Colombia Internacional

Colomb. int. | eISSN 1900-6004 | ISSN 0121-5612

Dependent Development: 30 years of Public Opinion in Latin America

No. 110 (2022-04-01)
  • Juan Bogliacini
    Universidad Católica de Urugay
  • Miguel García Sánchez
    Universidad de los Andes (Colombia)
  • Rosario Queirolo
    Universidad Católica de Urugay
https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint110.2022.01

Abstract

Objective/Context: This article explores the reasons behind the imbalance and limitations that persist in Latin America to access public opinion information on public policy preferences. Methodology: A descriptive analysis of the development of public opinion studies in the region, based on interviews with academics and pollsters from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Uruguay. Conclusions: Although data availability to study public policy opinion in Latin America has significantly increased in the last three decades, limitations persist due to three factors: (i) Latin American states have played a sporadic role in generating information for research in this field. (ii) The role of the private sector and politicians as funders and generators of public opinion data makes the availability of information very sporadic and of limited access. (iii) The agenda of open access public opinion studies is defined by academics from the Global North, whose research agenda moves more towards issues of stability and democratic values than towards citizens’ public policy preferences. Originality: This paper contributes to a more comprehensive descriptive overview of the evolution of the sub-discipline of public opinion in Latin America. In addition, it highlights the need for public funds to systematically survey the public policy preferences of citizens in the region and make microdata publicly available to inform political decision-making and academic research.

Keywords: Latin America, public opinion, citizen’s preferences, public policy

References

Burstein, Paul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda”. Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 29-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219881

Carlin, Ryan E., JonathanHartlyn, TimothyHellwig, Gregory J.Love, CeciliaMartínez-Gallardo y Matthew M.Singer. 2018. “Public Support for Latin American Presidents: The Cyclical Model in Comparative Perspective”. Research & Politics 5 (3): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018787690

Carlin, Ryan E., CeciliaMartínez-Gallardo y JonathanHartlyn. 2012. “Executive Approval Under Alternative Democratic Regime Types”. En Problems Confronting Contemporary Democracies, editado por DouglasChalmers y ScottMainwaring, 203-222. Notre Damme: Notre Damme University Press.

García-Sánchez, Miguel y Ryan E.Carlin. 2020. “The FARC in the Public Eye: Negotiation, Integration, and Political Participation”. Journal of Politics in Latin America 12 (3): 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X20970805

Gélineau, François y Matthew M.Singer. 2015. “The Economy and Incumbent Support in Latin America”. En The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts, editado por RyanCarlin, MatthewSinger y Elizabeth J.Zechmeister, 281-299. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Inglehart, Ronald y Wayne E.Baker. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values”. American Sociological Review 65 (1): 19-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657288

Klašnja, Marko, PabloBarbera, NickBeauchamp, JonathanNagler y Joshua A.Tucker. 2017. “Measuring Public Opinion with Social Media Data”. En The Oxford Handbook of Polling and Survey Methods, editado por Lonna RaeAtkeson y R. MichaelAlvarez. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190213299.013.3

Lupu, Noam. 2015. “Partisanship in Latin America”. En The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts, editado por RyanCarlin, MatthewSinger y Elizabeth J.Zechmeister, 226-245. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Lupu, Noam y ZachWarner. 2017. “Mass-Elite Congruence and Representation in Argentina”. En Malaise in Representation in Latin American Countries, editado por AlfredoJoignant, MauricioMorales y ClaudioFuentes, 281-302. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rodríguez-Zepeda, Juan Antonio y PatriciaOtero-Felipe. 2021. “A Multilevel Model of Ideological Congruence in Latin America”. Latin American Politics and Society 63 (3): 119-145. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2021.25

Rosas, Guillermo2010. “Trust in Elections and the Institutional Design of Electoral Authorities: Evidence from Latin America”. Electoral Studies 29 (1): 74-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.09.006

Savage, Mike, FionaDevine, NiallCunningham, MarkTaylor, YaojunLi, JohsHjellbrekke, BrigitteLe Roux, SamFriedman y AndrewMiles. 2013. “A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment”. Sociology 47 (2): 219-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128

SchneiderDaniel y KristenHarknett. 2022. “What’s to Like? Facebook as a Tool for Survey Data Collection”. Sociological Methods & Research 51 (1): 108-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882477

Seligson, Mitchell A.2008. Challenges to Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Evidence from the AmericasBarometer 2006-2007. Vanderbilt: Vanderbilt University.

Wlezien, Christopher y Stuart N.Soroka. 2007. “The Relationship between Public Opinion and Policy”. En The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, editado por Russel J.Dalton y Hans DieterKlingesmann, 799-819. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.