Voting Intention and Party Preference in Bogota
No. 86 (2016-01-01)Author(s)
-
María Camila Angulo AmayaUniversidad de los Andes (Colombia)
Abstract
This article presents an exploratory analysis of the relationship of mutual causality between electoral behaviour and party preference among the citizens of Bogota as a proxy for partisan identity. Specifically, it shows how party preference affects the voting decision of citizens, as well as how said decision also affects their preference for a particular political party. The analysis developed makes it possible to conclude that in political systems where political parties have little discipline, programmatic voting is not decisive in elections, which is why one is more likely to find a stronger connection between voting decision and party preference than vice versa.
References
Boston University, Metropolitan College (s. f.) “Lambda”. URL:https://learn.bu.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-826908-dt-content-rid-2073693_1/courses/13sprgmetcj702_ol/week05/metcj702_W05S03T03_lambda.html
Campbell, Angus, Philip E.Converse, Warren E.Miller y Donald E.Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carey, John y MatthewS. Shugart.1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas”. Electoral Studies14 (4): 417-439. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
Dalton, Russell J. y StevenWeldon. 2007. “Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization”. Party Politics SAGE Publications13 (2): 179-196. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068807073856
Fiorina, Morris P.1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. Nueva Haven: Yale University Press.
Fiorina, Morris P.2002. “Parties and Partisanship: A 40-Year Retrospective”. Political Behavior24 (2): 93-115. DOI: dx.doi.org/0190-9320/02/0600-0093/0
García, Miguel y FelipeBotero.2012. “No Person Is an Island. Political Discussion Networks and Electoral Behavior in a Context of Weak Partisanship”. Ponencia en Reunión Anual de APSA, agosto 30-septiembre 22, Nueva Orleans.
García, Miguel, Juan Carlos RodríguezRaga y MitchellSeligson. 2013. “Cultura política de la democracia en Colombia, 2013: actitudes democráticas en el contexto del proceso de paz”. Observatorio de la Democracia. URL:http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/colombia/Colombia_Country_Report_2013_W_081414.pdf
Goodman, Leo A. y William H.Kruskal. 1954. “Measures of Association for Cross Classifications”. Journal of the American Statistical Association49 (268): 732-764. URL:http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/users/brooks/public_html/feda/papers/goodmankruskal1.pdf
Goodman, Leo A. y William H.Kruskal. 1959. “Measures of Association for Cross Classifications. II: Further Discussion and References”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54 (285): 123-163. URL:http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/users/brooks/public_html/feda/papers/goodmankruskal2.pdf
Holmberg, Sören.1994. “Party Identification Compared Across the Atlantic”. En Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren E. Miller, editado por KentJennings y Thomas E.Mann, 93-121. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Holmberg, Sören.2007. “Partisanship Reconsidered”. En The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, editado por Russel J.Dalton y Hans-DieterKlingemann, 557-570. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Hoskin, Gary y MiguelGarcía.2006. La reforma política de 2003. ¿La salvación de los partidos políticos colombianos?Bogotá: Uniandes-CESO.
Instituto para el Desarrollo de la Democracia Luis Carlos Galán (ILCG). 2001. “Comportamiento electoral en Bogotá, 1982-1997”. Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá, vol. II.
Jaramillo-de la Roche, Sebastián. 2008. “Reputación de partido o reputación personal: los alcances de la reforma política de 2003 en el Concejo de Bogotá”. Papers Política4 (1): 213-245.
Johnston, Richard.2006. “Party Identification: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences?”Annual Review of Political Science9: 329-351. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523
Mainwaring, Scott y EdurneZoco.2007. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition”. Party Politics. SAGE Publications13 (2): 155-178. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068807073852
Pasotti, Eleonora.2010. Political Branding in Cities. The Decline of Machine Politics in Bogotá, Naples, and Chicago. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil. 2014. “Histórico de resultados electorales, 2014”. URL:http://www.registraduria.gov.co/-Historico-de-Resultados-.html
Reyes Torres, Francisco José.2001. “Las elecciones del año 2000 en Bogotá en perspectiva histórica”. En Colombia: elecciones 2000, editado por Fernando Giraldo García, Rodrigo Lozada y Patricia Muñoz, 81-97. Bogotá: CEJA.
Sánchez C., Fernando F.2002. “Desalineamiento electoral en Costa Rica”. Ciencias Sociales (98): 29-56 (IV). URL:http://163.178.170.74/wp-content/revistas/98/03-.pdf
Seligson, Mitchell y Juan CarlosRodríguez-Raga. 2012. “Cultura política de la democracia en Colombia y en las Américas, 2012: hacia la igualdad de oportunidades”. Vanderbilt University. URL:http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/colombia/Colombia_Country_Report_2012_W.pdf
Universidad Complutense de Madrid. (s. f.) Capítulo 12. “Análisis de variables categóricas: ߢEl procedimiento Tablas de contingenciaߣ”. URL:http://pendientedemigracion.ucm.es/info/socivmyt/paginas/D_departamento/materiales/analisis_datosyMultivariable/12contin_SPSS.pdf
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.