Dearq

Dearq | eISSN 2215-969X

Fabricating (Other) Computations: Digital Fabrication and Technological Appropriation in Latin America

No. 27 (2020-07-01)
  • David M. Sperling
    Institute of Architecture and Urbanism - University of São Paulo sperling@sc.usp.br
  • Pablo C. Herrera
    Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas pablo.herrera@upc.edu.pe
  • Rodrigo Scheeren
    Institute of Architecture and Urbanism - University of São Paulo rodrigoscheeren@gmail.com
https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq27.2020.06

Abstract

This paper introduces and examines the latest and current background of digital fabrication in the context of Latin American architecture and presents updated information from the Homo Faber: Digital Fabrication in Latin America Project, which focuses on laboratories exploring the application of manufacturing technologies in architectural experiments and design objects. The results point to a context including several dynamics involving the emergence of digital craft in communities, the redesign of standard building components, the creation of mobile laboratories, experiments connecting low and high technologies, hacking practices, as well as bottom-up strategies to implement these technologies in the industry. The overall conclusion is that technology transfer and technological appropriation processes are still being carried out in the region.

Keywords: Digital Fabrication, Fabrication Laboratories, Technological Appropriation, Architectural Design, Design Practice, Latin America

References

Betancourt, María, RosarioCelaya, and MaríaRamírez. “Open educational practices and technology appropriation: the case of the Regional Open Latin American Community for Social and Educational Research (CLARISE)”. RUSC Universities and Knowledge Society Journal 11, no. 1 (2014): 4-17.

Benfield, Dalida. “Decolonizing the digital/digital decolonization”, Worlds & Knowledges Otherwise 3, no.1 (2009), https://globalstudies.trinity.duke.edu/projects/wko-digital-3

Bonsiepe, Gui. A tecnologia da tecnologia [el diseño de la periferia]. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher, 1983 [1985].

Canclini, Néstor. Diferentes, Desiguales, Desconectados. Mapas de la Interculturalidad. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2004.

Dagnino, Renato. Tecnologia Social: contribuições conceituais e metodológicas.Campina Grande: EDUEPB, 2014.

Fernández Cox, Cristian. “Modernidad Apropiada, Modernidad Revisada y Modernidad Reencantada”, in Modernidad y Postmodernidad en América Latina. Bogotá: Escala, 1991.

Flusser, Vilém. The Shape of Things: A Philosophy of Design. New York: Reaktion Books, 1999.

Frampton, Kenneth, “Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance” in The Anti-Aesthetic. Essays on Postmodern Culture. Seattle: Bay Press, 1983.

Gershenfeld, Neil, AlanGershenfeld, and JoelCutcher-Gershenfeld. Designing reality: how to survive and thrive in the third digital revolution. New York: Basic Books, 2017.

Gonçalves, Eduardo, MauroBorges, and Joãode Negri. “Condicionantes de la innovación tecnológica en Argentina y Brasil”. Revista de la CEPAL 94 (2008): 75-99.

González, Francisco, and NuriaÁlvarez. Politics and Digital Fabrication. An Ongoing Debate. Sevilla: Vivok Works, 2017.

Gonzalez Arnao, Walter. Neo-Handicraft in America. Methods to incorporate digital fabrication processes into handicrafts.Lima: Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, 2019.

Gutiérrez, Ramón. Arquitetura Latino-americana: textos para reflexão e polêmica.São Paulo: Nobel, 1989.

Herrera, Pablo C. “Reutilizando códigos en arquitectura como mecanismos de información y conocimiento: De la programación Escrita a la Visual,” in Didáctica proyectual y entornos post digitales. Prácticas y reflexiones en escuelas latinoamericanas de Arquitectura y Diseño, eds. DianaRodríguez, MaríaTosello, and David M.Sperling. Mar del Plata: Universidad Mar del Plata, 2013: 238-254.

Iriarte, Pablo. “Digital Craft in Semi-peripheral Nations,” in Projects Catalog of the 38th ACADIA 2018, 50-72.

Leach, Neil, and PhilipYuan. Scripting the Future. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2012.

Leach, Neil, and PhilipYuan. Fabricating the Future. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2012.

Leach, Neil, and PhilipYuan. Computational Design. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2018.

Leach, Neil, and XuWeiguo. Architecture Biennial Beijing: (Im)material Processes. New Digital Techniques for Architecture.Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2008.

Leach, Neil, and Weiguo, Xu. Architecture Biennial Beijing: Machinic Processes. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2010.

Lemon, Michael, and EdenMedina. “A Review of History of Technology Scholarship on Latin America,” in Beyond Imported Magic. Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America., edited by EdenMedina, Ivan daCosta Marques, and ChristinaHolmes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.

Liernur, Jorge Francisco. “América Latina: Los espacios del ‘otro’” in A fin de siglo. Cien años de arquitectura. Los Ángeles/México: MOCA/Antiguo Colegio de San Ildefonso, 1998.

Lima, Jacob Carlos. “Participação, empreendedorismo e autogestão: uma nova cultura do trabalho?”. Sociologias, 12, no. 25, (2010): 158-198, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-45222010000300007

Mignolo, Walter. “Introduction: Coloniality of power and de-colonial thinking”, Cultural Studies 21, no. 2-3, (2007): 155-167, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162498

Mignolo, Walter, and RolandoVazquez. “The Decolonial AestheSis Dossier,” Social Text Online (2013), https://socialtextjournal.org/periscope_article/the-decolonial-aesthesis-dossier/

Miyasaka, Elza, TassiaBorges Vasconselos, and RodrigoScheeren. “Hybrid cultures: design and construction strategies of complex shapes in Brazil in the first digital age,” in: Automation, Sustainability, Digital Fabrication, edited by GabrielaCelani and OlfaKanoun, pages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co., 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110537680-009

Montaner, Josep, and ZaidaMuxí. Arquitectura y Política. Ensayos para mundos alternativos. Barcelona: Editorial Gustavo Gili, 2011.

Mumford, Lewis. Técnica y Civilización. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1998.

Salovaara, Antti, and SakariTamminen. “Acceptance or Appropriation? A Design-Oriented Critique of Technology Acceptance Models” in Future Interaction Design II. London: Springer, 2009, 157-173, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_8

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. London: Routledge, 2014.

Scheeren, Rodrigo, Pablo CHerrera, and David M.Sperling (Editors). Homo Faber 2.0: Politics of Digital in Latin America. São Carlos: IAU/USP, 2018.

Sperling, David M., Pablo C.Herrera, and RodrigoScheeren. “Migratory Movements of Homo Faber: Mapping Fab Labs in Latin America,” in Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures. The Next City - New Technologies and the Future of the Built Environment, Edited by GabrielaCelani, David M.Sperling, and Juarez M.S.Franco. Berlin: Springer, 2015: 405-421.

Sperling, David M., Pablo C.Herrera, GabrielaCelani, and RodrigoScheeren. “Fabricação Digital na América do Sul: um Mapeamento de Linhas de Ação a partir da Arquitetura e Urbanismo,” in Anais do XIX Congresso da Sociedade Ibero-americana de Gráfica Digital. Florianópolis, 2015: 119-125.

Sperling, David M., and Pablo CHerrera (Editors). Homo faber: Digital Fabrication in Latin America CAAD Futures 2015> The Next City. São Carlos: Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, 2015.

Swan, Jacky, and PeterClark. “Organizational Decision-making in the Appropriation of Technological Innovation: Cognitive and Political Dimensions,” European Work and Organizational Psychologist 2, no. 2 (1992): 103-127, https://doi.org/10.1080/09602009208408538

Waisman, Marina. La arquitectura descentrada. Bogotá: Escala, 1995.

Winner, L. (1980). “Do Artifacts have Politics?,” Daedalus, Modern Technology. Problem or Opportunity, 109 no. 1: 121-136.