Colombia Internacional

Colomb. int. | eISSN 1900-6004 | ISSN 0121-5612

Para além da confrontação: examinando os conflitos relacionais e os espaços de vulnerabilidade nas relações internacionais

No. 125 (2026-01-14)
  • Javier Herrán Gallego
    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia - UNED (Espanha)
    ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6437-1090

Resumo

Objetivo/contexto: desenvolver um quadro analítico orientado para o estudo dos processos de subjetivação em cenários que, mesmo na ausência de conflito, constituem espaços decisivos para a própria gestação de configurações conflituosas. O estudo parte de um diálogo entre distintas tradições teóricas —ocidentais e sinocêntricas— que aborda a natureza e as causas do conflito internacional. A partir desta discussão, introduz-se a noção de conflito relacional como uma categoria diferenciada, mas complementar, em relação às conceções convencionais de conflito. Metodologia: sobre uma base conceptual heterogénea, aplica-se uma abordagem metodológica hermenêutica e propõem-se os espaços de vulnerabilidade como zonas liminares situadas entre o risco e o conflito —convencional e relacional— caracterizadas por uma construção subjetiva da incerteza. Conclusões: os espaços de vulnerabilidade constituem um quadro teórico sólido para a categorização e análise de diversos padrões de conduta e mecanismos de filtragem perante um mesmo fenómeno, o que permite ampliar a noção de vulnerabilidade para múltiplas dimensões. Originalidade: examina o papel da relacionalidade chinesa na sua abordagem ao conflito e destaca a existência de espaços de significação plural que, embora se manifestem na realidade empírica, carecem de uma conceptualização teórica adequada dentro da disciplina.

Palavras-chave: conflito, confucionismo, relacionalidade, relações internacionais, teorias das relações internacionais, vulnerabilidade

Referências

Acharya, Amitav. 2014. Rethinking Power, Institutions and Ideas in World Politics: Whose IR Matters? Londres: Routledge.

Acharya, Amitav. 2018. Constructing Global Order: Agency and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Acharya, Amitav y Barry Buzan. 2019. The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at Its Centenary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca y Ayşe Zarakol. 2021. “Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents”. International Organization 75 (2): 611-634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454

Ashley, Richard K. 1987. “The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics”. Alternatives 12 (4): 403-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437548701200401

Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Nueva York: Basic Books.

Ayoob, Mohammed. 1995. The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

Baldwin, David A. 1984. Economic Statecraft. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Barbalet, Jack. 2021. The Theory of Guanxi and Chinese Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brands, Hal. 2018. American Grand Strategy in the Age of Trump. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Buzan, Barry y Ole Wæver. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Campbell, David. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Chan, Wing-Tsit. 2002. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Chen, C. Chao, Ya-Ru Chen y Katherine R. Xin. 2004. “Guanxi Practices and Trust in Management: A Procedural Justice Perspective”. Organization Science 15 (2): 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0047

Chiozza, Giacomo y Hein E. Goemans. 2011. Leaders and International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, Ian. 2011. Hegemony in International Society. Londres: Oxford University Press.

CNDH (Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos). 2015. Informe especial sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en México. Ciudad de México: CNDH.

Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1993. “Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Structural Analysis of US Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines”. International Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 297-320. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600810

Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1997. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Echeverría, Jesús. 2019. Relaciones internacionales III: paz, seguridad y defensa en la sociedad internacional. Madrid: UNED.

Fierke, Karin M. y Vivienne Jabri. 2019. “Global Conversations: Relationality, Embodiment and Power in the Move towards a Global IR”. Global Constitutionalism 8 (3): 506-535. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381719000121

Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Finnemore, Martha y Michelle Jurkovich. 2020. “The Politics of Aspiration”. International Studies Quarterly 64 (4): 759-769. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa052

Finnemore, Martha y Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change”. International Organization 52 (4): 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789

Fung, Yu-lan. 1989. A History of Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gilpin, Robert. 1975. U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. Nueva York: Basic Books.

Hagström, Linus y Karl Gustafsson. 2015. Japan and Identity Change: Why It Matters in International Relations. Londres: Routledge.

Heginbotham, Eric y Richard J. Samuels. 2021. “Balance of Economic Resources and Conventional Military Potential”. En Pick Your Poison: Comparing the Deterrence Problem in Asia and Europe, editado por Paul van Hooft y Tim Sweijs, 3-9. La Haya: Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.

Hopf, Ted. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory”. International Security 23 (1): 171-200. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.171

Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Huang, Yong. 2013. Confucius: A Guide for the Perplexed. Londres: Bloomsbury.

Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Jervis, Robert. 1999. “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate”. International Security 24 (1): 42-63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347

Jiang, Qing 2013. A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.

Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Kavalski, Emilian. 2018. “Guanxi or What Is the Chinese for Relational Theory of World Politics”. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 18 (3): 397-420. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcy008

Kavalski, Emilian. 2022. “What Can Guanxi International Relations Be About?”. En China’s Rise and Rethinking International Relations Theory, editado por Chengxin Pan y Emilian Kavlaski, 62-82. Bristol: Bristol University Press.

Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Keohane, Robert O. y Joseph Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson y Duncan Snidal. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions”. International Organization 55 (4): 761-799. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3078615

Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Layne, Christopher. 2018. “The Us–Chinese Power Shift and the End of the Pax Americana”. International Affairs 94 (1): 89-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix249

Legler, Thomas, Martin Turzi y Eduardo Tzili-Apango. 2018. “China y la búsqueda de la gobernanza regional autónoma en América Latina”. Revista Cidob d’Afers Internacionals 119: 245-264. https://www.cidob.org/publicaciones/china-y-la-busqueda-de-la-gobernanza-regional-autonoma-en-america-latina

Lejano, Raúl P. 2021. “Relationality: An Alternative Framework for Analysing Policy”. Journal of Public Policy 41 (2): 360-383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X20000057

Li, Chenyang. 2014. The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony. Londres: Routledge.

Liang, Shuming. 1989. History of Chinese Philosophy of Harmony. Londres: Routledge.

Ling, L. H. M. 2013. Imagining World Politics: Sihar & Shenya, A Fable for Our Times. Nueva York. Routledge.

Martin, Lisa L. 1992. “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism”. International Organization 46 (4): 765-792. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033245

Martin, Lisa L. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

McCourt, David M. 2023. The New Constructivism in International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McGrew, Anthony y Paul Lewis, eds. 1992. Global Politics: Globalization and the Nation-State. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Mckeever, Kevin y Lynn Davies. 1999. Politics and International Relations. Nueva York: Harper Collins.

Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. “The False Promise of International Institutions”. International Security 19 (3): 5-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078

Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Nueva York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Milner, Helen V. 1992. “International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses”. World Politics 44 (3): 466-496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546

Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics”. International Organization 51 (4): 513-553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447

Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Nueva York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Nordin, Astrid H. M., Graham M. Smith, Raoul Bunskoek, Chiug-chiu Huang, Yih-jye (Jay) Hwang, Patrick Thaddeus Jackson, Emilian Kavalski et al. 2019. “Towards Global Relational Theorizing: A Dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone Scholarship on Relationalism”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (5): 570-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1643978

Nye, Joseph S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Nueva York: PublicAffairs.

Oye, Kenneth A., ed. 1986. Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Perez Mena, Ferran. 2024. Contender States and Modern Chinese International Thought: From the Republican Era until the “Chinese School of International Relations”. Singapur: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pye, Lucian. 1981. The Dynamics of Chinese Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.

Qin, Yaqing. 2018. A Relational Theory of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Qin, Yaqing y Astrid H. M. Nordin. 2019. “Relationality and Rationality in Confucian and Western Traditions of Thought”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (5): 601-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1641470

Rosecrance, Richard. 1986. The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. Nueva York: Basic Books.

Shih, Chih-yu. 2024. Relations and Roles in China’s Internationalism: Rediscovering Confucianism in a Pluriversal World. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Sil, Rudra y Peter J. Katzenstein. 2010. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tang, Junyi. 2005. Essays on Chinese Philosophy and Culture. Taipéi: Student Book Co.

Tickner, Arlene B. y David L. Blaney, eds. 2012. Thinking International Relations Differently. Londres: Routledge.

Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Nueva York: Addison-Wesley.

Weiming, Tu. 2010. The Global Significance of Concrete Humanity: Essays on the Confucian Discourse in Cultural China. Boston: Cheng & Tsui Company.

Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wight, Colin. 2006. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Womack, Brantly. 2023. Recentering Pacific Asia: Regional China and the Global Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Xin, Katherine R. y Jone L. Pearce. 1996. “Guanxi: Connections as Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support”. The Academy of Management Journal 39 (6): 1641-1658. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/257072

Yan, Xuetong. 2019. Leadership and the Rise of Great Powers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Yao, Xinzhong. 2000. An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zhang, Feng. 2015. Chinese Hegemony: Grand Strategy and International Institutions in East Asian History. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Zhao, Tingyang. 2019. Redefining a Philosophy for World Governance. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

Licença

Copyright (c) 2026 Javier Herrán Gallego

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.