Dearq

Dearq | eISSN 2215-969X

In Search of Gender Perspectives in Indexed Publications on Architecture and Urbanism: A Systematic Bibliographic Review Focused on Teaching

No. 40 (2024-09-30)
  • Lucía Martín López
    Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
    ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-9619
  • Rodrigo Durán López
    Universidad Anáhuac México
    ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-5577
https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq40.2024.06

Abstract

By systematically reviewing indexed literature in the Scopus database, this study aims to identify the status of publications on the teaching of architecture and urbanism from a gender perspective. The PRISMAstatement is used, and the analysis is conducted from a descriptive viewpoint, examining trends in production, geographic location, networks of coexistence of significant terms, high-impact documents, and funding organizations. The review shows that scientific production on gender topics is feminized and underrepresented in Latin America, and it provides parallel reflections to establish a debate on the state of the art.

Keywords: PRISMA methodology, bibliometric analysis, thematic networks, feminism, teaching, pedagogy

References

1. Alcalde, M. Cristina. 2010. The Woman in the Violence: Gender, Poverty, and Resistance in Peru. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

2. Arias Laurino, Daniela Beatriz. 2018. "La construcción del relato arquitectónico y las arquitectas de la modernidad: un análisis feminista de la historiografía". Tesis doctoral, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5821/dissertation-2117-123109.

3. Bell, Carla Jackson, ed. 2014. Space Unveiled: Invisible Cultures in the Design Studio. Londres: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315765990.

4. Buckley, Sandra. 1996. "A Guided Tour of the Kitchen: Seven Japanese Domestic Tales". Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14 (4): 441-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d140441.

5. Burgstahler, Sheryl. 2011. "Universal Design: Implications for Computing Education". ACM Transactions on Computing Education 11 (3): 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2037276.2037283.

6. Cho, Ji Young. 2017. "An investigation of design studio performance in relation to creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style". Thinking Skills and Creativity 23: 67-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.006.

7. Czytajlo, Natalia y María Paula Llomparte Frenzel. 2023. "Género y paisaje: perspectivas emergentes y cartografías sociales. Experiencias desde laboratorios temáticos en Tucumán, Argentina". Revista INVI 38 (107): 122-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-8358.2023.68877.

8. Ervin, Elizbeth. 2006. "Rhetorical Situations and the Straits of Inappropriateness: Teaching Feminist Activism". Rhetoric Review 25 (3): 316-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327981rr2503_5.

9. González-Rogado, Ana Belén, Susana Nieto-Isidro y Alicia García-Holgado. 2023. "Access and Dropout in Engineering and Architecture Studies. A Preliminary Study with a Gender Perspective". En Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, editado por Francisco García-Peñalvo y Alicia García-Holgado, 431-439. Singapore: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_44.

10. Gürel, Meltem Ö., y Kathryn H. Anthony. 2006. "The Canon and the Void: Gender, Race, and Architectural History Texts". Journal of Architectural Education 59 (3): 66-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2006.00036.x.

11. Harwood-Jones, Markus, Lee Airton y Kel Martin. 2023. "Reimagined and redesigned: Recommendations for gender-neutral washrooms and changerooms on campus". Canadian Journal of Higher Education 53 (1): 65-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v53i1.189703.

12. Hernández, Felipe. 2023. "Lyda Caldas and women architects in Colombia: the landscape of Universidad del Valle in Meléndez". Journal of Architecture 28 (3): 383-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2023.2206408.

13. Hutton, Brian, Ferrán Catalá-López y David Moher. 2016. "La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA". Medicina Clínica 147 (6): 262-266.

14. Karimi, Pamela. 2013. Domesticity and Consumer Culture in Iran: Interior revolutions of the modern era. Abingdon,: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203072905.

15. Navarro-Astor, Elena, Marisa Román-Onsalo y Margarita Infante-Perea. 2016. "Revisión internacional de estudios de barreras de carrera bajo la perspectiva de género en la industria de la construcción". Innovar 26 (61): 103-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n61.57169.

16. Page, Matthew J., Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M. Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue E. Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth W Loder, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A McGuinness, Lesley A Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C Tricco, Vivian A Welch, Penny Whiting, David Moher. 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews". BMJ (71). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

17. Patchcoski, Brian J. y Angie M. Harris. 2023. "Redefining Community Through Collaboration: Defining Gender-Neutral Housing for a Four-Year Residential Liberal Arts College". En Trans* Policies & Experiences in Housing & Residence Life, editado por Jason C. Garvey, Stephanie H. Chang, Z. Nicolazzo y Rex Jackson, 81-89. Nueva York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003448266.

18. Pektaş, Şule Taşli, y Feyzan Erkip. 2006. "Attitudes of Design Students Toward Computer Usage in Design". International Journal of Technology and Design Education 16 (1): 79-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-3175-0.

19. Pérez-Rincón, Socorro. 2023. "Enseñanza del urbanismo desde una perspectiva social y feminista. Experiencias docentes y conflictos comparados". Revista Bitacora Urbano Territorial 33 (1): 197-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/bitacora.v33n1.104529.

20. Rasmussen, Mary Lou. 2009. "Beyond gender identity?". Gender and Education 21 (4): 431-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802473958.

21. Rodríguez-Esteban, Agustín y Javier Vidal. 2022. "Spanish graduates' regret about program of study from the perspective of education-job mismatch". Education Policy Analysis Archives 30 (79). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6683.

22. Sáinz, Milagros, y Jörg Müller. 2018. "Gender and family influences on Spanish students' aspirations and values in stem fields". International Journal of Science Education 40 (2): 188-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1405464.

23. Sánchez de Madariaga, Inés y Marion Roberts, eds. 2016. Fair Shared Cities: The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe. Nueva York: Routledge.

24. Sánchez Hernández, María F. 2009. "Evolución de las publicaciones femeninas en España. Localización y análisis". Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información (32): 217-244.

25. Vergara, Diego, Álvaro Antón-Sancho, Jamil Extremera y Pablo Fernández-Arias. 2021. "Assessment of Virtual Reality as a Didactic Resource in Higher Education". Sustainability 13 (22): 12730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212730.