“BREATHE”: THE SPATIAL TRIANGULATION OF EVERYDAY LITERARY EXPERIENCE IN AMBIENT LITERATURE AND M-READING
No. 26 (2022-05-01)Author(s)
-
Juan Álvarez UmbarilaUniversidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Abstract
This paper proposes an analysis of “Breathe” (2018)—a smartphone short story that customizes its content according to the reader’s contextual data—through the “triangulation” of three interdependent spaces of interaction: story, technology, and environment. The central proposition is that the interrelation of these three proposed spaces can locate the literary experience of “Breathe” in real-life circumstances, and it builds on the presupposition that literature is not experienced in a vacuum, but in real-life situations that involve concrete purposes, technologies, audiences, and environments. Ultimately, this paper wonders about how embodied technologies and situated experiences affect our interactions with literary texts.
References
Ambient Literature Project.UWE Bristol, Bath Spa University, University of Birmingham, 2018.
Andrews, Nigel. “Ai Weiwei’s Human Flow — The Refugee Crisis as Global Landslide.” Financial Times, 2017.
Certeau, Michel de. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by StevenRendall, University of California Press, 1988.
Clasen, Mathias. Why Horror Seduces. Oxford University Press, 2017.
Dovey, Jonathanet al. “Introduction.” Ambient Literature: Towards a New Poetics of Situated Writing and Reading Practices, edited by TomAbba, JonathanDovey, KatePullinger, PalgraveMcMillan, 2021, pp. 1-26.
Dovey, Jonathan. “Ambient Literature: Writing Probability.” Ubiquitous Computing, Complexity and Culture, edited by UlrikEkman et al., Routledge, 2016, pp. 141-154.
Farman, Jason. “Stories, Spaces, and Bodies: The Production of Embodied Space Through Mobile Media StoryTelling.” Communication, Research and Practice, vol. 1, iss. 2, 2015, pp. 101-116.
Farr, William, SaraPrice and CareyJewitt. “An Introduction to Embodiment and Digital Technology Research: Interdisciplinary Themes and Perspectives.” National Centre for Research Methods, 2012, pp. 1-18.
Foucault, Michel. “Of Other Spaces.” Architechture, Movement, Continuité, translated by JayMiskowiec, 1984.
Frith, Jordan. “Splintered Space: Hybrid Spaces and Differential Mobility.” Mobilities, vol. 7, iss. 1, 2012, pp. 131-149.
Hayler, Matt. Challenging the Phenomena of Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Hupfeld, Anikaet al. “Leisure-Based Reading and the Place of E-Books in Everyday Life.” Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013, edited by PaulaKotzéet al., IFIP – Springer, 2013, pp. 1-18.
Kuzmičová, Anežkaet al. “m-Reading: Fiction Reading from Mobile Phones”. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technology, vol. 26, iss. 2, 2020, pp. 333-349.
Kuzmičová, Anežka. “Does It Matter Where You Read? Situating Narrative in Physical Environment.” Communication Theory, vol. 26, iss. 3, 2016, pp. 290-308.
Maloney, Jennifer. “The Rise of Phone Reading.” The Wall Street Journal, 2015, https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-rise-of-phone-reading-1439398395
Manguel, Alberto. A History of Reading. Viking Penguin, 1996.
Massey, Doreen. For Space. Sage Publications, 2005.
Miller, Carolyn R. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 70, iss. 1, 1984, pp. 151-167.
Pullinger, Kate. “Breathe and Conditional text” Ambient Literature Project. UWE Bristol, Bath Spa University, University of Bromingham, 2018.
Pullinger, Kate. Breathe. Ambient Literature Project – Google Creative Lab Sidney – Visual Editions, 2016.
RouncefieldMark and PeterTolmie. “Digital Words: Reading and the 21st Century Home.” The Connected Home: the Future of Domestic Life, edited by RichardHarper, Springer, 2011.