Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad logo

Desarro. soc. | eISSN 1900-7760 | ISSN 0120-3584

Of ends and means: Development policy assessment with human development and multiple causality

No. 83 (2019-07-01)
  • Pablo Garcés Velástegui
https://doi.org/10.13043/dys.83.10

Abstract

Policy assessment often involves the study of outcomes and their causes. Development policy analyses have conventionally used an economistic perspective with a focus mainly on pecuniary indicators and the search for the one model of best fit. However, i) if development policy outcomes are ultimately to be assessed in terms of people’s quality of life; and, ii) if policies establish similar outcomes for different people in different contexts, alternative approaches seem required to study a policy’s ends and means. As such, this article advances the combined use of the Human Development and Capability Approach with fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis as a promising option. While the former, being a people-centred framework, can contribute to assess policy ends, the latter, enabling the study of multiple conjunctural causation, can shed light on the diverse means leading to them.

Keywords: Government policy, human development, set theory, causal analysis, comparative analysis

References

Alkire, S. (2010). Human development: Definitions, critiques and related concepts (OPHI Working Papers 36). Oxford: University of Oxford.

Alkire, S., & Deneulin, S. (2010a). A normative framework for development. In S.Deneulin, & L.Shahani (Eds.), An introduction to the human development and capability approach (pp. 3-21). London: Earthscan.

Alkire, S., & Deneulin, S. (2010b). The human development and capability approach. In S.Deneulin, & L.Shahani (Eds.), An introduction to the human development and capability approach (pp. 22-48). London: Earthscan.

Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2009). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an approach. In B.Rihoux, & C.Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Birkland, T. (2011). An introduction to the policy process. New York: Routledge.

Cassani, A., Luppi, F., & Natalizia, G. (2016). Pathways of democratisation to human development in post-communist countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(3), 512-530.

Chambers, R. (2004). Ideas for development (Working Paper 238). Sussex: IDS.

Chiappero-Martinetti, E. (2006). Capability approach and fuzzy set theory: Description, aggregation and inference issues. In A.Lemmi, & G.Betti (Eds.), Fuzzy set approaches to multidimentional poverty measurement (pp. 93-114). New York: Springer, Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being.

Clower, R., Dalton, G., Harwitz, M., & Walters, A. (1966). Growth without development: An economic survey of Liberia. US: Northwestern University Press.

Comim, F. (2008). Measuring capabilities. In S.Alkire, F.Comim, & M.Qizilibash (Eds.), The capability approach in human development: Concepts, applications and measurement (157-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dasgupta, P. (2001). Human well-being and the natural environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Delreux, T., & Hesters, D. (2010). Solving contradictory simplifying assumptions in QCA: Presentation of a new best practice (Working Paper 58). COMPASSS.

Garcés, P. (2016). Beyond positivism: Fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and pragmatist research. Revista PUCE, 103, 439-459.

Garcés, P. (2018a). Do many roads lead to Rome? Multiple causation in monetary transfers and how to approach it. Revista de Estudios de Políticas Públicas, 6, 1-11.

Garcés, P. (2018b). Política pública como política humana: un prolegó­meno a un marco conceptual y método de análisis. Revista Estado Gobierno y Gestión Pública, 31, 77-118.

Garcés, P. (2018c). Diverse causes, similar outcomes: Reassessing the means and ends of development policy employing multiple causality and capabilities. Revista de Gestión Pública, 7(2), 171-202.

Haq, M. (1995). Reflections on human development. New York: Oxford University Press.

Haq, M. (1995). The human development paradigm. In M.Haq (Ed.), Reflections on Human Development (pp. 13-23). New York: Oxford University Press.

Klugman, J., Rodríguez, F., & Choi, H-J. (2011). The HDI 2010: New controversies, old critiques. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(1), 249-288.

Kühner, S. (2015). The productive and protective dimensions of welfare in Asia and the Pacific: Pathways towards human development and income equality? Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 31(2), 151-173.

Medina, I., Castillo, P., Álamos-Concha, P., & Rihoux, B. (2017). Análisis cualitativo comparado (QCA). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

Mehta, L., Haug, R., & Haddad, L. (2006). Reinventing development research. Forum for Development Studies, 33(1), 1-6.

Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. London: University of Chicago Press.

Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ranis, G., Stewart, F., Ramirez, A. (2000). Economic growth and human development. World Development, 25(2), 197-209.

Rihoux, B., & Lobe, B. (2009). The case for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Adding leverage for thick cross-case comparison. In D.Byrne, & C.Ragin (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods (pp. 222-242). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Rihoux, B., Rezsöhazy, I., & Bol, D. (2011). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in public policy analysis: An extensive review. German Policy Studies, 7(3), 9-82.

Robeyns, I. (2017). Well-being, freedom and social justice. Cambridge: Open Book Publishersç.

Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. London: Cambridge University Press.

Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sen, A. (1990). Development as capability expansion. In K.Griffin, & J.Knight (Eds.), Human development and the international development strategy for the 1990s (pp. 41-58). London: Macmillan.

Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M.Nussbaum, & A.Sen The quality of life (pp. 30-53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. (2000). A decade of human development. Journal of Human Development, 1(1), 17-23.

Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006). Fuzzy set theory: Applications in the social sciences. London: SAGE Publications.

Spence, R. (2010). Economic growth. In S.Deneulin, & L.Shahani (Eds.), An introduction to the human development and capability approach (pp. 73-100). London: Earthscan.

Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J-P. (2010). Mis-measuring our lives, why GDP doesn’t add up. London: The New Press.

Summer, A., & Tribe, M. (2008). International development studies: Theories and methods in research and practice. London: Sage Publications.

Turok, I. (1991). Policy evaluation as science: A critical assessment. Applied Economics, 23, 1543-1550.

UNDP. (2016a). Human Development Report 2016: Human development for everyone. New York: United Nations Development Program.

UNDP. (2016b). Human Development Report 2016: Human development for everyone. Technical notes. New York: United Nations Develop-ment Program.

Wolff, J., & de-Shalit, A. (2013). Disadvantage. London: Oxford University Press.

Zimmermann, B. (2006). Pragmatism and the capability approach: Challenges in social theory and empirical research. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(4), 467-484.