Latin American Law Review

Lat. Am. Law Rev. | eISSN 2619-4880

La incorporación de excepciones y limitaciones a las legislaciones de derechos de autor para impulsar el desarrollo de la Inteligencia Artificial en América Latina

No. 9 (2022-08-01)
  • Maximiliano Marzetti
    IESEG School of Management (France)
https://doi.org/10.29263/lar09.2022.02

Resumen

En este artículo, analizo las ventajas y desventajas de incorporar excepciones y limitaciones a las leyes de derechos de autor de los países latinoamericanos a favor de la Inteligencia Artificial (IA). En la sección 1 se describen las amenazas y oportunidades que la IA puede representar para la región. La sección 2 se refiere a los efectos que la legislación de derechos de autor puede tener en las decisiones de inversión de las empresas de IA, a los beneficios potenciales para los países que las incorporen, se incluyen perspectivas de Derecho y Economía y de Derecho Comparado, y se analiza la actual asimetría regulatoria existente en la materia en la región. La sección 3 concluye con recomendaciones de políticas públicas.

Palabras clave: Inteligencia artificial, propiedad intelectual, derecho de autor, copyright, derechos conexos, excepciones y limitaciones, fair use, dominio público, dominio público pagante, análisis económico del derecho, derecho y economía, derecho comparado, derecho latinoamericano

Referencias

Albrieu, R., Rapetti, M., López Brest, C., Larroulet, P., & Sorrentino, A., CIPPEC, (2019). Inteligencia artificial y crecimiento económico. Oportunidades y desafíos para Argentina.

“Better rules on Text and Data Mining are needed to maximize the potential of Artificial Intelligence in Europe” | LERU. (2018). Retrieved November 11th, 2020, from https://www.leru.org/news/better-rules-on-text-and-data-mining-are-needed-to-maximise-the-potential-of-artificial-intelligence-in-europe.

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton.

Coase, R. H. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost.” The Journal of Law & Economics, 3.

Conference on the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market – Insights from the ‘exceptions’ panel: Copyright (un)harmonization?” CITIP blog (2020). Retrieved November 29th, 2020, from https://www.law.kuleuven.be/citip/blog/conference-on-the-directive-on-copyright-in-the-digital-single-market-insights-from-the-exceptions-panel-copyright-unharmonization.

Copeland, Jack. (2000). “What is Artificial Intelligence?” Retrieved December 7th, 2019, from [http://www.alanturing.net/turing_archive/pages/Reference-Articles/WhatisAI.html].

Crews, Kenneth D. (2017). Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Libraries and Archives: Updated and Revised.

Depoorter, B., & Parisi, F. (2002). “Fair Use and Copyright Protection: A Price Theory Explanation.” International Review of Law and Economics, 21(4), 453–473.

Estrategia de Inteligencia Artificial, 2018, https://datos.gob.mx/blog/estrategia-de-inteligencia-artificial-mx-2018?category=noticias&tag=nula.

Flynn, S., Geiger, C., Quintais, J., Margoni, T., Sag, M., Guibault, L., & Carroll, M. W. (2020, April 20). Implementing User Rights for Research in the Field of Artificial Intelligence: A Call for International Action.

Geiger, C., Geiger, C., Hilty, R., Griffiths, J., & Suthersanen, U. (2010). “Declaration A Balanced Interpretation of “TheThree-Step Test” In Copyright Law.” Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-1-2-2010/2621.

GOV.UK. “Exceptions to copyright.” Retrieved November 29th, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright#text-and-data-mining-for-non-commercial-research].

Heller, M. A. (1998), “The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets.” Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 621–688.

Hugenholtz, B. (2019, July 24th). “The New Copyright Directive: Text and Data Mining (Articles 3 and 4)” - Kluwer Copyright Blog. Retrieved April 28th, 2020, from http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/07/24/the-new-copyright-directive-text-and-data-mining-articles-3-and-4/

Hugenholtz, B. P., & Senftleben, M. R. F. (2011). “Fair Use in Europe. In search of flexibilities. “ Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2012-39.

Japanese Copyright Act no. 48 of May 6th, 1970, amended by Act No. 72 of July 13th, 2018.

Levendowski, Amanda. (2018). “How Copyright Law Can Fix Artificial Intelligence’s Implicit Bias Problem.” Wash. L. Rev., 93(579).

Marzetti, M. (2019). “Paying for works in the public domain? The “domaine public payant” in the 21st century.” GRUR Int., (343).

Mattei, U. (1994). “Efficiency in legal transplants: An Essay in Comparative Law and Economics.” International Review of Law and Economics, 14(1), 3–19.

Nino, C. S. (2005). Un país al margen de la ley: estudio de la anomia como componente del subdesarrollo argentino. Ariel.

Ovanessoff, A., & Plastino, E. (2017), Accenture, “How Artificial Intelligence can drive South America’s growth.”

Oxford Insights. (2019). Government Artificial Intelligence Readiness Index. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordinsights.com/ai-readiness2019.

Posner, R. A., & Landes, W. M. (2003). The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Harvard University Press.

PricewaterhouseCooper. (2017). Sizing the prize. What’s the real value of AI for your business, and how can you capitalise?

PricewaterhouseCooper. (2018). The macroeconomic impact of artificial intelligence.

Prosser, Marc (2020, February 5th). “How AI Helped Predict the Coronavirus Outbreak Before It Happened.” Retrieved April 28th, 2020, from https://singularityhub.com/2020/02/05/how-ai-helped-predict-the-coronavirus-outbreak-before-it-happened/.

“Public consultation initiative for digital government in Uruguay,” https://www.gub.uy/participacionciudadana/consultapublica.

Ronald H.Coase. “Prize Lecture to the Memory of Alfred Nobel,” 1991

Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper and Row, p. 83.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.

Senftleben, M. R. F. (2017). “The Perfect Match: Civil Law Judges and Open-Ended Fair Use Provisions.” American University International Law Review.

Stigler, G. J. (1966). The Theory of Price, 3rd ed., New York, Macmillan.

UK Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988.

US Copyright Office (2021). US Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition, Section 306 “The Human Authorship Requirement”.

US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (2018). Opinion in re Naruto v. Slater, no. 16-15469.

US Supreme Court (1984). Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417.

WIPO. (2019). Technology Trends – Artificial Intelligence.

World Economic Forum. (2016). “Latin America is the world’s most unequal region. Here’s how to fix it.” Retrieved December 6th, 2019, from [https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/inequality-is-getting-worse-in-latin-america-here-s-how-to-fix-it/].

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2022 Maximiliano Marzetti

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.