Coautoria de propostas legislativas no Congresso colombiano, 2002-2006
No. 83 (2015-01-01)Autor(es)
-
Eduardo AlemánUniversity of Houston (US)
Resumo
Neste artigo, examinam-se as conexões políticas existentes entre os legisladores colombianos (representantes e senadores) durante a primeira presidência de Álvaro Uribe (2002-2006). A análise utiliza informação sobre a coautoria de propostas legislativas. A iniciação destas por um par de legisladores captura a intenção de ambos de mudar o statu quo numa direção específica. Essa cooperação para promover propostas legislativas revela as similitudes que existem entre os atores políticos. Examinar as conexões entre os diferentes grupos e a densidade das conexões existentes dentro desses grupos pode informar-nos a respeito dos partidos e das preferências políticas de seus membros. Neste artigo, pesquisam-se esses aspectos da rede de conexões estabelecidas nas câmaras do congresso colombiano por meio da coautoria de propostas legislativas. Além de iluminar a coesão e o alinhamento dos partidos, este artigo constata que as conexões baseadas na coautoria são também influenciadas por aspectos institucionais e regionais.
Referências
Alemán, Eduardo.2009. Institutions, Political Conflict, and the Cohesion of Policy Networks in the Chilean Congress, 1961-2006. Journal of Latin American Studies41 (3): 467-491.
Alemán, Eduardo, ErnestoCalvo, Mark P.Jones, and NoahKaplan. 2009. Comparing Cosponsorship and Roll-Call Ideal Points. Legislative Studies Quarterly34 (1): 87-116.
Alemán, Eduardo and ErnestoCalvo. 2013. Explaining Policy Ties: A Network Analysis of Bill Initiation Data. Political Studies61(2): 356-377
Alesina, Alberto, AlbertoCarrasquilla, and Juan JoséEchevarría. 2005. Decentralization in Colombia. In Institutional Reforms: The Case of Colombia, ed. AlbertoAlesina, 175-208. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Archer, Ronald P. and Matthew S.Shugart. 1997. The Unrealized Potential of Presidential Dominance in Colombia. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, eds. ScottMainwaring and Matthew S.Shugart, 110-159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Balla, Steven J. and Christine L.Nemacheck. 2001. Position-Taking, Legislative Signaling, and Non-Expert Extremism: Cosponsorship of Managed Care Legislation in the 105th House of Representatives. Congress & the Presidency27 (2): 163-188.
Botero, Felipe and Lucio R.Rennó. 2007. Career Choice and Legislative Reelection: Evidence from Brazil and Colombia. Brazilian Political Science Review1 (1): 102-124.
Campbell, James.1982. Co-Sponsoring Legislation in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly7 (3): 415-422.
Carroll, Royce and MónicaPachón. 2014. The Unrealized Potential of Presidential Coalitions in Colombia. To be included in Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America, eds. EduardoAlemán and GeorgeTsebelis.
Coppedge, Michael.1997. A Classification of Latin American Party Systems. Working Paper 244. Notre Dame: Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame.
Crisp, Brian F., KristinKanthak, and JennyLeijonhufvud. 2004. The Reputations Legislators Build: With Whom Should Representatives Collaborate?American Political Science Review98 (4): 703-716.
Escobar-Lemmon, María. 2003. Political Support for Decentralization: An Analysis of the Colombian and Venezuelan Legislatures. American Journal of Political Science47 (4): 683-697.
Fowler, James.2006. Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks. Political Analysis14 (4): 456-487.
Giraldo, Fernando and José DanielLópez. 2006. El comportamiento electoral y de partidos en los comicios para Cámara de Representantes de 2002 y 2006: un estudio comparado desde la Reforma Política. Colombia Internacional64: 122-153.
Goodreau, Steven M., Mark S.Handcock, David R.Hunter, Carter T.Butts, and MartinaMorris. 2008. A Statnet Tutorial. Journal of Statistical Software24 (9): 1-26.
Handcock, Mark S., David R.Hunter, Carter T.Butts, Steven M.Goodreau, and MartinaMorris. 2003. Statnet: Software Tools for the Statistical Modeling of Network Data. University of Washington. [Online]http://statnetproject.org
Hunter, David R., Mark S.Handcock, Carter T.Butts, Steven M.Goodreau, and MartinaMorris. 2008. ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks. Journal of Statistical Software24 (3): 1-28.
Jones, Mark P.2007. Political Parties and Party Systems in Latin America. Paper prepared for the symposium Prospects for Democracy in Latin America. Denton: Department of Political Science, University of North Texas.
Kessler, Daniel and KeithKrehbiel. 1996. Dynamics of Cosponsorship. American Political Science Review90 (3): 555-566.
Krivitsky, Pavel N.2012. Exponential-Family Random Graph Models for Valued Networks. Electronic Journal of Statistics6: 1100-1128.
Light, Paul C.1992. Forging Legislation. New York: W.W. Norton.
Mayhew, David.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nielson, Daniel L. and Matthew S.Shugart. 1999. Constitutional Change in Colombia: Policy Adjustment through Institutional Change. Comparative Political Studies32 (3): 313-341.
Robins, Garry, PipPattison, YuvalKalish, and DeanLusher. 2007. An Introduction to Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models for Social Networks. Social Networks29: 173-191.
Rosas, Guillermo.2005. The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: An Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences. Comparative Political Studies38 (7): 824-849.
Saiegh, Sebastián M.2009. Recovering a Basic Space from Elite Surveys: Evidence from Latin America. Legislative Studies Quarterly34 (1): 117-145.
Talbert, Jeffery C. and MatthewPotoski. 2002. Setting the Legislative Agenda: The Dimensional Structure of Bill Cosponsoring and Floor Voting. Journal of Politics64 (3): 864-891.
TamCho, WendyK. and James H.Fowler. 2010. Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation. The Journal of Politics72 (1): 124-135.
Wasserman, Stanley and GarryRobins. 2005. An Introduction to Random Graphs, Dependence Graphs, and p*. In Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, eds. Peter J.Carrington, JohnScott, and StanleyWasserman, 148-161. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wawro, Gregory.2000. Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Zhang, Yan, A. J.Friend, Amanda L.Traud, Mason A.Porter, James H.Fowler, and Peter J.Mucha. 2008. Community Structure in Congressional Cosponsorship Networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications387 (7): 1705-1712.
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.