Centro Cultural DMZ: El rol del espacio compartido en la crisis de la península coreana
No. 18 | 2016-01-01Autor/a(es/as)
-
Jin Young Songjsong11@buffalo.edu Assistant professor, School of Architecture and Planning, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA
Resumen
Si vemos el espacio urbano como un marco de eventos y memoria, la infraestructura del conflicto es inevitablemente entendida como una práctica de memoria, la cual promueve la consolidación del conflicto o las asociaciones positivas. Usando el mecanismo de la memorización, este artículo examina la función del espacio compartido, es decir, del entorno construido que ocupa el espacio entre las fronteras altamente conflictivas de la península de Corea. Con el fin de superar las limitaciones de dos recientes proyectos inter-coreanos, los cuales se centraron en la cooperación económica, analizamos la planeación y diseño estratégico de la Zona Desmilitarizada (DMZ) del Centro Cultural, la cual se basa en el papel que juega el espacio compartido como contribución para la paz y la reconciliación.
Referencias
Anson, Caroline. “Planning for Peace: The Role of Tourism in the Aftermath of Violence.” Journal of Travel Research 38, no. 1 (1999): 57-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759903800112
Antonsich, Marco. “‘OccupyBufferZone’: Practices of Borderline Resistance in a Space of Exception.” Area 45, no. 2 (2013): 175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12005
Azar, EdwardE. “The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24, no. 1 (1980): 143-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002200278002400106
Bahr, Egon. “Speech at the Evangelical Academy in Tutzing” (July 15, 1963).
Bakshi, Anita. “Urban Form and Memory Discourses: Spatial Practices in Contested Cities.” Journal of Urban Design 19, no. 2 (2014): 189-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854696
Baillie, Britt. “Vukovar’s Divided Memory: The Reification of Ethnicity through Memorialization”. Electronic working papers series 25.” http://www.conflictincities.org/PDFs/WorkingPaper25(DividedMemory).pdf (October 20, 2013).
Brand, Ralf. “Written and Unwritten Building Conventions in a Contested City: The Case of Belfast.” Urban Studies 46, no. 12 (2009): 2669a-2689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009345538
Butler, Richard, and WantaneeSuntikul, eds. Tourism and War. Routledge, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107706
Byrne, Jonny, Cathy GormleyHeenan and Gillian Robinson. “Attitudes to Peace Walls.” OFMDFM-Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister (2012).
Cho, Kun Shik, “Inter-Korea Tourism Achievements and Challenge,” proceedings from KNTO International Symposium, 2008.
Cho, Minho. “A Re-Examination of Tourism and Peace: The Case of the Mt. Gumgang Tourism Development on the Korean Peninsula.” Tourism Management 28, no. 2 (2007): 556-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.019
Constantinou, CostasM. “On the Cypriot States of Exception.” International Political Sociology 2, no. 2 (2008): 145-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00041.x
Doucette, Jamie and Seung-Ook Lee. “Experimental Territoriality: Assembling the Kaesong Industrial Complex in North Korea.” Political Geography 47 (2015): 53-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.04.001
Featherstone, David. Resistance, Space and Political Identities: The Making of Counter-Global Networks. Vol. 103. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305050
Gaffikin, Frank, MalachyMceldowney, and KenSterrett. “Creating Shared Public Space in the Contested City: The Role of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 15, no. 4 (2010): 511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502338
Giessmann, HansJ. “German ‘Ostpolitik’ and Korean Unification: Parallels, Contrasts, Lessons.” Pacific Focus 16, no. 2 (2001): 25-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1976-5118.2001.tb00254.x
Kim, Cheol-won and Tae-sook Lee. “Change of Perception of Unification through Tourism.” Journal of Unification Studies 20, no. 1 (2008): 67-96.
Kim, Ke Chung. “Preserving Biodiversity in Korea’s Demilitarized Zone.” Science 278, no. 5336 (1997): 242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5336.242
Kim, Yong-Kwan, and JohnL.Crompton. “Role of Tourism in Unifying the Two Koreas.” Annals of Tourism Research 17, no. 3 (1990): 353-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(90)90003-A
Komarova, Milena. “Shared Space in Belfast and the Limits of a Shared Future.” Divided Cities/Contested States Working Paper 3 (2008).
Moon, Chung-in. “The Kim Dae Jung Government’s Peace Policy toward North Korea.” Asian Perspective (2001): 177-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2001.0028
Moon, Chung-in. The Sunshine Policy: In Defense of Engagement as a Path to Peace in Korea. Yonsei: Yonsei University Press, 2012.
Na, Hee-Seung. “State of Works on the Reconstruction of Trans-Korean Railway and its Linkage with the Trans-Continental Railways.” In ASEM Symposium on An Iron Silk Road. Vol. 17, 2004.
Nora, Pierre. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.” Representations (1989): 7-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
Ong, Aihwa. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387879
Pullan, Wendy. “Frontier Urbanism: The Periphery at the Centre of Contested Cities.” The Journal of Architecture 16, no. 1 (2011): 15-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2011.546999
Pullan, Wendy. “Locating the Civic in the Frontier: Damascus Gate.” Did Someone Say Participate? (2006): 109-22.
Riegl, Alois. “The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Essence and its Development.” Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage 69 (1996): 83.
Ricoeur, Paul. Memory, History, Forgetting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226713465.001.0001
Virilio, Paul. City of Panic. Oxford: Berg, 2005.
Webster, Craig, and StanislavIvanov. “Tourism as a Force for Political Stability.” The International Handbook on “Tourism and Peace” (2013).