The Partisanship of Ministers in the Formation of Cabinets in Colombia
No. 120 (2024-10-09)Author(s)
-
Luis Bernardo Mejía GuinandUniversidad de los Andes (Colombia)ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-6262
-
Juan Carlos Rodríguez-RagaUniversidad de los Andes (Colombia)ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6491-478X
-
Santiago Giraldo DazaSantiago Giraldo Daza es politólogo de la Universidad de los Andes (Colombia). Sus intereses de investigación tratan sobre las políticas públicas, la educación, el género y el medio ambiente.
Abstract
Objective/context: By developing an empirical study on the Colombian case, this article tests a flexible typology to identify the variants of partisanship of 196 ministers, grouped in 91 different cabinets, during six governments between 1998 and 2022. The paper also explores the factors associated with the strategic decision made by a president regarding the degree of partisanship of their cabinet. Methodology: For the former, we classified different variants of partisanship based on a biographical log, which grades the partisan experience of the ministers at the time of appointment. For the latter, we estimated a linear regression model, taking the aggregate index of cabinet partisanship as the dependent variable. Conclusions: A better identification of the ministers who are considered partisan allows for finding a statistically significant correlation between the president’s image and the cabinet’s degree of partisanship. Originality: We used an original database containing information on 196 ministers.
References
Acto Legislativo 01 del 3 de julio de 2003, “Por el cual se adopta una Reforma Política Constitucional y se dictan otras disposiciones”. Diario Oficial 45237, 3 de julio de 2003.
Albala, Adrián. 2009. “Coaliciones gubernamentales y régimen presidencial: incidencia sobre la estabilidad política, el caso del Cono Sur (1983-2005)”. Documentos Cidob América Latina 29.
Albala, Adrián. 2016. “Presidencialismo y coaliciones de gobierno en América Latina: un análisis del papel de las instituciones”. Revista de Ciencia Política 36 (2): 459-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2016000200003
Albala, Adrián, Paula Clerici y Alejandro Olivares. 2024. “Determinants of the Cabinet Size in Presidential Systems”. Governance 37 (3): 771-784. https://doi.org /10.1111/gove.12803
Amorim Neto, Octavio. 1998. Cabinet Formation in Presidential Regimes: An Analysis of 10 Latin American Countries. Río de Janeiro: Instituto Universitário de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro.
Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2006. “The Presidential Calculus: Executive Policy Making and Cabinet Formation in Americas”. Comparative Political Studies 39 (4): 415-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005282381
Camerlo, Marcelo y Antonio Castaldo. 2024. “Government Partisans: A Practical Typology”. Party Politics 30 (3): 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231159862
Camerlo, Marcelo y María Eugenia Coutinho. 2019. “Ministros y afiliación partidaria. Propuesta metodológica aplicada al caso argentino”. América Latina Hoy 81: 99-118. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh20198199118
Camerlo, Marcelo y Aníbal Pérez-Liñán. 2015. “Minister Turnover, Critical Events, and the Electoral Calendar in Presidential Democracies”. The Journal of Politics 77 (3): 608-619. https://doi.org/10.1086/681028
Carreras, Miguel. 2012. “The Rise of Outsiders in Latin America, 1980-2010: An Institutionalist Perspective”. Comparative Political Studies 45 (12): 1451-1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012445753
Chasquetti, Daniel. 2001. “Democracia, multipartidismo y coaliciones en América Latina: evaluando la difícil combinación”. En Tipos de presidencialismo y coaliciones políticas en América Latina, editado por Jorge Lanzaro, 319-359. Buenos Aires: Clacso.
Chasquetti, Daniel. 2006. “La supervivencia de las coaliciones presidenciales de gobierno en América Latina”. Postdata 11: 163-192. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=52235599006
Cheibub, Jose Antonio y Fernando Limongi. 2002. “Democratic Institutions and Regime Survival: Parliamentary and Presidential Democracies Reconsidered”. Annual Review of Political Science 5: 151-179. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.102301.084508
Cheibub, José Antonio, Adam Przeworski y Sebastian Saiegh. 2004. “Government Coalitions and Legislative Success under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism”. British Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 565-587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000195
Domínguez, Jorge, ed. 1997. Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Duque Daza, Javier. 2014. “Partidos y partidismo. Los partidos políticos colombianos y su enraizamiento en la sociedad”. Revista Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas 44 (120): 311-347. https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/3265
Fregosi, Renée. 2004. “La déconstruction du bipartisme en Argentine, au Paraguay et en Uruguay”. En Voter dans les Amériques, editado por Jean Michel Blanquer, 127-136. París: Éditions de l’Institut des Amériques. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00156912/
Invamer-Gallup. 2023. “Gallup Poll Colombia” # 158, diciembre. https://es.scribd.com/document/692259733/2023-12-Invamer-Poll-158
Ley 216 del 6 de diciembre de 2021, “Por medio de la cual se crea el Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación y se dictan otras disposiciones”. Diario Oficial 51880, 6 de diciembre de 2021.
Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia. 2012. “Out of the Cabinet: What Drives Defections from the Government in Presidential Systems?” Comparative Political Studies 45 (1): 62-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011421306
Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia. 2014. “Designing Cabinets: Presidential Politics and Ministerial Instability”. Journal of Politics in Latin America 6 (2): 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1400600201
Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia y Petra Schleiter. 2015. “Choosing Whom to Trust: Agency Risks and Cabinet Partisanship in Presidential Democracies”. Comparative Political Studies 48 (2): 231-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014544361
McDonnell, Duncan y Marco Valbruzzi. 2014. “Defining and Classifying Technocrat-led and Technocratic Governments”. European Journal of Political Research 53 (4): 654-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12054
“Nuevo gabinete: ¿conejo a los partidos?”. 2022. El Espectador, 9 de agosto. https://www.elespectador.com/politica/nuevo-gabinete-conejo-a-los-partidos/
Raile, Eric, Carlos Pereira y Timothy Power. 2011. “The Executive Toolbox: Building Legislative Support in a Multiparty Presidential Regime”. Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909355711
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Luis Bernardo Mejía Guinand, Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Raga, Santiago Giraldo Daza

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.