H-ART. Revista de historia, teoría y crítica de arte

hart. Rev. Hist. Teor. Crit. Arte | eISSN 2590-9126 | ISSN 2539-2263

Tecnoflâneurs and Fakirs: Art on the Other Side of the Digital Innovation Divide

No. 9 (2021-07-01)
  • Tirtha Prasad Mukhopadhyay
  • Reynaldo Thompson
https://doi.org/10.25025/hart09.2021.07

Abstract

In this article we look at four international artists whose art has its origin in common civilian life and its concerns. The story of this art should be re-written in terms of a historiography of the average underprivileged common person, who does not reap the benefits of a discriminatory economy. Artists discussed here, namely, Daniel Cruz (Chile), Gilbert Prado (Brazil), Kausik Mukhopadhyay (India) and Probir Gupta (India) have been creating art on the impoverished side of the digital innovation divide, in their own niche and horizons of belief. Discarded gadgets, scraps, broken circuits or sensors, microphones and other junk are incorporated to create fragile but impactful installations. Junk animism and low-fi artificial intelligence often inform their work. Such artists do not inhabit traditionally known borders of nation, class or identity but only a space across fault lines which divide and exacerbate human society from within. Cruz’ project titled Surfonic exists on the margins of internet gateways. Mukhopadhyay uses scrap media for his installations. They exploit so much technology as just to animate their art. This commitment to voluntary defeatism upends a culture of spectacle. The artist is like a flaneur or technological fakir, quintessentializing human experience against the greed and pretensions of a global market of art.

Keywords: global innovation divide, junk, niche art, regiocal, poverty

References

Archer, Michael. Art since 1960. Londres: Thames & Hudson, 2002.

Benjamin, Walter. “Sobre el concepto de historia”. En Obras I-2, traducido por AlfredoBrotons Muñoz. Madrid: Abada, 2008, 303-318.

Bennett, Tony. The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.

Banerjee, Abhijit. V. y EstherDuflo. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. Nueva York: Public Affairs, 2012.

Blau, Judith R., Peter M.Blau, y Reid M.Golden. “Social Inequality and the Arts.” American Journal of Sociology 91, n.o 3 (1985): 309-331.

PiñeroBernardo and DanielCruz. “Acciones Remotas/Colectivo, Divergencia & Convergencia: Arte en Latinoamérica”. (Unpublished Paper) 2017.

Currid-Halkett, Elizabeth. The Warhol Economy: How Fashion, Art, and Music Drive New York City. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.

García Canclini, Néstor. Consumidores y ciudadanos: Conflictos multiculturales de la globalización. Ciudad de México: Grijalbo, 1995.

Drori, Gili S. “Globalization and Technology Divides: Bifurcation of Policy Between the ‘Digital Divide’ and the ‘Innovation Divide’”. Sociological Inquiry 80, n.o 1 (2010): 63-91.

Dussel, Enrique. Filosofía de la liberación. Bogotá: Nueva América, 1996.

Goser, Karl F. “Implementation of Artificial Neural Networks into Hardware: Concepts and Limitations”. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 41, n.o 1-2 (1996): 161-171.

JanMohamed, Abdul R. “The Economy of Manichean Allegory: The Function of Racial Difference in Colonialist Literature”. Critical Inquiry 12, n.o 1 (1985): 59-87.

Paul B.Jaskot. “Digital methods and the historiography of art.” The Routledge Companion to Digital Humanities and Art History. Editado por KathrynBrown. London ; New York Routledge, Taylor et Francis Group, 2020

Logan, Robert K. Understanding New Media: Extending Marshall McLuhan. Nueva York: Peter Lang, 2010.

Lyotard, Jean-François. La condición posmoderna: Reporte sobre el saber. Madrid: Cátedra, 1987.

McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Corte Madera: Gingko Press, 2003.

Manovich, Lev. Software Takes Command. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.

Markusen, Ann. “Urban Development and the Politics of a Creative Class: Evidence from a Study of Artists”. Environment and Planning A 38, n.o 10 (2006): 1921-1940.

Marsden, Peter V., Josh S, Reed, Michael D.Kennedy y Kandi M.Stinson. “American Regional Cultures and Differences in Leisure Time Activities”. Social Forces 60, n.o 4 (1982): 1023-1049.

Thompson, Reynaldo and TirthaMukhopadhyay, “Digital Arts in Latin America: A Report on the Archival History of Intersections in Art and Technology in Latin America”. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (2020): Retrieved 9th June 2021. https://academic.oup.com/dsh/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/llc/fqaa046/5999149?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Mukhopadhyay, Tirtha Prasad y ReynaldoThompson. “The Search for Entropy: Latin America’s Contribution to Digital Art Practice.” Texto presentado en Digital Humanities Conference, Ciudad de México, junio de 2018.

Ryan, John y DeborahSim. “When Art Becomes News: Portrayals of Art and Artists on Network Television News”. Social Forces 68, n.o 3 (1990): 869-889.

Starn, Randolph. “A Historian’s Brief Guide to New Museum Studies”. The American Historical Review 110, n.o 1 (2005): 68-98.

Wang, Kuo-Yan. “Development of the Art Auction Market in China: From the Perspective of Industry Clusters”. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research 9 (2020): 253-258.

Zepke, Stephen. “‘A Work of Art Does Not Contain the Least Bit of Information’: Deleuze and Guattari and Contemporary Art”. Performance Philosophy 3, n.o 3 (2017): 751-765.