill. 2008. “Candidate and Party Strategies in Two- Stage Elections Beginning with a Primary”. American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 344-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00316.x

Agranov, Marina. 2011. “Flip-Flopping, Intense Primaries and the Selection of Candidates”, 1.o de diciembre, 1-27. Consultado el 23 de febrero de 2022. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2412252

Alcántara Sáez, Manuel. 2002. “Experimentos de democracia interna: las primarias de partidos en América Latina”. Working Paper of the Kellogg Institute 293: 1-45. Consultado el 17 de julio de 2018. https://kellogg.nd.edu/sites/default/files/old_files/documents/293_0.pdf

Aldrich, John H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout”. American Journal of Political Science 37: 246-278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111531

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Altman, David. 2013. “Universal Party Primaries and General Election Outcomes: The Case of Uruguay (1999-2009)”. Parliamentary Affairs 66 (4): 834-855. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss010

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Shigeo Hirano y James Snyder. 2006. “What Did the Direct Primary Do to Party Loyalty in Congress?”. En Process, Party, and Policy Making: Further New Perspectives on the History of Congress, editado por David Brady y Matthew McCubbins, 21-36. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Aragón, Fernando M. 2013. “Political Parties, Candidate Selection, and Quality of Government”. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 13 (2): 783-810. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2013-0036

Atkenson, Lonna R. 1998. “Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes: Another Look at Presidential Campaigns”. American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 256-271. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991755

Barnea, Shlomit y Gideon Rahat. 2007. “Reforming Candidate Selection Methods: A Three-Level Approach”. Party Politics 13 (3): 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807075942

Benoit, Kenneth. 2006. “Duverger’s Law and the Study of Electoral Systems”.

French Politics 4 (1): 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200092

Bibby, John. 1996. Politics, Parties, and Elections in America. Chicago: Nelson- Hall.

Birch, Sara. 2016. Full Participation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Boatright, Robert G., Vincent G. Moscardelli y Clifford D. Vickrey. 2020. “Primary Election Timing and Voter Turnout”. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 19 (4): 472-485. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2019.0583

Bunker, Kenneth y Gabriel L. Negretto. 2023. “The Party System Effects of Unstable Electoral Rules in Latin America”. Party Politics 0 (0): en línea. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231196111

Buquet, Daniel. 2007. “Entre la legitimidad y la eficacia: reformas en los sistemas de elección presidencial en América Latina”. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 16: 35-49. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/6939

Buquet, Daniel y Daniel Chasquetti. 2008. “Presidential Candidate Selection in Uruguay: 1942-2004”. En Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America, editado por Peter Siavelis y Scott Morgenstern, 319-359. University Park: Penn State University Press.

Buquet, Daniel y Ariadna Gallo. 2022. “Elección presidencial a tres vueltas: efectos de las primarias abiertas, simultáneas y obligatorias en Argentina y Uruguay”. Opinião Pública 28 (2): 292-321. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912022282292

Buquet, Daniel y Rafael Piñeiro. 2011. “Participación electoral en las elecciones primarias en Uruguay”. Revista Debates 5 (2): 79-95. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.22615

Burden, Barry y Steven Greene. 2000. “Party Attachments and State Election Laws”. Political Research Quarterly 53: 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290005300103

Burden, Barry y Phillip Jones. 2009. “Strategic Voting in the US”. En Duverger’s Law of Plurality Voting. The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States, editado por Bernard Grofman, André Blais y Shaun Bowler, 47-64. Nueva York: Springer.

Burden, Barry C., Bradley M. Jones y Michael S. Kang. 2014. “Sore Loser Laws and Congressional Polarization”. Legislative Studies Quarterly 39: 299-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2354168

Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, William Miller y Donald Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Nueva York: Wiley.

Cancela, Joao y Benny Geys. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-analysis of National and Subnational Elections”. Electoral Studies 42: 264-275 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005

Carey, John y John Polga-Hecimovich. 2006. “Primary Elections and Candidate Strength in Latin America”. The Journal of Politics 68 (3): 530-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00443.x

Cho, Seok-Ju e Insun Kang. 2015. “Open Primaries and Crossover Voting”.

Journal of Theoretical Politics 27 (3): 351-379 https://doi.org/10.1177/09516298145316

Cohen, Marty, David Karol, Hans Noel y John Zaller. 2008. The Party Decides. Presidential Nomination before and after Reforms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Colomer, Josep. 2002. “Las elecciones primarias presidenciales en América Latina y sus consecuencias políticas”. En El asedio a la política, editado por Marcelo Cavarozzi y Juan Abal Medina, 117-134. Rosario: Homo Sapiens.

Corbetta, Piergiorgio y Rinaldo Vignati. 2013. “The Primaries of the Centre Left: Only a Temporary Success?”. Contemporary Italian Politics 5 (1): 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2013.788269

Cox, Gary W. 1997. La coordinación estratégica de los sistemas electorales del mundo. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Cox, Gary W. y Michael C. Munger. 1989. “Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 U. S. House Elections”. American Political Science Review 83: 217-231. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956441

Cross, William, Ofer Kenig, Scott Pruysers y Gideon Rahat. 2016. The Promise and Challenge of Party Primary Elections: A Comparative Perspective. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Crotty, William y John Jackson. 1985. “Presidential Primaries and Nomination”.

American Political Science Review 79 (3): 836-837. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956853

Cruz, Camilo, Fabián Acuña y Cristhian Uribe. 2023. “¿Elección a cuatro vueltas? El uso de primarias interpartidistas en las elecciones presidenciales de Colombia de 2022”. Colombia Internacional 116: 67-101. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint116.2023.03

Duverger, Maurice. (1951) 1996. Los partidos políticos. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Epstein, León. 1986. Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Fearon, James D. 1991. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science”. World Politics 43 (2): 169-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010470

Fiorina, Morris. 1999. “What Ever Happened to the Median Voter?”. Trabajo presentado en MIT Conference on Parties and Congress, Cambridge, 2 de octubre.

Freidenberg, Flavia. 2003. Selección de candidatos y democracia interna en los partidos de América Latina. Biblioteca de la Reforma Política 1. Lima: International IDEA.

Freidenberg, Flavia, coord. 2022. Reformas electorales en América Latina. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas.

Freidenberg, Flavia y Tomas Dosek. 2016. “Las reformas electorales en América Latina (1978-2015)”. En Reformas políticas en América Latina, tendencias y casos, editado por Kevin Casas-Zamora, Marian Vidaurri, Betilde Muñoz-Pogossian y Raquel Chanto, 25-92. Washington D. C.: OEA.

Freidenberg, Flavia y Cristhian Uribe. 2018. “Las reformas político-electorales en América Latina (2015-2018)”. Documento de Trabajo n.o 13. Observatorio de Reformas Políticas en América Latina. Microsoft Word. reformaspoliticas.org

Gallagher, Michael y Michael Marsh, eds. 1998. Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective. The Secret Garden of Politics. Londres: Sage.

Gallo, Ariadna. 2021. “Entre lo ideado y lo obtenido: un análisis de los efectos de las primarias abiertas en Argentina a diez años de su incorporación formal”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política 34: 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2021.34.241061

Geer, John. 1988. “Assessing the Representativeness of Electorates in Presidential Primaries”. American Journal of Political Science 32 (4): 929-945.

Geys, Benny. 2006. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate Level Research”. Electoral Studies 25 (4): 637-663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341700062X

Grofman, Bernard, Orestis Troumpounis y Dimitrios Xefteris. 2019. “Electoral Competition with Primaries and Quality Asymmetries”. The Journal of Politics 81 (1): 260-273. https://doi.org/10.1086/700271

Hazan, Rouven y Gideon Rahat. 2010. Democracy within Parties. Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hirano, Shigeo y James Snyder. 2019. Primary Elections in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ignazi, Piero. 2017. The Uneven Road to Party Legitimacy. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

Johnson, Gregg B., Meredith-Joy Petersheim y Jesse T. Wasson 2010. “Divisive Primaries and Incumbent General Election Performance: Prospects and Costs in U. S. House Races”. American Politics Research 38 (5): 931-955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09345823

Kang, Michael. 2011. “Sore Loser Laws and Democratic Contestation”. Georgetown Law Journal 99: 113. Emory Law and Economics Research Paper n.o 11-102. SSRN. Consultado el 3 de abril de 2022. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1809970

Kang, Michael y Barry Burden. 2018. “Sore Loser Laws in Presidential and Congressional Elections”. En Routledge Handbook of Primary Elections. Nueva York: Routledge. SSRN. Consultado el 15 de julio de 2022. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3410165

Katz, Richard y Peter Mair. 1995. Three Faces of Party Organization: Adaptation and Change. Working Paper of the European Policy Research Unit. Manchester: University of Manchester.

Kaufmann, Karen, James Gimpel y Adam Hoffman. 2003. “A Promise Fulfilled? Open Primaries and Representation”. The Journal of Politics 65 (2): 457-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-2-00009

Kemahlioglu, Ozge, Rebecca Weitz-Shapiro y Shigeo Hirano. 2009. “Why Primaries in Latin American Presidential Elections?”. The Journal of Politics 71 (1): 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608090221

Kenney, Patrick y Tom Rice. 1987. “The Relationship between Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes”. American Journal of Political Science 31 (1): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111323

Key, Vladimir O. 1964. Politics, Parties and Pressure Group. Nueva York: Thomas Crowell Company.

Kirkpatrick, Jeane. 1976. The New Presidential Elite. Nueva York: Russell Sage.

Laakso, Markku y Rein Taagepera. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe”. Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407901200101

Langston, Joy. 2010. “El dinosaurio que no murió: el PRI de México”. En Del nacionalismo al neoliberalismo 1940-1994, editado por Elisa Servín, 295-344. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Ley 26571 de 2009. Ley de Democratización de la Representación Política, la Transparencia y la Equidad Electoral. Argentina. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/ normativa/nacional/ley-26571-161453/actualizacion

McClintock, Cynthia. 2018. Electoral Rules and Democracy in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McClosky, Herbert. 1964. “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics”.

American Political Science Review 58 (2): 361-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952868

Moore, David y Richard Hofstetter. 1973. “The Representativeness of Primary Elections: Ohio, 1968”. Polity 6 (2): 196-222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234007

Negretto, Gabriel. 2007. La reforma electoral en América Latina: entre el interés partidario y las demandas ciudadanas. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Norrander, Barbara. 1989. “Ideological Representativeness of Presidential Primary Voters”. American Journal of Political Science 33: 570-558. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111063

Peterson, David y Paul Djupe. 2005. “When Primary Campaigns Go Negative: The Determinants of Campaign Negativity”. Political Research Quarterly 58 (1): 45-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/3595594

Piereson, James y Terry Smith. 1977. “Primary Divisiveness and General Election Success: A Re-examination”. Journal of Politics 37: 555-561. https://doi.org/10.2307/2129007

Polsby, Nelson. 1983. Consequences of Party Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rahat, Gideon y Rouven Hazan. 2001. “Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework”. Party Politics 7 (3): 297-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068801007003003

Ranney, Austin. 1968. “The Representativeness of Primary Electorates”. Midwest Journal of Political Science 12 (2): 224-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110334

Rombi, Stefano. 2021. “Voters’ Motivation for Selecting the Party Leader: The Case of the Italian Democratic Party”. Frontiers in Political Science 29: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.742232

Sandri, Giulia. 2011. “Leadership Selection Methods in Italy and Their Consequences on Membership Mobilization”. Documento presentado en ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 12-17 de abril.

Santoro, Ignacio. 2020. “¿Menos partidos, más democracia? Análisis del impacto de las primarias obligatorias en el sistema de partidos en Argentina”. Elecciones 19 (20): 109-139. https://doi.org/10.53557/Elecciones.2020.v19n20.05

Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Schattschneider, Elmer. (1941) 1964. Régimen de partidos. Madrid: Tecnos.

Serra, Gilles. 2011. “Why Primaries? The Party’s Tradeoff between Policy and Valence”. Journal of Theoretical Politics 23: 21-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/09516298103828

Serra, Gilles. 2013. “No Polarization in Spite of Primaries: A Median Voter Theorem with Competitive Nominations”. En The Political Economy of Governance Institutions, Political Performance and Elections, editado por Norman Schofield y Gonzalo Caballero, 211-229. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Siavelis, Peter y Scott Morgenstern. 2008. “Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America: A Framework for Analysis”. En Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America, editado por Peter Siavelis y Scott Morgenstern, 3-37. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.

Steger, Wayne P. 2015. A Citizen’s Guide to Presidential Nominations: The Competition for Leadership. Nueva York: Routledge.

Uribe Mendoza, Cristhian. 2022. “Las reformas electorales en América Latina: los retos en los procesos de cambio institucional y los desafíos para la construcción democrática”. En Reformas electorales en América Latina, editado por Flavia Freidenberg, 315-330. Ciudad de México: UNAM.

Villaplana Jiménez, Ramón, Adrián Megías y Óscar Barberà. 2023. “Party Primaries and Turnout: Meso-level Explanations”. Party Politics 0 (0): en línea. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231199450

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Buquet, Ariadna Gallo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.