Dearq

Dearq | eISSN 2215-969X

Cinco principios para una arquitectura vulnerable e íntima: dibujando límites y aperturas alternativos al hogar y al yo

No. 31 (2021-09-01)
  • Maya Orzechowska
    Ryerson University, Canadá morzechowska@ryerson.ca

Resumen

Los límites y las aberturas del hogar no están separados entre sí; desempeñan un papel activo en políticas de salud corporal y social. Tanto la idea de hogar como la de vivienda falla cada día a un mayor número de personas; por eso, este artículo busca alternativas a la narrativa del hogar, de la intimidad interna utópica, que avala el retiro, y de una relación de no responsabilidad frente al ámbito público. Se sugiere que el resultado es distópico en ocultar y exacerbar la vulnerabilidad y su resistencia al cambio. En contraste, una arquitectura vulnerable e íntima se centra en el cuerpo vulnerable, que dibuja lo extraño, reprimido y emocional en el hogar.

Palabras clave: hogar, límites, empatía, disparidad, utopía, Levittown, psicoanálisis

Referencias

Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bachelard, Gaston. 1969. The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press.

Banham, Reyhner. 1965. “A Home is not a House”. Art in America 2: 70-79.

Chantry, Erin. s. f. “The Legacy of Levittown”. En Smart Cities Dive. https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/ex/sustainablecitiescollective/legacy-levittown/79661/

Chermayeff, Serge y ChristopherAlexander. 1963. Community and Privacy: Towards a New Architecture of Humanism. New York: Doubleday and Company.

Colomina, Beatriz. 2019. X-Ray Architecture. Zürich, Switzerland: Lars Müller Publishers.

Diccionario en línea de Oxford. 1989. Londres: Oxford University Press.

Dufourmantelle, Anne y JacquesDerrida. 2000. Of Hospitality: Anne Dufourmantelle invites Jacques Derrida to Respond. Traducido por RachelBowlby. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Ekerdt, David J., Julie F.Sergeant, MollyDingel y MaryElizabeth Bowen. 2004. “Household Disbandment in Later Life”. The Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 9B: S265-S273.

Freud, Sigmund. 1919. “The Uncanny”. En Sammlung. Traducido por A.Strachey. Funfte Folge.

Grosz, Elizabeth A. y PeterEisenman. 2001. Architecture from the Outside: Essays on Virtual and real Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habraken, N. John. 1972. Supports: An Alternative to Mass Housing. New York, N. Y.: Praeger.

Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Lexico.com. s. f. “Insulate”. https://www.lexico.com/definition/insulate

Kovar, Zuzana. 2018. Architecture in Abjection: Bodies, Spaces and Their Relations. London: I. B. Tauris.

Kunze, Donald. 2003. “The Natural Attitude versus the Uncanny”. Pennsylvania State University. http://www.arch.mcgill.ca/theory/conference/papers/Kunze_Donald_revised_June6_07.pdf

Krukowski, Samantha. 1993. “Le Corbusier’s Beistegui as Emblem of Surrealist Space”. http://www.rasa.net/

Marshall, Colin. 2015. “Levittown: The Prototypical American Suburb – A History of Cities in 50 Buildings, Day 25”. The Guardian, 25 de abril 25 de 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/apr/28/levittown-america-prototypical-suburb-history-cities

Ockman, Joan. 2016. “Afterword”. En Can Architecture be an Emancipatory Project?: Dialogues on Architecture and the Left, editado por NadirLahiji. Winchester: Zero Books.

Orzechowska, Maya. 2020. “On boundaries + Apertures: Drawing a Vulnerable and Intimate Architecture”. Tesis de Maestría, Ryerson University, Canadá.

Pérez-Gómez, Alberto. 2006. Built Upon Love: Architectural Longing after Ethics and Aesthetics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Pérez-Gómez, Alberto. 2018. “Surrealism and architectural atmosphere”. En Architectural Design: Celebrating the Marvelous. Surrealism in Architecture, editado por NeilSpiller, 88: 25-35. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Philips, John W. P. 2015. “Force and Vulnerability in Philosophy and Science: Husserl, Derrida, Steigler”. Cultural Politics an International Journal 11, n.º 2: 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-2895723

Preciado, Paul B. 2020. “Learning from the Virus”. Traducido por MollyStevens. Artforum. https://www.artforum.com/print/202005/paul-b-preciado-82823

Rendell, Jane. 2019. “May Mo(u)rn: Transitional Spaces in Architecture and Psychoanalysis – A Site-Writing”. The Journal of Architecture 24, n.º 2: 223-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2019.1578076

Riggs, Ransom. 2010. “Strange Geographies: Death in Venice”. Mental Floss, 16 de mayo de 2010. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/24709/strange-geographies-death-venice

Teyssot, Georges. 2013. A Topology of Everyday Constellations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Young, Jessie. 2019. “‘Dead space’: Photographer Captures Hong Kong’s Dense Hillside Cemeteries”. CNN, 17 de septiembre de 2019. https://www.cnn.com/style/article/hong-kong-cemetery-intl-hnk-scli/index.html

Young, Liam. 2012. “The Educator of Excess”. En Future Practice: Conversations from the Edge of Practice, editado por RoryHyde. London: Routledge.

Wigley, Mark. 1992. “Heidegger’s House: The Violence of the Domestic”. En Columbia Documents of Architecture and Theory, vol. 1. New York: Columbia University.

World Economic Forum. 2019. The Global Risks Report 2019. 14.ª ed. Geneva.

World Health Organization. 2003. “Sars Outbreak Contained Worldwide”. https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2003/pr56/en/

World Health Organization. 2017a. “Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs)”. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)

World Health Organization. 2017b. “Cardiovascular Diseases”. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death