Cuando la ley se queda corta: constitucionalismo y “derechos fluviales”

Fuentes jurídicas primarias

Aratiatia Livestock Limited vs. el Consejo Regional de Southland [Aratiatia Livestock Limited v Southland Regional Council], NZEnvC 208. (2019, Tribunal Ambiental). Nueva Zelanda.

Consejo de Bienestar Animal de la India vs. A. Nagaraja [Animal Welfare Board of India v A. Nagaraja], 15 SCC 190. (Corte Suprema, 2010). India.

Consejo Maorí de Nueva Zelanda vs. fiscal general [The New Zealand Maori Council v The Attorney-General], 1 NZLR 641. (1987). Nueva Zelanda.

Constitución de la India [The Constitution of India]. (1950). India.

Constitución de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Registro Oficial, (449), 20 de octubre de 2008. Ecuador. https://www.gob.ec/sites/default/files/regulations/2020-06/CONSTITUCION%202008.pdf

Constitución Política de la República de Colombia. (1991). Gaceta Constitucional, (116), 20 de julio de 1991 (2.a ed. corregida). Colombia. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/index.php/constitucion-politica

Convenio n.o 169 sobre Pueblos Indígenas y Tribales en Países Independientes, 27 de junio de 1989. Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). https://www.refworld.org.es/docid/50ab8efa2.html

Decreto-Ley 4633 de 2011, por medio del cual se dictan medidas de asistencia, atención, reparación integral y de restitución de derechos territoriales a las víctimas pertenecientes a los pueblos y comunidades indígenas. (2011, 7 de diciembre). Diario Oficial, CXLVII(48278), 9 de diciembre de 2011. Colombia.

Francis Coralie Mullin vs. la Administración de Delhi, Territorio de la Unión [Francis Coralie Mullin v Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi], AIR 746, SCR (2) 516. (1981, Corte Suprema). P. Bhagwati [autor]. India.

Hoani Te HeuHeu Tukino vs. Consejo de Tierras Maoríes del Distrito de Aotea [Hoani Te Heuheu Tukino v Aotea District Maori Land Board], NZLR 590. (1941, Consejo Privado). Nueva Zelanda.

Karnail Singh vs. el Estado de Haryana [Karnail Singh v State of Haryana], CRR 533 2013. (2019, Tribunal Superior de Punjab y Haryana). Rajiv Sharma [juez]. India.

Kharak Singh vs. el Estado de Uttar Pradesh y otros [Kharak Singh v The State Of U. P. & Others], 1963 AIR 1295, 1964 SCR (1) 332. (1962, Corte Suprema). N. R. Ayyangar [autor]. India.

Lalit Miglani vs. el Estado de Uttarakhand y otros [Lalit Miglani v State of Uttarakhand & Others], PIL 140. (2017, Tribunal Superior de Uttarakhand). India.

Ley 70 de 1993, por la cual se desarrolla el artículo transitorio de la Constitución Política. El Congreso de Colombia. (1993, 27 de agosto). Diario Oficial, (41013), 31 de agosto de 1993.

Ley de Conservación del Agua y el Suelo de 1967 [Water and Soil Conservation Act]. (1967). Nueva Zelanda

Ley de Energía Hidráulica de 1903 [Water Power Act]. (1903). Nueva Zelanda.

Ley de Enmienda de las Minas de Carbón de 1903 [Coal Mines Amendment Act]. (1903). Nueva Zelanda.

Ley de Gestión de Recursos de 1991 [New Zealand Resource Management Act]. (1991, 22 de julio). Nueva Zelanda.

Ley de la Declaración de Derechos de Nueva Zelanda [New Zealand Bill of Rights Act]. (1990). Nueva Zelanda.

Ley del Agua (prevención y control de la contaminación) [The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act]. (1974). India. https://cpcb.nic.in/upload/home/water-pollution/WaterAct-1974.pdf

Ley del Tratado de Waitangi [Treaty of Waitangi Act]. (1975). Nueva Zelanda.

Ley Te Awa Tupua (Acuerdo de Reclamaciones del Río Whanganui) [Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act]. (2017). Nueva Zelanda. http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/consol_act/tatrcsa2017470/

M. C. Mehta vs. India y otros [M.C. Mehta v Union of India & Others], 1988 AIR 1115, 1988 SCR (2) 530. (1988, Corte Suprema). E. Venkataramiah [autor]. India.

M. C. Mehta vs. India y otros [M.C. Mehta v Union of India & Others], 3 SCR 128. (2004, Corte Suprema). Y. Sabharwal [autor]. India.

Maneka Gandhi vs. India [Maneka Gandhi v Union of India], 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621. (1978, Corte Suprema). M. H. Beg [autor]. India.

Mohd. Salim vs. el Estado de Uttarakhand y otros [Mohd. Salim v State of Uttarakhand & Others], PIL n.o 126 de 2014. (2017, Tribunal Superior de Uttarakhand). India.

Narayan Dutt Bhatt vs. India y otros [Narayan Dutt Bhatt v Union Of India & Others], PIL n.o 43 de 2014. (2018, Tribunal Superior de Uttarakhand). India.

Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. India y otros [Narmada Bachao Andolan v Union Of India & Others], AIR 2000 SC 3751. (2000, Corte Suprema). A. Pasayat [autor]. India.

ONU (Organización de las Naciones Unidas). (1973). Informe de la Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Medio Humano. Estocolmo, 5 a 16 de junio de 1972. https://www.un.org/es/conferences/environment/stockholm1972

ONU (Organización de las Naciones Unidas). (2007). Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los Derechos de los Pueblos Indígenas. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_es.pdf

People’s Union for Civil Liberties vs. India y otros [People’s Union of Civil Liberties v Union of India & Others], recurso de amparo (civil) n.o 196 de 2001. (2007, Corte Suprema). India.

Propietarios de Wakatū vs. fiscal general [Proprietors of Wakatu v Attorney-General], 1 NZLR 423. (2017, Corte Suprema). Nueva Zelanda.

Re the Bed of the Whanganui River, NZLR 600. (1962, Tribunal de Apelación). Nueva Zelanda.

Sentencia AHC4806-2017, T-1700122130002017-00468-02. (Corte Suprema de Justicia, 2017). Sala de Casación Civil, Luis Armando Tolosa Villabona [magistrado ponente]. Hábeas corpus presentado por Luis Domingo Gómez Maldonado en nombre del oso de anteojos “Chucho”. Colombia. (Caso Oso Chucho) https://www.cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/relatorias/tutelas/B%20SEP2017/AHC4806-2017.doc

Sentencia del Río Bogotá, n.o AP-25000-23-27-000-2001-90479-01. (Consejo de Estado, 2014). Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Marco Antonio Velilla Moreno [consejero ponente]. Gustavo Moya Ángel y otros vs. Empresa de Energía de Bogotá y otros. Colombia [acción popular].

Sentencia STC4360-2018, T-1100122030002018-00319-01. (Corte Suprema de Justicia, 2018). Sala de Casación Civil, Luis Armando Tolosa Villabona [magistrado ponente]. Generaciones Futuras y otros vs. Ministerio del Medioambiente y otros. Colombia. (Caso Derechos de la Amazonía) https://cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/STC4360-2018-2018-00319-011.pdf

Sentencia T-025/04, expediente T-653010 y acumulados. (Corte Constitucional, 2004). Sala Tercera de Revisión, Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa [magistrado ponente]. Abel Antonio Jaramillo y otros vs. Red de Solidaridad Social y otros. Colombia. (Caso Desplazamiento) https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2004/t-025-04.htm

Sentencia T-622/16, expediente T-5.016.242. (Corte Constitucional, 2016). Sala Sexta de Revisión, Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio [magistrado ponente]. Centro de Estudios para la Justicia Social Tierra Digna y otros vs. Presidencia de la República y otros. Colombia. (Caso Río Atrato) https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/t-622-16.htm

Sentencia T-760/08, expediente T-1281247 y acumulados. (Corte Constitucional, 2008). Sala Segunda de Revisión, Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa [magistrado ponente]. Luz Mary Osorio Palacio y otros vs. Colpatria EPS y otros. Colombia. (Caso Derecho a la Salud) https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2008/T-760-08.htm

Sentencia T-955/03, expediente T-562887. (Corte Constitucional, 2003). Sala Octava de Revisión, Álvaro Tafur Galvis Rentería [magistrado ponente]. Consejo Comunitario Mayor Cuenca Río Cacarica vs. Ministerio del Medioambiente y otros. Colombia. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2003/T-955-03.htm

Subhash Kumar vs. el Estado de Bihar y otros [Subhash Kumar v State Of Bihar And Ors], 1991 AIR 420, 1991 SCR (1) 5. (1991, Corte Suprema). K. Singh [autor]. India.

Sunil Batra vs. el Gobierno de Delhi [Sunil Batra v Delhi Administration], 1980 AIR 1579, 1980 SCR (2) 557. (1980, Corte Suprema). V. Krishnaiyer [autor]. India.

Tau vs. el fiscal general [Tau v Attorney-General], NZHC 3063. (2020, Tribunal Superior). Nueva Zelanda.

Tratado de Waitangi [Te Tiriti ō Waitangi], 6 de febrero de 1840. Nueva Zelanda.

Tribunal de Oficio vs. el Gobierno de Chandigarh [Court on its own motion v Chandigarh Administration], AIRONLINE 2020 P AND H 122. (2020, Tribunal Superior de Punjab y Haryana). Rajiv Sharma y Harinder Singh Sidhu [jueces]. India.

Unni Krishnan, J. P. y otros vs. el Estado de Andhra Pradesh y otros [Unni Krishnan, J.P. & Others v State of Andhra Pradesh & Others], 1993 AIR 2178, 1993 SCR (1) 594. (1993, Corte Suprema). L. Sharma [autor]. India.

Virendra Gaur y otros vs. el Estado de Haryana y otros [Virendra Gaur & Others v State of Haryana & Others], (6) SCR 78. (1994, Corte Suprema). India.

Wi Parata vs. el Obispo de Wellington [Wi Parata v Bishop of Wellington], 3 NZ Jur (NS) 72. (1877, Corte Suprema). Nueva Zelanda.

Fuentes secundarias

Abeyratne, R. A. (2018). Privileging the powerful: Religion and constitutional law in India. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 13(2), 307-331. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.10

Adelman, J. (2014). Liberalism and constitutionalism in Latin America in the 19th century. History Compass, 12(6), 508-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12157

Alley, K. D. (1994). Ganga and Gandagi: Interpretations of pollution and waste in Benaras. Ethnology, 33(2), 127-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773893

Alley, K. D. (2002). On the banks of the Gaṅgā: When wastewater meets a sacred river. University of Michigan Press.

Alley, K. D. (2019). River goddesses, personhood and rights of nature: Implications for spiritual ecology. Religions, 10, 502. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10090502

Barcan, R. (2020). The campaign for legal personhood for the Great Barrier Reef: Finding political and pedagogical value in a spectacular failure of care. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 3(3), 810-832. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619886975

Benedict, M. L. (1987). Our “sacred” constitution - Another view of the constitution as literary text. William & Mary Law Review, 29(1), 27-34. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol29/iss1/4

Bhatia, G. (2019). The transformative Constitution: A radical biography in nine acts. HarperCollins India.

Birrell, K. y Dehm, J. (2021). International law and the humanities in the Anthropocene. En S. Chalmers y S. Pahuja (eds.), Routledge handbook of international law and the humanities (pp. 407-421). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003170914

Bonet, J. (2007). ¿Por qué es pobre el Chocó? Documentos de Trabajo sobre Economía Regional, (90). https://www.banrep.gov.co/sites/default/files/publicaciones/archivos/DTSER-90.pdf

Borrows, J. (2018). Origin stories and the law. En M. Hickford y C. Jones (eds.), Indigenous peoples and the state: International perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (pp. 30-56). Routledge.

Bosselmann, K. (2008). The principle of sustainability: Transforming law and governance. Ashgate.

Boyd, D. R. (2011). The implicit constitutional right to live in a healthy environment. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law (RECIEL), 20(2), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2011.00701.x

Boyd, D. R. (2012). The environmental rights revolution: A global study of constitutions, human rights, and the environment. UBC Press.

Boyd, D. R. (2017). The rights of nature: A legal revolution that could save the world. ECW Press.

Brinks, D. M. y Blass, A. (2017). Rethinking judicial empowerment: The new foundations of constitutional justice. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 15(2), 296-331. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox045

Brinks, D. M. y Blass. A. (2018). The DNA of constitutional justice in Latin America: Politics, governance, and judicial design. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823538

Chandra, A. (2018). Courting the people: Public interest litigation in post-emergency India. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(2), 710-718. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy045

Chaturvedi, I. (2019). Why the Ganga should not claim a right of the river. Water International, 44(6-7), 719-735. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1679947

Clavijo Ospina, F. (2020). Una revolución llamada derechos de la naturaleza. En N. Castro Niño y W. Robayo Galvis (eds), Emergencia climática: perspectiva 2030. XI Jornadas de Derecho Constitucional. Constitucionalismo en transformación. Prospectiva 2030 (pp. 649-699). Universidad Externado de Colombia. https://co.boell.org/es/2021/05/27/emergencia-climatica

Coates, N. (2018). Future contexts for Treaty interpretation. En M. Hickford y C. Jones (eds.), Indigenous peoples and the state: International perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (pp. 166-185). Routledge.

Coombes, B. (2020). Nature’s rights as Indigenous rights? Mis/Recognition through personhood for Te Urewera. Espace Populations Sociétés, (1-2). https://doi.org/10.4000/eps.9857

Couso, J., Huneeus, A. y Sieder, R. (2010). Cultures of legality: Judicialization and political activism in Latin America. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730269

Curran, V. (2006). Comparative Law and Language. En M. Reimann y R. Zimmermann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (pp. 675-708). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0021

Daly, E., Kotzé, L. J., May, J., Soyapi, C., Kreilhuber, A., Ognibene, L. y Kariuki, A. (eds). (2017). New frontiers in environmental constitutionalism. United Nations Environment Programme.

Daly, E. y May, J. R. (2018). Implementing environmental constitutionalism: Current global challenges. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316691588

Departamento de Conservación. (2020). Te Mana o te Taiao: Aotearoa New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy 2020. Nueva Zelanda. https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/biodiversity/aotearoa-new-zealand-biodiversity-strategy/

Escobar, A. (1997). Cultural politics and biological diversity: State, capital, and social movements in the Pacific Coast of Colombia. En L. Lowe y D. Lloyd (eds.), The politics of culture in the shadow of capital (pp. 201-226). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822382317-008

Faure, M. G. y Raja, A. V. (2010). Effectiveness of environmental public interest litigation in India: Determining the key variables. Fordham Environmental Law Review, 21(2), 239-292. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1776923

Gargarella, R. (2014). Latin American constitutionalism: Social rights and the “engine room” of the Constitution. Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law, 4(1), 9-18. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjicl/vol4/iss1/3

Geiringer, C. (2019). When constitutional theories migrate: A case study. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 67(2), 281-326. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz013

Gellers, J. C. (2015). Explaining the emergence of constitutional environmental rights: A global quantitative analysis. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 6(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2015.01.04

Gellers, J. C. (2017). The global emergence of constitutional environmental rights. Elsevier.

Gilbert, J. (2018). Natural resources and human rights: An appraisal. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795667.001.0001

Ginsburg, T. y Dixon, R. (2011). Comparative constitutional law. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931214

Ginsburg, T., Huq, A. Z. y Versteeg, M. (2018). The coming demise of liberal constitutionalism? The University of Chicago Law Review, 85(2), 239-256. https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/coming-demise-liberal-constitutionalism

Gluckman, P. (2017). New Zealand’s fresh waters: Values, state, trends and human impacts. https://www.dpmc.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2021-10/pmcsa-Freshwater-Report.pdf

Gobierno de Nueva Zelanda. (2020). National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/publications/Files/national-policy-statement-for-freshwater-management-2020.pdf

González Serrano, M. X. (2020). Tres años de ríos con derechos: agencia colectiva de ontologías comunitarias sobre el agua [publicación de blog]. Rivers. https://rivers-ercproject.eu/es/tres-anos-de-rios-con-derechos-agencia-colectiva-de-ontologias-comunitarias-sobre-el-agua/

Good, M. (2013). The river as a legal person: Evaluating nature rights-based approaches to environmental protection in Australia. National Environmental Law Review, (1), 34-42. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.292428406941067

Grimm, D. (2005). Integration by constitution. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3(2-3), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moi014

Gupta, S., Saksena, S. y Baris, O. F. (2019). Environmental enforcement and compliance in developing countries: Evidence from India. World Development, 117, 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.02.001

Guzmán Jiménez, L. F. (2015). Las aguas residuales en la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado: periodo 2003-2014 [tesis]. Universidad Externado de Colombia. https://publicaciones.uexternado.edu.co/gpd-las-aguas-residuales-en-la-jurisprudencia-del-consejo-de-estado-periodo-2003-2014-9789587724264.html

Guzmán, J. J. (2019). Decolonizing law and expanding human rights: Indigenous conceptions and the rights of nature in Ecuador. Deusto Journal of Human Rights, (4), 59-86. https://doi.org/10.18543/djhr-4-2019pp59-86

Hein, M. (2020). Do constitutional entrenchment clauses matter? Constitutional review of constitutional amendments in Europe. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 18(1), 78-110. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa002

Hirschl, R. (2014). Comparative matters: The renaissance of comparative constitutional law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714514.001.0001

Holley, C. y Sinclair, D. (eds.). (2018). Reforming water law and governance: From stagnation to innovation in Australia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8977-0

Iorns Magallanes, C. (2015). Nature as an ancestor: Two examples of legal personality for nature in New Zealand. VertigO: La Revue Électronique en Sciences de l’Environnement, (22). https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.16199

Izquierdo, B. y Viaene, L. (2018). Decolonizing transitional justice from indigenous territories. Peace in Progress, (34). https://www.icip.cat/perlapau/en/article/decolonizing-transitional-justice-from-indigenous-territories/

James, S. P. (2020). Legal rights and nature’s contributions to people: Is there a connection? Biological Conservation, 241, 108325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108325

Jolly, S. y Menon, K. S. R. (2021). Of ebbs and flows: Understanding the legal consequences of granting personhood to natural entities in India. Transnational Environmental Law, 10(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102520000424

Jones, C. (2016). New treaty, new tradition: Reconciling New Zealand and Maori law. UBC Press.

Jones, C. (2018). Māori and State visions of law and peace. En M. Hickford y C. Jones (eds.), Indigenous peoples and the state: International perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (pp. 13-29). Routledge.

Joseph, P. A. (2014). Constitutional and administrative law in New Zealand. Brookers.

Kauffman, C. M. (2020). Managing people for the benefit of the land: Practicing Earth jurisprudence in Te Urewera, New Zealand. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 27(39), 578-595. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isaa060

Kauffman, C. M. y Martin, P. L. (2019). How courts are developing river rights jurisprudence: Comparing guardianship in New Zealand, Colombia, and India. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 20, 260-289. https://vjel.vermontlaw.edu/publications/courts-developing-river-rights-jurisprudence-comparing-guardianship-new-zealand-colombia-india

Kotzé, L. J. (2012). Arguing global environmental constitutionalism. Transnational Environmental Law, 1(1), 199-223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102511000094

Kotzé, L. J. (2017). Global environmental constitutionalism in the Anthropocene. En L. J. Kotzé (ed.), Environmental law and governance for the Anthropocene. Hart Publishing.

Kotzé, L. J. (2018). Six constitutional elements for implementing environmental constitutionalism in the Anthropocene. En E. Daly y J. R. May (eds.), Implementing environmental constitutionalism: Current global challenges (pp. 13-33). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316691588.003

Krishnamurthy, V. (2009). Colonial cousins: Explaining India and Canada’s unwritten constitutional principles. Yale Journal of International Law, 34(1), 207-239. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6580

Kysar, D. A. (2010). Regulating from nowhere: Environmental law and the search for objectivity. Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1nq5km

Lemaitre, J. (2009). El derecho como conjuro: fetichismo legal, violencia y movimientos sociales. Siglo del Hombre; Universidad de los Andes.

Lurgio, J. (2019, 29 de noviembre). Saving the Whanganui: Can personhood rescue a river? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/30/saving-the-whanganui-can-personhood-rescue-a-river

Macpherson, E. (2019). Indigenous rights to water in law and regulation: Lessons from comparative experience. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611091

Macpherson, E. (2021). Ecosystem rights and the Anthropocene in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. En D. Amirante y S. Bagni (eds.), Environmental constitutionalism in the Anthropocene: Values, principles, actions. Routledge.

Macpherson, E. y Clavijo Ospina, F. (2018). The pluralism of river rights in Aotearoa New Zealand and Colombia. Journal of Water Law, 25(6), 283-293.

Macpherson, E., Torres Ventura, J. y Clavijo Ospina, J. (2020). Constitutional law, ecosystems and indigenous peoples in Colombia: Biocultural rights and legal subjects. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S204710252000014X

Marsden, M. (2003). The woven universe: Selected writings of Rev. Māori Marsden. Estate of Rev. Māori Marsden.

Marshall, V. (2020). Removing the veil from the “rights of nature”: The dichotomy between first nations customary rights and environmental legal personhood. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 25(2), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2019.1802154

May, J. (2006). Constituting fundamental environmental rights worldwide. Pace Environmental Law Review, 23, 113-182. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1341179

May, J. R. (2020). Environmental rights and wrongs: Implementing environmental constitutionalism. En I. N. Duy, S. Bragdø-Ellenes, I. L. Backer, S. Eng y B. E. Rasch (eds.), Uten sammenligning: Festskrift til Eivind Smith 70 år (pp. 383-397). Fagbokforlaget.

May, J. R. y Daly, E. (2015). Global environmental constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139135559

Milgin, A., Nardea, L., Grey, H., Laborde, S. y Jackson, S. (2020). Sustainability crises are crises of relationship: Learning from Nyikina ecology and ethics. People and Nature, 2(4), 1210-1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10149

Ministerio de Medioambiente. (2020a). Action for healthy waterways - decisions on national direction and regulations for freshwater management. Nueva Zelanda. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/publications/Cabinet-papers-briefings-and-minutes/cab-paper-action-for-healthy-waterways-decisions-on-national-direction-and-regulations-for-freshwater-management.pdf

Ministerio de Medioambiente. (2020b). Essential freshwater Te Mana o Te Wai factsheet. Nueva Zelanda. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/Publications/Files/essential-freshwater-te-mana-o-te-wai-factsheet.pdf

Ministerio de Justicia. (2013). New Zealand’s Constitution: A report on a conversation. Nueva Zelanda. https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Constitutional-Advisory-Panel-Full-Report-2013.pdf

Molano Bravo, A. (2017). De río en río: vistazo a los territorios negros. Editorial Aguilar.

Morris, J. D. K. y Ruru, J. (2010). Giving voice to rivers: Legal personality as a vehicle for recognising indigenous peoples’ relationships to water? Australian Indigenous Law Review, 14(2), 49-62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26423181

Neuborne, B. (2003). The Supreme Court of India. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(3), 476-510. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/1.3.476

New Zealand Resource Management Review Panel. (2020). New directions for resource management in New Zealand. Ministerio de Medioambiente, Nueva Zelanda. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/Publications/Files/rm-panel-review-report-web.pdf

Eco Jurisprudence Monitor. (S. f.). Colombia court case on the rights of Chucho the Andean Spectacled Bear. https://ecojurisprudence.org/initiatives/rights-of-andean-spectacled-bear/

O’Donnell, E. (2017). Competition or collaboration? Using legal persons to manage water for the environment in Australia and the United States. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 34(6), 503-521.

O’Donnell, E. (2018). At the intersection of the sacred and the legal: Rights for nature in Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(1), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqx026

O’Donnell, E., Poelina, A., Pelizzon, A. y Clark, C. (2020). Stop burying the lede: The essential role of indigenous law(s) in creating rights of nature. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(3), 403-427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102520000242

Oficina de Arreglos de Tratados [The Office of Treaty Settlements]. (2015). Ka Tika ā Muri, Ka Tika ā Mua: He Tohutohu Whakamārama i Ngā Whakataunga Kerēme e Pā Ana Ki Te Tiriti o Waitangi Me Ngā Whakaritenga Ki Te Karauna - Healing the past, building a future: A guide to Treaty of Waitangi claims and negotiations with the Crown. Nueva Zelanda. https://ngatirangitihi.iwi.nz/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/The-Red-Book-Healing-the-past-building-a-future.pdf

Oficina del Ministro de Medioambiente. (2021). Cabinet proposal - Reforming the resource management system. Nueva Zelanda. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/publications/Cabinet-papers-briefings-and-minutes/cabinet-paper-reforming-the-resource-management-system_1.pdf

O’Gorman, R. (2017). Environmental constitutionalism: A comparative study. Transnational Environmental Law, 6(3), 435-462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000231

Palmer, G. W. R. y Butler, A. S. (2018). Towards democratic renewal: Ideas for constitutional change in New Zealand. Victoria University Press.

Palmer, G. W. R., Butler, A. S., Scott, T. y New Zealand Law Foundation. (2016). A constitution for Aotearoa New Zealand. Victoria University Press.

Patel, G. (2010). Idols in Law. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(50), 47-52. https://www.epw.in/journal/2010/50/verdict-ayodhya-special-issues/idols-law.html

Poelina, M. R. A., Bagnall, B. y Lim, M. (2020). Recognizing the Martuwarra’s First Law Right to Life as a Living Ancestral Being. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(3), 541-568. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102520000163

Ramanatha Aiyar, P. (2006). Concise law dictionary: With legal maxims, Latin terms, and words & phrases. Wadhwa and Company.

Ram-Prasad, C. (2013). Pluralism and liberalism: Reading the Indian Constitution as a philosophical document for constitutional patriotism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(5), 676-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.691765

Richardson, W. y McNeish, J.-A. (2021). Granting rights to rivers in Colombia: Significance for extrACTIVISM and governance. En J. Shapiro y J.-A. McNeish (eds.), Our extractive age: Expressions of violence and resistance (pp. 155-176). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127611

Rival illegal armed groups terrify communities in the Rio Quito Chocó. (2020). ABColombia. https://reliefweb.int/report/colombia/rival-illegal-armed-groups-terrify-communities-rio-quito-choc

Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2012). Etnicidad.gov: los recursos naturales, los pueblos indígenas y el derecho a la consulta previa en los campos sociales minados. Dejusticia. https://www.dejusticia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/fi_name_recurso_261.pdf

Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2019). Empowered participatory jurisprudence: Experimentation, deliberation and norms in socioeconomic rights adjudication. En K. G. Young (ed.), The Future of Economic and Social Rights (pp. 233-258). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284653.010

Ruru, J. (2018). The failing modern jurisprudence of the Treaty of Waitangi. En M. Hickford y C. Jones (eds.), Indigenous peoples and the State: International perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi. Routledge.

Salazar, Á. (2020). Los ríos tienen alma, hay que recuperarla [publicación de blog]. Blogs. Comisión de la Verdad, Colombia. https://comisiondelaverdad.co/actualidad/blogs/los-rios-tienen-alma-hay-que-recuperarla

Salmond, A. (2017). Tears of Rangi: Experiments across worlds. Auckland University Press.

Sanders, K. (2018). ‘Beyond human ownership’? Property, power and legal personality for nature in Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(2), 207-234. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqx029

Shapiro, M. y Stone Sweet, A. (2002). On law, politics, and judicialization. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199256489.001.0001

Shelton, D. (2006). Human Rights and the Environment: What specific environmental rights have been recognized. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 35(1), 129-171. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp/vol35/iss1/7

Simon, H. H. (2016). Te arewhana kei roto i te rūma: An indigenous neo-disputatio on settler society, nullifying Te Tiriti, “natural resources” and our collective future in Aotearoa New Zealand. Te Kaharoa, 9(1), 54-119. https://doi.org/10.24135/tekaharoa.v9i1.6

Singh, M. P. (2018). Constitutionalism in India in comparative perspective. NUJS Law Review, 11(4), 643-662. http://nujslawreview.org/2020/08/04/constitutionalism-in-india-in-comparative-perspective/

Srivastav, P. (2019). Legal personality of Ganga and ecocentrism: A critical review. Cambridge Law Review, 4(1), 151-168.

Tănăsescu, M. (2020). Rights of nature, legal personality, and indigenous philosophies. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(3), 429-453. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102520000217

Tănăsescu, M. (2022). Understanding the rights of nature: A critical introduction. Transcript Verlag. https://www.transcript-publishing.com/978-3-8376-5431-8/understanding-the-rights-of-nature/

Te Aho, L. (2010). Indigenous challenges to enhance freshwater governance and management in Aotearoa New Zealand: The Waikato river settlement. Journal of Water Law, 20(5-6), 285-292. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/5705

Te Aho, L. (2014). Ruruku Whakatupua Te Mana o te Awa Tupua – Upholding the mana of the Whanganui river. Māori Law Review, (mayo). https://maorilawreview.co.nz/2014/05/ruruku-whakatupua-te-mana-o-te-awa-tupua-upholding-the-mana-of-the-whanganui-river/

Te Aho, L. (2019). Te Mana o te Wai: An indigenous perspective on rivers and river management. River Research and Applications, 35(10), 1615-1621. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3365

Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu. (2020, 2 de noviembre). Ngāi Tahu takes court action to protect South Island lakes and rivers [comunicado de prensa]. https://ngaitahu.iwi.nz/ngai-tahu-takes-court-action-to-protect-south-island-lakes-and-rivers/

The Independent Working Group on Constitutional Transformation. (2016). He Whakaaro Here Whakaumu mō Aotearoa: The report of Matike Mai Aotearoa. https://nwo.org.nz/resources/report-of-matike-mai-aotearoa-the-independent-working-group-on-constitutional-transformation/

Valencia Villa, H. (1997). Cartas de batalla: una crítica del constitucionalismo colombiano. Cerec.

Venter, F. y Kotzé, L. J. (2017). The methodology of environmental constitutional comparison. En A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos y V. Brooks (eds.), Research methods in environmental law: A handbook (pp. 237-264). Edward Elgar.

Villavicencio Calzadilla, P. (2019). A paradigm shift in courts’ view on nature: The Atrato River and Amazon Basin cases in Colombia. Law, Environment and Development Journal: LEAD Journal, 15(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00033081

Tribunal de Waitangi [Waitangi Tribunal]. (1999). The Whanganui River Report (Wai 167). GP Publications.

Tribunal de Waitangi [Waitangi Tribunal]. (2011). Ko Aotearoa Tēnei: Report on the Wai 262 Claim. https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/news/ko-aotearoa-tenei-report-on-the-wai-262-claim-released/

Tribunal de Waitangi [Waitangi Tribunal]. (2019). The stage 2 report on the national freshwater and geothermal resources claims. https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_152208791/Freshwater%20W.pdf

Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought & agency amongst humans and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), 20-34. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/19145

Weis, L. K. (2018). Environmental constitutionalism: Aspiration or transformation? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(3), 836-870. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3439884

West, R. C. (1972). La minería de aluvión en Colombia durante el período colonial. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Williams, C. A. (2004). Between resistance and adaptation: Indigenous peoples and the colonisation of the Chocó, 1510-1753. Liverpool University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjcpb

Zimmer, K. (2021, 16 de marzo). The human right that benefits nature. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210316-how-the-human-right-to-a-healthy-environment-helps-nature

Derechos de autor 2024 Elizabeth Macpherson, Axel Borchgrevink, Rahul Ranjan, Catalina Vallejo Piedrahíta

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.