Latin American Law Review

Lat. Am. Law Rev. | eISSN 2619-4880

Derecho al voto y poder judicial electoral en Brasil

No. 13 (2024-10-29)
  • Antonio Gomes Moreira Maués
    Universidade Federal do Pará

Resumen

Este artículo tiene como objetivo demostrar cómo las  garantías  constitucionales  del  derecho  de  voto y el diseño constitucional del Poder Judicial Electoral han protegido la integridad electoral en Brasil durante el gobierno Bolsonaro (2019-2022). La Constitución de 1988 atrincheró el derecho al voto, amplió el sufragio y adoptó el voto obligatorio, creando prácticas de voto inclusivo que facilitan la participación electoral. Además, la Constitución estableció un Poder Judicial Electoral independiente que opera en todos los niveles de gobernanza electoral, incluida la elaboración de normas. El artículo analiza cómo han evolucionado esas instituciones y el proceso de retroalimentación positiva que reforzó la autoridad del Poder Judicial Electoral como único organismo de gestión electoral en el país. Este proceso también ha sido garantizado por la vinculación institucional del Tribunal Superior  Electoral  con  el  Supremo  Tribunal  Federal,  donde  este  último  actúa  como  punto de veto autorreferente, ratificando las decisiones del Poder Judicial Electoral.

Palabras clave: Voting rights, electoral management, electoral justice, Brazilian election law

Referencias

Aguiar, Natália Nunes and Casalecchi, Gabriel. “E se o voto fosse facultativo? Expectativas de participação eleitoral voluntária no Brasil e o papel do status socioeconômico”. Opinião Pública 27, no. 1 (2021): 261-297.

Gardbaum, Stephen. “Comparative Political Process Theory”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 4 (2020): 1429-1457.

Garnett, Holly Ann, James, Toby S., MacGregor, Madison, and Caal-Lam, Sofia. Year in elections global report 2023. The Electoral Integrity Project, 2023.

Ginsburg, Tom. "The jurisprudence of anti-erosion". Drake Law Review 66, no. 4 (2018): 823-853.

Ginsburg, Tom and Huq, Aziz Z. How to save a constitutional democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2018.

Holston, James. Insurgent citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.

IDEA. Electoral justice. Stockholm: International IDEA, 2010.

IDEA. Electoral management design. Stockholm: International IDEA, 2014.

James, Toby S. Comparative electoral management: performance, networks and instruments. New York: Routledge, 2020.

James, Toby S., Garnett, Holly Ann, Loeber, Leontine, and van Ham, Carolien. “Electoral management and the organisational determinants of electoral integrity: introduction”. International Political Science Review 40, no. 3 (2019): 295-312.

James, Toby S. and Garnett, Holly Ann. “Introduction: the case for inclusive voting practices”. Policy Studies 41, no. 2-3 (2020): 113-130.

James, Toby S. and Garnett, Holly Ann. “Inclusive voting practices: lessons for theory, praxis, and the future research agenda”. Policy Studies 41, no. 2-3 (2020): 288-294.

Lamounier, Bolívar. “Authoritarian Brazil Revisited: The Impact of Elections on the Abertura.” In Democratizing Brazil: Problems of Transition and Consolidation, ed. by Alfred Stepan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

Lessig, Lawrence. They don’t represent us. New York: Dey Street Books, 2019.

Marchetti, Vitor. Justiça e competição eleitoral. Santo André: UFABC, 2013.

Meyer, Emilio Peluso Neder. Constitutional erosion in Brazil. Oxford: Hart, 2023.

Mozaffar, Shaheen and Schedler, Andreas. “The comparative study of electoral governance – introduction”. International Political Science Review 23, no. 1 (2002): 5-27.

Nicolau, Jairo. Eleições no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2012.

Nicolau, Jairo. “Impact of electronic voting machines on blank votes and null votes in Brazilian elections in 1998”. Brazilian Political Science Review 9, no. 3 (2015): 3-20.

Norris, Pippa. Why electoral integrity matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Norris, Pippa. Why elections fail. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Norris, Pippa. Strengthening electoral integrity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Orozco Henríquez, José de Jesús. Justicia electoral comparada de América Latina. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2019.

Pierson, Paul. Politics in time: history, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.

Schaffer, Frederic Charles. “Might cleaning up elections keep people away from the polls? Historical and comparative perspectives”. International Political Science Review 23, no. 1 (2002): 69–84.

Schedler, Andreas. “The nested game of democratization by elections”. International Political Science Review 23, no. 1 (2002): 103–122.

Superior Electoral Court. Brazilian electronic voting machine: 20 years in favor of democracy. Brasilia: Superior Electoral Court, 2016.

V-Dem Institute. Democracy facing global challenges. Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute, 2019.

Van Ham, Carolien and Garnett, Holly Ann. “Building impartial electoral management? Institutional design, independence and electoral integrity”. International Political Science Review 40, no. 3 (2019): 313-334.

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2024 Antonio Gomes Moreira Maués

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.