Pensar la religión, el derecho y la política en América Latina
No. 51 (2015-01-01)Autor/a(es/as)
-
Elizabeth Shakman Hurd
Resumen
La era secular de Charles Taylor es a un mismo tiempo importante e insuficiente para el estudio de la religión, el derecho y la política en América Latina. Si bien hay aspectos de la experiencia del Atlántico Norte que se han globalizado, dando forma a sistemas jurídicos y otras formas de gobernanza política alrededor del mundo, las historias y experiencias locales y regionales suelen distar significativamente de la explicación de la secularidad y la concepción de la religión de Taylor. Los estudios académicos sobre religión y la política en la región necesitan tomar en consideración aquellos aspectos de la historia local y regional, tales como las historias y experiencias indígenas y afro-descendientes, que desafían o pueden ser indiferentes para las experiencias de secularidad y religión euro-americanas y globalizadas. Hacer esto requiere forcejear con los efectos globales de la historia establecidos por Taylor y avanzar al mismo tiempo más allá de ellos para dar cuenta de las prácticas, historias, y formas de vida que operan por fuera o en contra de la “secularidad 3”, y las presunciones sobre la religión que aquella presupone y produce.
Referencias
Adcock, C. S. 2012. The Problem of Translation: A View from India. The Immanent Frame. <http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2012/04/26/the-problem-of-translation-a-view-from-india/>.
Agrama, Hussein Ali.2010. Secularism, Sovereignty, Indeterminacy: Is Egypt a Secular or a Religious State?Comparative Studies in Society and History52, n° 3: 495-523.
Alter, Karen J.2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Asad, Talal.2012. Thinking about Religious Belief and Politics. In The Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies, ed. RobertOrsi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 36-57.
Bowen, John.2010. Secularism: Conceptual Genealogy or Political Dilemma?Comparative Studies in Society and History52, n° 3: 680-694.
Carlson, Eric.2005. China’s New Regulations on Religion: A Small Step, Not a Great Leap, Forward. BYU Law Review3: 747-798.
Casanova, José.2001. Religion, the New Millennium, and Globalization. Sociology of Religion62, n° 4: 415-441.
Chatterjee, Nandini.2010. English Law, Brahmo Marriage, and the Problem of Religious Difference: Civil Marriage Laws in Britain and India. Comparative Studies in Society and History52, n° 3: 524-552.
Comaroff, Jean and John L.Comaroff. 2013. Writing Theory from the South: The Global Order from an African Perspective. World Financial Review17-20.
Comaroff, John L.2010. Reflections on the Rise of Legal Theology: Law and Religion in the Twenty-First Century. In Contemporary Religiosities: Emergent Socialities and the Post-Nation-State, eds. BruceKapferer, KariTell, and AnnelinEriksen. New York: Berghahn Books, 193-216.
Conforti, Benedetto.2002. La Tutela Internazionale della Libertà Religiosa. Rivista Internazionale dei Diritti dell’UomoXV, n° 2: 269-283.
Dressler, Markus and Arvind-Pal S.Mandair. 2011. Introduction: Modernity, Religion-Making, and the Postsecular. In Secularism and Religion-Making, eds. MarkusDressler and ArvindMandair. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3-36.
Göle, Nilüfer.2010. Manifestations of the Religious-Secular Divide: Self, State and the Public Sphere. In Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age, eds. Linell E.Cady and Elizabeth ShakmanHurd. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 41-56.
Gomes, Evaldo Xavier.2009. The Implementation of Inter-American Norms on Freedom of Religion in the National Legislation of OAS Member States. Brigham Young University Law Review3: 575-596.
Honig, Bonnie.2006. Another Cosmopolitanism? Law and Politics in the New Europe. In Seyla Benhabib, Another Cosmopolitanism, The Berkeley Tanner Lectures, Robert Post, eds. with commentaries by JeremyWaldron, BonnieHonig, and WillKymlicka. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 102-27.
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman.2008a. The Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman.2008b. Book Review: A Secular Age by CharlesTaylor. Political Theory 36, n° 3: 486-491.
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman.2014. The Specific Order of Difficulty of Religion. The Immanent Frame. <http://bit.ly/1kqYQnG>.
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman.2015. Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR). 2001. Case of “The Last Temptation of Christ,” (Olmedo Bustos et al.) vs. Chile. Judgment of February 5. <http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_73_ing.pdf>.
Johnson, Greg.2007. Sacred Claims: Repatriation and Living Tradition. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Koskienniemi, Martti.2011. The Mystery of Legal Obligation. International Theory3, n° 2, 319-325.
Laborde, Cécile.2014. Three Approaches to the Study of Religion. The Immanent Frame. <http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2014/02/05/three-approaches-to-the-study-of-religion/>.
Post, Dianne.2013. Land, Life, and Honor: Guatemala’s Women in Resistance. Fair Observer. <http://www.fairobserver.com/article/land-life-honor-guatemala-women-resistance>.
Quiroa, Néstor.2011. The Popol Vuh and the Dominican Religious Extirpation in Highland Guatemala: Prologues and Annotations of Fr. Francisco Ximénez. The Americas67, n° 4: 467-494.
Rivers, Julian.2010. The Law of Organized Religions: Between Establishment and Secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Salomon, Noah.2011. The Ruse of Law: Legal Equality and the Problem of Citizenship in a Multi-religious Sudan. In After Secular Law, eds. Winnifred FallersSullivan, Robert A.Yelle, and MateoTaussig-Rubbo. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 200-220.
Sherwood, Yvonne.2015. On the Freedom of the Concepts of Religion and Belief. In Politics of Religious Freedom, eds. Winnifred FallersSullivan, Elizabeth ShakmanHurd, SabaMahmood, and PeterDanchin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Slotte, Pamela.2010. The Religious and the Secular in European Human Rights Discourse. Finnish Yearbook of International Law21: 1-56.
Sparrow, Andrew.2014. Britain Is Now ‘Post-Christian’, Says Ex-Archbishop Rowan Williams. The Guardian. <http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/apr/27/britain-post-christian-says-rowan-williams>.
Stoeckl, Kristina.2014. The Theology Blind Spot. The Immanent Frame. <http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2014/02/13/the-theology-blind-spot/>.
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers.1999. Exporting Religion: Where the Religious Freedom Act Fails. Commonweal126, n° 4: 10-11.
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers.2003. Religious Freedom and the Rule of Law: Exporting Modernity in a Postmodern World?Mississippi College Law Review22, n° 2: 173-184.
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers.2007. The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers.2010. Varieties of Legal Secularism. In Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age, eds. Linell E.Cady and Elizabeth ShakmanHurd. New York: Palgrave, 107-120.
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers, Robert A.Yelle and MateoTaussig-Rubbo (eds.). 2011. After Secular Law. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Taylor, Charles.2007. A Secular Age. Harvard: Belknap.
Wenger, Tisa.2009. We Have a Religion: The 1920s Pueblo Indian Dance Controversy and American Religious Freedom. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Zeghal, Malika.2008. Islamism in Morocco: Religion, Authoritarianism and Electoral Politics. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers.
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.