NETWORKED INTIMACIES: EXHIBITION AND SURVEILLANCE IN KENTUKIS BY SAMANTA SCHWEBLIN
No. 24 (2021-07-01)Author(s)
-
Valerie Osorio-RestrepoThe University of Texas at Austin, Estados Unidos
Abstract
Many authors have explored the relationship between technology and intimacy in 21st Latin American literature, and have pointed out legal, political, and affective dilemmas in relation to the freedom of subjects, the control of their intimacy, and the systems that monitor them. Kentukis poses the image of global connection through a network of intimacies in which the subjects observe and are observed. On the basis of these global connections, I propose that the exhibition of intimacy allows us to consider it as a collective phenomenon and insert it in the discussion on civil rights.
References
Alter, Alexandra. “Samanta Schweblin Talks About Her Creepy New Novel”. The New York Times, 30 de abril de 2020, https://t.ly/20Zi.
Anderson, Benedict. Comunidades imaginadas. Reflexiones sobre el origen y la difusión del nacionalismo. Traducido por Eduardo L.Suárez, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1993.
Berlant, Lauren. Preface. The Female Complaint, Duke University Press, 2008, pp. VII-XIV.
Buzai, Gustavo. “Fronteras en el ciberespacio: el nuevo mapa mundial visto desde Buenos Aires (Argentina)”. Revista colombiana de geografía, vol. 3, núm. 2, 2014, pp. 85-92, doi: dx.doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v23n2.38088.
Castells, Manuel. “Informationalism, Networks, and the Network Society. A Theoretical Blueprint”. The Network Society. A Cross-cultural Perspective, EdwardElgar, 2004, pp. 3-48.
---. “La geografía de internet. Lugares conectados en red”. La galaxia Internet, Areté, 2001, pp. 235-274.
Clough, Patricia. Introduction.The Affective Turn. Theorizing the Social, Duke University Press, 2007, pp.1-33.
Cvetkovich, Ann. An Archive of Feelings. Trauma, Sexuality and Lesbian Public Cultures. Duke University Press, 2003.
Dubrofsky, Rachel E. y Shoshana AmielleMagnet. Introduction. Feminist Surveillance Studies, Duke University Press, 2015, pp. 1-17.
Felton-Dansky, Miriam y JacobGallagher-Ross. “Digital Feelings”. Theater, vol. 46, núm. 2, pp. 1-5.
Hall, Rachel. “Terror and the Female Grotesque”. Feminist Surveillance Studies, Duke University Press, 2015, pp. 127-149.
Hillis, Ken. “The Avatar and Online Affect”. Networked Affect, The mit Press, 2015, pp. 75-88.
Illouz, Eva. Intimidades congeladas. Las emociones en el capitalismo. Traducido por JoaquínIbarburu, Katz, 2007.
Lewis, Randolph. Under Surveillance. Being Watched in Modern America. University of Texas Press, 2017.
Miller, Richard. On the End of Privacy. Dissolving Boundaries in a Screen-Centric World. Pittsburg University Press, 2019.
Mirzoeff, Nicholas. Introduction.The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality, Duke University Press, 2011, pp. 1-34.
Mossberger, Karen, Caroline J.Tolbert y Ramona S.McNeal. “Defining Digital Citizenship”. Digital Citizenship. The Internet, Society and Participation, The mit Press, 2008, pp. 1-19.
Peirano, Marta. El enemigo conoce el sistema. Debate, 2019.
Pybus, Jennyfer. “Accumulating Affect. Social Networks and Their Archives of Feelings”. Networked Affect, The mit Press, 2015, pp. 235-249.
Schweblin, Samanta. Kentukis. Random House, 2019.
Sibila, Paula. La intimidad como espectáculo. Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2017.
Smith, Andrea. “Not-Seeing”. Feminist Surveillance Studies, Duke University Press, 2015, pp. 22-38.
Thrift, Nigel. “Understanding the Material Practices of Glamour”. The Affect Theory Reader, Duke University Press, 2010, pp. 289-308.
Williams, Raymond. “Estructuras de sentimiento”. Marxismo y literatura, traducido por GuillermoDavid, Las Cuarenta, 2009, pp. 174-185.
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. Public Affairs, 2019.