El impacto de las condicionalidades de salud en los programas de transferencias condicionadas de dinero: el caso de la AUH en Argentina

Akresh, R., de Walque, D., & Kazianga, H. (2012). Alternative Cash Transfer Delivery Mechanisms: Impacts on Routine Preventative Health Clinic Visits in Burkina Faso (Working Paper No. 17785). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Angelucci, M., Attanasio, O., & Di Maro, V. (2012). The Impact of Oportunidades on Consumption, Savings and Transfers. Fiscal Studies, 33, 305-334.

Attanasio, O., Battistin, E., Fitzsimons, E., Mesnard, A., & Vera-Hernández, M. (2005a). How Effective are Conditional Cash Transfers? Evidence from Colombia (Briefing Note No. 54). London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Attanasio, O., Battistin, E., & Mesnard, A. (2012). Food and Cash Transfers: Evidence from Colombia. The Economic Journal, 122, 92-124.

Attanasio, O., Gómez, L. C., Heredia, P., & Vera-Hernández, M. (2005b). The Short-Term Impact of a Conditional Cash Subsidy on Child Health and Nutrition in Colombia (Report Summary: Familias No. 03). London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Austin, P. C. (2008). Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 17 (12), 1218-1225.

Austin, P. C. (2009a). Using the Standardized Difference to Compare the Prevalence of a Binary Variable Between Two Groups in Observational Research. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 38(6), 1228-1234.

Austin, P. C. (2009b). Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine, 28(25), 3083-3107.

Baird, S., Ferreira, F., Özler, B., & Woolcock, M. (2014). Conditional, Unconditional and Everything in Between: A Systematic Review of the Effects of Cash Transfer Programmes on Schooling Outcomes. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 6(1), 1-43.

Barham, T., & Maluccio, J. A. (2009). Eradicating diseases: The effect of conditional cash transfers on vaccination coverage in rural Nicaragua. Journal of Health Economics, 28(3), 611-621.

Beautrais, A. L, Fergusson, D. M., & Shannon, F. T. (1982). Use of preschool dental services in a New Zealand birth cohort. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 10, 249-252.

Brenzel, L. E., Barham, T., & Maluccio, J. A. (2007). Beyond 80%: Are There New Ways of Increasing Vaccination Coverage? Evaluation of CCT Programmes in Mexico and Nicaragua (Health, Nutrition, and Population Discussion Paper Series). Washington, DC: World Bank.

Cruz, R., Moura, L. & Soares Neto, J. (2017) Conditional cash transfers and the creation of equal opportunities of health for children in low and middle-income countries: a literature review. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16 (161), 1-12.

Camargo, M. B. J., Barros, A. J. D., Frazão, P., Matijasevich, A., Santos, I. S., Peres, M. A., & Peres, K. G. (2012). Predictors of dental visits for routine check-ups and for the resolution of problems among preschool children. Revista de Saúde Pública, 46(1), 87-97.

Carvalho, N., Thacker, N., Gupta, SS., & Salomon, JA. (2014) More evidence on the impact of India’s conditional cash transfer program, Janani Suraksha Yojana: quasi-experimental evaluation of the effects on childhood immunization and other reproductive and child health outcomes. PLoS One, 9(10), 1-13.

Cochran, W. G., & Rubin, D. B. (1973). Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review. The Indian Journal of Statistics, 35(4), 417-446.

Cortez, R., & Romero, D. (2013). Argentina – Increasing Utilization of Health Care Services among the Uninsured Population: The Plan Nacer Programme (Universal Health Coverage UNICO Studies Series No. 12). Washington, DC: World Bank.

De Brauw, A., Gilligan, D. O., Hoddinott, J., & Roy, S. (2014) The Impact of Bolsa Familia on Schooling: Girls’ Advantage Increases and Older Children Gain. (International Food Policy Research Institute Discussion Paper Vol. 01319). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151-161.

Diaz, J., & Handa, S. (2006). An Assessment of Propensity Score Matching as a Nonexperimental Impact Estimator: Evidence from Mexico’s PROGRESA Programme. The Journal of Human Resources, 41(2), 319-345.

DPN. (2011). Décimo Octavo Informe Anual (Annual Report No. 18). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Defensor del Pueblo de la Nación.

Fernald, L. C. H., Gertler, P. J., & Neufeld, L. M. (2009). 10-year effect of Oportunidades, Mexico’s conditional cash transfer programme, on child growth, cognition, language, and behaviour: a longitudinal follow-up study. The Lancet, 374, 1997-2005.

Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. (2009). Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Gazola Hellman, A. (2015). How does Bolsa Familia Work? Best Practices in the Implementation of Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes in Latin America and the Caribbean (IDB Technical Note No. IDB-TN-856). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

Gertler, P. (2000). The impact of PROGRESA on health. (Final Report, International Food Policy Research Institute). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

Karaca-Mandic, P., Norton, E. C., & Dowd, B. (2012). Interaction Terms in Nonlinear Models. Health Services Research, 47(1), 255-274.

Handa, S., & Maluccio, J. A. (2010). Matching the Gold Standard: Comparing Experimental and Nonexperimental Evaluation Techniques for a Geographically Targeted Programme. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(3), 415-447.

Haushofer, J. & Shapiro, J. (2013). Household response to income changes: Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer programme in Kenya (Working Paper).

Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605-654.

Maurizio, R., & Bertranou, F. (2012). Semi-conditional cash transfers in the form of family allowances for children and adolescents in the informal economy in Argentina. International Social Security Review, 65(1).

Maurizio, R., & Vázquez, G. (2014). Argentina: Impacts of the child allowance programme on the labour-market behaviour of adults. CEPAL Review, 113, 115-137.

Ministerio de Salud de la Nación (2013). Análisis del proceso institucional de generación de una política social de impacto multisectorial: el Plan Nacer y la Asignación Universal por Hijo y por Embarazo (Documento de Divulgación de Resultados). Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Molyneux, M. (2006). Mothers at the Service of the New Poverty Agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s Conditional Transfer Programme. Social Policy & Administration, 40, 425-449.

Norton, E., Wang, H., & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4(2), 103-116.

Pautassi, L., & Arcidiácono, P., & Straschnoy, M. (2014). Condicionando el cuidado. La Asignación Universal por Hijo para la Protección Social en Argentina. ÍCONOS Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 50, 61-75.

Peters, D. H., Garg, A., Bloom, G., Walker, D. G., Brieger, W. R., & Hafizur Rahman, M. (2008). Poverty and Access to Health Care in Developing Countries. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1136, 161-171.

Perova, E., & Vakis, R. (2012). 5 Years in Juntos: New Evidence on the Programme’s Short and Long-Term Impacts. Economía, 35(69), 53-82.

Rabinovich, L., & Diepeveen, S. (2014). The Design of Conditional Cash Transfers: Experiences from Argentina’s Universal Child Allowance (CESR-Schaeffer Working Paper Series No. 2014-007). Los Angeles, CA: CESR/ Schaeffer Center for the Study of Health Inequality (CSHI).

Robertson, L., Mushati, P., Eaton, JW., Dumba, L., Mavise, G., Makoni, J., Schumacher, C., Crea, T., Monasch, R., Sherr, L., Garnett, GP., Nyamukapa, C., & Gregson, S. (2013). Effects of unconditional and conditional cash transfers on child health and development in Zimbabwe: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet, 381, 1283-92.

Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for casual effects. Biometrica, 70(1), 41-55.

Salvia, A., Tuñón, I., & Poy, S. (2015). Asignación Universal por Hijo para Protección Social: impacto sobre el bienestar económico y el desarrollo humano de la infancia. Población & Sociedad, 22(2), 101-134.

Smith, J. A., & Todd, P. E. (2005). Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?Journal of Econometrics, 125 (1-2), 305-353.

Straschnoy, M. (2017). Análisis evaluativo de las condicionalidades de la Asignación universal por hijo. Política y Cultura, 47, 143-164.

Tuñón, I. (2016). Infancias con derechos postergados. Avances, retrocesos e inequidades a finales del Bicentario (2010-2015) (Annual Brief No. 6). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Observatorio de la Deuda Social Argentina.

Tuñón, I. (2017). Evolución de indicadores de desarrollo humano y social en la infancia en perspectiva de derechos humanos (2010-2016) (Annual Brief No. 7). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Observatorio de la Deuda Social Argentina.

Tuñón, I., & Poy, S. (2017). Infancias en situación de pobreza multidimensional. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Observatorio de la Deuda Social Argentina.

World Bank (2015). The State of Social Safety Nets 2015. Washington, DC: World Bank.