Palabras clave
innovación tecnológica
Heidegger
crítica a la tecnología
poder y tecnología
Cómo citar
Resumen
El artículo se divide en tres partes. En la primera, describo tres de las respuestas más frecuentes a la pregunta: ¿por qué es necesario, importante o urgente que se incorpore la innovación tecnológica en la educación jurídica? Las primeras dos respuestas están relacionadas directamente con agentes del mercado que demandan educación jurídica: los estudiantes de derecho y las firmas de abogados. Por un lado, la bibliografía jurídica que se ocupa de este tema argumenta que las facultades de derecho deben innovar en materia tecnológica para satisfacer las expectativas y necesidades de las nuevas generaciones de estudiantes de derecho. Por el otro, argumenta que se debe alcanzar este fin para satisfacer las expectativas y necesidades de las firmas de abogados, que son las que contratan a los nuevos graduandos de las facultades de derecho. La tercera respuesta señala que la innovación tecnológica en las facultades de derecho es necesaria porque permite que los estudiantes alcancen los objetivos de aprendizaje más eficazmente. En la segunda parte, ofrezco mis críticas a las dos primeras respuestas, aquellas que reaccionan a las necesidades tanto del mercado de servicios jurídicos como del mercado de servicios educativos, y quieren satisfacerlas. Esta crítica se fundamenta en una lectura heideggeriana de la tecnología. En la tercera parte, presento mis críticas a la tercera respuesta, aquella que conecta estrechamente los fines pedagógicos que persigue la educación jurídica con la innovación tecnológica. En esta sección argumento (i) que la tercera respuesta se ve debilitada por la falacia naturalista; (ii) no fundamenta empíricamente sus conclusiones, o no lo hace suficientemente, y presenta algunos de sus argumentos empíricos como absolutos aunque no exista un consenso en la comunidad jurídica, científica o educativa en torno a ellos; (iii) no ofrece argumentos precisos y detallados que muestren cómo la innovación tecnológica permite alcanzar los objetivos que usualmente persigue de la educación jurídica; y (iv) oscurece la relación que existe entre tecnología y poder en la educación jurídica.
Citas
Acevedo Sánchez, Daniel Santiago. “Tecnología, derecho y la transformación de esta
profesión: ¿por dónde empezar? (I),” Ámbito Jurídico, November 8th, 2018, https://www.
ambitojuridico.com/noticias/columnista-online/tic/tecnologia-derecho-y-la-transformacion-deesta-
profesion-por-donde.
Allen, Jeffrey. “Technology for the Mobile Lawyer in All of Us.” GPSolo 29, n.° 6 (2012): 4-5.
Alvi, Shahid. “Proceed with Caution: Technology Fetishism and the Millennial Generation.”
Interactive Technology and Smart Education 8, n.° 2 (2011): 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1108/
américaeconomía.com. “Global Legal Tech Venture Day llega a México para buscar y apoyar
nuevas empresas.” américaeconomía.com, w. d., https://mba.americaeconomia.com/articulos/
notas/global-legal-tech-ventureday-llegamexico-para-buscar-y-apoyar-nuevas-empresas.
American Bar Association [ABA]. “Report and Recommendations American Bar Association
Task Force on The Future of Legal Education,” report, 2014, https://www.americanbar.org/
content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/report_and_recommendations_
of_aba_task_force.pdf.
Becker, David M. “Some Concerns About the Future of Legal Education.” Journal of Legal
Education 51, n.° 4 (2001): 469-486. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42898323.
Beckerman-Roday, Andrew. “Ethical Risks from the Use of Technology.” Rutgers Computer
and Technology Law Journal 31, n.° 1 (2004), 1-34.
Beldarrain, Yoany. “Distance Education Trends: Integrating New Technologies to Foster Student
Interaction and Collaboration.” Distance Education 27, n.° 2 (2006): 139-153.
Benjamin, Walter. Baudelaire, edited by José Manuel Cuesta Abad, translated by Alfredo
Brotons Muñoz. Madrid: Abada Editores, 2014.
Bennett, Sue; and Maton, Karl. “Beyond the ‘Digital Natives’ Debate: Towards a More Nuanced
Understanding of Students’ Technology Experiences.” Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning 26, n.° 5 (2010): 321-331. Https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x.
Bennett, Sue; Maton, Karl; and Kervin, Lisa. “The ‘Digital Natives’ Debate: A Critical Review
of Evidence.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39, n.° 5 (2008): 775-786.
Black, Max. “The Gap Between ‘Is’ and ‘Should’.” The Philosophical Review 73, n.° 2 (1964):
-181. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183334.
Bonilla, Daniel. “Los mandarines del derecho: el trabajo jurídico pro-bono en perspectiva
comparada,” in Los mandarines del derecho: trasplantes jurídicos, análisis cultural del derecho
y trabajo pro-bono, 29-134. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores y Universidad de los
Andes, Facultad de Derecho, 2017.
Bonnett, Michael. “Education in a Destitute Time.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 17, n.° 1
(1983): 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.1983.tb00013.x.
Broussard, Camille. “Teaching with Technology: Is the Pedagogical Fulcrum Shifting?” New
York Law School Review 53, (2009): 903-915.
Brown, Peter C.; Roediger, Henry L.; and McDaniel, Mark A. Make It Stick: The Science of
Successful Learning. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2014.
Bullen, Mark; Morgan, Tannis; and Qayyum, Adnan. “Digital Learners in Higher Education:
Generation Is Not the Issue.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 37, n.° 1 (2011):
- 24. https://doi.org/10.21432/t2nc7b.
Caron, Paul L. “Teaching with Technology in the 21st Century Law School Classroom.” The
Future of Law Libraries, (2006): https://ssrn.com/abstract=896906.
Caron, Paul L., and Rafael Gely. “Taking Back the Law School Classroom: Using Technology
to Foster Active Student Learning.” Journal of Legal Education 54, n.° 4 (2004): 551-569.
Chakraborty, Saikat; Chakraborty, Bidisha; Dahiya, Virender Singh; and Timajo, Louie. “Education
as an Instrument of Social Change and Enhancing Teaching-Learning Process with
the Help of Technological Development.” Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative
Research 5, n.° 10 (2018): 317-321 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325143953_
Education_as_an_instrument_of_social_change_and_enhancing_teaching-learning_process_
with_the_help_of_technological_development.
Cicero, Nidia. “Innovar la enseñanza del derecho. ¿Solo se trata de tecnologías de la información
y comunicación?” Revista Pedagogía Universitaria y Didáctica del Derecho 5, n.° 2
(2018): 91-110. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5885.2018.51976.
Correas, Carlos-Ignacio Massini. Filosofía del derecho I. El derecho y los derechos humanos.
Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot 1994).
Courage, Mary L., Aishah Bakhtiar, Cheryll Fitzpatrick, Sophie Kenny, and Katie Brandeau.
“Growing up Multitasking: The Costs and Benefits for Cognitive Development.” Developmental
Review 35, n.° 4 (2015): 5-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.002.
Cuban, Larry. Teachers and Machines. The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. New
York: Teachers College Press, 1986.
Cunningham, Lawrence. “Digital Evolution in Law School Course Books: Trade-Offs, Opportunities
and Vigilance,” in Legal Education in the Digital Age, edited by Edward Rubin, 81.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Davis, Hank. Caveman Logic. The Persistence of Primitive Thinking in a Modern World. New
York: Prometheus, 2009.
DeGroff, Eric A. “Training Tomorrow’s Lawyers: What Empirical Research Can Tell us about
the Effect of Law School Pedagogy on Law Student Learning Styles.” Southern Illinois University
Law Journal 36, (2011): 251-285.
Dreyfus, Hubert. “Heidegger on Gaining a Free Relation to Technology,” in Readings in the
Philosophy of Technology, edited by David M. Kaplan, 2nd. ed., 25. Lanham: Rowman &
Littlefield Publishers, 2009.
Dreyfus, Hubert. “Heidegger on the Connection between Nihilism, Art, Technology and Politics,”
in The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, edited by Charles B. Guignon, 2nd ed.,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Easton, Catherine. “An Examination of Clicker Technology Use in Legal Education.” Journal
of Information Law and Technology, n.° 3 (2009): https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7
CA217185439&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=13614169&p=AONE
&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Ef774eefe.
Ebo, Bosah. Cyberghetto or cybertopia? Race, Class, and Gender on the Internet. Westport:
Praeger, 1998.
“Educación y tecnología: de la mano.” Ámbito Jurídico, November 11th, 2018, https://www.
ambitojuridico.com/noticias/tecnologia/educacion-y-cultura/educacion-y-tecnologia-dela-
mano.
Eicks, Jeannette. “Educating Superior Legal Professional: Successful Modern Curricula Join
Law and Technology,” in Educating the Digital Lawyer, edited by Marc Lauritsen and Oliver
Goodenough, 1-14. Cambridge: Harvard Law School Program on the Legal Profession, 2012,
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2465977.
Farrell, Lindsey; and Hurt, Andrew C. “Training the Millennial Generation: Implications for
Organizational Climate.” Journal of Organizational Learning and Leadership 12, n.° 1 (2014):
-60.
Feenberg, Andrew. Questioning Technology. New York: Routledge, 1999.
Feenberg, Andrew. “Constructivism and Technology Critique: Replies to Critics.” Inquiry, 43,
n.° 2 (2000): 225-237.
Feenberg, Andrew. “The Ontic and the Ontological in Heidegger’s Philosophy of Technology:
Response to Thomson.” Inquiry 43, n.° 4 (2000): 445-450.
Fitzsimons, Patrick. “Enframing Education,” in Heidegger, Education, and Modernity, edited
by Michael Peters. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010.
Foer, Joshua. Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everything.
New York: Penguin Books, 2011.
Frand, Jason. “The Information Age Mindset: Changes in Students and Implications for
Higher Education.” Educause Review, (2000): 15-24. https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/
article-downloads/erm0051.pdf.
Friedman, Ron. “The Future Law Office: Going Virtual.” LAW PRAC. MGMT. 30 (2004).
Galanter, Marc and Henderson, William D. “The Elastic Tournament: The Second Transformation
of the Big Law Firm.” Stanford Law Review 60, n.° 6 (2008): 1867-1929.
Gallagher, Winifred. Rapt: Attention and the Focused Life. Nueva York: Penguin Books, 2010.
Galves, Fred. “Will Video Kill the Radio Star? Visual Learning and the Use of Display Technology
in the Law School Classroom.” Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, (2004):
-198.
Gerdy, Kristin B.; Wise, Jane H.; Craig, Alison. “Expanding Our Classroom Walls: Enhancing
Teaching and Learning through Technology.” Legal Writing 11 (2005): 263-294.
Glenn, David. “Divided Attention.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, February 28, 2010,
http://chronicle.com/article/Scholars-Turn-Their-Attention/63746/.
Goldman, Pearl. “Legal Education and Technology: An Annotated Bibliography.” Law Library
Journal 93, n.° 3 (2001): 423-468.
Goldman, Pearl. “Legal Education and Technology II: An Annotated Bibliography.” Law Library
Journal 100, n.° 3 (2008): 415-528.
Granat, Richard. “The Many Faces of e-Lawyering: Everyday Law for Everyday People.” Law
Practice Management, n.° 30 (2004): 36.
Grisdela, Margaret. “Overview of the U.S. Legal Market.” HG Legal Resources, w. d., https://
www.hg.org/marketing-us-market.html.
Harris, Nikos. “The Risks of Technology in the Law Classroom: Why the Next Great Development
in Legal Education Might Be Going Low-Tech.” University of British Columbia Law
Review 51, n.° 3 (2018): 773.
Harvard Law School. “Programming for Lawyers.” Harvard Law School, last modification
, access August 11th, 2019, https://hls.harvard.edu/academics/curriculum/catalog/default.
aspx?O=71516.
Haun, Daniel. Is the Internet Changing the Way You Think? The Net’s Impact on Our Minds
and Future, edited by John Brockman, 293. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2011.
Heidegger, Martin. “The Question Concerning Technology,” in The Question Concerning
Technology and Other Essays, translated by William Lovitt, 3-13. New York: Harper Torchbooks,
Helsper, Ellen J.; and Eynon, Rebecca. “Digital Natives: Where Is the Evidence?” British Educational
Research Journal 36, n.° 3 (2010): 503-520.
Howe, Neil; and Strauss, William. Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1548 to
New York: Quill, 1991).
Hume, David. “Treatise of Human Nature,” in The Philosophical Works of David Hume,
Book III, Part I, Section I, vol. 2. Edinburgh: Adam Black and William Tait, 1826.
“Interview Clifford Nass.” Frontline, February 2, 2010, https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/front
line/digitalnation/interviews/nass.html.
Jacobson, M. H. Sam. “Paying Attention or Fatally Distracted: Concentration, Memory, and
Multi-Tasking in a Multi-Media World.” Journal of Legal Writing Institute 16, (2010): 419.
Johnson, Stephen M. “www.lawschool.edu: Legal Education in the Digital Age.” Journal of
Legal Education 50, n.° 3 (2000): 393-397.
Johnson, Stephen. “Teaching for Tomorrow: Utilizing Technology to Implement the Reforms
of MacCrate, Carnegie, and Best Practices.” Nebraska Law Review 92, n.° 1 (2013):46-85.
Jones, Chris; Ramanau, Ruslan; Cross, Simon; and Healing, Graham. “Net Generation or
Digital Natives: Is there a Distinct New Generation Entering University?” Computers & Education
, n.° 3 (2010): 722-732.
Jones, Chris; and Shao, Binhui. “The Net Generation and Digital Natives: Implications for
Higher Education.” Higher Education Academy (2011).
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Straus and Giroux, 2011.
Kaplan, Ari. “Reimagining Innovation in Legal Education (Interview with Gebe Teninbaum).”
Above the Law, January 11th, 2019, https://abovethelaw.com/career-files/reimagining-
innovation-in-legal-education/.
Katz, Martin J. “Facilitating Better Law Teaching – Now The 2012 Randolph W. Thrower
Symposium: Innovation for the Modern Era: Law, Policy, and Legal Practice in a Changing
World.” Emory Law Journal 62, n.° 4 (2012): 823-850.
Kellner, Douglas. “New Technologies/New Literacies: Reconstructing Education for the New
Millennium.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11, (2001): 67-81.
Kimbro, Stephanie. “Receiving a Digital Legal Education.” Lawyerist (Blog), 2010, https://
lawyerist.com/receiving-a-digital-legal-education/.
Lambeir, Bert. “Comfortably Numb in the Digital Era: Man’s Being as Standing-Reserve or
Dwelling Silently,” in Heidegger, Education, and Modernity, edited by Michael Peters. London:
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010.
Larson, Joni. “Turning the Tables: Is It Time for Professors to Stop Fighting the Presence of
Students’ Technology in the Classroom and Instead Use It to Enhance Student Learning?” The
Northern Kentucky Law Review 43, (2016): 231.
Lasso, Rogelio. “From the Paper Chase to the Digital Chase: Technology and the Challenge of
Teaching 21st Century Law Students.” Santa Clara Law Review 43, n.° 1 (2002): 1-62.
Latrup-Pedersen, Tom. “Trends in Legal Education in the Learning Society —The Challenge
of Information Technology.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 9, n.° 2 (2002):
-186.
Law Geex. “LegalTech Hits $1 Billion Investment as Lawyers Embrace Automation.” The
Law Geex Blog (Blog), December 3, 2018, https://blog.lawgeex.com/legaltech-hits-1-billioninvestment-
as-lawyers-embrace-automation/
Lee, Jennifer; Lin, Lin; and Robertson, Tip. “The Impact of Media Multitasking on Learning.”
Learning Media and Technology, n.° 1 (2012): 94-104.
Levitin, Daniel J. The Organized Mind: Thinking Straight in the Age of Information Overload.
New York: Dutton, 2014.
Levy, James B. “Teaching the Digital Caveman: Rethinking the Use of Classroom Technology
in Law School.” Chapman Law Review 19, n.° 1 (2016): 241-306.
Lohr, Steve. “Where Non-Techies Can Get with the Programming.” The New York Times,
April 4, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/education/edlife/where-non-techiescomputer-
programmingcoding.html.
“Los abogados y la tecnología,” Universidad Externado de Colombia, last modification:
w. d., access August 8th, 2019, https://www.uexternado.edu.co/Derecho/los-abogadosy-latecnologia/.
Lui, Kelvin F. H.; and Wong, Alan C. N. “Does Media Multitasking Always Hurt? A Positive
Correlation between Multitasking and Multisensory Integration.” Psychonomic Bulletin and
Review 19, n.° 4 (2012): 647-653.
Maharg, Paul; and Muntjewerff, Antoinette J. “Through a Screen, Darkly: Electronic Legal
Education in Europe.” The Law Teacher 36, n.° 3 (2002): 307-332.
Marcus, Richard L. “The Electronic Lawyer.” DePaul Law Review 58, n.° 2 (2008): 263-310.
McGinnis, John O.; and Pearce, Russell G. “The Great Disruption: How Machine Intelligence
Will Transform the Role of Lawyers in the Delivery of Legal Services Colloquium: The
Legal Profession’s Monopoly on the Practice of Law.”.Fordham Law Review 82, n.° 6 (2013):
-3066.
Medina, John. Brain Rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and
School. Washington: Pear Press, 2008.
Moghaddam, Golnessa Galyani. “Information Technology and Gender Gap: Toward a Global
View.” The Electronic Library 28, n.° 5 (2010): 722-733.
Moppett, Samantha. “Control-Alt-Incomplete? Using Technology to Assess ‘Digital Natives’.”
Chicago Kent Journal of Intellectual Property 12, n.° 1 (2013): 77-129.
Morris, Jason. “How Programming Can Make the Law More Accessible,” Tedx Talks (YouTube
video, May 8th, 2018), https://www.youtube.com/watch?V=d5Mt-q9k7tu.
Murray, Kristen E. “Let Them Use Laptops: Debunking the Assumptions Underlying the Debate
over Laptops in the Classroom.” Oklahoma City University Law Review 36, (2011):
-239.
Ohm, Paul. “Computer Programming and the Law: A New Research Agenda.” Villanova Law
Review 54, (2009): 117-132.
Olubiyi, Ifeoluwa; Olaniyan, Ayobami; Odiaka, Ngozi. “The Role of Technology in the Advancement
of Legal Education and Practice in Nigeria” (Conference: Nigerian Association of
Law Teachers, 2015), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280566346_The_Role_of_
Technology_in_the_Advancement_of_Legal_Education_and_Practice_in_Nigeria.
O’Neil, Megan. “Confronting the Myth of the ‘Digital Native’.” The Chronicle Higher Education,
April 21st, 2014, http://chronicle.com/article/Confronting-the-Myth-of-the/145949/.
Pagel, Mark. “Brain Candy and Bad Mathematics,” in Is the Internet Changing the Way You
Think? The Net’s Impact on Our Minds and Future, edited by John Brockman. New York:
Harper Collins Publishers, 2011.
Palfrey, John. “Smarter Law School Casebooks,” in Legal Education in the Digital Age, edited
by Edward Rubin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Paul, Gregory. “Hell if I Know,” in Is the Internet Changing the Way You Think? The Net’s
Impact on Our Minds and Future, edited by John Brockman. New York: Harper Collins Publishers,
Pinker, Steven. How the Mind Works. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1997.
Pinker, Steven. “Not at All,” in Is the Internet Changing the Way You Think? The Net’s Impact
on Our Minds and Future, edited by John Brockman. New York: Harper Collins Publishers,
Pistone, Michele. “Law Schools and Technology: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading.”
Journal of Legal Education 64, n.° 4 (2015): 586-604.
Pivovarov, Valentin, and Dolm, Nick. “713% Growth: Legal Tech Set an Investment Record
in 2018.” Forbes, January 15th, 2019, https://www.forbes.com/sites/valentinpivovarov/2019/
/15/legaltechinvestment2018/
Prensky, Marc. “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1.” On The Horizon 9, n.° 1 (2001): 1-6.
Priest, Stephen. The British Empiricists, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2007.
Ratey, John J. A User’s Guide to the Brain. Nueva York: Vintage, 2001.
Ravizza, Susan M.; Hambrick, David Z.; and Fenn, Kimberly M. “Non-academic Internet
Use in the Classroom Is Negatively Related to Classroom Learning Regardless of Intellectual
Ability.” Computers & Education 78, (2014): 109-114.
Richtel, Matt. “Technology Changing How Students Learn, Teachers Say,” New York Times,
November 1st, 2012, A18, https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/01/education/technology-ischanging-
how-students-learn-teachers-say.html?emc=eta1&_r=0.
Riquelme, Rodrigo. “LegalTech: el valor y los retos de la tecnología en el mundo del derecho.”
El Economista, March 1st, 2019, https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/tecnologia/Legal-
Tech-el-valor-y-los-retos-dela-tecnologia-en-el-mundo-del-derecho-20190228-0148.html.
Rubin, Edward (ed.). Legal Education in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2012.
Saw, Yenée. “Putting technology in its Place: Are Law Schools the Right Place to Teach Coding?”
Thompson Reuters Legal Insight, July 12th, 2017, http://insight.thomsonreuters.com.
au/posts/law-schools-teach-coding.
Schank, Roger. Teaching Minds: How Cognitive Science Can Save Our Schools. New York:
Teachers College Press, 2011.
Schank, Roger. “The thinking Process Hasn’t Changed in 50,000 Years.” Edge, last modification
w. d., access August 8th, 2019, https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11519.
Schiltz, Patrick J. “On Being a Happy, Healthy, and Ethical Member of an Unhappy, Unhealthy,
and Unethical Profession.” Vanderbilt Law Review 52, n.° 4 (1999): 871-951.
Shell, Duane F.; Brooks, David W.; Trainin, Guy; Wilson, Kathleen M.; Kauffman, Douglas F.;
and Herr, Lynne M. The Unified Learning Model: How Motivational, Cognitive, and Neurobiological
Sciences Inform Best Teaching Practices. New York: Springer, 2010.
Sherwin, Richard K.; Feigenson, Neal; Spiesel, Christina. “Law in the Digital Age: How Visual
Communication Technologies are Transforming the Practice, Theory, and Teaching of Law.”
Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law 12, n.° 2 (2006): 227-270.
Sieckmann, Jan R. “La Sociología del derecho en la formación jurídica.” Academia. Revista
sobre Enseñanza del Derecho, n.° 12, (2008): 117-133.
Sites, Brian. “The Influence of Algorithms: The Importance of Tracking Technology as Legal
Educators.” The Law Teacher 23, n.° 1 (2016): 21-28.
Sk, Esahaque. “Education as an Instrument of Social Change.” International Research Journal
of Multidisciplinary Studies 3, (2017).
Skiba, Diane J.; and Barton, Amy J. “Adapting Your Teaching to Accommodate the Net Generation
of Learners.” The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 11, n.° 2 (2006).
Slomanson, William R. “Blended Learning: A Flipped Classroom Experiment.” Journal of
Legal Education 64, n.° 1 (2014): 93-102.
Standish, Paul. “Only Connect: Computer Literacy from Heidegger to Cyberfeminism.” Educational
Theory 49, n.° 4 (1999): 417-435.
Steele, Thomas M. “The MacCrate Report: Its Impact on Education in Law Firm Management.”
Pace Law Review 23, n.° 2 (2003): 613-654.
Steiner, George. Martin Heidegger, 4th. ed. New York: Open Road Media, 2013.
Sylwester, Robert. A Celebration of Neurons: An Educator’s Guide to The Human Brain. New
York, Assn for Supervision & Curriculum, 1995.
The Irish Times Content Studio. “Technology Drives Change and Creates New Solutions for
Legal Clients.” The Irish Times, January 31st, 2019, https://www.irishtimes.com/special-reports/
innovation-inlaw/technology-driveschange-and-creates-new-solutions-for-legal-clients-
3769572.
“The University Map of Legal Tech: Who Teaches it in the World.” The Technolawgist, March
th, 2019, http://www.thetechnolawgist.com/2019/03/18/the-university-map-of-legal-techwho-
teaches-it-in-the-world/.
Thompson, Penny. “The Digital Natives as Learners: Technology Use Patterns and Approaches
to Learning.” Computers and Education 65, (2013): 12-33.
Thomson, Iain D. Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Thomson, Iain. “Ontotheology? Understanding Heidegger’s Destruktion of Metaphysics.” International
Journal of Philosophical Studies 8, n.° 3 (2000): 297-327.
Threedy, Debora L.; and Dewald, Aaron. “Re-Conceptualizing Doctrinal Teaching: Blending
Online Videos with in-Class Problem-Solving.” Journal of Legal Education 64, n.° 4 (2015):
-621.
Troksa, Lauren. “The Study of Generations: A Timeless Notion within a Contemporary Context”.
Thesis, University of Colorado, 2016.
USC Gould School of Law. “The Rise of Virtual Law Practices and ‘e-Lawyering’,” Online International
LLM Degree Program (Blog), 2017, https://onlinellm.usc.edu/blog/elawyering-andvirtual-
law-practices/.
Waddington, David I. “A Field Guide to Heidegger: Understanding ‘The Question Concerning
Technology’.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 37, n.° 4 (2005): 567-583.
Wallace, James E. “Philosophy and the Future Law School Curriculum.” Denver Law Journal
, n.° 5 (1967): 24-35.
Wang, Shiang-Kwei: Hsu, Hui-Yin; and Coster, Daniel. “An Investigation of Middle School
Science Teachers and Students Use of Technology Inside and Outside of Classrooms: Considering
Whether Digital Natives Are More Technology Savvy than Their Teachers.” Educational
Technology Research and Development 62, n.° 6 (2014).
Warner, Richard; Sowle, Stephen D; Sadler, Will. “Teaching Law with Computers.” Rutgers
Computer and Technology Law Journal 24, (1998): 107-185.
Warren, Kay B.; and Bourque, Susan C. Women, Technology, and International Development
Ideologies: Analyzing Feminist Voices, in Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist
Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. California: University of California Press, 1991.
Willis, Miguel. “8 Law Schools on Cutting Edge of Tech + Innovation,” Innovative Law Student
(Blog), April 28th, 2016, https://www.innovativelawstudent.com/2016/04/7-law-schools-cuttingedge-
tech-innovation/.
Wolf, Maryanne. Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of The Reading Brain. New
York: Harper Perennial, 2007.
Zarrett, Nicole R.; and Malanchuk, Oksana. “Who’s Computing? Gender and Race Differences
in Young Adults Decisions to Pursue and Information Technology Career.” New Directions
for Child and Adolescent Development, n.° 110 (2005): 65-84.