Dearq

Dearq | eISSN 2215-969X

Bio-currencies: an alternative to Payments for Environmental Services (PES)

No. 26 (2020-01-01)
  • Santiago De Francisco Vela
    Universidad de los Andes. Design Department, Colombia s.defrancisco@uniandes.edu.co
  • Miguel Navarro-Sanint
    Universidad de los Andes. Design Department, Colombia mi-navar@uniandes.edu.co
  • María Belén Castellanos Ramírez
    Universidad de los Andes. Design Department, Colombia mb.castellanos10@uniandes.edu.co
  • Leidy Lorena Rodríguez Pinto
    Universidad de los Andes. Design Department, Colombia ll.rodriguezp@uniandes.edu.co
  • Catalina Ramírez Díaz
    Fondo Patrimonio Natural. Programa Conservación y Gobernanza, Colombia cramirez@patrimonionatural.org.co
https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq26.2020.07

Abstract

In Colombia’s Amazon piedmont, the cattle industry is one of the most important productive activities (IGAC 2016) due to a high demand and to the sturdy infrastructure built upon it that satisfies peasants’ economic stability. However, in piedmont ecosystems, which shelter a great number of species and water springs, this industry has caused massive and irreversible environmental losses for community profit.

As a result, how can communities’ productive practices be adapted to reduce the environmental impact within their territories? Payments for Environmental Services (PES), for which landowners receive money (or other spurs) in exchange for conservation efforts, have been a way to redirect communities’ activities. Nevertheless, PES has not proven to be a long-term solution. We studied the cattle industry system in depth (production, distribution, commercialization) in a community located in San Vicente del Caguán, and found that stakeholders have used non-traditional currencies that determine and influence several of their productive behaviors. We focus on identifying the (economic and non-economic) interests that foster certain behaviors as they might allow us to re discover and revalue the existing bio-currencies that trigger specific efforts, not only to stop (or reduce) deforestation rates, but to start (or increase) active recovery actions in highly affected areas. Bio-currencies could then be defined as alternative economic instruments that do not involve monetary transactions and do not try to compete with them. Their purpose is to trigger less harmful productive practices for the environment.

Keywords: bio-currencies, conservation strategies, participatory design, rural communities, environmental services

References

Beckman, Sara, and MichaelBarry. 2007. “Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking.” California management review, 50(1), 25-56.

Bendell, Jem, and Thomas H.Greco. 2013. “Currencies of transition: transforming money to unleash sustainability.” In The Necessary Transition (pp. 224-245). Routledge.

Bosco, Fernando J.2006. “Actor-network theory, networks, and relational approaches in human geography.” Approaches to human geography, vol/issue no. 136-146.

Buur, Jacob, and BenMatthews. 2008. “Participatory innovation.” International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(03), 255-273.

C&G program. 2013. “Programa de Conservación y Gobernanza para el piedemonte amazónico.” Retrieved from https://www.patrimonionatural.org.co/proyectos/conservacion-y-gobernanza/

Callon, Michel.1986. “The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle.” In Mapping the dynamics of science and technology, edited by CallonM., LawJ., and RipA., 19-34. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carrol, John M.1999. “Five reasons for scenario-based design.” In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers 1-11. Place: IEEE.

Dunne, Anthony, and FionaRaby. 2013. “Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming.” Place: MIT press.

Durston, John.2001. “Evaluando capital social en comunidades campesinas en Chile.” In ponencia presentada en el Vigesimotercer Congreso de LASA (Washington, DC, 6-8 September).

Durston, John.2002. El capital social campesino en la gestión del desarrollo rural: díadas, equipos, puentes y escaleras (Vol. 69). Place: United Nations Publications.

Easterly, William.2008. “Institutions: Top down or bottom up?” American Economic Review, 98(2), 95-99.

Flores, Margarita, and FernandoRello. 2002. Capital social rural. Place: UNAM.

Gobbi, Jose, FranciscoAlpízar, RógerMadrigal,, and MarcoOtárola. 2006. Perfil de sistemas de pagos por servicios ambientales para apoyo de prácticas forestales y agrícolas sostenibles. Place: Inter-American Development Bank.

Gunn, Wendy, and JaredDonovan. 2012. “Design anthropology: An introduction.” Design and anthropology, vol/issue no. 1-16.

Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi [IGAC]. 2016. “Ganadería y algunos cultivos se abren paso sobre los tesoros ambientales del Caquetá” Noticias IGAC. Retrieved from: https://noticias.igac.gov.co/es/contenido/ganaderia-y-algunos-cultivos-seabren-paso-sobre-los-tesoros-ambientales-del-caqueta

McDonald, Seonaidh.2005. “Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organizational research.” Qualitative research, 5(4), 455-473.

Mitchell, Robb, AgneseCaglio, and JacobBuur. 2013. “Oops! moments: Kinetic material in participatory workshops.” Nordes, 1(5).

Mitchell, Robb, and JacobBuur. 2010. “Tangible business model sketches to support participatory innovation.” In Proceedings of the 1st DESIRE Network Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design. 29-33. Place: Desire Network.

Moore, Eli, and CatalinaGarzón. 2010. “Social cartography: The art of using maps to build community power.” Race, Poverty & the Environment, 17(2), 66-67.

Mulgan, Geoff, SimonTucker, RushanaraAli, and BenSanders. 2007. “Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated.

Nardi, Bonnie A., and VickyO’Day. 1999. Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Place: MIT Press.

OECD Better Life Initiative. 2011. Compendium of OECD well-being indicators.

Robbins, Joel. and JulianSommerschuh. 2016. “Values.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by F.Stein, S.Lazar, M.Candea, H.Diemberger, J.Robbins, A.Sanchez, and R.Stasch. Available at http://doi.org/10.29164/16values

Sanders, Elizabeth B-N, and Pieter JanStappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design.” Co-design, 4(1), 5-18.

Sanders, Elizabeth B-N.2002. “From user-centered to participatory design approaches.” In Design and the social sciences. 18-25. Place: CRC Press.

Van der Hammen, María Clara, SandraFrieri, Norma ConstanzaZamora, and María PatriciaNavarrete. 2012. “Herramientas para la formación en contextos interculturales.” II. Autodiagnóstico: Reflexionar para conocer el territorio. Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje, Tropenbos Internacional Colombia. Bogotá: NUFFIC-NPT.

Visser, Froukje Sleeswijk, Pieter JanStappers, RemkoVan der Lugt, and Sanders, Elizabeth B-N. 2005. “Contextmapping: experiences from practice.” CoDesign, 1(2), 119-149.

Wunder, Sven.2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts.

Ylirisku, Salu Pekka, and JacobBuur. 2007. “Designing with Video: Focusing the user-centred design process.” Springer Science & Business Media.