Reconciling Keynes and Tinbergen? Klein and His View on Econometrics as a Practical Tool for Policy Formulation
No. 99 (2025-02-27)Author(s)
-
Erich Pinzón-FuchsUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3912-9907
Abstract
In 1944, just five years after the controversy between John Maynard Keynes and Jan Tinbergen, Lawrence R. Klein found himself in a unique position. As a leading expert on Keynesian economics in the United States, Klein was recruited at the Cowles Commission to rebuild Tinbergen’s macro-econometric model of the US economy. This paper explores Klein’s macro-econometric approach as a serious attempt to reconcile Tinbergen’s work with Keynes’s criticisms. For Klein, macro-econometric modeling was not merely a tool for generating insights about the economic world but also a practice that took seriously the inherent limitations of statistical and mathematical methods. Ultimately, it was this complex practice—rather than econometric techniques alone—that enabled macroeconomists to discover, understand, and articulate concrete observations about the economy.
References
Backhouse, R. E. (1998). The Transformation of U.S. Economics, 1920-1960, Viewed through a Survey of Journal Articles. History of Political Economy, 30, annual suppl., 85-107.
Backhouse, R. E. (2017). Founder of Modern Economics: Paul A. Samuelson: Volume 1: Becoming Samuelson, 1915-1948. Oxford University Press.
Bjerkholt, O. (2014). Lawrence R. Klein, 1920-2013: Notes on the early years. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36, 767-784.
Boumans, M. (2010). The problem of passive observation. History of Political Economy, 42(1), 75-100.
Boumans, M. (2019). Econometrics: the Keynes–Tinbergen controversy. The Elgar Companion to John Maynard Keynes. Edward Elgar Publishing, 283-289.
Carabelli, A. M. (1988). On Keynes’s Method. MacMillan Press Ltd.
Desrosières, A. (2003). Managing the economy, the State, the market and statistics. In T. Porter and D. Ross (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 7, Modern Social and Behavioural Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Garrone, G. & Marchionatti, R. (2004). Keynes on Econometric Method: A reassessment of his debate with Tinbergen and other econometricians, 1938-1934. Working paper No. 01/2004, Università di Torino.
Goutsmedt, A., Pinzón-Fuchs, E., Renault, M., & Sergi, F. (2019). Reacting to the Lucas Critique The Keynesians’ Replies. History of Political Economy, 51(3), 535-556.
Haavelmo, T. (1943). The Statistical Implications of a System of Simultaneous Equations. Econometrica, 11(1), 1-12.
Haavelmo, T. (1944). The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica, 12, annual suppl., i-vi+1-118.
Haberler, G. (1937). Prosperity and Depression. The League of Nations.
Hacking, I. (1992). Statistical Language, Statistical Truth, and Statistical Reason: The Self- Authentication of a Style of Scientific Reasoning. In E. McMullin (ed.), Social Dimensions of Science, 130-157. Notre Dame University Press.
Hacking, I. (2002). Historical Ontology. Harvard University Press.
Hendry, D. F. (1980). Econometrics – Alchemy or Science? Economica, 47(188), 387-406.
Hendry, D. F. & Morgan, M. S. (eds.) (1995). The Foundations of Econometric Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Keynes, J. N. (1910). The Scope and Method of Political Economy. MacMillan Company.
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. Macmillan and Co., Limited.
Keynes, J. M. (1964). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Harvest/Harcourt, Inc.
Keynes, J. M. (1971). The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes (Vol. 30, pp. 1971-89). Macmillan.
Keynes, J. M. (2013). The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes: Volume 14: The General Theory and After; Part 2: Defence and Development. Cambridge University Press for the Royal Economic Society.
Keynes, J. M. (1939). Professor Tinbergen’s Method. Economic Journal, Vol. 49, pp. 558-68.
Keynes, J. M. (1940). Comment Economic Journal, 50, 154-156.
Klein, L. R. (1947). Theories of Effective Demand and Employment. Journal of Political Economy, 55(2),108-131.
Klein, L. R. (1950). Economic Fluctuations in the United States, 1921-1941. Wiley.
Klein, L. R. (1954). The Empirical Foundations of Keynesian Economics. In Kurihara, K. K. (ed.)., Post Keynesian Economics,15-44. H. Wolff Manufacturing Company.
Klein, L. R. (1957). The Scope and Limitations of Econometrics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 6(1), 1-17.
Klein, L. R. (1960). Single Equation System Methods of Estimation in Econometrics. Econometrica, 28(4), 866-871.
Klein, L. R. (1966). The Keynesian Revolution. Palgrave McMillan.
Klein, L. R. (1991). Econometric contributions of the Cowles Commission, 1944-47: A Retrospective View, Banca Nationale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 44(77), 107- 117.
Klein, L. R. & Goldberger, A. (1955). An Econometric Model of the United States, 1929-1952. North-Holland Publishers.
Klein, L. R. (1985). Did Mainstream Econometric Models Fail to Anticipate the Inflationary Surge? In G. R. Feiwell (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Macroeconomics and Distribution. State University of New York Press, 289-296.
Klein, L. R. & Mariano, R. S. (1987). The ET interview with Professor L. R. Klein. Econometric Theory, 3(3), 409-460.
Koopmans, T. (1941). The Logic of Econometric Business-Cycle. Journal of Political Economy, 49(2), 157-181.
Koopmans, T. (1957). Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. McGraw- Hill.
Keuzenkamp, H.A. (1995). Keynes and the logic of econometric method, (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 1995- 113). Unknown Publisher.
Keuzenkamp, H. A. (2000). Probability, econometrics and truth: the methodology of econometrics. Cambridge University Press.
Lawson, T. (1985). Uncertainty and Economic Analysis. The Economic Journal, 95(380), 909-927.
Lawson, T. (2009). Keynes, prediction and econometrics. In Keynes' economics (Routledge revivals) (pp. 94-107). Routledge.
Lucas, R. (1976). Econometric Policy evaluation: a critique. in Lucas (1981 pp. 104-130). Reprinted from K. Brunner and A. H. Meltzer (eds.) The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 5. North-Holland.
Maas, H. (2014). Economic Methodology: A Historical Introduction. Routledge.
Marschak, J. & Lange, O. (1940). Mr. Keynes on the Statistical Verification of Business Cycle Theories. In Hendry, D. F. and M. S. Morgan (eds.) (1995). The Foundations of Econometric Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Marshall, A. (1895) Principles of Economics, third edition. Macmillan and Co.
Mirowski, P. (2012). The Cowles Commission as an anti-Keynesian stronghold 1943-54. In Duarte, P. & Lima, G. (2012). Microfoundations Reconsidered: the relationship of micro and macroeconomics in historical perspective, 131-167. Edgar Elgar.
Moggridge, D. E. (ed.) (1973). The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, Volume XIV: The General Theory and After, II. Macmillan.
Moggridge, D. E. (1992). Maynard Keynes: An Economist’s Biography. Routledge.
Morgan, M. S. (1990). The History of Econometric Ideas. The Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, M. S. & Rutherford M. (1998). American Economics: The Character of the Transformation. In Morgan, M. S. & Rutherford, M. (eds.), From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism (Annual supplement to volume 30 of History of Political Economy). Duke University Press.
Morgan, M. S. & Morrison, M. (eds.) (1999). Models as Mediators. Cambridge University Press.
Nell, E. & Errouaki, K. (2013). Rational Econometric Man: Transforming Structural Econometrics. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Patinkin, D. (1976). Keynes and Econometrics: On the Interaction between the Macroeconomic Revolutions of the Interwar Period. Econometrica, 44(6), 1091-1123.
Pesaran, M. H. & Smith, R. (1985). Keynes on Econometrics. In T. Lawson and H. Pesaran (eds.) Keynes’ Economics: Methodological Issues. Croom Helm Ltd.
Pinzón-Fuchs, E. (2014). Econometrics as a Pluralistic Scientific Tool for Economic Planning: On Lawrence R. Klein’s Econometrics. CES Working Paper (No.2014.80), Paris 1 University.
Pinzón-Fuchs, E. (2019). Lawrence R. Klein and the making of macro-econometric modeling, 1938-1955, History of Political Economy, 51(3): 401–423.
Pinzón-Fuchs, E. (2023). Becker, Friedman, and Klein on Statistical Illusions: Devising Criteria to Judge the Performance of Large-Scale Macroeconometric Models. Lecturas de Economia, (98).
Shackle, G. L. S. (1967). The Years of High Theory: Invention and Tradition in Economic Thought, 1926-1939. Cambridge University Press.
Stone, R. (1978). Keynes, political arithmetic and econometrics, British Academy.
Tinbergen, J. (1937). An Econometric Approach to Business Cycle Problems. Herman and Cie., Editeurs.
Tinbergen, J. (1939). Statistical Testing of Business Cycle Theories, Vol I: A Method and its Application to Investment Activity; Vol. II: Business Cycles in the United States of America, 1919-1932. League of Nations.
Tinbergen, J. (1940). On a method of statistical business-cycle research: A Reply. Economic Journal, 50, 141-154.
Tinbergen, J. (1981). The Use of Models: Experience and Prospects. The American Economic Review, 71(6), Nobel Lectures and 1981 Survey of Members, 17-22.
Tinbergen, J.; Magnus, J. R., & Morgan, M. S. (1987). The ET interview: Professor J. Tinbergen. Econometric Theory, 3(1), 117-142.
Zellner, A. (1982). Basic Issues in Econometrics: Past and Present. The American Economist, 26 (2), 5-10.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.