Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad logo

Desarro. soc. | eISSN 1900-7760 | ISSN 0120-3584

Consensus, dissensus, and ideology: The case of economists in Uruguay

No. 94 (2023-07-19)
  • Verónica Amarante
  • Marisa Bucheli
  • Maria Cecilia Lara Martínez
    Universidad de la República
https://doi.org/10.13043/DYS.94.3

Abstract

This article studies the consensus among economists in Uruguay regarding a
set of economic propositions. The findings indicate that the levels of consensus in Uruguay are comparatively lower than in other countries, although the
levels of dissensus are also lower, resulting in a modest level of agreement
overall. The propositions related to discrimination and, to a lesser extent, environmental issues demonstrate the highest levels of agreement. There is also
consensus regarding the desire to improve income equality and the recognition
of the State’s importance in achieving this goal. However, there is no consensus regarding specific redistributive tools. Based on clustering and multiple
correspondence analysis, we identify two distinct groups according to their
support for different economic propositions. The probability of belonging to
these groups is strongly associated with individual ideological positions, which
are often influenced by the ideology of one’s parents.

Keywords: Ideology, Economics, Latin America

References

Aiginger, K., McCabe, M., Mueller, D. C., & Weiss, C. (2001). Do American and European industrial organization economists differ? Review of Industrial Organization, 19(4), 383-404.

Amarante, V., Bucheli, M.; Moraes, M., & Pérez, T. (2021). Women in research in economics in Uruguay. Cuadernos de Economía, 40(84), 763-790.

Amarante, V., Bucheli, M., & Pérez, T. (2022). Gender differences in opinions about market solutions and government interventions. The case of Uruguayan economists (Working Paper). FCS-Decon, Udelar.

Andere, J. L., & Canché, J. L. (2019). Entendiendo el consenso en la profesión económica en México. Análisis Económico, 34(86), 9-34.

Caminal, R., & Rodríguez, D. (2003). La opinión de los economistas académicos en España: ¿consenso o segmentación? Moneda y Crédito, (217), 257-303.

De Benedictis, L., & di Maio, M. (2011). Economists' views about the economy. Evidence from a survey of Italian economists. Rivista Italiana Degli Economisti, 16(1), 37-84.

De Benedictis, L., & di Maio, M. (2016). Schools of thought and economists’ opinions on economic policy. Eastern Economic Journal, 42(3), 464-482.

Di Maio, M. (2013). Are mainstream and heterodox economists different? An empirical analysis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 72(5), 1315-1348.

Frey, B. S., Pommerehne, W. W., Schneider, F., & Gilbert, G. (1984). Consensus and dissension among economists: an empirical inquiry. American Economic Review, 74(5), 986-994.

Fuchs, V. R. (1996). Economics, values, and health care reform. American Economic Review, 86(1), 1-24.

Fuchs, V. R., Krueger, A. B., & Poterba, J. M. (1998). Economists' views about parameters, values, and policies. Survey results in labor and public economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1387-1425.

Fuller, D., & Geide, D. (2003). Consensus among economists: revisited. The Journal of Economic Education, 34(4), 369-387.

Fuller, D., & Geide, D. (2014). Consensus among economists –an update. The Journal of Economic Education, 45(2), 131-146.

Geide, D., & Pérez, A. L. P. (2021). Consensus among economists 2020 –A sharpening of the picture.

Gordon, R., & Dahl, G. B. (2013). Views among economists: Professional consensus or point-counterpoint? American Economic Review, 103(3), 629-35.

Greenacre, M., & Blasius, J. (2006). Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Haab, T. C., & Whitehead, J. C. (2020). What do environmental and resource economists think? Results from a survey of AERE members. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1), 43-58.

Kearl, J. R., Pope, C. L., Whiting, G. C., & Wimmer, L. T. (1979). A confusion of economists? The American Economic Review, 69(2), 28-37.

Klein, D. B., & Stern, C. (2007). Is there a free-market economist in the house? The policy views of American Economic Association Members. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66(2), 309-334.

May, A. M., McGarvey, M. G., & Whaples, R. (2014). Are disagreements among male and female economists marginal at best? A survey of AEA members and their views on economics and economic policy. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(1), 111-132.

May, A. M., McGarvey, M. G., & Kucera, D. (2018). Gender and European economic policy. A survey of the views of European economists on contemporary economic policy. Kyklos, 71(1), 162-183.

Mueller, D. C. (1995). American and European economists. Kyklos, 48(2), 251-255.

O’Neill, D. (2015). Divided opinion on the fair minimum wage act of 2013. Random or systematic differences? Economics Letters, 136, 175-178.

Neumann, L. (1979). Effects of categorization on relationships in bivariate on relationships in bivariate distributions and applications to rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 2262-B.

Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1989). Measuring attitudes: recording responses. En S. Sudman & N. M. Bradburn (Eds.), Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design (pp. xxx-yyyy) Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Tastle, W. J., & Wierman, M. J. (2007). Consensus and dissention. A measure of ordinal dispersion. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 45(3), 531-545.

Urzúa, C. M. (2007). Consensos & disensos entre los economistas mexicanos. Revista de la CEPAL, 91, 153-165.

Van Dalen, H. P. (2019). Values of economists matter in the art and science of economics. Kyklos, 72(3), 472-499.

Whaples, R. (1996). Is there consensus among American labor economists? Survey results on forty propositions. Journal of Labor Research, 17(4), 725-734.

Whaples, R. (2009). The policy views of American Economic Association members. The results of a new survey. Econ Journal Watch, 6(3), 337.