Constitutional courts in transitions to democracy: Limits, critiques and possibilities in Brazil and Argentina
No. 5 (2020-08-01)Author(s)
-
Mariana Rezende OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil)
Abstract
After World War II, a court-centered model of democratization and transitional justice has developed and consolidated. Trough adjudication, courts could promote the consolidation of liberal democratic governance, protecting fundamental rights, limiting state power and promoting stability and predictability in the interpretation of the law, to attract investments. However, decades after the start of the third wave of democratization, analyses of the jurisprudence of these courts reveal a less convincing performance of its democratizing role. We ask whether the courts have effectively advanced the consolidation of liberal democracy, by analyzing its two fronts: the protection of fundamental rights and the consolidation of liberal economic policies. Based on case studies of key decisions made by the constitutional courts in Brazil and Argentina, of a qualitative nature, we argue that the performance of the courts does not match the high expectations of the model of court-centric democratization.
References
Arthur, Paige. “Como as “transições” reconfiguraram os direitos humanos: uma histórica conceitual da justiça de transição.” In: Justiça de Transição: manual para a América Latina, edited by FélixReátegui. Brasília and New York: Comissão de Anistia, 2011.
Bazán, Víctor. “¿La Corte Suprema de Justicia argentina se reinventa, presentándose como un tribunal constitucional?. Cuestiones constitucionales, no.20, (2009): 3-63.
Bell, Christine. “Transitional Justice, Interdisciplinarity and the State of the ‘Field’ or ‘Non-Field’.” International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3, no.1 (2009): 5-27.
Daly, Tom Gerald. The Alchemists: questioning our faith in courts as democracy-builders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Faúndez, Julio. “Rule of Law or Washington Consensus: the evolution os the World Bank’s approach to legal and judicial reform.” In: Law in the Pursuit of Development, por AmandaPerry-Kessaris, 180-201. London: Routledge, 2009.
Franzki, Hannah, e Maria CarolinaOlarte. “Understanding the political economy of transitional justice.” in Transitional Justice Theories, edited by Teresa KolomaBeck, ChristianBraun, FriederikeMieth, SusanneBuckley-Zistel, 201 - 221. New York: Routledge, 2014.
Gargarella, Roberto. “In search of a democratic justice –what courts should not do: Argentina, 1983–2002.” Democratization 10, n. 4 (2010): 181-197.
Gargarella, Roberto. “30 años de derechos humanos en la Argentina (1983-2013).” Revista SAAP, 7, no. 2 (November 2013): 289–296.
Ginsburg, Tom. “Courts and New Democracies: new works.” Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. Last modified June 1st, 2012. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/public_law_and_legal_theory/79/
Gloppen, Siri, Bruce M.Wilson, RobertoGargarella, ElinSkarr, e MortenKinander. Courts and Power in Latin America and Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10029-0.
Helmke, Gretchen. Courts under Constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Hilbink, Lisa. Judges beyond Politcs in Democracy and Dictatorship: lessons from Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Hirschl, Ran. Towards Juristocracy: the Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, Mass: Havard University Press, 2007.
Huntington, Samuel P. The third wave: Democratization in the late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1993.
Issacharoff, Samuel. Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Contitutional Courts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Kapszewski, Diana. “Economic Governance on Trial: High Courts and Elected Leaders in Argentina and Brazil,” Latin American Politics and Society, 55, no. 04 (2013): 47-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00214.x.
Macpherson, Crawford Brough. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
McEvoy, Kieran. “Letting go of legalism: Developing a ‘Thicker’ Version of Transitional Justice.” In Transitional justice from below, edited by KieranMcEvoy and LornaMcGregor. Portland, Oregon: Hart, 2008, 15-45.
Meyer, Emilio Peluso Neder. “Revisitando a Ditadura Civil-militar Brasileira: Crimes contra a Humanidade, Justiça de Transição e Estado de Direito,” 2015, accessed October 12, 2018, https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/kbi/people/visitingresearchers/VisitingResearcher-Positions/Emilio-Meyer---Artigo-Final-Brazil-Institute.pdf.
Meyer, Emilio Peluso Neder. Ditadura e responsabilização: elementos para uma justiça de transição no Brasil. Belo Horizonte: Arraes, 2012.
Mihr, Anja. “Transitional Justice and Democracy.” In: Transitional Justice: between criminal justice, atonement and democracy, edited by AnjaMihr. Utrecht: Netherlands Institute of Human Rights, 2012, 11-50.
Pereira, Anthony. Ditadura e Repressão: o autoritarismo e o Estado de Direito no Brasil, no Chile e na Argentina. Translated by Patríciade Queiroz Carvalho Zimbres. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2010.
Robins, Simon. “Transitional Justice as an Elite Discourse.” Critical Asian Studies, 44, no. 1, (2012): 3-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2012.644885.
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2001. “Democracy by Judiciary.” Paper presented at Constitutional Courts, Washington University, November 1-3, 2001, 32. Available at: https://ec.wustl.edu/harris/conferences/constitutionalconf/ScheppelePaper.pdf
Teitel, Ruti G. Globalizing Transitional Justice: contemporary essays.New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Teitel, Ruti G. Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
United Nations. “Report of the Secretary General on the rule of law and transitional justice and post-conflict societies.” 2004.
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Mariana Rezende Oliveira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.