Dearq

Dearq | eISSN 2215-969X

It's not the canon, it's how you use it

No. 36 (2023-05-28)
  • Ruth Verde Zein
    Escuela de Arquitectura y Urbanismo. Universidad Presbiteriana Mackenzie, Brasil

Abstract

What are canons? How do they come into existence and how do they develop? Is the idea behind them different from that of a paradigm? How do canons permeate architectural history narratives and come to frame the educational and professional fields? Why is this felt to be a problem? Are canons an inevitable trait of our field? Can we move forward just by shuffling, expanding or regionalizing them?  Or would this be a cure that made the poison stronger rather than eliminating it? This essay considers these issues and raises critical questions about the current meaning and use of architectural canons. It suggests that, for the moment, we should continue to use them but in less inappropriate ways, until it becomes possible to propose a non-canonical history of architecture and a non-canonical practice.

Keywords: architectural history, historiography, architectural education, architectural practice, canons

References

Bonta, Juan Pablo. 1975. Anatomía de la interpretación arquitectónica. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

Bonta, Juan Pablo. 1977. Architecture and its Interpretation: A Study of Expressive Systems in Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.

Bozdogan, Sybel. 1999. “Architectural History in Professional Education: Reflections on Postcolonial Challenges to the Modern Survey”. Journal of Architectural Education 52, n.º 4: 207-215.

Foqué, Richard. 2010. Building Knowledge in Architecture. Antwerp: University Press.

Gürel, Meltem Ö. y Kathryn H. Anthony. 2006. “The Canon and the Void: Gender, Race, and Architectural History Texts”. Journal of Architectural Education 59, n.º 3: 66-76.

Jencks, Charles. 2001. “Canons in Crossfire”. Harvard Design Magazine, n.º 14 (Summer): 43-49.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (50th Anniversary Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kindle Edition.

Lara, Fernando. 2018. “Urbis Americana: Thoughts on our Shared (and Exclusionary) traditions”. En Urbis Americana: Thoughts on our Shared (and Exclusionary) Traditions, coordinado por B. Freire-Medeiros y J. O’Donnel, 10-15. London: Routledge.

Leatherbarrow, David. 2001. “What Goes Unnoticed”. Harvard Design Magazine, n.º 14: 16-23.

Lipstadt, Hèléne. 2001. “Learning from Saint Louis”. Harvard Design Magazine, n.º 14: 4-15.

Torrent, Horacio. 2017. “‘O sonho e a realidade’: Unidad estilística y dispersión urbana”. En Caleidoscopio concreto: Fragmentos de arquitetura moderna em São Paulo, editado por Ruth Verde Zein, 379-414. São Paulo: Romano Guerra.

Veyne, Paul. 2014. Como se escreve a história [e] Foucault revoluciona a história. Brasília: Editora UnB.

Zein, Ruth Verde. 2019. Critical Readings. Austin/São Paulo: Nhamérica/Romano Guerra.

Zein, Ruth Verde. 2020. “The Meaningful Emptiness of the Canon”. V! RUS, São Carlos, n.º 20. http://www.nomads.usp.br/virus/virus20/?sec=4&item=1&lang=en

Zein, Ruth Verde. 2021. Historiographical Revisions: Modern Architecture in Brazil. Río de Janeiro: Riobooks.

Zito, Tom. 2018. “The Pledge. The Turn. The Prestige”. Alta Journal, December 18th. https://www.altaonline.com/dispatches/a4688/the-pl edge-the-turn-the-prestige/