Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad logo

Desarro. soc. | eISSN 1900-7760 | ISSN 0120-3584

It’s not what you know but who you know: Heterogeneous peer effects at a Colombian University

No. 80 (2018-01-01)
  • Ana María Díaz
  • Ignacio Penagos
https://doi.org/10.13043/DYS.80.2

Abstract

This paper uses matched survey and administrative data on first-year Economics students who were studying at the Javeriana University in Bogotá, Colombia, in 2015 in order to estimate peer effects on student grades. We employ the strategy proposed by De Giorgi, Pellizzari & Redaelli (2010) to identify and estimate these peer effects. Our results show that peer effects are economically significant in their context, that they result from the sharing of specific rather than general skills among peers, and that they flow mainly from peers with whom students interact frequently and who are considered to be leaders.

Keywords: Peer effects, social network formation, academic achievement, homophily

References

Babcock, P., Bedard, K., Charness, G., Hartman, J., & Royer, H. (2015). Letting down the team? Social effects of team incentives. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(5), 841-870.

Brady, R., Insler, M., & Rahman, A. (2015). Bad company: Reconciling negative peer effects in college achievement (MPRA Paper 68354). Munich, Germany.

Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2009). Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics, 150(1), 41-55.

Carrell, S. E., Sacerdote, B. I., & West, J.E. (2011). From natural variation to optimal policy? The Lucas critique meets peer effects. Washington D. C.: National Bureau of Economic Research.

De Giorgi, G., Pellizzari, M., & Redaelli, S. (2010). Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 241-275.

Duflo, E., & Saez, E. (2003). The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 18(3), 815-842.

Foster, G. (2006). It’s not your peers, and it’s not your friends: Some progress toward understanding the educational peer effect mechanism. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8), 1455-1475.

Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.

Griffith, A. L., & Rask, K. N. Peer effects in higher education: A look at heterogeneous impacts. Economics of Education Review, 39, 65-77.

Han, L. & Li, T. (2009). The gender difference of peer influence in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 129-134.

Hoxby, C. M., & Weingarth, G. (2005). Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects (Working paper).

Lazear, E. P. Educational production. (2001). The Quarterly Journal of Introduction to Economics, 16(3), 777-803.

Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531-542.

McEwan, P. J., & Soderberg, K. A. (2006). Roommate effects on grades: Evidence from first-year housing assignments. Research in Higher Education, 47(3), 347-370.

Moreira, M. J. (2003) A conditional likelihood ratio test for structural models. Econometrica, 71(4), 1027-1048.

Sacerdote, B. (2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. The Quarterly Journal of Introduction to Economics, 16(2), 681-704.

Sacerdote, B. (2011). Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far?Handbook of the Economics of Education (chap. 3, pp. 249-277). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9-23.