Links between Political Parties and Feminist Movements in Latin America: The Case of the Struggle for Legal Abortion in Bolivia
No. 122 (2025-04-16)Author(s)
-
Cecilia Rocha-CarpiucUniversidad de la República (Uruguay)
-
Verónica Pérez BentancurUniversidad de la República (Uruguay)
Abstract
Objective/context: In Latin America, access to abortion is one of the most significant expressions of gender or class inequalities. Because of its contentious nature, it is challenging to enact such policies. The literature suggests that passing pro-abortion legislation requires secular contexts and, in particular, strong feminist movements allied with left-wing parties in government. However, the mechanisms by which these factors interact have been understudied. This article examines the case of Bolivia; theoretically, one would not expect decriminalization to occur there due to the country’s strong conservatism and the relative weakness of its feminist movement. Nevertheless, in 2017, the Bolivian Parliament approved a reform that decriminalized abortion under various grounds. Methodology: This article draws on original fieldwork that included in-depth interviews with feminist activists and legislators, as well as a systematic review of documents and press coverage. Conclusions: This study shows that, within a party structure where decision-making is guided by deliberation—such as in the Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS)—party legislators occupying key positions and maintaining ties with the feminist movement played a critical role in the reform, persuading leaders and other members of the party to support it. Originality: This article fills a gap in the literature by offering a deeper understanding of the kinds of links between feminist movements and left-wing parties that make it possible to advance contentious agendas such as legal abortion.
References
Alberti, Carla. 2015. “Consolidating Power in Multiethnic Societies: The MAS and the Ambivalence of Collective Mobilization in Bolivia”. Development 58 (1): 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.55
Amenta, Edwin. 2013. “Political Mediation Model”. En The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, editado por Donatella Della Porta, Bert Klandermans, Doug McAdam y David A. Snow, 1-5. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm158.pub2
Amenta, Edwin, Neal Caren, Elizabeth Chiarello y Yang Su. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements”. Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 287-307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120029
Anria, Santiago. 2019. When Movements Become Parties: The Bolivian MAS in Comparative Perspective. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Anria, Santiago, Verónica Pérez Bentancur, Rafael Piñeiro Rodríguez y Fernando Rosenblatt. 2022. “Agents of Representation: The Organic Connection between Society and Leftist Parties in Bolivia and Uruguay”. Politics & Society 50 (3): 384-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292211042442
Beach, Derek y Rasmus Brun Pedersen. 2016. Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Beckwith, Karen. 2000. “Beyond Compare? Women’s Movements in Comparative Perspective”. European Journal of Political Research 37 (4): 431-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00521
Bellucci, Mabel. 2014. Historia de una desobediencia: aborto y feminismo. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.
Blofield, Merike. 2006. The Politics of Moral Sin: Abortion and Divorce in Spain, Chile and Argentina. Nueva York: Routledge.
Blofield, Merike. 2008. “Women’s Choices in Comparative Perspective: Abortion Policies in Late-Developing Catholic Countries”. Comparative Politics 40 (4): 399-419. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20434093
Blofield, Merike y Christina Ewig. 2017. “The Left Turn and Abortion Politics in Latin America”. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 24 (4): 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxx018
Brady, Henry. 2010. “Data-Set Observations versus Causal-Process Observations: The 2000 U.S Presidential Election”. En Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standars, editado por Henry E. Brady y David Collier, 237-242. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Centellas, Miguel. 2018. “Bolivia in 2017: Headed into Uncertainty”. Revista de Ciencia Política 38 (2): 155-179. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2018000200155
Cherif, Feryal M. 2015. Myths about Women’s Rights: How, Where, and Why Rights Advance. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Colectivo Rebeldía. 2011. Pensamos, Existimos, Exigimos... Por el Derecho a Decidir. Propuesta al Código Penal. Santa Cruz: Colectivo Rebeldía.
Daby, Mariela y Mason W. Moseley. 2022. “Feminist Mobilization and the Abortion Debate in Latin America: Lessons from Argentina”. Politics & Gender 18 (2): 359-593. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000197
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Nueva York: Harper & Row.
Etchemendy, Sebastián. 2020. “The Politics of Popular Coalitions: Unions and Territorial Social Movements in Post-Neoliberal Latin America (2000-15)”. Journal of Latin American Studies 52 (1): 157-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X19001007
Fernandez Anderson, Cora. 2017. “Decriminalizing Abortion in Uruguay: Women’s Movements, Secularism, and Political Allies”. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38 (2): 221-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1219583
Fernandez Anderson, Cora. 2020. Fighting for Abortion Rights in Latin America: Social Movements, State Allies and Institutions. Nueva York: Routledge.
Fernandez Anderson, Cora. 2022. “Legalising Abortion in Argentina: Social Movements and Multi-Party Coalitions”. Journal of Politics in Latin America 14 (2): 143-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X221100274
Friedman, Elisabeth Jay. 2019. Seeking Rights from the Left: Gender, Sexuality, and the Latin American Pink Tide. Durham: Duke University Press.
George, Alexander L. y Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Goertz, Gary. 2017. Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies: An Integrated Approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2015. Nations under God: How Churches Use Moral Authority to Influence Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Guzmán, Virginia, Ute Seibert y Silke Staab. 2010. “Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, Politics and Women’s Rights in Chile”. Third World Quarterly 31 (6): 971-988. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2010.502730
Haas, Liesl. 2010. Feminist Policymaking in Chile. University Park: Penn State Press.
Htun, Mala. 2003. Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family Under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Htun, Mala y S. Laurel Weldon. 2018. The Logics of Gender Justice: State Action on Women’s Rights Around the World. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Hummel, Calla y Ximena Velasco-Guachalla. 2024. “Activists, Parties, and the Expansion of Trans Rights in Bolivia”. Comparative Politics 56 (3): 321-43. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041524X17042290047647
Inglehart, Ronald y Pippa Norris. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Jáuregui Jinés, Luciana. 2019. Las Bartolinas y sus Tres Ojos. Historia, identidad y conflicto social. La Paz: Flascso.
Johnson, Niki, Cecilia Rocha y Marcela Schenck. 2015. La inserción del aborto en la agenda político-pública uruguaya 1985-2013. Un análisis desde el movimiento feminista. Montevideo: Cotidiano Mujer.
Kimball, Natalie L. 2022. Un secreto a voces: la historia de los embarazos no deseados y el aborto en la Bolivia moderna. La Paz: Editorial 3600.
Levitsky, Steven y Kenneth Roberts. 2011. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore: JHU Press.
Luna, Juan Pablo, Rafael Piñeiro Rodríguez, Fernando Rosenblatt y Gabriel Vommaro. 2021. “Political Parties, Diminished Subtypes, and Democracy”. Party Politics 27 (2): 294-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820923723
Madrid, Raúl L. 2012. The Rise of Ethnic Politics in Latin America. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott, ed. 2018. Party Systems in Latin America. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow y Charles Tilly. 1997. “Toward an Integrated Perspective on Social Movements and Revolution”. En Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture and Structure, editado por Mark Iriving Lichbanch y Alan Zuckerman, 142-173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McBride Stetson, Dorothy, ed. 2001. Abortion Politics, Women’s Movements, and the Democratic State: A Comparative Study of State Feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199242666.001.0001
McCarthy, John D. y Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory”. American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212-1241. https://doi.org/10.1086/226464
Ministerio de Salud. 2016. Estudio nacional de mortalidad materna 2011. Bolivia. La Paz: Ministerio de Salud.
Pew Research Center. 2014. Religión en América Latina: cambio generalizado en una región históricamente católica. Estados Unidos: Pew Research Center [edición digital]. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2014/11/PEW-RESEARCH-CENTER-Religion-in-Latin-America-Overview-SPANISH-TRANSLATION-for-publication-11-13.pdf
Sainsbury, Daine. 1999. “Gender, Policy Regimes and Politics”. En Gender and Welfare State Regimes, editado por Daine Sainsbury, 245-275. Oxford: OUP.
Silva, Eduardo. 2017. “Reorganizing Popular Sector Incorporation: Propositions from Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela”. Politics & Society 45 (1): 91-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329216683166
Silva, Eduardo y Federico Rossi. 2018. Reshaping the Political Arena in Latin America: From Resisting Neoliberalism to the Second Incorporation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Steven K. Worden y Robert D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation”. American Sociological Review 51 (4): 464-481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
Tabbush, Constanza, María Constanza Díaz y Catalina Trebisacce. 2016. “Matrimonio igualitario, identidad de género y disputas por el derecho al aborto en Argentina. La política sexual durante el kirchnerismo (2003-2015)”. Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad 22: 22-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1gm01z9.7
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow, Sidney. 2021. Movements and Parties: Critical Connections in American Political Development. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Tesoriero, María Victoria. 2013. “El movimiento de mujeres y la lucha por el derecho al aborto en Argentina”. En Peripecias en la lucha por el derecho al aborto, editado por Marta Vassallo, 199-216. Córdoba: Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir.
Tilly, Charles, Ernesto Castañeda y Lesley J. Wood. 2020. Social Movements, 1768-2018. Nueva York: Routledge.
Weldon, Laurel. 2002. Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Weldon, Laurel. 2011. When Protest Makes Policy: How Social Movements Represent Disadvantaged Groups. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cecilia Rocha-Carpiuc, Verónica Pérez Bentancur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.