Latin American Law Review

Lat. Am. Law Rev. | eISSN 2619-4880

Trust, support for democracy and corruption: public perceptions of the Colombian Constitutional Court

No. 4 (2020-01-01)
  • Sandra Botero
    Universidad del Rosario, Colombia

Abstract

Though Latin American high courts have increasingly gained saliency as political actors in recent decades, few scholars have explored the relationship between these tribunals and public opinion. This article represents a contribution to that effort by focusing on the case of the Colombian Constitutional Court. What factors help explain individual’s trust in the constitutional tribunal? The analysis is based on ten public opinion surveys (nationally representative samples) taken between 2005-2018 in Colombia. I show that support for democracy and trust in the court are positively related. Those who perceive corruption as more widespread tend to be more distrustful of the court. Additionally, the analysis suggests that this negative effect becomes noteworthy in recent years.

Keywords: Colombian Constitutional Court, public opinion, trust in courts

References

Albarracin, Juan, LauraGamboa y ScottMainwaring. “Deinstitutionalization without Collapse: Colombia’s Party System”. En Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse, editado por ScottMainwaring. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Barómetro de las Américas Colombia. Reporte 2016 (Observatorio de la democracia, Universidad de los Andes y USAID, 2016), https://obsdemocracia.org/uploads/cms_files/USAID_Compilado_informes.pdf.

Botero, Sandra. “Agents of neoliberalism? High Courts, Legal Preferences, and Rights in Latin America”. En Latin America since the left turn, editado por TuliaFalleti y EmilioParrado. Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.

Easton, David. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support”. British Journal of Political Science 5, n.° 4 (1975): 435-457. https://www.jstor.org/stable/193437.

ElColombiano. “Los protagonistas del escándalo Pretelt”. 24 de agosto de 2016. https://www.elcolombiano.com/colombia/los-protagonistas-del-escandalo-jorge-pretelt-MH4845871).

ElTiempo. “Los escándalos del magistrado Alberto Rojas”. 21 de julio de 2017. https://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/cortes/los-escandalos-del-magistrado-alberto-rojas-108290.

García Sánchez, Miguel, Juan Camilo PlataCaviedes y Jemmy Alejandra RamírezRamírez. Colombia rural posconflicto, democracia e instituciones 2017. Colombia: Observatorio de la Democracia y Universidad de los Andes, 2017. https://obsdemocracia.org/temas-de-estudio/democracia-e-instituciones/?question_id=11178.

Gibson, James L. “The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity”. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4, n.° 3 (2007): 507-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00098.x.

Gibson, James L. y Gregory A.Caldeira. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2009.

Gibson, James L. y Gregory A.Caldeira. “Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court”. Journal of Politics 65, n.° 1 (2003): 1-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00001.

Gibson, James L., Gregory A.Caldeira y Lester KenyattaSpence. “Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment”. Political Research Quarterly 58, n.° 2 (2005): 187-201. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3595622.

Gibson, James L., Gregory A.Caldeira, y Vanessa A.Baird. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts”. The American Political Science Review 92, n.° 2 (1998): 343-358. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2585668.

Gómez Forero, Camilo. “Seis lecturas para entender el Cartel de la Toga”. El Espectador, 1 de octubre de 2017, https://www.elespectador.com/noticias/judicial/seis-lecturas-para-entender-el-cartel-de-la-toga-articulo-715926.

Hamm, Joseph A., LeeJooho, RickTrinkne, TwilaWingrove, StevenLeben y ChristinaBreuer. “On the Cross-Domain Scholarship of Trust in the Institutional Context”. En Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust: Towards Theoretical and Methodological Integration, editado por EllieShockley, Tess M.S.Neal, Lisa M.PytlikZilling y Brian H.Bornstein. Nueva York: Springer, 2016.

La SillaVacía. “Las insistencias de Pretelt”. 5 de marzo de 2015, https://lasillavacia.com/historia/las-insistencias-de-pretelt-49670.

Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP). El Barómetro de las Américas.www.LapopSurveys.org.

Malone, Mary Fran T. “The Verdict is in: The Impact of Crime on Public Trust in Central American Justice Systems”. Journal of Politics in Latin America 2, n.° 3 (2010): 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1000200304.

Morris, Stephen D. y Joseph L.Klesner. “Corruption and Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence from Mexico”. Comparative Political Studies 43, n.° 10 (2010): 1258–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010369072.

Nunes, Rodrigo M. “Ideational Origins of Progressive Judicial Activism: The Colombian Constitutional Court and the Right to Health”. Latin American Politics and Society 52, n.° 3 (2010): 67-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2010.00090.x.

Observatorio de la democracia, Universidad de los Andes, USAID. “Barómetro de las Américas Colombia. Reporte 2016”. https://obsdemocracia.org/uploads/cms_files/USAID_Compilado_informes.pdf.

RevistaSemana. “¿Cómo operaba la maquinaria de corrupción en el Meta?”. http://especiales.semana.com/corrupcion-en-el-meta/index.html.

Roberts, Julian V. “Public Opinion, Crime, and Criminal Justice”. Crime and Justice 16, (1992): 99-180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1147562.

Rodríguez Raga, Juan Carlos. “Strategic Deference in the Colombian Constitutional Court 1992-2006”. En Courts in Latin America, editado por GretchenHelmke y Julio RíosFiguero. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Transparency International. “Global Corruption Barometer 2019”. 2019. https://www.transparency.org/research/gcb/global_corruption_barometer_2019.

Uprimny Yepes, Rodrigo. “The constitutional court and control of presidential extraordinary powers in Colombia”. Democratization 10, n.° 4 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340312331294027.

Uprimny Yepes, Rodrigo y Mauricio GarcíaVillegas. “Corte Constitucional y emancipación social en Colombia”. En Emancipación social y violencia en Colombia, editado por Boaventura de SousaSantos y Mauricio GarcíaVillegas. Bogotá: Norma, 2004.

Vanberg, Georg. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review”. American Journal of Political Science 45, n.° 2 (2001): 346-361. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2669345.

Van de Walle, Steven. “Trust in the Justice System: A Comparative View across Europe”. Prison Service Journal, n.° 183 (2009): 22–26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228123527.

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Sandra Botero

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.