La política y la economía de la ley de competencia brasileña
PDF (English)
HTML (English)

Palabras clave

Ley de competencia
Brasil
economía política
regulación económica

Cómo citar

Kira, B. (2023). La política y la economía de la ley de competencia brasileña. Latin American Law Review, (11), 21–52. https://doi.org/10.29263/lar11.2023.02

Resumen

Frente al renovado debate internacional sobre la relación entre la ley de competencia y objetivos sociales y económicos más amplios, este artículo examina los fundamentos de la ley de competencia brasileña. El artículo describe la evolución de la ley en el contexto de las transformaciones más amplias del capitalismo y revela cómo las disputas legales, políticas y económicas, tanto a nivel nacional como internacional, han dado forma a su diseño e implementación. El artículo argumenta que, si bien la base de la ley de competencia brasileña moderna se puede encontrar en una Constitución progresista y en los principios que guían el orden económico hacia la promoción de la justicia sustantiva, la aplicación de la ley de competencia en Brasil se ha desvinculado gradualmente de la promoción de los derechos socioeconómicos. Este aislamiento de la práctica de competencia brasileña de preocupaciones sociopolíticas más amplias estuvo profundamente influenciado por los supuestos epistemológicos y la metodología económica de la Escuela de Chicago, que han dirigido la defensa de competencia, en los Estados Unidos y en otras jurisdicciones, hacia nociones formalistas de eficiencia.

https://doi.org/10.29263/lar11.2023.02
PDF (English)
HTML (English)

Citas

Aguillar, Fernando H. A., and Diogo R. Coutinho. ‘A Evolução Da Legislação Antitruste No Brasil’. Revista de Concorrência e Regulação 2, no. 7–8 (2011): 139–59.

Azevedo, Paulo Furquim de. ‘Análise Econômica Da Defesa Da Concorrência’. In Direito e Economia No Brasil: Estudos Sobre a Análise Econômica Do Direito, edited by Luciano Benetti Timm. Indaiatuba: Editora Foco, 2019.

Beltrán, Laura. ‘How the Consumer Welfare Standard Propagates Gender and Racial Inequalities’. Promarket (blog), 9 January 2023. https://www.promarket.org/2023/01/09/howthe-consumer-welfare-standard-propagates-gender-and-racial-inequalities/.

Berman, Elizabeth Popp. Thinking like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022.

Bonefeld, Werner. ‘Freedom and the Strong State: On German Ordoliberalism’. New Political Economy 17, no. 5 (November 2012): 633–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2012.656082.

Bork, Robert H. ‘Legislative Intent and the Policy of the Sherman Act’. The Journal of Law & Economics 9 (1966): 7–48.

—. The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. New York: Basic Books, 1978.

Botta, Marco. ‘The Definition of the Relevant Market and the Degree of Market Concentration in the Emerging Economies: Case Study on Brazil and Argentina’. World Competition 33, no. Issue 4 (2010): 663–82. https://doi.org/10.54648/WOCO2010053.

Bradford, Anu, Adam S Chilton, and Filippo Maria Lancieri. ‘The Chicago School’s Limited Influence on International Antitrust’. The University of Chicago Law Review 87, no. 2 (2020): 297–329.

Brandeis, Louis D. The Words of Justice Brandeis. Edited by Solomon Goldman, with a Foreword by William O. Douglas. New York: H. Schuman, 1953.

Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos. ‘Models of the Developmental State’. CEPAL Review, no. 128 (2019): 35–47.

Britton-Purdy, Jedediah, David Singh Grewal, Amy Kapczynski, and K. Sabeel Rahman. ‘Building a Law-and-Political-Economy Framework: Beyond the Twentieth-Century Synthesis’. Yale Law Journal 129, no. 6 (2020): 1784–1835.

Buck, Solon J. The Granger Movement: A Study of Agricultural Organization and Its Political, Economic and Social Manifestations, 1870-1880. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913.

Cabral, Mário André Machado. ‘Silêncio Na Historiografia Econômica Brasileira: A Legislação Concorrencial Como Inovação Institucional (1937-1945)’. Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos 42, no. 88 (2021): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2021.e78946.

CADE. Defesa Da Concorrência No Brasil: 50 Anos. Brasília: Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica, 2013.

—. ‘Guide for Horizontal Merger Review’. Guidelines. Brasília: Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica, 2016. https://cdn.cade.gov.br/Portal/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/ guias-do cade/GUIDE%20FOR%20HORIZONTAL%20MERGER%20REVIEW.pdf.

Camarotto, Murillo. ‘Cade Vai Optar Pela Ortodoxia Em Decisões’. Valor Econômico, 15 July 2021. https://valor.globo.com/empresas/noticia/2021/07/15/cade-vai-optar-pela-ortodoxia-emdecisoes.ghtml.

Camic, Charles, and Geoffrey Martin Hodgson, eds. ‘General Introduction’. In The Essential Writings of Thorstein Veblen, 1–39. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2011.

Capers, Bennett, and Gregory Day. ‘Race and the Consumer Welfare Standard’. Promarket (blog), April 13th, 2023. https://www.promarket.org/2023/04/13/race-and-the-consumerwelfare-standard/.

Cashman, Sean Dennis. America in the Gilded Age: Third Edition. NYU Press, 1993.

Chamberlin, Edward Hastings. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition: A Re-Orientation of the Theory of Value. 8. ed. Harvard Economics Studies 38. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1969.

Chang, Ha-Joon. ‘The Economics and Politics of Regulation’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 21, no. 6 (1997): 703–28.

Comparato, Fabio Konder. ‘Regime Constitucional Do Controle de Preços No Mercado’. Revista de Direito Público 24, no. 97 (1991): 17 28.

Crane, Daniel A. ‘A Neo-Chicago Perspective on Antitrust Institutions’. Antitrust Law Journal 78, no. 1 (2012): 43–65.

Cullis, Philip. ‘The Limits of Progressivism: Louis Brandeis, Democracy and the Corporation’. Journal of American Studies 30, no. 3 (1996): 381–404.

European Commission. ‘A Competition Policy Fit for New Challenges’. October 29th, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/vestager/announcements/speechevp-margrethe-vestager-2021-competition-law-conference-organised-association-finnishlawyers_en.

Fox, Eleanor M. ‘Economic Development, Poverty and Antitrust: The Other Path’. Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas 13, no. 2 (2007): 211–36.

Frazão, Ana. ‘A Necessária Constitucionalização Do Direito Da Concorrência’. In Direitos Fundamentais e Jurisdição Constitucional, 139–58. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2014.

—. Direito Da Concorrência: Pressupostos e Perspectivas. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017.

Freyer, Tony. Regulating Big Business: Antitrust in Great Britain and America, 1880–1990. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511582387.

Grewal, David Singh, and Jedediah Purdy. ‘Law and Neoliberalism’. Law and Contemporary Problems 77, no. 4 (2014): 23.

Gutiérrez, Juan David, and Andrés Felipe Suárez. ‘Using Competition Law to Link Regulation and Development’. Law and Development Review 16, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2022-0045.

Harris, Angela, and James J. Varellas. ‘Law and Political Economy in a Time of Accelerating Crises’. Journal of Law and Political Economy 1, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5070/LP61150254.

Hofstadter, Richard. The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F. D. R. New York: Alfred A. Knop, 1956.

—. ‘What Happened to the Antitrust Movement’. In The Political Economy of the Sherman Act: The First One Hundred Years, by E. Thomas Sullivan, 20–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Hovenkamp, Herbert. ‘Is Antitrust’s Consumer Welfare Principle Imperiled?’ The Journal of Corporation Law 45, no. 1 (2019): 65–94.

—. ‘Structuralism in Competition Policy’. In The Opening of American Law: Neoclassical Legal Thought, 1870-1970. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199331307.001.0001.

—. The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 2008.

IMF. ‘Chapter 2: The Rise of Corporate Market Power and Its Macroeconomic Effects’. In World Economic Outlook 2019, 55–76. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484397480.081.

Kennedy, Duncan. ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis of Entitlement Problems: A Critique’. Stanford Law

Khan, Lina. ‘The End of Antitrust History Revisited’. Harvard Law Review 133 (2020): 1655–82.

Kira, Beatriz. ‘Is IFood Starving the Market? Antitrust Enforcement in the Market for Online Food Delivery in Brazil’. World Competition 46, no. 2 (2023): 133–62.

Lamoreaux, Naomi R. The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895 - 1904. 1. paperback ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Lipsky Jr., Abbott B. ‘Antitrust Economics - Making Progress, Avoiding Regression’. George Mason Law Review 12, no. 1 (2003): 163–77.

Luciano, Laíse Da Correggio. ‘The AmBev Decision and the Regulation of Economic Power in Brazil: At a Crossroads between the US and the EU Competition Law Models’. World Competition 34, no. Issue 1 (2011): 139–55. https://doi.org/10.54648/WOCO2011007.

Martinez, Ana Paula. ‘Histórico e Desafios Do Controle de Concentrações Econômicas No Brasil’. Revista de Concorrência e Regulação 2, no. 7–8 (2011): 311–46.

Mason, Edward S. Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1957.

McChesney, Fred S. ‘Economics versus Politics in Antitrust’. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 23, no. 1 (1999): 133–44.

McCluskey, Martha T, Frank A Pasquale, and Jennifer Taub. ‘Law and Economics: Contemporary Approaches’. Yale Law and Policy Review 35 (2016): 297–308.

Miola, Iagê Zendron. ‘Competition Law and Neoliberalism: The Regulation of Economic Concentration in Brazil’. Revista Direito e Práxis 7, no. 4 (2016): 643–89. https://doi.org/10.12957/dep.2016.26512.

Monti, Giorgio. EC Competition Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

OECD. ‘OECD Peer Reviews of Competition Law and Policy: Brazil’. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, March 25th, 2019. https://www.oecd.org/competition/oecd-peer-reviews-of-competition-law-and-policy-brazil-2019.htm.

—. ‘Roundtable on Competition Policy, Industrial Policy and National Champions’. Global Forum on Competition, October 19th, 2009.

Onto, Gustavo. ‘Regulation as Cultural Transformation: The “Educational Role” of the Brazilian Competition Policy’. Revista Direito e Práxis 7, no. 4 (2016): 690–715. https://doi.org/10.12957/dep.2016.26507.

Posner, Richard A. ‘The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127, no. 4 (April 1979): 925. https://doi.org/10.2307/3311787.

Prado, Mariana Mota, Mario Schapiro, and Diogo R. Coutinho. ‘The Dilemmas of the Developmental State: Democracy and Economic Development in Brazil’. Law and Development Review 9, no. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2016-0015.

Ragazzo, Carlos Emmanuel Joppert, and Cristiane Landerdahl de Albuquerque. ‘From Postto Pre-Merger Notification: The Ultimate Outreach Challenge’. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, no. 2 (2012): 1–8.

Robinson, Joan. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan, 1979.

Rodrigues, Lorenna. ‘Novo Presidente Do Cade, Alexandre Cordeiro Diz Que Tenderá a Ser “Menos Intervencionista”’. Estadão, July 14th, 2021. https://economia.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,novo-presidente-do-cade-alexandre-cordeiro-diz-que-tendera-a-ser-menos intervencionista,70003778696.

Roosevelt, Theodore. Theodore Roosevelt: An Autobiography. Open Road Integrated Media, Inc., 2013.

Schapiro, Mario Gomes, and Fabiana Mesquita Bacchi. ‘Análise Dos Atos de Concentração No Brasil: Forma, Função e o Incrementalismo Reformista Do CADE’. In Direito Econômico Concorrencial, by Leonor Cordovil and Vinícius Marques de Carvalho, 49 96. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2013.

Schechter, Asher. ‘What Would Lina Khan’s FTC Nomination Mean For the Future of Antitrust Enforcement?’ Promarket (blog), March 10th, 2021. https://www.promarket.org/2021/03/10/biden-lina-khan-ftc-antitrust-enforcement-new-brandeis/.

Schneider, Ben Ross. ‘The Desarrollista State in Brazil and Mexico’. In The Developmental State, edited by Meredith Woo-Cumings, 276–305. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501720383-011.

Schuartz, Luis Fernando. ‘A Desconstitucionalização do Direito de Defesa da Concorrência’. FGV Direito Rio - Textos para Discussão, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10438/1762.

Schumacher, E. F. Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as If People Mattered. Vintage Classics. London: Vintage Books, 1993.

Schumpeter, Joseph A., and A. J. Nichol. ‘Robinson’s Economics of Imperfect Competition’. Journal of Political Economy 42, no. 2 (April 1934): 249–59. https://doi.org/10.1086/254595.

Silva, Virgílio Afonso da. The Constitution of Brazil: A Contextual Analysis. Constitutional Systems of the World. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing, 2019.

Silveira, Paulo Burnier da. Direito Da Concorrência. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense, 2020.

Skidmore, Thomas E. Politics in Brazil, 1930 - 1964. Oxford University Press, 2007. https:// doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332698.001.0001.

Sullivan, E. Thomas. The Political Economy of the Sherman Act: The First One Hundred Years. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of Business Enterprise. Great Britain: Amazon, 2016.

Waller, Spencer Weber. ‘The Law and Economics Virus’. Cardozo Law Review 31, no. 2 (2009): 367–403.

Wilks, Stephen. ‘Competition Policy’. In The Oxford Handbook of Business and Government, by David Coen, Wyn Grant, and Graham Wilson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199214273.003.0033.

Wright, Joshua D., Elyse Dorsey, Jonathan Klick, and Jan M. Rybnicek. ‘Requiem for a Paradox: The Dubious Rise and Inevitable Fall of Hipster Antitrust’. Arizona State Law Journal 51, no. 1 (2019): 293–370.

Wu, Tim. ‘The Consumer Welfare Standard Is Too Tainted’. Promarket (blog), 19 April 2023. https://www.promarket.org/2023/04/19/the-consumer-welfare-standard-is-too-tainted/.

—. The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. New York, NY: Columbia Global Reports, 2018.

Zingales, Nicolo, and Bruno Renzetti. ‘Digital Platform Ecosystems and Conglomerate Mergers: A Review of the Brazilian Experience’. World Competition 45, no. Issue 4 (2022): 473–510. https://doi.org/10.54648/WOCO2022021.