Cooperação dependente associada. Relações estratégicas assimétricas entre a Colômbia e os Estados Unidos da América
No. 85 (2015-09-01)Autor(es)
-
Arlene B. TicknerUniversidad de los Andes (Colombia)
-
Mateo MoralesUniversidad de los Andes (Colombia)
Resumo
A “exportação” da segurança se converteu em peça-chave da política exterior da Colômbia. Embora a cooperação prestada pelo país a terceiros obedeça a uma estratégia de projeção regional e internacional, boa parte dela é produto da triangulação com os Estados Unidos. O objetivo principal deste artigo é interrogar criticamente esse novo modelo de interação bilateral à luz da literatura conceitual sobre as relações internacionais assimétricas, que gira em torno dos graus de dependência, submissão, penetração, reciprocidade e autonomia que existem entre os Estados com diferenças marcadas de poder. Argumentamos que, em situações caracterizadas pela assimetria, um comportamento mais autônomo do país débil não necessariamente se contrapõe com ser dependente do forte. Contudo, o artigo conclui que a “cooperação dependente associada” entre a Colômbia e os Estados Unidos, que parece configurar uma relação bilateral mais estratégica e de menor subordinação, não está isenta de contradições.
Referências
Abernethy, David.1986. Dominant-Subordinate Relationships: How Shall We Define Them? How Do We Compare Them? En Dominant Powers and Subordinate States: The United States in Latin America and the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe, ed. JanTriska, 103-122. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ardila, Martha.1991. Cambio de norte: momentos críticos en la política exterior colombiana. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo Editores.
Biddle, Jesse y JohnStephens.1989. Dependent Development and Foreign Policy: The Case of Jamaica. International Studies Quarterly33 (4): 411-434.
Borda, Sandra.2007. La internacionalización del conflicto armado despues del 11 de Septiembre: ¿la ejecución de una estrategia diplomática o la simple ocurrencia de lo inevitable?Colombia Internacional (65): 66-89
Braveboy-Wagner, Jaqueline Anne. 2003. The Foreign Policy of the Global South: Rethinking Conceptual Frameworks. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Camacho, Carlos.2010. Respice Polum: las relaciones entre Colombia y EE. UU. en el siglo XX y los usos (y abusos) de una locución latina. Historia y Sociedad (19): 175-201.
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique.1973. Associated-Dependent Development: Theoretical and Practical Implications. En Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies and Future, ed. A.Stepan, 142-176. Nueva Haven: Yale University Press.
Cardoso, FernandoHenrique y EnzoFaletto.1969. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
Carney, Christopher.1989. International Patron-Client Relationships: A Conceptual Framework. Studies in Comparative International Development24 (2): 42-55.
Crandall, Russell.2002. Driven by Drugs: U.S. Policy toward Colombia. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
David, Steven R.1991. Explaining Third World Alignment. World Politics43 (2): 233-256.
DeShazo, Peter, TanyaPrimiani y PhillipMcLean.2007. Back from the Brink: Evaluating Progress in Colombia, 1999 ‐2007. CSIS, noviembre.
Donnelly, Jack.2006. Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society. European Journal of International Relations12 (2): 139-170.
Dos Santos, Theotonio.1968. El nuevo carácter de la dependencia. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios Sociológicos10: 1-25.
Dos Santos, Theotonio.1973. Imperialismo y empresas multinacionales. Buenos Aires: Editorial Galerna.
Drekonja, Gerhard.1983. Retos de la política exterior colombiana. Bogotá: CEREC-CEI.
Escudé, Carlos.1995. El realismo de los Estados débiles. Buenos Aires: GEL.
Evans, Peter.1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinationals, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gates, Robert M.2010. Helping Others Defend Themselves. Foreign Affairs89 (4): 2-6.
Gleijeses, Piero.2006. Moscowߣs Proxy? Cuba and Africa 1975-1988. Journal of Cold War Studies8 (4): 98-146.
Hey, Jeanne.1993. Foreign Policy Options under Dependence: A Theoretical Evaluation with Evidence from Ecuador. Journal of Latin American Studies25 (3): 543-574.
Hughes, Jeffrey.1986. On Bargaining. En Dominant Powers and Subordinate States: The United States in Latin America and the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe, ed. JanTriska, 168-200. Durham: Duke University Press.
Jaguaribe, Helio.1979. Autonomía periférica y hegemonía céntrica. Estudios Internacionales46: 91-130.
Jayamaha, Dilshika, ScottBrady, BenFitzgerald y JasonFritz.2010. Lessons Learned from U.S. Government Law Enforcement in International Operations. PKSOI Papers, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
Jenzen-Jones, Nic. 2011. Run Through the Jungle: Colombiaߣs JUNGLA Commandos. Small Wars Journal. Recuperado dehttp://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/run-through-the-jungle-colombia%E2%80%99s-jungla-commandos "http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/run-through-the-jungle-colombia%E2%80%99s-jungla-commandos" http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/run-through-the-jungle-colombia%E2%80%99s-jungla-commandos.
Johnson, Paul.1986. The Subordinate States and Their Strategies. En Dominant Powers and Subordinate States: The United States in Latin America and the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe, ed. JanTriska, 285-309. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kaplan, Robert D.2006. Imperial Grunts. Nueva York: Vintage.
Killebrew, Bob y MatthewIrvine.2011. Security through Partnership: Fighting Transnational Cartels in the Western Hemisphere. Policy Brief. Center for a New American Security.
Klare, Michael.1989. Subterranean Alliances: America’s Global Proxy Network. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Lake, David.1996. Anarchy, Hierarchy and Variety of International Relations. International Organization50 (1): 1-33.
Lake, David.2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Nueva York: Cornell University Press.
Luján, Fernando M.2013. Light Footprints. The Future of American Military Intervention. Voices from the Field. Center for a New American Security.
Main, Alexander.2014. The U.S. Re-militarization of Central America and Mexico. NACLA Report on the Americas47 (2): 65-70.
Moon, Bruce.1983. The Foreign Policy of the Dependent State. International Studies Quarterly27 (3): 315-340.
Mumford, Andrew.2013. Proxy Warfare. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Packenham, Robert A.1992. The Dependency Movement. Scholarship and Politics in Development Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pardo, Rodrigo y Juan GabrielTokatlian. 2010. Segundo centenario y política exterior: una reflexión en torno a Colombia. En Colombia 1910-2010, eds. M. T.Calderón e I. Restrepo, 199-274. Bogotá: Taurus.
Peña, Félix.1973. Argentina en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión SAIC.
Petraeus, David H. y MichaelOߣHanlon. 2013. The Success Story Next Door. Político, septiembre 24. Recuperado dehttp://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/general-david-petraeus-michael-ohanlon-the-success-story-next-door-97316.html
Puig, Juan Carlos. (1980). Doctrinas internacionales y autonomía latinoamericana. Caracas: Instituto de Altos Estudios de América Latina, Universidad Simón Bolivar.
Robinson, Linda.2013. The Future of U.S. Special Operations Forces. Council on Foreign Relations Special Report, No. 66.
Russell, Roberto y Juan GabrielTokatlian. 2003. De la autonomía antagónica a la autonomía relacional: una mirada teórica desde el Cono Sur. Perfiles Latinoamericanos21:159-194.
Russell, Roberto y Juan GabrielTokatlian. 2013. América Latina y su gran estrategia: entre la aquiescencia y la autonomía. Revista CIDOB dߣAfers Internacionals104: 157-180.
Shoemaker, Christopher y JohnSpanier.1984. Patron-Client Relationships. Nueva York: Praeger.
Singer, Marshall.1972. Weak States in a World of Powers: The Dynamics of International Relationships. Nueva York: The Free Press.
Thomas, Jim y ChrisDougherty.2013. Beyond the Ramparts. The Future of U.S. Special Operations Forces. Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA).
Thompson, Andrew.1992. Informal Empire? An Exploration in the History of Anglo-Argentine Relations, 1810-1914. Journal of Latin American Studies24 (2): 419-436.
Tickner, Arlene B.2003. Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies. International Studies Perspectives4: 325-350.
Tickner, Arlene B.2007. Intervención por invitación. Claves de la política exterior colombiana y de sus debilidades principales. Colombia Internacional65: 90-111.
Tokatlian, Juan Gabriel y LeonardoCarvajal.1995. Autonomía y política exterior: un debate abierto, un futuro incierto. Revista CIDOB d’afers Internacionals28: 7-31.
Tokatlian, Juan Gabriel.1996. Pos-Guerra Fría y política exterior. De la autonomía relativa a la autonomía ambigua. Análisis Político28: 22-40.
Tokatlian, Juan Gabriel y RodrigoPardo.1988. Política exterior colombiana: ¿de la subordinación a la autonomía?Bogotá: Tercer Mundo Editores.
Walt, Stephen.1987. The Origins of Alliances. Nueva York: Cornell University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth.1979. Theory of International Politics. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill
Wendt, Alexander y Michael Barnett, M.1993. Dependent State Formation and Third World Militarization. Review of International Studies19 (4): 321-347.
Wendt, Alexander y DanielFriedheim.1995. Hierarchy Under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State. International Organization49 (4): 689-721.
Womack, Brantly.2004. Asymmetry Theory and China’s Concept of Multipolarity. Journal of Contemporary China13 (39): 351-366.
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.